This is a specific subject page, dealing exclusively with, or primarily with, the subject in the title. Because of need, there are many such pages at RHWW: usually, but not always, linked to primary pages. For those in a hurry, they enable a quick summary of many important subjects. The menu for these pages is here: Click>>>

 

Who are Americas Blacks


The Albinos have created a make-believe "Fantasy" reality for themselves, and because they control all media and sources of information, they have managed to indoctrinate Blacks into believing their Fantasies. To be CLEAR what I am saying is: (using the Britannica Dictionary definition of INDOCTRINATE: which is to teach (someone) to fully accept the ideas, opinions, and beliefs of a particular group, and not to consider other ideas, opinions, and beliefs. Mental programming is another way to say it: i.e. mental programming creates beliefs, these beliefs then create our attitudes, our attitudes in turn create feelings, our feelings determine our actions, finally our actions create results. That is what the Albinos have done to you by withholding one crucial bit of information: THAT IS WHO YOU ARE!

Think about it, do you have any clue as to who you really are? In the spirit of truth in all things it must be admitted that the Albinos are not the only culprits: ignorant and even stupid Negroes share some Blame. By that I mean that part of your confusion is believing that you are African. Well how convenient is THAT? If you are African how could you possibly trace your linage through a bunch of African tribes with no written records? DNA? Forget it, it's mostly a scam, see the 60 minutes expose (link below). Worst yet, that means that you have only your own people to blame for your plight. (It was Africans who SOLD Africans to the Albinos, so that Albinos could settle Black Lands). You probably don't know it (unless you are a regular Realhistoryww.com reader) but the Albinos can't stand to be in the Sun for very long, as would be needed to do FARMING on Black lands.
     
 Click here for >> Family Tree: A CBS News expose of the "Wildly" false claims of Genetic Testers.
f



Generally speaking, if that Scottish gardener above had simply worn a shirt he would have been okay. Albinos are not in real danger until they cross the 40th. parallel which coincidentally coincides with the "MASON DIXON" line, which set the border between Slavery States and non-Slavery States. As can be seen in the map below the southern border of Pennsylvania serves as a rough line for the 40th. parallel.


s
 
Very near to the southern border of Pennsylvania is the historic town of Gettysburg, please note the UV index warning for Gettysburg.


c
x




c
c




Clearly Albinos could not FARM to feed themselves below the Mason-Dixon line.
But their solution was simple, ENSLAVE PIGMENTED  (normal) PEOPLE TO DO THE WORK FOR THEM!
x
 



Today, although Albinos have "Air-conditioned" tractors to farm with, many jobs still require "Hand Picking" to do the job, naturally American farmers turn to the pigmented workers from Latin America for these jobs. Because Latin Americans range from the "Pure Black" indigenous Americans to the "Barely Brown" Mexican mestizo, those of lighter skin must protect themselves from the Sun just like a full Albino must do.
c
c
x
d



So back to who are you? You might have guessed by now that you are unlikely to be African, at least no more so than Albinos or Chinese. The thing about you being African was invented by the HUCKSTER the right reverend Jesse Jackson in 1988.

It was at a news conference in 1988 in the Chicago Hyatt Regency O'Hare Hotel that civil rights activist Rev. Jesse L. Jackson announced that Black people preferred to be called “African American.” Jackson said: “To be called African American has cultural integrity. Of course Black people preferred no such thing, and we have spent the last thirty something years trying to get Albinos to stop saying it. But of course they won't stop, because it makes it so easy for them to continue their subterfuge.








This is Henry Louis Gates - nicknamed "Skip" - Skippy.

Henry Louis "Skip" Gates Jr. (born September 16, 1950) is an American literary critic, writer, professor, historian,
and filmmaker  who serves as the Alphonse Fletcher University Professor and the director of the Hutchins Center for African
and African American Research at Harvard University. He is a trustee of the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History.

c



Henry Louis Gates arrest controversy

On July 16, 2009, Harvard University professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. was arrested at his Cambridge, Massachusetts home by local police officer Sgt. James Crowley, who was responding to a 911 caller's report of men breaking and entering the residence. The arrest initiated a series of events that unfolded under the spotlight of the international news media. The arrest occurred just after Gates returned home to Cambridge after a trip to China to research the ancestry of Yo-Yo Ma for Faces of America. Gates found the front door to his home jammed shut and, with the help of his driver, tried to force it open. A local witness reported their activity to the police as a potential burglary in progress. Accounts regarding the ensuing confrontation differ, but Gates was arrested by the responding officer, Cambridge Police Sgt. James Crowley, and charged with disorderly conduct. On July 21, the charges against Gates were dropped. The arrest generated a national debate about whether or not it represented an example of racial profiling by police.

On July 22, President Barack Obama said about the incident, "I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that. But I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home, and, number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there's a long history in this country of African Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately." Law enforcement organizations and members objected to Obama's comments and criticized his handling of the issue. In the aftermath, Obama stated that he regretted his comments and hoped that the situation could become a "teachable moment".
d


On July 24, Obama invited both parties to the White House to discuss the issue over a beer, and on July 30, Obama and Vice President Joe Biden joined Crowley and Gates in a private, cordial meeting in a courtyard near the White House Rose Garden; this became known colloquially as the "Beer Summit". "I continue to believe, based on what I have heard, that there was an overreaction in pulling Professor Gates out of his home to the station," the president added. "I also continue to believe, based on what I heard, that Professor Gates probably overreacted as well. My sense is you've got two good people in a circumstance in which neither of them were able to resolve the incident in the way that it should have been resolved and the way they would have liked it to be resolved."

Years later, in his memoir A Promised Land, Obama wrote that according to the White House's polling, the incident caused a larger drop in white support for his presidency than any other single event.
x


f


Henry Louis Gates has used his academic credentials, and "Celebrity" as a friend of Obama; to criss-cross the world telling everyone that Black Americans are the descendants of African Slaves. He has written books about it and even created TV shows about it. His most egregious ploy was to travel to Latin America telling Blacks there that they are Africans. Luckily most of our people knew better, they mostly ignored him and told him to go home. (Black Brazilians are hopeless, so no telling what they said).
 
v



Here is Henry Louis Gates latest con:
The "Black" Dictionary
New York Times
Sandra E. Garcia
Wed, May 24, 2023 at 7:56 AM EDT

In a recent online presentation, editors and researchers working on a first-of-its-kind dictionary of African American English gave a status update on the project. As academics explained their various methodologies, slides displayed behind them showed words that are more often associated with Twitter than Oxford: “Bussin,” virtual attendees were told, means impressive or tasty, while a “boo” is a lover. Those were two of the first 100 words that the Oxford University Press said it had prepared to include in the Oxford Dictionary of African American English, the hopeful result of the three-year research project announced last spring.

The researchers say they aim to publish a first batch of 1,000 definitions — some words and phrases will have more than one — by March 2025. But the more important goal of the project, which will be edited by Henry Louis Gates Jr., a scholar of African American history at Harvard University, is to underscore the significance of African American English and to create a resource for future research into Black speech, history and culture. Among his other bona fides, Gates is something of a dictionary nerd. “When I was in the third grade, we studied the dictionary,” he said in a recent interview. “We had a unit on how to use the Webster’s dictionary, and even then — third grade, that means I was 8 years old — I thought the dictionary was magical.” Gates now collects and cherishes rare and historical dictionaries, including one he bought in the early days of the pandemic, when the future did not seem as sturdy as it once was. “I was sitting here in this kitchen, sheltering in, doing a Zoom,” he recalled. “I said: ‘You know what? We could die at any time. I’m going to buy a first edition of the Samuel Johnson dictionary.’”

To support their etymological claims, researchers and editors from Oxford Languages and the Harvard University Hutchins Center for African & African American Research have drawn on lyrics from jazz, hip-hop, blues and R&B as well as letters, diaries, newspaper and magazine articles, Black Twitter, slave narratives and abolitionist writings. Individual entries will be explained using quotations pulled from Black literature, including examples from Zora Neale Hurston, Langston Hughes, Ralph Ellison, Toni Morrison and Martin Luther King Jr. One of the main challenges for the researchers is finding Black sources to confirm the use of the words. “The further back in history, the less we can find Black people having agency over how we’re written about,” said Bianca Jenkins, a lexicographer working on the project. “Due to enslavement, Black people were prevented by law from being educated, from being taught to read. Black people had to really take it upon ourselves and educate ourselves.”

But it is not simply about the words that appear in letters, books, poems and lyrics. It is also about the words that morphed into other pronunciations and evolved to have a veiled meaning, for the safety of Black people. Black people take language and “wrap it around themselves,” Gates said. “They turn words inside out.” “We are endlessly inventive with language, and we had to be,” he continued. “We had to develop what literary scholars call double-voiced discourse. We had to learn to speak the master’s language, then you had to learn to speak under the masters so that you could have a coded way of speaking English that would allow you to voice your feelings without being killed, whipped or — worst-case scenario — without being lynched.”

The dictionary will exist as a living record well after March 2025 has come and gone: According to Gates, the public will continue to be able to suggest entries for consideration even after the first edition is published. Gates recalled asking his cousin, who fought in the Vietnam War, to add a few words. He submitted 200, Gates said, his wide smile revealing the apples of his cheeks. In April, Oxford Languages and the Hutchins Center shared 10 entries with The New York Times. Below are selected definitions, variant forms and etymologies.
bussin (adjective and participle): 1. Especially describing food: tasty, delicious. Also more generally: impressive, excellent. 2. Describing a party, event, etc.: busy, crowded, lively. (Variant forms: bussing, bussin’.)
grill (noun): A removable or permanent dental overlay, typically made of silver, gold or another metal and often inset with gemstones, which is worn as jewelry.

Promised Land (n.): A place perceived to be where enslaved people and, later, African Americans more generally, can find refuge and live in freedom. (Etymology: A reference to the biblical story of Jewish people seeking freedom from Egyptian bondage.)
chitterlings (n. plural): A dish made from pig intestines that are typically boiled, fried or stuffed with other ingredients. Occasionally also pig intestines as an ingredient. (Variant forms: chitlins, chittlins, chitlings, chitterlins.)
kitchen (n.): The hair at the nape of the neck, which is typically shorter, kinkier and considered more difficult to style.
cakewalk (n.): 1. A contest in which Black people would perform a stylized walk in pairs, typically judged by a plantation owner. The winner would receive some type of cake. 2. Something that is considered easily done, as in This job is a cakewalk.
old school (adj.): Characteristic of early hip-hop or rap music that emerged in New York City between the late 1970s to the mid 1980s, which often includes the use of couplets, funk and disco samples, and playful lyrics. Also used to describe the music and artists of that style and time period. (Variant form: old skool.)
pat (verb): 1. transitive. To tap (the foot) in rhythm with music, sometimes as an indication of participation in religious worship. 2. intransitive. Usually of a person’s foot: to tap in rhythm with music, sometimes to demonstrate participation in religious worship.
Aunt Hagar’s children (n.): A reference to Black people collectively. (Etymology: Probably a reference to Hagar in the Bible, who, with her son, Ishmael, was cast out by Sarah and Abraham [Ishmael’s father], and became, among some Black communities, the symbolic mother of all Africans and African Americans and of Black womanhood.)
ring shout (n.): A spiritual ritual involving a dance where participants follow one another in a ring shape, shuffling their feet and clapping their hands to accompany chanting and singing. The dancing and chanting gradually intensify and often conclude with participants exhibiting a state of spiritual ecstasy.

In addition to appearing in the Oxford Dictionary of African American English, the entries will also be added to the wider word bank of the Oxford English Dictionary, Gates said. “That is the best of both worlds, because we want to show how Black English is part of the larger of Englishes, as they say, spoken around the world,” he said. More than just a collection of words, Gates said, the new dictionary will serve as a record of the ways Black people have molded the English language to protect themselves and also keep a morsel of autonomy in a world that would have them have none. “Everybody has an urgent need for self-expression,” he said, adding, “You need to be able to communicate what you feel and what you think to other people in your speech community.
“That is why we refashioned the English language.”
Obviously we are making the case that Gates is a "Charlatan",
but why can't he just be another ignorant Black American who truly thinks he is African? HERE IS WHY!


d
This is a printout of columns from the "Slave Voyages Database". It clearly shows that for ALL of North America only 306,726 African Slaves were landed. No way the Black millions of America came from 306,726 AFRICANS! So what does this have to do with Henry Louis Gates being a liar? See below.




Henry Louis Gates introduces Slave Voyages 2.0 and some of its people.
(He knew all along)
https://www.slavevoyages.org/


The SlaveVoyages website is a collaborative digital initiative that compiles and makes publicly accessible records of the largest slave trades in history. Search these records to learn about the broad origins and forced relocations of more than 12 million African people who were sent across the Atlantic in slave ships, and hundreds of thousands more who were trafficked within the Americas. Explore where they were taken, the numerous rebellions that occurred, the horrific loss of life during the voyages, the identities and nationalities of the perpetrators, and much more. Time line: March, 2021 - SlaveVoyages.org, created and hosted at Emory University and a preeminent resource for the study of slavery, will be operated by a newly formed consortium of institutions, ensuring the preservation, stability and future development of what has become the single most widely used online resource for anyone interested in slavery across the Atlantic world. The new consortium, organized by Emory, will function as a cooperative academic collaboration through a contractual agreement among six institutions: Emory, the Hutchins Center for African and African American Research at Harvard University, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, the Omohundro Institute of Early American History & Culture at William & Mary, Rice University, and three campuses at the University of California that will assume a joint membership: UC Santa Cruz, UC Irvine and UC Berkeley. Membership is for a three-year term and is renewable.
c



“The launch of the SlaveVoyages.org consortium is an innovation not just for scholars of slavery, but for all soft money digital humanities projects,” says David Eltis, Robert W. Woodruff Professor Emeritus of History and co-director of the SlaveVoyages project. “At long last, this consortium opens up a route to sustainability.” Long-term sustainability has become an important question for granting agencies considering support for research in the humanities, says Allen Tullos, co-director of Emory’s Center for Digital Scholarship (ECDS), which has worked with Eltis and other scholars to host, enhance and expand SlaveVoyages, including a major relaunch in 2018. “This consortium is a new model for publishing and sustaining large-scale digital humanities research.” Each member institution of the SlaveVoyages consortium will support the site through dues and be represented on the consortium’s steering committee, which decides which institutional member will host the site. The host institution will receive funding through membership dues to offset costs of maintaining the site, and will maintain performance metrics, develop environmental and technical standards for the site, and provide administrative support.

Slavevoyages.org has its origins in the 1960s, when historians began collecting data on slave ship voyages, and estimating the number of enslaved Africans to cross the Atlantic between the 16th through 19th centuries. Developing a single, multisource dataset was a pipe dream until the 1990s, when Eltis and other researchers began to collaborate on centralizing their findings. The data migrated from punch cards, to laptop computer, to a CD-ROM published in 1999, to a website that debuted at Emory in 2008.

“Twenty years and four million viewers after its first appearance as a CD-ROM, the future of 48,000 slaving ventures recorded in SlaveVoyages is finally secured for posterity," says Henry Louis Gates Jr., Alphonse Fletcher University Professor and director of Harvard’s Hutchins Center, a consortium member. Gates has called SlaveVoyages.org “a gold mine” and “one of the most dramatically significant research projects in the history of African studies, African American studies and the history of world slavery itself.” SlaveVoyages.org is the culmination of both independent and collaborative work by a multidisciplinary team of international scholars and historians, librarians, cartographers, computer programmers, designers and digital experts. Many who began their academic careers working on the project are now alumni of Emory’s Laney Graduate School, and have emerged as the next generation of slave trade scholars. From 2015-2018, SlaveVoyages.org was completely re-coded and modernized, and continues to publish new research and resources, from lesson plans for young students, to new features such as an interactive time lapse detailing the volume and destinations of voyages over the centuries. The site attracts more than 1,400 visitors a day, including educators, scholars, scientists, artists, genealogists and curators with national museums and history centers.

“SlaveVoyages has had a tremendous role in expanding opportunities for graduate students doing many different kinds of work,” says Tullos. “We’ve helped to create a generation of digital scholars.” More than 50 researchers from Emory and institutions around the world have contributed to the project, which has received funding from the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Mellon Foundation, the Arts and Humanities Research Council of the UK, and Harvard’s Hutchins Institute. In August of 2020, ECDS helped SlaveVoyages migrate its multiple databases to the Amazon Web Services Cloud platform, a more technologically sustainable model which includes improved responsiveness to traffic increases and a more robust connection between database and web server. With the new consortium, SlaveVoyages will continue to serve as a model, inspiring other research and serving as a resource for new initiatives and broader public understanding of the history of slavery.

One such initiative is The Middle Passage Ceremonies and Port Markers Project (MPCPMP). Founded in 2011, the project provides a way for communities to honor the millions who died or survived the transatlantic voyage known as the Middle Passage, by assisting them in conducting an ancestral remembrance ceremony and installing a historic marker at a documented Middle Passage landing site. “Throughout all these efforts, the SlaveVoyages dataset has been our grounding for information and data,” says Ann Chinn, executive director of MPCPMP. “It’s a tangible connection to history. That has been one of the invaluable results of what the SlaveVoyages database provides for the public. People are using the information to remember, heal and expand the reconciliation process that is so critically needed today.”
THESE ARE TYPICAL NATIVE AMERICANS - Including the Mongols who came in the Clovis timeframe.
v
     
s

No Arawak pictures - here is why: The Arawak are a group of indigenous peoples of northern South America and of the Caribbean.
Specifically, the term "Arawak" has been applied at various times to the Lokono of South America and the Taíno, who historically lived in the Greater Antilles and northern Lesser Antilles in the Caribbean.
Mongol People
d



Native Brazilians
x
      
s




For some in the Caribbean, the situation is MUCH LESS CLEAR!
The reason, except for Brazil, that is where the great majority of African Slaves were sent - here is the breakdown.
Places that received the most African Slaves
c



Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History.
Historical Context: American Slavery in Comparative Perspective
by Steven Mintz.  Skippy is associated with this institution, so take it with caution.

Quote: Of the 10 to 16 million Africans who survived the voyage to the New World, over one-third landed in Brazil and between 60 and 70 percent ended up in Brazil or the sugar colonies of the Caribbean (Obviously those numbers are inaccurate). Only 6 percent arrived in what is now the United States. Yet by 1860, approximately two thirds of all New World slaves lived in the American South - they were NOT African!

For a long time it was widely assumed that southern slavery was harsher and crueler than slavery in Latin America, where the Catholic church insisted that slaves had a right to marry, to seek relief from a cruel master, and to purchase their freedom. Spanish and Portuguese colonists were thought to be less tainted by racial prejudice than North Americans and Latin American slavery was believed to be less subject to the pressures of a competitive capitalist economy. In practice, neither the Church nor the courts offered much protection to Latin American slaves. Access to freedom was greater in Latin America, but in many cases masters freed sick, elderly, crippled, or simply unneeded slaves in order to relieve themselves of financial responsibilities.

Here is why we posted this article - THE DEATH rates among slaves in the Caribbean were one-third higher than in the South, and suicide appears to have been much more common. Unlike slaves in the South, West Indian slaves were expected to produce their own food in their "free time," and care for the elderly and the infirm. The largest difference between slavery in the South and in Latin America was demographic. The slave population in Brazil and the West Indies had a lower proportion of female slaves, a much lower birthrate, and a higher proportion of recent arrivals from Africa. In striking contrast, southern slaves had an equal sex ratio, a high birthrate, and a predominantly American-born population.

Slavery in the United States was especially distinctive in the ability of the slave population to increase its numbers by natural reproduction. In the Caribbean, Dutch Guiana, and Brazil, the slave death rate was so high and the birthrate so low that slaves could not sustain their population without imports from Africa. The average number of children born to an early nineteenth-century southern slave woman was 9.2—twice as many as in the West Indies. In the West Indies, slaves constituted 80 to 90 percent of the population, while in the South only about a third of the population was enslaved. Plantation size also differed widely. In the Caribbean, slaves were held on much larger units, with many plantations holding 150 slaves or more. In the American South, in contrast, only one slaveholder held as many as a thousand slaves, and just 125 had over 250 slaves. Half of all slaves in the United States worked on units of twenty or fewer slaves; three-quarters had fewer than fifty. With that information you can better judge how many Africans survived in Brazil and the West Indies.


Brazil - 3,169,835 Slaves landed: Current population - 214 million. But because Black Brazilians don't acknowledge being Black, there is no way to estimate how many of Brazil's Black population are of African linage.

Of course we do realize that we are getting that information through the filter of Albinos, and we do know that Albinos and their flunkies are degenerate liars; so could it be that Black Brazilians are simply rejecting African-hood and NOT Blackness?

Jamaica - 935,138 Slaves landed - Current population 2.8 million.
Cuba - 766,310 Slaves landed - Current population 2.8 million.
Saint Dominique (HAITI) - 695,200 Slaves landed - Current population 11.5 million.
Barbados - Slaves landed 375,874 - Current population 281,200.
Dutch Guiana (Suriname) Slaves landed 259,995 - Current population 628,800.
Martinique - Slaves landed 174,673 - Current population - 376,480
Grenada - Slaves landed 123,378 - Current population 124,610
Saint Kitts and Nevis - Slaves landed 119,557 - Current population 47,606
Antigua and Barbuda - Slaves landed 119,866 - Current population 93,219
Dominica - Slaves landed 102,401 -  Current population 72,412
Hispaniola (Dominican Republic) - Slaves landed 27,955 - Current population 11.12 million.

Our "Mea Culpa": like so many others, we have made fun of Black Dominican Republic people for not accepting that they are BLACK people!  Note this youtube video >>
But as can clearly be seen from the Slave Database numbers, the chances of a Black Dominican Republic person being African is VERY, VERY, small. So perhaps they too
are not rejecting Blackness, they are simply rejecting African-hood.
Likewise Puerto Rico received only 26,993 African Slaves, therefore the few Puerto Ricans who admit Blackness are likely Taínos or Taíno mulatto's.



v

The following countries are in the Western Hemisphere region: Their populations are:
(Data from datacatalog.worldbank.org)

  1. Canada - 38.25 million
    Mexico - 126.7 million
    Guatemala - 17.11 million
    Belize - 400,031
    El Salvador - 6.314 million
    Honduras - 10.28 million
    Nicaragua - 6.851 million
    Costa Rica - 5.154 million
    Panama - 4.351 million
    Jamaica - 2.828 million
    Cuba - 11.26 million
    The Bahamas - 407,906
    Haiti - 11.45 million
    Dominican Republic - 11.12 million
    Antigua and Barbuda - 93,219
    Dominica - 72,412
    Saint Lucia - 179,651

  1. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines - 104,332
    Barbados - 281,200
    Grenada - 124,610
    Trinidad and Tobago - 1.526 million
    Colombia - 51.874 million
    Venezuela - 28.301 million
    Guyana - 808,726
    Suriname - 618,040
    Ecuador – 18 million
    Peru - 33.72 million
    Brazil - 214.3 million
    Bolivia - 12.08 million
    Paraguay - 6.704 million
    Chile – 19.603 million
    Argentina - 45.81 million
    Uruguay - 3.426 million
    U.S. -  333.287 million

Total population of the Americas = 1,020,299,000 Billion
(not counting countries with less than 1 million population).


Canada claims a White population of (69.8%)
Mexico claims a White population of (10%)
Guatemala claims a White population of (18.5%)
Cuba - U.S. State dept. says that 37% of Cubans are White. (forget the silliness from Wikipedia).
Haiti - Europeans, Asians, and Arabs account for less than (5%)
Dominican Republic claims a White population of (17.8%)
Colombia - According to the 2018 census, 87.58% of Colombians do not identify with any ethnic group.
The black population officially is 26% of the population, but experts put it at 36-40%.
Venezuela claims a White population of (20%)
Ecuador claims a White population of (6.1%)
Peru claims a White population of (5.9%)
Brazil claims a White population of (47.7%) and a Black population of (7.6%).
U.S.A. As of July 1, 2022, United States Census Bureau estimates that 75.8% of the US population were white alone, while Non-Hispanic whites were 59.3% of the population. While Blacks are 13.6% of the population.
Bolivia claims a White population of (5%)
Chile claims a White population of (64%)
Argentina - They refuse to tell the usual lies, so they jumble everything together: European (mostly Spanish and Italian descent) and Mestizo (mixed European and Amerindian ancestry) 97.2%, Amerindian 2.4%, African descent 0.4% (2010 est.)
The Human race is comprised of Blacks, Black Mongols, and their Albinos. That which is NOT Albino  (Called by them - "White") MUST be one of the other two.
c


The point of this last exercise was to demonstrate that regardless of the Albinos lies, there is no way to
account for the multitudes of Blacks in the Americas from 8,699,717 African Slaves. Simple as that!

It is hoped that once brainwashed Blacks understand that what
the Albinos say does not stand up to common-sense logic,
perhaps then they can free their minds.



Back to who are you.

Now things get complicated, I told you that Albinos were not totally responsible for your ignorance of yourself. I base that on the fact that in all the "CENSUSES"  that I have seen, nowhere do the Albinos refer to you (us Blacks) as "Africans". It is always "Non-white" "Colored" or "Black", and nowhere do they state "Provenance" (the beginning of somethings existence; somethings origin), therefore they never said that we were African.



This is the actual 1790 Census

d



           
d





This is an easier to read Wikipedia transcription of the 1790 census
s



So how did Blacks in the U.S. get so screwed up about who they are? Well Albino media (not the government) kept telling them that the people in Cowboy shows were Indians and the people in Tarzan shows were Africans, since the people in the Tarzan shows looked like you, you naturally assumed that you must be African. Combine that with the outright lies taught to you by Historians and Educators, and the fact that many Albinos (the majority?) are degenerate liars - especially those making movies and television shows in the early days, and of course politicians. So there you have it, why you are so screwed up. Have you heard of Ron DeSantis - Governor of Florida?



This seems to be a good place to explain something to you: I know that many people (Black and Albino)
believe that what they see on TV and in the Movies is TRUE because if it wasn't true they couldn't say it. WRONG!!

NEW YORK TIMES April, 18, 2023. Fox News abruptly agreed on Tuesday to pay $787.5 million to resolve a defamation suit filed by Dominion Voting Systems over the network’s promotion of misinformation about the 2020 election, averting a lengthy and embarrassing trial just as a packed courtroom was seated in anticipation of hearing opening statements. The settlement, one of the largest ever in a defamation case, was the latest extraordinary twist in a case that has been full of remarkable disclosures that exposed the inner workings of the most powerful voice in conservative news. Note, Fox is a CABLE broadcaster. Newspapers and Cable-casters no not have a Public license to operate, therefore they can say whatever they want under the protections of "Free speech".

Newsstory from NPR - The truth is there's little the government can do about lies on cable. Example: If a company makes a false claim in an advertisement, the government has the power to hold that company accountable and not allow consumers to be fleeced. That's because the Federal Trade Commission regulates truth in advertising. "When consumers see or hear an advertisement, whether it's on the Internet, radio or television, or anywhere else, federal law says that ad must be truthful, not misleading, and, when appropriate, backed by scientific evidence," the FTC boasts. "The FTC enforces these truth-in-advertising laws, and it applies the same standards no matter where an ad appears — in newspapers and magazines, online, in the mail, or on billboards or buses. "But that's not the case for what we hear on cable news or read on social media (or political ads for that matter). And that was put into stark relief last week when Fox News' Tucker Carlson tried to rewrite history on the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.

TV Broadcasters like CBS, NBC, ABC, etc. and RADIO Broadcasters that use the PUBLIC airways are governed by the FCC - The Federal Communications Commission. Radio and television broadcasters must obtain a license from the government because, according to American law, the public owns the airwaves. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issues these licenses and is in charge of regulating the airwaves. Subject: Broadcasting false information that causes substantial ‘public harm’.

The FCC prohibits broadcasting false information about a crime or a catastrophe if the broadcaster knows the information is false and will cause substantial “public harm” if aired. FCC rules specifically say that the “public harm must begin immediately, and cause direct and actual damage to property or to the health or safety of the general public, or diversion of law enforcement or other public health and safety authorities from their duties.” Broadcasters may air disclaimers that clearly characterize programming as fiction to avoid violating FCC rules about public harm. Broadcasting false content during news programming. The FCC is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on First Amendment rights of the press. It is, however, illegal for broadcasters to intentionally distort the news, and the FCC may act on complaints if there is documented evidence of such behavior from persons with direct personal knowledge.




a

s
x
For those of you who still don't get it, DeSantis is talking about ALBINO children feeling guilty or ashamed about what was done TO BLACK people by Albinos.
z
Think those Black kids know what those signs mean? See what I mean by degenerate Albinos.

Worthwhile Black parents would have marched on the capitol for using their children in such a way.

Don't laugh, but I bet there are Negro parents in Florida who are saying "oh look, Mr. Ronny is protecting our kids against being called Slave, Black, Nigger".



Here is some of what Mr. Ronny, governor of Florida is trying to hide from Albino Children.
This article is a compilation of the works of (JSTOR Daily)
 JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources),
 And The Oklahoma Historical Society.
The Devastation of Black Wall Street


Tulsa, Oklahoma - 1921. A wave of racial violence destroys an affluent Black American community: seen as a threat to white-dominated American capitalism. In 1921, Tulsa, Oklahoma’s Greenwood District, known as Black Wall Street, was one of the most prosperous Black American communities in the United States. But on May 31 of that year, the  Tulsa Tribune  reported that a black man, Dick Rowland, attempted to rape a white woman, Sarah Page. Whites in the area refused to wait for the investigative process to play out, sparking two days of unprecedented racial violence. Thirty-five city blocks went up in flames, 300 people died, and 800 were injured. Defense of white female virtue was the expressed motivation for the collective racial violence.

By early 1921 Tulsa was a modern city with a population of more than one hundred thousand. Most of the city's ten thousand Black American residents lived in the Greenwood District, a vibrant neighborhood that was home to two newspapers, several churches, a library branch, and scores of black-owned businesses. However, Tulsa was also a deeply troubled town. Crime rates were extremely high, and the city had been plagued by vigilantism, including the August 1920 lynching, by a white mob, of a white teenager accused of murder. Newspaper reports confirmed that the Tulsa police had done little to protect the lynching victim, who had been taken from his jail cell at the county courthouse.

 Eight months later an incident involving Dick Rowland, a Black American shoe shiner, and Sarah Page, a white elevator operator, would set the stage for tragedy. While it is still uncertain as to precisely what happened in the Drexel Building on May 30, 1921, the most common explanation is that Rowland stepped on Page's foot as he entered the elevator, causing her to scream. The next day, however, the Tulsa Tribune, the city's afternoon daily newspaper, reported that Rowland, who had been picked up by police, had attempted to rape Page. Moreover, according to eyewitnesses, the Tribune also published a now-lost editorial about the incident, titled "To Lynch Negro Tonight." By early evening there was, once again, lynch talk on the streets of Tulsa.
Greenwood before the devastation

c





v





v





v





b





v



Talk soon turned to action. By 7:30 p.m. hundreds of whites had gathered outside the Tulsa County Courthouse, demanding that the authorities hand over Dick Rowland, but the sheriff refused. At about 9 p.m., after reports of the dire conditions downtown reached Greenwood, a group of approximately twenty-five armed African American men, many of them World War I veterans, went down to the courthouse and offered their services to the authorities to help protect Rowland. The sheriff, however, turned them down, and the men returned to Greenwood.

Stunned, and then enraged, members of the white mob then tried to break into the National Guard armory but were turned away by a handful of local guardsmen. At about 10 p.m. a false rumor hit Greenwood that whites were storming the courthouse. This time, a second contingent of Black American men, perhaps seventy-five in number, went back to the courthouse and offered their services to the authorities. Once again, they were turned down. As they were leaving, a white man tried to disarm a black veteran, and a shot was fired. The riot began.

Over the next six hours Tulsa was plunged into chaos as angry whites, frustrated over the failed lynching, began to vent their rage at Black Americans in general. Furious fighting erupted along the Frisco railroad tracks, where black defenders were able to hold off members of the white mob. An unarmed Black American man was murdered inside a downtown movie theater, while carloads of armed whites began making "drive-by" shootings in black residential neighborhoods. By midnight fires had been set along the edge of the Black American commercial district. In some of the city's all-night cafes, whites began to organize for a dawn invasion of Greenwood.

During the early hours of the conflict local authorities did little to stem the growing crisis. Indeed, shortly after the outbreak of gunfire at the courthouse, Tulsa police officers deputized former members of the lynch mob and, according to an eyewitness, instructed them to "get a gun and get a nigger." Local units of the National Guard were mobilized, but they spent most of the night protecting a white neighborhood from a feared, but nonexistent, black counterattack. Shortly before dawn on June 1, thousands of armed whites had gathered along the fringes of Greenwood. When daybreak came, they poured into the Black American district, looting homes and businesses and setting them on fire. At least one machine gun was utilized by the invading whites, and some participants have claimed that airplanes were also used in the attack. Black Tulsans fought hard to protect their homes and businesses, with particularly sharp fighting occurring off of Standpipe Hill. In the end, they were simply outgunned and outnumbered. By the time that additional National Guard troops arrived in Tulsa at approximately 9:15 a.m. on the morning of June 1, most of Greenwood had already been put to the torch.
b





b





x




c




f





c





v





c





v




c




d




c




Nine thousand people became homeless, Josie Pickens writes in Ebony. This “modern, majestic, sophisticated, and unapologetically black” community boasted of “banks, hotels, cafés, clothiers, movie theaters, and contemporary homes.” Not to mention luxuries, such as “indoor plumbing and a remarkable school system that superiorly educated black children.” Undoubtedly, less fortunate white neighbors resented their upper-class lifestyle. As a result of a jealous desire “to put progressive, high-achieving Black Americans in their place,” a wave of domestic white terrorism caused black dispossession.
c
               
d





d



The creation of the powerful black community known as Black Wall Street was intentional. “In 1906, O.W. Gurley, a wealthy Black American from Arkansas, moved to Tulsa and purchased over 40 acres of land  that he made sure was only sold to other Black Americans,” writes Christina Montford in the Atlanta Black Star. Gurley provided an opportunity for those migrating “from the harsh oppression of Mississippi.” The average income of black families in the area exceeded “what minimum wage is today.” As a result of segregation, a “dollar circulated 36 to 100 times” and remained in Greenwood “almost a year before leaving” - an amazing achievement. Even more impressive at that time, the “state of Oklahoma had only two airports,” yet six black families owned their own airplanes.

O. W. Gurley:
O. W. Gurley (December 25, 1867 – August 6, 1935) was once one of the wealthiest Black men and a founder of the Greenwood district in Tulsa, Oklahoma, known as "Black Wall Street". Ottaway W. Gurley was born in Huntsville, Alabama to John and Rosanna Gurley, formerly enslaved persons, and grew up in Pine Bluff, Arkansas. After attending public schools and self-educating, he worked as a teacher and in the postal service. While living in Pine Bluff, Gurley married Emma Wells, on November 6, 1889. They had no children. In 1893, he came to Oklahoma Territory to participate in the Land Run of 1893, staking a claim in what would be known as Perry, Oklahoma. The young entrepreneur had just resigned from an appointment under president Grover Cleveland in order to strike out on his own. In Perry he rose quickly, running unsuccessfully for treasurer of Noble County at first, but later becoming principal at the town's school and eventually starting and operating a general store for 10 years.

In 1905, Gurley sold his store and land in Perry and moved with his wife, Emma, to the oil boomtown of Tulsa, where he purchased 40 acres of land which was "only to be sold to colored. The first law passed in the new State of Oklahoma, 33 days after statehood, set in place a Jim Crow system of legally enforced segregation, and required blacks and whites to live in separate areas. However, Oklahoma was considered a significant economic and social opportunity by Gurley, politician Edward P. McCabe and others, leading to the establishment of 50 all-black towns and settlements, among the highest of any state or territory.

Among Gurley's first businesses was a rooming house which was located on a dusty trail near the railroad tracks. This road was given the name Greenwood Avenue, named for a city in Mississippi. The area became very popular among black migrants fleeing the oppression in Mississippi. They would find refuge in Gurley's building, as the racial persecution from the south was non-existent on Greenwood Avenue. On the contrary, Greenwood was later dubbed Black Wall Street as it became increasingly self-sustained and catered to upwardly mobile Black people. Gurley also provided monetary loans to Black people wanting to start their own businesses.

In addition to his rooming house, Gurley built three two-story buildings and five residences and bought an 80-acre (32 ha) farm in Rogers County. Gurley also founded what is today Vernon AME Church. He also helped build a black Masonic lodge and an employment agency. This implementation of "colored" segregation set the Greenwood boundaries of separation that still exist: Pine Street to the north, Archer Street and the Frisco tracks to the south, Cincinnati Street on the west, and Lansing Street on the east. Gurley formed an informal partnership with another Black American entrepreneur, J.B. Stradford, who arrived in Tulsa in 1899, and they developed Greenwood in concert.  In 1914, Gurley's net worth was reported to be $150,000 (about $3 million in 2018 dollars). And he was made a sheriff's deputy by the city of Tulsa to police Greenwood's residents, which resulted in some viewing him with suspicion. By 1921, Gurley owned more than one hundred properties in Greenwood and had an estimated net worth between $500,000 and $1 million (between $6.8 million and $13.6 million in 2018 dollars).

Gurley's prominence and wealth were short lived, and his position as a sheriff's deputy did not protect him during the race massacre. In a matter of moments, he lost everything. During the race massacre, The Gurley Hotel at 112 N. Greenwood, the street's first commercial enterprise as well as the Gurley family home, valued at $55,000, was lost, and with it Brunswick Billiard Parlor and Dock Eastmand & Hughes Cafe. Gurley also owned a two-story building at 119 N. Greenwood. It housed Carter's Barbershop, Hardy Rooms, a pool hall, and cigar store. All were reduced to ruins. By his account and court records, he lost nearly $200,000 in the 1921 race massacre.

Because of his leadership role in creating this self-sustaining exclusive black "enclave," it has been rumored that Gurley was lynched by a white mob and buried in an unmarked grave. However, according to the memoirs of Greenwood pioneer, B.C. Franklin, Gurley left Greenwood for Los Angeles, California. Gurley and his wife, Emma, moved to a 4-bedroom home in South Los Angeles and ran a small hotel. Gurley died from arteriosclerosis and a cerebral hemorrhage, in Los Angeles, California, on August 6, 1935, at the age of 67. His widow Emma passed away three years later, in 1938. Gurley was honored in a 2009 documentary film called, Before They Die! The Road to Reparations for the 1921 Tulsa Race Riot Survivors. Wikipedia.

These Black Americans’ economic status could not save them from the racial hostility of their day. Greenwood survivors recount disturbing details about what really happened that night. Eyewitnesses claim “the area was bombed with kerosene and/or nitroglycerin,” causing the inferno to rage more aggressively. Official accounts state that private planes “were on reconnaissance missions, they were surveying the area to see what happened.” Despite all of the economic damage, Hannibal Johnson, author of Black Wall Street: From Riot to Renaissance in Tulsa’s Historic Greenwood District, explains that neither the survivors nor their families ever received the reparations suggested by the Tulsa Race Riot Commission. The commission recommended reparations for “people who lost property” and proposed “the establishment of a scholarship fund—that did happen, for a limited time.” The commission also proposed initiatives for the economic revitalization of the Greenwood community. Despite the tragic events, these grand ideas never manifested into a tangible reality.

Underlying Causes of the Massacre
In “The Tulsa Race Riot of 1921: toward an Integrative Theory of Collective Violence,” the sociologist Chris M. Messer explores the underlying causes of the massacre. As a result of mass migrations to the area, driven in part by increased job opportunities, Tulsa became the city with the most African-Americans in the state. With a boom in the black population and their demands for equality, “perceptions of discrimination and shared experience among Black Americans allowed for little time for adaptation among whites.” Tulsa’s rapid change in racial demographics made the city ripe for a riot motivated by white animosity against black economic progress. Whites of the era equated improvements in “wages and working conditions” as communistic threats. In essence, whites were resentful that blacks no longer passively accepted second-class citizenship in their own homeland.

Another structural factor that played a vital role in the Tulsa race riot was segregation. Ironically, black businesses benefited from self-sufficiency, which held both benefits and drawbacks for entrepreneurship. “Through maintenance of the legal separation of race in sociality, business, education, and residential areas, the structure of segregation encouraged initiative, but also placed parameters by restricting Black American opportunities,” Messer writes: In other words, since it was against the law for blacks to shop at white-owned stores, black businesses flourished. However, even though black businesses profited from how segregation reduced competition for black patrons, segregation also limited blacks’ mobility and opportunities to achieve outside their community.

According to Messer, the police force also contributed to the riot. Due to their ineffective leadership, they allowed mobs to gather at the courthouse for hours before seeking additional assistance. Furthermore, they actively participated in the riot by deputizing whites without discretion, arming them with guns to multiply the police force overnight. The police disregarded due process, arresting blacks and interning them in detention camps; meanwhile, no whites were arrested during the riot. Both politicians and the media falsely framed the Tulsa riot as an uprising started by lawless blacks. Tulsa newspapers regularly referred to the Greenwood district as “Little Africa” and “nigger town.” Blacks in the district were labeled “bad niggers” who drank booze, took dope, and ran around with guns. Perhaps as a result of government officials’ stereotyping rhetoric and the media’s biased reporting, whites and blacks interpreted the racial violence differently. Generally, white politicians and residents perceived the black community “as predisposed to crime and in need of social control,” Messer explains. In other words, due to assumptions of black criminality, whites justified deadly violence on Black Wall Street, because blacks needed to be subjugated.

The Tulsa World newspaper inflamed the tensions between blacks and whites by suggesting that the Ku Klux Klan could “restore order in the community.” Since the KKK asserted white superiority with terroristic acts, such as lynchings, the mere suggestion from a mainstream newspaper that the KKK should intervene demonstrates how white supremacy was not only legitimized but also promoted with legal impunity. In the early 1900s, there was a rise in Black Nationalist organizations that refused to cower in the face of KKK violence or submit to societal subordination. Whites responded to black pride and demands for equality with “social control, including segregation, lynchings, and pogroms,” Messer writes: In “Mass Media and Governmental Framing of Riots: The Case of Tulsa, 1921,” Messer and his colleague Patricia A. Bell offer further detail about how the media framed the riot, igniting tensions. In essence, blacks’ desire for socioeconomic progress and assertion of their rights was seen as a grave threat to white hegemony. Portraying all blacks as criminals served the black inferiority narrative, maintained Jim Crow segregation, and promoted the violent enforcement of racist ideology.

For instance, the racial framing of blacks as criminals legitimized whites’ congregation “at the courthouse and the subsequent destruction of the Greenwood area.” Consequently, it’s no surprise that blacks perceived the riot started by whites “as a massacre of their community.” The massacre of Black Wall Street primarily occurred due to whites “generalized perception that Black Americans were ‘out of line’” and needed to be put “back in their place.” Despite racial discrimination and Jim Crow segregation, the Greenwood district offered proof that black entrepreneurs were capable of creating vast wealth. Based on critical analysis of the events, Messer asserts “there is evidence that whites perceived Black Americans as an economic threat to the city.” For those who supported black subjugation, witnessing blacks thrive and defy the stereotypes of black inferiority was too much.

Soon after the riot, Walter F. White of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) visited Tulsa. According to him, black economic prosperity contributed to the destruction of the Greenwood District. White reported in The Nation how the city prospered under the oil boom. He stated that the town had grown from a population of 18,182 in 1910 to somewhere “between 90,000 to 100,000” residents by 1920. White claimed that the sudden wealth of the townspeople rivaled the “forty-niners” in California. However, when blacks experienced wealth, lower-class whites resented their success. Many whites believed they were “members of a divinely ordered superior race.” Despite their inflated perceptions of themselves, there were three blacks in Oklahoma “worth a million dollars each.” A man named J.W. Thompson was worth $500,000. There were “a number of men and women worth $100,000; and many whose possessions” were “valued at $25,000 and $50,000 each. This was particularly true of Tulsa, where there were two colored men worth $150,000 each; two worth $100,000; three $50,000; and four who were assessed at $25,000.”

White concluded that many of the white pioneers in Oklahoma were former residents of “Mississippi, Georgia, Tennessee, [and] Texas.” Unfortunately, they failed to leave their “anti-Negro prejudices” behind in the Deep South. White had no positive words for Oklahoman whites. He considered them “lethargic and unprogressive by nature, it sorely irks them to see Negroes making greater progress than they themselves are achieving.” In one instance, a white worker burned and demolished his black boss’s “printing plant with $25,000 worth of printing machinery in it.” In the process of leading the destructive mob, this disgruntled white employee was killed at the site.

The destruction of this successful Black American community was no accident. Messer asserts that “the destruction of the community was rationalized as a necessary and natural response to put them back in their place.” Evidently, private industry and the state stood to benefit economically from the destruction. Two days after the riot, the mayor wasted no time in establishing the Reconstruction Committee to redesign the Greenwood District for industrial purposes. Blacks were offered below market value for their property. White men who offered “almost any price for their property” perceived survivors as desperate and destitute. In essence, Black Americans posed a “geographical problem because their community was situated in an ideal location for business expansion.” The government and private industry worked in concert to bring down land prices and maintain white dominance in the Tulsa area. Poor whites’ resentment of successful, landowning blacks allowed elite whites to use them as pawns to obtain more land, wealth, and prosperity. Judging by the legal impunity granted to whites by law enforcement, the state endorsed and, in fact, supported the Tulsa riot for self-serving, capitalistic gains.

Historically, American capitalism has thrived with an elite few maintaining power and wealth. When blacks gain a strong foothold in a community or industry, they have the power to effect meaningful change. Thus, the socioeconomic progress of  Black Americans on Black Wall Street threatened the power structure of white-dominated American capitalism. When white people destroyed black business establishments and homes, the façade of white superiority was maintained. By the 1940s, the Greenwood District was rebuilt, but due to integration during the Civil Rights era, never regained as much prominence. The fate of Black Wall Street illustrates that as long as power remains in the hands of elite, mainly white families, America’s socioeconomic system can be marshalled to support and advance the tenets of white supremacy. Regardless of the progress made by prominent Black Americans, American capitalism is structured to keep a white segment of society ahead of the remaining marginalized many. More on the Oklahoma land Rush at the bottom.
Okay - here we go, the great REVEAL! YOU ARE THE FATHER!! Oh, oh, wrong show, got a little confused there, lets try again.
YOU ARE (pick one): but first lets get rid of the African thing.



x


From the 1790 census above we see that the enslaved population of the united states was 694,280. However from the Slave database we see that by 1790-1800 only 248,646 African Slaves had been imported into the United States, Canada and northern Mexico. Over the next 75 years only 58,080 more African Slaves were imported for a total of 306,726 African Slaves imported into North America. Today the Black population of the United States is at least 100,000,000 (one hundred million), forget the Albinos lying census, look at the numbers for Obama and Biden while the great majority of Albinos voted for Trump.


Note this pie chart: nationally Trump got 87% of the Albino Vote.
Yet Obama would have beat him easily. Where do you think Obama's votes were coming from?

Do you understand now why the Albinos are trying so hard to Suppress your vote?
d


You can't get that from 306,726 Africans. BTW - polls say that Bidens support by Blacks is down by 75%, down to 75% (sorry), if that is true, then look forward to another Trump Presidency. I expected his failure to obtain universal voting rights and an end to the filibuster hurt him with Blacks, but I never expected it to be so bad - guess we were all disappointed by Kamala too. Was marrying a White Man a tell?

Just ran across this Time Magazine article, though you might be interested:
 Time Magazine
 Black Voters Gave Biden the White House. They May Determine Whether He Stays There.



By Philip Elliott - April 12, 2023 12:00 PM EDT
This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter.

Plenty of ink has been spent linking Joe Biden’s win in 2020 with Black voters. It’s no exaggeration to credit his nomination to a unified Black electorate in South Carolina’s primary, thanks in no small measure to the clout of Rep. Jim Clyburn’s endorsement in a state where more than half of Democratic turnout was Black. The throughline continues to that November, when Biden’s win over Donald Trump came thanks to that slice of voters who remained loyal to the former Vice President—and deeply hostile to the man he was facing. If he wins again next year, Biden’s final act in public life could be the surest flex of Black political power in decades.

But, quietly, there have been some rumblings inside Democratic circles that Biden needs to do more to shore up his position with Black voters. While polls show almost half of all Democrats would prefer he hang up his Air Force One bomber jacket after one term, his support remains far stronger among Black voters. And yet, even that number may be going ever so wobbly. We are talking about movement on the fringes of a mainstay of Democratic politics, for sure, but recent elections have shown that even the slightest gradation matters. Biden’s favorability ratings among Black voters have shifted from 84% right after he took office in 2021 to 74% at the end of March 2023, according to YouGov/Economist polling. (That’s still better than Biden’s 46% favorable rating at the start of his term among white voters, which has since slipped to 40%.) Outside super PACs and friendly-to-Biden organizations have also picked up on these blips, both in polling and in focus groups in battleground states and are starting to figure out how to connect with Black voters.

Historically, to be candid, Republicans have done themselves no favors in pursuing or persuading Black voters, and there are few reasons to think that is going to be quick to change. No, not even Sen. Tim Scott’s announcement on Wednesday that he would form a presidential exploratory committee—a tangible step that allows the lone Black Republican in the Senate to raise and spend money for an eventual White House campaign—is likely to change the macro trends there. The Republican Party’s longstanding opposition to a voting rights bill in Congress and their years of antipathy toward and obstruction of Barack Obama are tough to shake. Some Republicans have aligned themselves with Christian nationalists and groups with links to white supremacy. That all makes for a challenging recruiting pitch to Black voters, even if Scott on his own is a charismatic and compelling figure: comment - NO HE IS NOT!



South Carolina U.S. Senator Tim Scott
Former governor of South Carolina Nikki Haley
c
        
s
Timothy Eugene Scott (born September 19, 1965) is an American businessman and politician serving as the junior United States senator from South Carolina since 2013. A member of the Republican Party, Scott was appointed to the U.S. Senate by Governor Nikki Haley in 2013. He retained his seat after winning a special election in 2014, and was elected to full terms in 2016 and 2022.

When Albinos and their Mulattoes chose Black leadership, it is always to further their aims, NOT Black aims. Scott will no doubt function like Clarence Thomas has done.
Nimarata Nikki Haley (née Randhawa; born January 20, 1972 is an American politician who served as the 116th governor of South Carolina from 2011 to 2017. She was the 29th United States ambassador to the United Nations for two years, from January 2017 through December 2018.

She is the first Asian Indian American to serve as a member of a presidential cabinet. Haley was born in Bamberg, South Carolina, and earned an accounting degree from Clemson University. She joined her family's clothing business before serving as treasurer and then president of the National Association of Women Business Owners.

First elected to the South Carolina House of Representatives in 2004, she served three terms. In 2010, during her third term, she was elected governor of South Carolina, and won re-election in 2014. Haley was the first female governor of South Carolina, the youngest governor in the country, and the second governor of Indian descent (after fellow Republican Bobby Jindal of Louisiana). She was also the first female American governor of Asian American heritage.




This is what we know about Tim Scott:

Marital status
Scott is unmarried. When entering public life at age 30, he said he was a virgin. He owns an insurance agency and is a partner in Pathway Real Estate Group, LLC. Scott is an evangelical Protestant and a member of Seacoast Church, a large evangelical church in Charleston.

Scott declined to join the Congressional Black Caucus.

Voting rights
In January 2001, the U.S. Department of Justice sued Charleston County, South Carolina for racial discrimination under the Voting Rights Act, because its council seats were based on at-large districts. The Department of Justice alleged that the issue was not a question of ethnicity, stating that voters in black precincts in the county had rejected “Tim” Scott as a candidate for the council. The lawsuit noted that because of the white majority, "white bloc voting usually results in the defeat of candidates who are preferred by black voters." The Department added that blacks live in compact areas of the county, and could be a majority in three districts if the county seats were apportioned as nine single-member districts.

Health care
Scott believes the Affordable Care Act of Barack Obama should be repealed. He has said that U.S. health care is among the greatest in the world, that people all over the world come to study in American medical schools, waiting lists are rare, and that Americans are able to choose their insurance, providers, and course of treatment. Scott supports an alternative to the ACA that he says keeps its benefits while controlling costs by reforming the medical tort system by limiting non-economic damages and by reforming Medicare.

Black health
Compared to their white counterparts, African Americans are generally at higher risk for heart diseases, stroke, cancer, asthma, influenza and pneumonia, diabetes, and HIV/AIDS, according to the Office of Minority Health, part of the Department for Health and Human Services.

Abortion
Scott has been a vocal opponent of abortion and supports the United States anti-abortion movement. In a 2023 interview, he said he would sign a 20-week federal abortion ban into law if elected president.

Poverty in South Carolina
12.1% of the population for whom poverty status is determined in Congressional District 2, SC (85.5k out of 704k people) live below the poverty line, a number that is lower than the national average of 12.8%. The largest demographic living in poverty are Females 25 - 34, followed by Females 18 - 24 and then Females 35 - 44. The most common racial or ethnic group living below the poverty line in Congressional District 2, SC is White, followed by Black and Hispanic.

Racial makeup of South Carolina
In 2021, the white (non-Hispanic) group made up 63.4% of the population.
The Black (non-Hispanic) population had the largest decrease dropping 1.7 percentage points to 26.1%.

2022 United States Senate election in South Carolina: Tim Scott - Republican - 1,066,274  - 62.9% - Krystle Matthews (Black democrat) – 627,616 - 37.0%

Poor Tim, he is owned by the Albinos yet he couldn't even get all of THEIR votes. Krystle Matthews (the Black democrat) seems to have gotten 11% more than the Black vote alone. Trouble is, having been made by Albinos and NOT Blacks, he thinks that being a United States Senator means that he is an important person. Not understanding that without a constituency of your own, you are just another dumb Negro. So just imagine his surprise if he runs for President, and he finds that he has gotten few White votes, and has lost the Black vote, by a wide margin, to a WHITE guy!





Clarence Thomas

When Justice Thurgood Marshall (the only Black on the Supreme court) announced his retirement, pressure was immediately put on then President George Bush (the elder) to replace Marshall with another Black. Needing Black votes for an upcoming election, Bush is reported to have said: well if I have to replace Marshall with a Black, then it will be "Our kind of Black". Clarence Thomas was his nominee. Clarence has turned out to be the most CORRUPT Justice in American history,  Clearly Justice Thomas has lost all sense of his Blackness, including the ability to imagine and empathize as a Black person: Just like Stephen. It is expected that he will be impeached and expelled from the Supreme court - all Black America will cheer. If Joe Biden can get that done, it will go a long way to shore-up his Black support - we are all embarrassed by that insect.


s




Continue Time magazine article:

Trump remains the nominal candidate to beat for the GOP nomination, and his comparable poll numbers show a deeply unpopular figure among Black voters; his unfavorable number fell to 60% at the end of last month in the YouGov/Economist poll, down from the 93% mark he posted during the summer of 2020. Still, with Biden’s standing among Black voters on ground more like Hillary Clinton’s in 2016 than Biden’s in 2020, it’s worth taking a beat to look at the hard numbers, and consider why. First, a little history. Since exit polls became part of Election Day data dumps in 1972, no Republican has fared better with Black voters than Richard Nixon, who managed 18% in his ‘72 re-election campaign. No Democrat has captured their party’s nomination without the Black vote since 1992. (Sen. Edward M. Kennedy carried the Black vote in 1980 with 44% of the vote but missed the nomination, and the Rev. Jesse Jackson dominated that bloc during his 1984 and 1988 campaigns.) Put plainly: you can’t win the nomination or the White House as a Democrat without the Black vote.

Biden, facing no serious primary challenges at the moment, is expected to fall nicely into the historical patterns, but the general election might be a different story. Clinton in 2016 carried 88% of the Black vote, a slight swing from four years earlier when the country re-elected its first Black President with 93% of the Black vote. Still, those Black voters were relatively meh when it came to Clinton’s candidacy; Trump didn’t seem quite so bad and had a certain novelty about him. When Biden ran as the nominee in 2020, he carried 87% of the Black vote, according to exit polls, and that was when voters faced a choice whether they wanted another four years of Trump. And, in last year’s midterm elections, Democrats drew the support of 86% of the Black vote.
If all of this sounds statistically negligible, it is. Polling is of course imprecise; a margin of error is built into every survey, after all. And yet, it’s worth remembering that Trump prevailed in 2016 by besting Clinton by about 80,000 votes in just three states. If all holds steady, Biden could well end up in a rematch against Trump, who saw his support among Black voters climb from 8% in 2016 to 12% four years later. That shift wasn’t enough to deny Biden a gig he’s been chasing since his 20s, but it didn’t happen by accident.

Biden’s record on race at this point is decidedly up for debate, too. He made good on his campaign promises to pick a Black woman as a running rate and put one on the Supreme Court, and continues to this day to enjoy the political riches from those moves. But Biden’s efforts to get a comprehensive voting rights measure into law have come up short, his attempts to control gun violence are as stymied as they are frustrating, and it seems like every few weeks an unflattering story about Vice President Kamala Harris—the first woman and first woman of Black and Asian heritage in the job—seems to bandy around Biden’s chums. Go any deeper in Biden’s record and things get sticky.

To be clear: Biden is expected to keep Black voters as a reliable part of his coalition, and they’re his insulation from an electorate that, despite its increasing diversity, is still about 70% white. But campaigns are decided in small microtrends, and, with roughly 13% of the electorate steadily reporting they are Black, these voters cannot be ignored, especially if their allegiance grows less intense. (Other studies put Black voters’ clout around 20%, well ahead of what exit polls report.)

Biden gets this all too well. It’s why we saw the President release images of his call last week with two Black lawmakers from Tennessee who were expelled for leading a protest against gun violence. It’s why so much of the White House and Cabinet-level travels have made outreach to Black communities part of their agenda. And it’s why, even as Biden continues to delay his actual entrance to the 2024 campaign, he has signaled to his advisers that they’ve got to keep hitting the mark on building a diverse and inclusive team around him. That commitment may be as sincere as any politician’s belief, but it also makes for good politics—and it’s been evident for decades that Biden seldom can count on good luck to be a lengthy visitor.


Remember what was said about Albino media being used to control what you think above. Here is what else was said: "Today the Black population of the United States is at least 100,000,000 (one hundred million), forget the Albinos lying census, look at the numbers for Obama and Biden while the great majority of Albinos voted for Trump."






Before going on, some of our regular readers may be wondering why this material is being re-hashed. After all there are many pages on these subjects here on Realhistoryww already. Two things, I was just watching a news program that said California is debating giving Blacks reparations for Slavery, but they must prove their linage.




s


OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — California’s reparations task force voted Saturday to approve recommendations on how the state may compensate and apologize to Black residents for generations of harm caused by discriminatory policies.

The nine-member committee, which first convened nearly two years ago, gave final approval at a meeting in Oakland to a hefty list of proposals that now go to state lawmakers to consider for reparations legislation.

U.S. Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Oakland, who is cosponsoring a bill in Congress to study restitution proposals for African Americans, at the meeting called on states and the federal government to pass reparations legislation.

“Reparations are not only morally justifiable, but they have the potential to address longstanding racial disparities and inequalities,” Lee said.

The panel’s first vote approved a detailed account of historical discrimination against Black Californians in areas such as voting, housing, education, disproportionate policing and incarceration and others.

Other recommendations on the table ranged from the creation of a new agency to provide services to descendants of enslaved people to calculations on what the state owes them in compensation.

“An apology and an admission of wrongdoing just by itself is not going to be satisfactory,” said Chris Lodgson, an organizer with the Coalition for a Just and Equitable California, a reparations advocacy group.

An apology crafted by lawmakers must “include a censure of the gravest barbarities” carried out on behalf of the state, according to the draft recommendation approved by the task force.

Those would include a condemnation of former Gov. Peter Hardeman Burnett, the state’s first elected governor and a white supremacist who encouraged laws to exclude Black people from California.

After California entered the union in 1850 as a “free” state, it did not enact any laws to guarantee freedom for all, the draft recommendation notes. On the contrary, the state Supreme Court enforced the federal Fugitive Slave Act, which allowed for the capture and return of runaway enslaved people, until for over a decade until emancipation.

“By participating in these horrors, California further perpetuated the harms African Americans faced, imbuing racial prejudice throughout society through segregation, public and private discrimination, and unequal disbursal of state and federal funding,” the document says.

The task force approved a public apology acknowledging the state’s responsibility for past wrongs and promising the state will not repeat them. It would be issued in the presence of people whose ancestors were enslaved.

READ MORE: How St. Louis is approaching the question of reparations for Black citizens

California has previously apologized for placing Japanese Americans in internment camps during World War II and for violence against and mistreatment of Native Americans.

The panel also approved a section of the draft report saying reparations should include “cash or its equivalent” for eligible residents.

More than 100 residents and advocates gathered at Mills College of Northeastern University in Oakland, a city that is the birthplace of the Black Panther Party. They shared frustrations over the country’s “broken promise” to offer up to 40 acres and a mule to newly freed enslaved people.

Many said it is past time for governments to repair the harms that have kept African Americans from living without fear of being wrongfully prosecuted, retaining property and building wealth.

Elaine Brown, former Black Panther Party chairwoman, urged people to express their frustrations through demonstrations.

Saturday’s task force meeting marked a crucial moment in the long fight for local, state and federal governments to atone for discriminatory polices against African Americans. The proposals are far from implementation, however.

“There’s no way in the world that many of these recommendations are going to get through because of the inflationary impact,” said Roy L. Brooks, a professor and reparations scholar at the University of San Diego School of Law.

Some estimates from economists have projected that the state could owe upwards of $800 billion, or more than 2.5 times its annual budget, in reparations to Black people.

The figure in the latest draft report released by the task force is far lower. The group has not responded to email and phone requests for comment on the reduction.

Secretary of State Shirley Weber, a former Democratic assembly member, authored legislation in 2020 creating the task force with a focus on the state’s historical culpability for harms against African Americans, and not as a substitute for any additional reparations that may come from the federal government.

The task force voted previously to limit reparations to descendants of enslaved or free Black people who were in the country by the end of the 19th century.

The group’s work has garnered nationwide attention, as efforts to research and secure reparations for African Americans elsewhere have had mixed results.

The Chicago suburb of Evanston, for example, has offered housing vouchers to Black residents but few have benefited from the program so far.

In New York, a bill to acknowledge the inhumanity of slavery in the state and create a commission to study reparations proposals has passed the Assembly but not received a vote in the Senate.

And on the federal level, a decades-old proposal to create a commission studying reparations for African Americans has stalled in Congress.

Oakland city Council member Kevin Jenkins called the California task force’s work “a powerful example” of what can happen when people work together.

“I am confident that through our collective efforts, we can make a significant drive in advancing reparations in our great state of California and ultimately the country,” Jenkins said.


x
c
c
Note Mr. Amos Brown above, he is wearing a Muslim Skullcap, he obviously feels that proclaiming himself a African Muslim authenticates himself and substantiates his claims. We talked about the ignorance of Black Americans, actually what Mr. Brown is doing is showing that HE HAS LITTLE OR NO CLAIM to reparations, because Africans had little to do with United States Slavery. Using our raw numbers for 1860 (307,000 Africans - 4,000,000 U.S. Slaves) Africans were just 7.7 percent of the U.S. Slave population. That's about 8 Africans for each 100 U.S. Slaves.
x
s



A word of advice to Mr. Amos Brown, first do the work! Research is not that hard, if you do the research then you will find
that there are lots of pictures depicting REAL native Americans, painted by Europeans before their fear of Blacks took them over.
I am sure that you will find a costume more in keeping with your American identity.
n
n



d



n


While you are at it Mr. Brown, you might want to look-up some of the people who may be your family.
Unless you really ARE an African
d



s
Like I said - BLACKER!




Head Shaping is not as rare and unusual as you might think.
c
 c
 c




s
Pat was a Mayan nobleman; one of three who lead the last Mayan rebellion to recover lands in the Yucatan. In 1849 he was assassinated by a traitor nobleman. This portrait was likely done by an Albino or Mestizo Mexican, so we can't say how accurate it is. But the facial features are consistent with Mayan phenotype.


Interested in the Maya? Click here for the Mayan page >>



The other reason we are re-hashing is that Tori Bowie recently died. On May 2, 2023, after Bowie had not been seen or heard from for several days, authorities performed a wellness check at her home in Orange County, Florida, where she was found dead. She was 32 years old. Cause of death has still not been announced. I didn't know Tori, never even meant her, but whenever I saw her picture, and even though she was from Mississippi, I always knew that she was a California Indian.



s
     
c

Frentorish "Tori" Bowie (August 27, 1990 – c. May 2, 2023) was an American track and field athlete, who primarily competed in the long jump, 100 meters, and 200 meters. She won the silver medal in the 100 m and bronze in the 200 m at the 2016 Rio Olympics, bronze and gold in the 100 m at the 2015 and 2017 World Championships, respectively, and also earned gold medals as part of U.S. women's 4 × 100 m relays at both the 2016 Olympic Games and 2017 World Championships. Bowie competed collegiately for the University of Southern Mississippi and was a two-time NCAA Division I long jump champion, winning indoors and outdoors in 2011. After the 2014 World Indoor Championships, where she made her international debut competing in the long jump, she switched her focus to the sprints.



As to who you are, here are your choices: you can be a European, (the Albinos defeated us in the Thirty years war and the two British Civil wars). Or you can be a natural Native American, those so-called Indians like Geronimo, Sitting Bull etc. are MULATTOES, no natural Humans (unmixed) look like that. Natural Humans come only as Black Skinned Negroids, Caucasoids, or Mongoloids. White people are our Albinos, and the mixture produces our Mulattoes.


s


s
                             
s
Dravidian Man
Dravidian Albino



x





d




x



As you can see, the Slave population of the United States kept increasing by 29, 30, and 23%, even as the number of Africans imported slowed to 526 in 1850. Get an American history textbook and you will find that these increases coincides with the U.S. Army  subduing  Indian tribes, enslaving them and giving their land to Albino settlers.

Example: Remember the Tulsa Oklahoma Race Riot and Massacre above? Here is the how the Albinos came to be there:

Setting the stage for non-Indian settlement of other sections of Indian Territory; the Oklahoma Land Run of 1889 quickly led to the creation of the Oklahoma Territory under the Organic Act of 1890, and ultimately to the formation of the forty-sixth state of the Union which Oklahoma became in 1907. Oklahoma became the 46th state in 1907, following several acts that incorporated more Indian tribal land into U.S. territory. After its inclusion in the Union, Oklahoma became a center for oil production, with much of the state's early growth coming from that industry.

Oklahoma Land Rush
As the United States expanded westward in the 19th century, the government sought ways to open land to would-be Albino settlers. For example, President Abraham Lincoln signed the Homestead Act in 1862 (during the Civil War), which gave land to U.S. citizens, those who intended to become citizens, and those who had not taken up arms against the Union. "Homesteaders" could lay claim to up to 160 acres by paying a small registration fee. These "public lands," which had been acquired through coercement, or forcible removals of Native Americans, and were the ancestral homelands of hundreds of Native American tribal nations.

Toward the end of the 19th century, the federal government looked to expand further the amount of land available for settlement. The focus this time was on the Oklahoma and Indian Territories. Between 1889 and 1895, the United States gave away millions of Native-owned acres of land in those areas to non-Native people who wanted to settle there. In a series of chaotic land runs (or land rushes), tens of thousands of would-be settlers traveled from around the country to claim a piece of these newly opened territories and start a new life. These land rushes paved the way for Oklahoma to become a U.S. state in 1907.
MORE of what Mr. Ronny, governor of Florida is trying to hide from Albino Children.
d




TODAY IN FLORIDA
d


c


c
Is this guy a Cracker, or is he a CRACKER?




Historically and generally, Albinos have been degenerate liars and perpetrators of Violence. We assume this behavior is in reaction to their fear and dread that they cannot successfully compete with Blacks owing to their inability to withstand the Sun, and other things. Benjamin Franklin alluded to this in his 1751 essay "America land of Opportunity".
z
s



A few points on Franklin's essay:  As I told you, there are not all that many Albinos, regardless of what the lying Albino census says. For those of you who doubted that you could be European, well Franklin tells you that most Europeans were NOT White. Please note, this is an Albino transcription of the essay, there is no telling what words or thoughts were changed. As an example; Franklin was a man of science, thus of precision. The word "SWARTHY" has no specific meaning, Franklin would not have used it - Tawny is even worst  (nonspecific).

Where did the word swarthy originate?
Etymology. Alteration of swarty, from swart +‎ -y, from Old English sweart (“Black”).

Websters dictionary: tawny - a brownish-orange to light brown color.

As we know, human people are NOT orange colored.
Etymology of tawny - tawny (adj.) "tan-colored," late 14c., from Anglo-French tauné "of or like the brownish-yellow of tanned leather," from Old French tanét "dark brown, tan" (12c., Modern French tanné), past participle of taner "to tan hides," from Medieval Latin tannare


Why use bullshit words like Tawny and Swarthy to describe race? A great way by modern Albino writers to keep you ignorant about yourself. When you claim a particular people were Black or Brown skinned, an Albino can claim that is not what the word means - and they do! Remember - they have their hands on everything BEFORE it gets to you. It is much, much, better to use ORIGINAL materials.



Note these pages from "Memoirs of the Secret Services of John Macky, Esq.,
During the Reigns of King William, Queen Anne, and King George I." Printed in the year, 1733.
c
           
c


Note that the words used in REAL ORIGINAL documents are BLACK and BROWN, just as is NORMAL in everyday life.

Believe me now when I say Albinos are degenerate liars?

Black Kings and nobility in Britain??
These are the kind of things Albinos like Ronny Desantis are trying to hide.
After reading about the Tulsa Oklahoma Race Riot and Massacre some might wonder how the Albinos happened to be there in Oklahoma and other places.


c


When the Europeans first came to the Americas, their immediate course of action was to LOOT it: which they did. Then they thought to extract whatever valuable minerals they could from the ground - MINING - which they did. Then they thought to FARM the land - which they eventually did. Above we see a map of what countries claimed what land.
x

JUST "ONE" PROBLEM THOUGH, ALL OF THE LAND WAS ALREADY OWNED BY NATIVE AMERICANS.

In the East, Albinos first tried buying land with trinkets, but soon the natives got wise to that,
then the Europeans started playing hardball, they simply Murdered the Natives and took their land.


SCALPING!

The Albinos teach that it was Indians who did the SCALPING, but they don't tell you that it was THEM who taught it to the Indians, and the Indians were only returning the FAVOR! Scalping had been known in Europe, according to accounts, as far back as ancient Greece. More often, though, the European manner of execution involved beheading. Enemies captured in battle - or people accused of political crimes - might have their heads chopped off by victorious warriors or civil authorities. In some places and times in European history, leaders in power offered to pay "bounties" (cash payments) to put down popular uprisings. In Ireland, for instance, the occupying English once paid bounties for the heads of their enemies brought to them.

Europeans brought this cruel custom of paying for killings to the American frontier. Here they were willing to pay for just the scalp, instead of the whole head. The first documented instance in the American colonies of paying bounties for native scalps is credited to Governor Kieft of New Netherlands. By 1703, the Massachusetts Bay Colony was offering $60 for each native scalp. And in 1756, Pennsylvania Governor Morris, in his Declaration of War against the Lenni Lenape (Delaware) people, offered "130 Pieces of Eight [a type of coin], for the Scalp of Every Male Indian above the Age of Twelve Years, and 50 Pieces of Eight for the Scalp of Every Indian Woman, produced as evidence of their being killed. Massachusetts by that time was offering a bounty of 40 pounds (again, a unit of currency) for a male Indian scalp, and 20 pounds for scalps of females or of children under 12 years old.

As the United States acquired  the lands claimed by  France and then Spain the routine was the same, make war on the natives, kill them, and put the rest on reservations. The meaning of the Trail of Tears? In 1838 and 1839, as part of Andrew Jackson's Indian removal policy, the Cherokee nation was forced to give up its lands east of the Mississippi River and to migrate to an area in present-day Oklahoma. The Cherokee people called this journey the "Trail of Tears," because of its devastating effects.

After native Americans had been removed from the land in Oklahoma, it was then time to distribute that land to Albinos and a few others. A land run or land rush was an event in which previously restricted land of the United States was opened to homestead on a first-arrival basis. Lands were opened and sold first-come or by bid, or won by lottery, or by means other than a run. A homesteader had to be the head of a household or at least 21 years of age to claim a 160 acre parcel of land. Settlers from all walks of life worked to meet the challenge of "proving up". They included immigrants, farmers without land of their own, single women, and formerly enslaved people.

The Homestead Act of 1862 has been called one of the most important pieces of Legislation in the history of the United States. The act was signed into law by Abraham Lincoln after the southern states seceded. The Homestead Act of 1862 was a revolutionary concept for re-distributing stolen, now called "public" land in American history. The Homestead Act of 1862 allowed anyone over 21 years of age or the head of a household to apply for free federal land with two simple stipulations: 1. Be a citizen of the United States or legally declare their intent to become one 2. Did not fight against the United States or aid enemies of the United States. This law turned over vast amounts of the public domain to private citizens. 270 millions acres, or 10% of the area of the United States was claimed and settled under this act. A filing fee was the only money required, but sacrifice and hard work exacted a different price from the hopeful settlers. Each homesteader had to live on the land, build a home, make improvements and farm to get the land. Nearly four million homesteaders settled land across 30 states over 123 years.

 The Trail of Tears - In 1838 and 1839, as part of Andrew Jackson's Indian removal policy, the Cherokee nation was forced to give up its lands east of the Mississippi River and to migrate to an area in present-day Oklahoma. The Cherokee people called this journey the "Trail of Tears," because of its devastating effects.

The Land Run of 1889, although not without precedent in the history of the West, began the disposal of the federal public domain in Oklahoma. The legal basis for opening the Oklahoma District, now called the Unassigned Lands, came in 1889 when, in the U.S. Congress, Illinois Rep. William Springer amended the Indian Appropriations Bill to authorize Pres. Benjamin Harrison to proclaim the two-million-acre region open for settlement. Under the provisions of the Homestead Act of 1862, a legal settler could claim 160 acres of public land, and those who lived on and improved the claim for five years could receive a title.

The ink was hardly dry on Harrison's March 23, 1889, proclamation before Oklahoma settlement colonies were being formed in major U.S. cities. A multitude of impoverished farmers were not alone in their zeal to settle the Unassigned Lands, known popularly as the Oklahoma Lands. Tradesmen, professional men, common laborers, capitalists, and politicians alike looked to the cornucopia of opportunity offered by settlement of the long-withheld lands of Indian Territory. Across the nation, prospective settlers began hitching their teams to wagons and loading aboard their families and scant worldly goods. Others saddled their fastest horses or caught trains for what they considered to be the most advantageous point of entry. "It is an astonishing thing," the New York Herald observed on the eve of the opening, "that men will fight harder for $500 worth of land than they will for $10,000 in money." The Unassigned Lands, left vacant in the post–Civil War effort to create reservations for Plains Indians and other tribes, were considered some of the best unoccupied public land in the nation.

April 22, 1889, dawned bright and clear upon the estimated fifty thousand people who surrounded the Unassigned Lands. As noon approached, horsemen and wagons crowded forth to positions on the line, among them a few hardy women. Because of the social restraints of the day few Black Americans were at the front, though many came in immediately behind the initial rush and were rightfully "Eighty-niners." By setting the stage for settlement of Indian Territory, the Oklahoma Land Run of 1889 quickly led to the creation of Oklahoma Territory under the Organic Act of 1890 and ultimately to the formation of the forty-sixth state of the Union, Oklahoma, in 1907.
Why this mad determination to steal native land?
Because the Albinos were "Land-less" Serf's where they came from.
  
What did it mean to be a serf? Serfdom was a condition in Europe in which a tenant farmer was bound to a hereditary plot of land and to the will of his landlord. The vast majority of serfs in Europe obtained their subsistence by cultivating a plot of land that was owned by a lord.
c

Here at Realhistoryww we often talk about the difficulty Albinos have Farming because of their intolerance of the Sun. So how did they manage after Slavery was ended? Well for one thing they hired Blacks and migrant labor from Mexico and SOUTH. Next, they carefully chose the crops they were going to grow. In Oklahoma COTTON is the perfect example; Cotton is planted in May and harvested in October and November when the UV index is low. It is one of the more expensive crops to produce, in part because improved disease-resistant varieties and equipment needed to care for and harvest the crop can be costly. A new cotton harvester costs about $1 million, as an example.


UV index
 In Oklahoma City, the average daily maximum UV index in November is 3. A UV Index estimate of
3 to 5 represents a moderate threat to health from unprotected exposure to Sun's UV rays for average individuals.

Note: The daily maximum UV index of 3 in November interpret into the following advice: Take precautions. Light skin individuals may get burned in less than 30 minutes. The solar radiation is most powerful near the mid-day, so the exposure to the direct Sun should be reduced accordingly. On bright days sunglasses that block both UVA and UVB rays should be worn. A hat with a wide brim is extremely helpful, as it can prevent roughly 50% of UV radiation from reaching the eyes. Beware! The strength of the UV rays is increased nearly double-fold by the reflection of the snow.
c
     
c














Click to return to Realhistoryww home page