|
Not since Abraham Lincoln has there been a Black Suckerizer like Joe Biden.
And like Abraham Lincoln, there is a great effort by Blacks and Whites
to cover-up the fools dumb-ass thinking and outright failures.
We have a companion page on Abraham Lincoln;
|
or
Why Sensible Blacks
don't want Biden
| We
wondered why Biden had NOT solved any of our problems, or even seemed
to give them much concern. Now we know it's because his attention is on
his White/Albino base, not on us Black suckers whose votes elected him.
AXIOS - Behind the Curtain: Biden's race problem. Nov 6, 2023.
It emerged quietly in the 2020 election, when Biden won — but lost ground among Hispanics and Black voters. It's clear from consistent trends across multiple polls that Biden is bleeding support among Hispanic voters and Black voters — especially younger ones, and especially in swing states. In one fascinating way, Biden is morphing into Trump when it comes to his base: It's old and white voters who seem most solid in their support. Biden's support among nonwhite voters dropped 33 points The more diverse a state, the worse Biden does, The Times found. Trump's support among Black voters popped up to 22 points, which The Times called "unseen in presidential politics for a Republican in modern times." Biden's lead among Hispanics is in single digits in the six swing states polled (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin). Democrats typically win among Hispanics by 30+ points. A CBS News/YouGov poll out Sunday had a similarly worrisome finding for Democrats: "Hispanic voters are much likelier to say their finances would improve under Trump than Mr. Biden. And most Black voters do not expect their finances to change if Mr. Biden wins again." Then there's the war. As we wrote Sunday, liberal Jews and many minority Democratic leaders are locked in a bitter fight over Israel's response to the Hamas terrorist attack. Biden officials know that rift could deepen if the war escalates. |
First - lets Check out this ingrate, ignorant-ass Cracker;
(explained later) with a unwarranted high opinion of himself.
After twice running for the Presidency as Senator, and failing each time:
he finally reached VICE President as Barak Obama's Veep Choice.
In 2019 he was again failing miserably as a candidate for President, until the House "WHIP"
and South Carolina Congressman Jim Clyburn, gave his famous "We know Joe" speech.
Remembering - It took Biden three tries to get to the White House,
the first two—1988 and 2008—flaming out early and embarrassingly,
and even his final winning campaign in 2020, he struggled to gain traction and
seemed headed for another humiliating defeat until he got a last-minute rescue
from the Black and powerful South Carolina Congressman Jim Clyburn.
Newspaper Headline: Former VP Joe Biden secures endorsement from influential South Carolina
Rep. Jim Clyburn. The boost comes just three days before the Palmetto state's pivotal primary.
 |
"I know Joe. We know Joe. But most importantly, Joe knows us," Clyburn said while
announcing his endorsement of Biden and his campaign; which had been dogged by
disappointing results in the first two nominating contests in Iowa and New Hampshire
rebounding only slightly with a second place finish in last week’s Nevada caucuses.
 |
When accepting Clyburn's endorsement, Biden got emotional. "It’s hard to know what to say, for real," he said. The former vice president also had kind words for the South Carolina lawmaker. During a National Action Network breakfast just before the press conference announcing the endorsement, Biden praised Clyburn’s character. "A lot of folks talk the talk. Very few people walk the walk. And Jim Clyburn is a man of enormous integrity," Biden said. "Jim, you’re one of the finest men I’ve ever met. Not just in public life, but period." He was almost crying because he understood that Clyburn had just saved his political life.
Negroes - before you go off mumbling "There goes Realhistoryww.com again, always criticizing White People."
Please take a look at this chart from "Statista" and let it "BURN" into your mind.
| Statista
is a global data and business intelligence platform with an extensive
collection of statistics, reports, and insights on over 80,000 topics
from 22,500 sources in 170 industries. Established in Germany in 2007, Statista operates in 13 locations worldwide and employs around 1,100 professionals. |
 |
For those of you who have listened to Albinos being interviewed about WHY they
support Donald Trump; and their answers make no sense at all, or are obvious lies.
Just check out the numbers for who are the "Big Guns" in
the American Electorate, and you have your answer.
Of course the answer is that they fear losing control - after all, they own 80% of the country's wealth.
As it turns out, Biden is a bigger threat to Black people than Trump is. At least Trump tells us the truth,
he's going to look out for Albinos like himself; Not be a snake in-the-grass like Biden.
Even now he can't help but show his true colors;
the Democratic party is in disarray, but all he and
his family can think of is how to hold onto power.
Good of the Country be Damned!
 |
|
More questions about President Biden’s cognitive state are emerging as a new poll showed a jaw-dropping 72% of registered voters do not believe he is mentally fit for the job. While many Democrats were left flabbergasted and sent into a tailspin by Biden’s debate debacle last week, the 81-year-old president’s cognitive slips have been nothing new to his inner circle. White House aides have been meticulously working behind the scenes throughout his presidency to minimize his exposure to situations where his cognitive slip-ups could flare up in public and to adapt the day-to-day of the presidency to the needs of an octogenarian. The commander-in-chief is seen as prone to absent-minded gaffes and fatigue outside of six hours a day — between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. — and while traveling abroad, Axios said in a new report.
Top aides and allies have helped President Biden try to cope with his age-related struggles out of the public eye. From shorter stairs when boarding Air Force One to guiding him on jaunts over concerns about his gait and proclivity for appearing lost, his team has reportedly been forced to step up its efforts over time to shield him more and more. “I know many of these people and how the White House operates,” said Chandler West, the White House’s former deputy director of photography under Biden, in an Instagram story after the debate, Axios reported. “They will say he has a ‘cold’ or just experienced a ‘bad night,’ but for weeks and months, in private, they have all said what we saw last night — Joe is not as strong as he was just a couple of years ago,” West said. “The debate was not the first bad day, and it’s not gonna be the last,” said the ex-administration staffer, who had a first-hand seat to the president’s behavior. “It’s time for Joe to go.” |
 |
Even now, the Biden campaign touts how much its done for the "Middle Class" Which is TRUE!
The problem for us Blacks is that the Middle Class is overwhelmingly populated by ALBINOS!
NOT US!
One of Bidens "Sneakiest" Suckerizations of Blacks is his "Student Load Forgiveness" plan.
And when it comes to sticking it to Blacks - ALL of the Albino power structure takes part.
They all claim that the plan is Sooo good for Blacks
 |
^^ ^^ ^^
THIS IS A FINE EXAMPLE OF SUCKERIZATION!
 |
 |
Note: When all they want to show you is 8 year-old Statistics,
you know you're going to get it with "NO" Grease!
 |
167 Billion in total money, divided into 16.3 million total Students
9.1 White = 55.8% = White Students got 93.18 Billion Dollars.
3.2 Spanish = 19.6% = Spanish Students got 32.73 Billion Dollars.
2.2 Black = 13.5% = Black Students got 22.54 Billion Dollars.
1.1 Asian = 6.75% = Asian Students got 18.37 Dollars.
 |
PS - don't worry about absolute numbers, the United States Census Bureau
has been lying to non-Albinos about their numbers since the beginning.
How better to protect Albino power than to make all others feel impotent.
The answer is in percentages.
In 2008 Barack Obama got 69,499,000 votes;
the overwhelming percentage of them were Black Votes.
Obama got 95% of the Black vote.
As seen in the column chart above
Biden got 87% of the Black Vote.
Both Obama and Biden moped the floor with them.
So what do you think the "Real" population numbers are?
This an excerpt from "Lucky: How Joe Biden Barely Won the Presidency,"
a forthcoming book by Jonathan Allen, senior political analyst for NBC News Digital, and Amie Parnes, senior correspondent for
The Hill. The book, which will be published March 2 2024, by Crown, tells the inside story of the 2020 presidential election and in
particular of the many lucky breaks Biden got on his way to the Democratic nomination and eventually the presidency.
a forthcoming book by Jonathan Allen, senior political analyst for NBC News Digital, and Amie Parnes, senior correspondent for
The Hill. The book, which will be published March 2 2024, by Crown, tells the inside story of the 2020 presidential election and in
particular of the many lucky breaks Biden got on his way to the Democratic nomination and eventually the presidency.
This excerpt describes what led to the pivotal moment in the primary season, when Biden got a key endorsement from Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-S.C. The endorsement helped pave the way for his victory in South Carolina, in the Super Tuesday states a few days later, and eventually in the race for the nomination. It was Feb. 25, four days before the South Carolina primary, and Biden was blowing it again. Almost an hour and 45 minutes had passed already, and Biden hadn't mentioned the one promise Clyburn had said would nail down Black votes in South Carolina and throughout the rest of the primary in the general election.
By the time they gathered on the Yorktown the night before the debate, Biden was still waiting for the final word from Clyburn. "I'm going to endorse you the morning after" the debate, Clyburn said. "But my endorsement ain't going to mean much, just to be frank, if you flame out in the debate." Clyburn still wasn't sure that his endorsement would be enough of a lift for Biden. There were two questions hanging over Biden's head at that point: whether he would win the state and whether he would win by a margin large enough to signal to the rest of the country — and specifically to Black voters in the states voting three days later on Super Tuesday — that he was alive and kicking.
"We were in jeopardy of it being too close," said one top Biden aide. On the Yorktown that night, Clyburn and a few of his CBC House colleagues offered Biden counsel and made what amounted to a political "ask" — the favor a politician requests in return when he is granting one. "Find a way to say that you were a part of picking the first Latina woman member of the United States Supreme Court and you're looking forward to making the first African American woman a member of the United States Supreme Court," Clyburn instructed. Clyburn believed, and there was good evidence to support his view, that a Supreme Court justice was worth a lot more to the Black community than a vice president. VPs come and go, Clyburn thought. Al Gore was vice president. Where is he now? But a Supreme Court seat: That's for life!
'A chain reaction': that's how one endorsement set Joe Biden's surge in motion: Biden won South Carolina – and days later, Super Tuesday – after Jim Clyburn, the highest-ranking African American Democrat in Congress, backed him. When the House majority whip, Jim Clyburn, endorsed Joe Biden ahead of the South Carolina primary it effectively set off a series of events that resulted in the former vice-president trouncing his rivals in the Super Tuesday primary contests on Tuesday night.
Before Clyburn’s endorsement, Biden’s lead in South Carolina had shrunk to single digits. It was an ominous sign for a candidate who underperformed in the first three Democratic primary contests and whose campaign stressed that South Carolina would serve as a firewall. Biden’s ties to the African American community there, who make up the majority of Democratic voters, go back decades and the idea was that those relationships would carry him to victory in the state. “You cannot overstate the impact of Clyburn on South Carolina Democratic politics,” said Isaac Wright, a Democratic strategist and partner at the Forward Solution Strategy Group.
Following Biden’s decisive victory in South Carolina on Saturday, his main moderate rivals within the primary, the former South Bend mayor Pete Buttigieg and the Minnesota senator Amy Klobuchar, quickly dropped out of the race and endorsed him. Other endorsements, including the coveted backing of former Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid, Barack Obama’s US ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice and former candidate Beto O’Rourke, flooded in for Biden.
“Black voters turned out and they had their voices heard and they are on the trajectory of propelling Joe Biden to be the Democratic nominee. Clyburn’s endorsement was part of a flood of good fortune for Biden,” said Eric Goldman, a Democratic consultant. Biden’s turnaround, from a campaign on life support with no victories and dwindling cash to frontrunner, had happened in an eight-day period, with Clyburn’s endorsement marking the beginning of the dramatic change. A day after Super Tuesday Clyburn, again speaking on CNN, admitted he was surprised with the extent of Biden’s victories the night before.
Both Clyburn AND Biden got lucky: Black America didn't know Jim Clyburn or what a "Whip" did. People of sound Minds were so afraid of Donald Trump and his "Crazies" that they would follow just about anybody. And as to Jim Clyburn preferring a Supreme Court Justice: well Clarence Thomas has been on the high Court for 33 years, and that worthless, crooked Nigger hasn't done one single thing for Black people in all that time, so no Jim, take the Veep.
Today, more and more Blacks see Biden for
what he really is: a Benign Neglect artist.
Definition: an attitude or policy of ignoring an often delicate or
undesirable situation that one is held to be responsible for dealing with.
Reportedly coined in 1969 by Daniel Patrick Moynihan, adviser to U.S. President
Richard Nixon, who recommended this policy with respect to the issue of U.S. racial strife.
Btw: Nixon was no friend of Blacks, but going against them,
what with all the other things on his plate, just didn't make sense.
Our disdain for Biden is nothing new,
we first noticed him in the run-up to the Iraqi war. Bush jr, Donald
Rumsfeld, and Dick Cheney needed an excuse to invade Iraq because
Democrats did not believe Saddam Hussein had "weapons of mass destruction" (WMDs). So just as
Putin sought out the weakest mind (Donald Trump) to carry his message,
the Republicans also sought out the weakest mind to carry their message
(Joe Biden). The technique was the same; make him feel smart and intelligent,
flatter him. Next thing you know, Biden goes running back to Democrats
telling them that the Republicans are indeed right "SADDAM DOES HAVE WMDs". Soon the
War starts; of course Iraq had no WMDs.
CNN
Joe Biden says he opposed the Iraq War soon after it started.
A check of his record shows otherwise
By Nathan McDermott and Andrew Kaczynski, September 4, 2019
In recent speeches and
interviews defending his past foreign policy decisions, former Vice
President Joe Biden has misrepresented his past position on the Iraq
War. The Democratic presidential frontrunner, in explaining his 2002
vote to authorize military force in Iraq, told NPR in an interview that
aired on Tuesday that, “Immediately, that moment it started, I came out
against the war at that moment.”
Biden gave a similar explanation at CNN’s presidential debate in July, saying he made a “bad judgment” for trusting President George W. Bush “saying he was only doing this to get inspectors in and get the UN to agree to put inspectors in.” “From the moment ‘shock and awe’ started, from that moment I was opposed to the effort, and I was outspoken as much as anyone at all in the Congress and the administration,” Biden said. But a review of Biden’s public statements about Iraq in the lead up to the invasion shows he was never entirely opposed to military action against Saddam Hussein, and Biden continued to defend his vote to authorize the war in the months after the US military campaign began - hundreds of thousands die.
Then along comes the Obama presidential campaign, Obama needs help with the White Union workers in the Northern Midwest - which is Bidens strength. But unions have never been welcoming to Blacks - will it work? In 2008 Obama carries the ENTIRE Northern Midwest! Obama served two full terms, and many good things were done, but his presence as president brought to a simmer all Cracker resentments and hatreds always just below the surface in the U.S. Though the name (Tea Party), and how they rationalized their hatreds and resentments was silly, their hatreds and resentments were VERY real! The Obama years caused a dearth of new political talent coming up. But Obama's shadow was such that it stifled those coming up, so that by the 2020 campaign season none of the Democratic candidates could get any traction. A little pause for Hillary Clinton:
1) The Gore/Clinton ticket gave Al Gore his greatest successes, yet when he decided to run for President, he decided to run as his "OWN MAN" instead of running on his accomplishments with Bill Clinton. Result - he lost to a Putz - Bush Jr.
2) How can you sleep with one of the smartest politicians ever created, one who called himself the "FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT": yet loose because of a retreating Black Vote? Same way Biden probably will. These two idiots (Clinton and Biden) seem to have a problem being beholden to Blacks for electing them. As a result after election, they immediately start courting the Albino voters who originally spurned them, at the expense of the Blacks who supported them.
As Hillary found out, and Biden soon will, once you are identified with Black Voters it's best to continue in that direction as Cracker Voters will never trust you. As Biden himself has said recently: Remarks by President Biden at the Wisconsin Black Chamber of Commerce.
"And I want to thank everyone here at Milwaukee’s Black Chamber of Commerce for your partnership across the board on everything we’ve been working on. I come from a state that has the eighth-largest Black population in the country, and as they say — the saying goes where I come — “You brung me to the dance” early on." Actually the saying goes "You go home with the one who brung you to the dance." Too bad Biden is too stupid to take his own advice.
How did Hillary Clinton do in 2016? CNN, November 9, 2016: Hillary Clinton just couldn’t hold onto the Obama coalition. And that proved to be a large part of her undoing. African-American, Latino and younger voters failed to show up at the polls in sufficient numbers Tuesday to propel Clinton into the White House. Clinton conceded the race after 2 a.m. ET. Before polls closed her campaign had been confident of victory. In the end, however, she lost even some states thought to be safely in her column, like Wisconsin. She trailed in others, like Pennsylvania and Michigan. While she won the key demographic groups her campaign targeted, she underperformed President Obama across the board, even among women, according to exit poll data. Dumb Bitch!
Back to Biden: In the past several Albino politicians have sought help from prominent Black leaders in turning out the Black vote for their candidacy. These Black leaders have usually been worldly, urbane men with deep roots in Black communities.
When Jimmy Carter needed help, he called on Andrew Jackson Young Jr. (born March 12, 1932) an American politician, diplomat, and activist. Beginning his career as a pastor, Young was an early leader in the civil rights movement, serving as executive director of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) and a close confidant to Martin Luther King Jr. Young later became active in politics, serving as a U.S. Congressman from Georgia, United States Ambassador to the United Nations in the Carter Administration, and 55th Mayor of Atlanta. He was the first African American elected to Congress from Georgia since Reconstruction, as well as one of the first two African Americans elected to Congress from the former Confederacy since Reconstruction, alongside Barbara Jordan of Texas.
His downfall:
The Jews of Israel had extracted an agreement from the U.S. that the U.S. would not speak with the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization). On July 20, 1979 Young met with Zuhdi Labib Terzi, the UN representative of the PLO, at the apartment of the UN Ambassador from Kuwait. On August 10, news of the meeting became public when the Mossad (Israeli CIA) leaked its illegally-acquired transcript of the meeting first to Prime Minister Menachem Begin, and then through his office to Newsweek magazine. By August 14 the Israeli had succeeded in forcing Carter to fire Andrew Young. Interestingly today, Jews are still trying to get Black officials fired or not re-elected because they criticized the War in Gaza.
American Israel Public Affairs Committee
A Long-anticipated AIPAC (American Israel Public
Affairs Committee) blitz against Black New York Congressman Jamaal
Bowman begins with $2 million buy. The Pro-Israel group pours millions
into unseating New York progressive congressman Jamaal Bowman. The
Super Pac has run ads opposing the congressman and supporting his
opponent as he criticizes Israel’s military campaign in Gaza.
Quote: “Bowman is an anti-Israel extremist who traffics in conspiracy theories,” UDP spokesperson Patrick Dorton told Jewish Insider. “He vehemently disagrees with President Biden on the U.S.-Israel relationship and refused to condemn Hamas on the House floor. It’s clear that Bowman doesn’t represent the views of his district.”
Campaign finance disclosures released this weekend showed the Super Pac, called United Democracy Project (UDP), made up of billionaire Jews, is spending about $1m in support of Bowman’s opponent, the moderate Democrat George Latimer and $1m in negative advertisements opposing Bowman. If the group succeeds in defeating Bowman, it will deliver a significant blow to the progressive wing of the House.
“They don’t want Israel to be criticized, they don’t want Israel to be held accountable – they don’t want anyone to mention Palestine or speak up for Palestinian rights and lives,” said Bowman during an interview with MSNBC on Saturday.
Before his defeat in 2022 (redistricting), Jones was described as a rising star on the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. He was an advocate for "Medicare for All" and the Green New Deal. In June 2020, he supported calls to defund the police, and said that his goal in running for Congress was to "fight systemic racism". Jones was born in Nyack, New York, and grew up in Spring Valley, New York, where he was raised by a single mother, who worked multiple jobs to support him, and his grandparents.
He graduated from public schools in the East Ramapo Central School District. He earned his bachelor's degree from Stanford University in 2009. After graduating from Stanford, Jones worked in the U.S. Department of Justice during the presidency of Barack Obama. He then earned his Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School in 2013. This year Jones is running to take back his old 17th. seat in 2024. But now along comes the Jewish PAC of billionaires (AIPAC); As you will recall, they are trying to bring-down Jamaal Bowman and other Blacks because they criticized Israel for the Palestinian Slaughter.
Poor Mondaire Jones, we can well image the Jews coming to him with a offer he couldn't refuse: "Betray Jamaal Bowman" or they would "Come after Him". On June 5, 2024: Jones, a former Bowman ally, endorsed his opponent George Latimer citing (“Jewish residents in my district who feel anxiety, fear, and anger due to Representative Bowman's words and actions in particular and an overall climate in this country” (New Republic). The problem with Cowards is that they instinctively act out of fear, not waiting to reason things out. As Mondaire will find out, the rest of us don't like cowards or Traitors.
We understand that a "Rich Jew" can only vote once, just like a Black person. In order for Rich Jews to extend their power, they have to pay others to tell lies for them - then they have to hope for enough fools to believe their lies. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Too bad for Mondaire Jones, too many people know what's going on, and as I said, we don't like cowards or Traitors.
The move has unleashed fury from within progressive ranks. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) lambasted Jones, and the Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC has rescinded its endorsement of him. Progressives in and out of Capitol Hill have soured on Jones. Progressive leaders who considered Jones one of their own were quick to condemn his boosting of Latimer, especially as Democrats have only a slim chance of regaining control of the House and see every seat as critical to their calculus.
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the chair of the CPC, told NBC News she was “disgusted” by Jones’s actions. “I’m not surprised that Congressman Mondaire Jones did what he did because he is bought and paid for like all the other grifters who take money from AIPAC,” said Nina Turner, who served as Sen. Bernie Sanders’s (I-Vt.) campaign co-chair. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who like Bowman is a former educator, endorsed him this week, while the United Auto Workers (UAW) and Working Families Party also backed his reelection bid. “We can’t keep electing people who are too scared to stand up to the billionaires,” UAW President Shawn Fain wrote on the social platform X in favor of Bowman.
When Bill Clinton needed help he called on Vernon Eulion Jordan Jr. (1935 – 2021) he was an American business executive and civil rights attorney who worked for various civil rights movement organizations before becoming a close adviser to President Bill Clinton. Jordan grew up in Atlanta, Georgia, and graduated in 1957 from DePauw University. In the early 1960s, he started his civil rights career, most notably being a part of a team of lawyers that desegregated the University of Georgia. He then continued to work for multiple civil rights organizations until the late 1980s. In the early 1990s, he became a close ally and friend of Bill Clinton and he served as part of Clinton's transition team.
When Joe Biden needed help he called on James Enos Clyburn (born 1940 - South Carolina) he is an American politician and retired educator serving as a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from South Carolina. He previously served as House Majority Whip between 2007 and 2011 and between 2019 and 2023. Currently in his 16th term, Clyburn has served as the U.S. representative for South Carolina's 6th congressional district since 1993. His congressional district includes most of the majority-black precincts in and around Columbia and Charleston, as well as most of the majority-black areas outside Beaufort and nearly all of South Carolina's share of the Black Belt. Clyburn is the dean of South Carolina's congressional delegation, aside from the single term served by Joe Cunningham, Clyburn has been the only Democrat in South Carolina’s congressional delegation.
The problem is that Clyburn, though accomplished, is not worldly or urbane. He was born and raised in South Carolina, one of the poorest and most rural states in the union. His thinking reflects that lack of sophistication. Blacks like Clyburn are used to having Albinos lead, even when the issues intimately effect Blacks. Point being; it is felt that if Clyburn had been a more sophisticated politician he would have been able to explain to even an idiot like Biden that his thinking was wrong.
Biden gave a similar explanation at CNN’s presidential debate in July, saying he made a “bad judgment” for trusting President George W. Bush “saying he was only doing this to get inspectors in and get the UN to agree to put inspectors in.” “From the moment ‘shock and awe’ started, from that moment I was opposed to the effort, and I was outspoken as much as anyone at all in the Congress and the administration,” Biden said. But a review of Biden’s public statements about Iraq in the lead up to the invasion shows he was never entirely opposed to military action against Saddam Hussein, and Biden continued to defend his vote to authorize the war in the months after the US military campaign began - hundreds of thousands die.
Then along comes the Obama presidential campaign, Obama needs help with the White Union workers in the Northern Midwest - which is Bidens strength. But unions have never been welcoming to Blacks - will it work? In 2008 Obama carries the ENTIRE Northern Midwest! Obama served two full terms, and many good things were done, but his presence as president brought to a simmer all Cracker resentments and hatreds always just below the surface in the U.S. Though the name (Tea Party), and how they rationalized their hatreds and resentments was silly, their hatreds and resentments were VERY real! The Obama years caused a dearth of new political talent coming up. But Obama's shadow was such that it stifled those coming up, so that by the 2020 campaign season none of the Democratic candidates could get any traction. A little pause for Hillary Clinton:
We will NOT go deeply into the Hillary Clinton campaign of 2016 except
to ask:
WHY DO THOSE CLOSEST TO HIM (BILL CLINTON) HATE HIM?
Is it jealousy or hatred over the "Blowjobs?"
WHY DO THOSE CLOSEST TO HIM (BILL CLINTON) HATE HIM?
Is it jealousy or hatred over the "Blowjobs?"
1) The Gore/Clinton ticket gave Al Gore his greatest successes, yet when he decided to run for President, he decided to run as his "OWN MAN" instead of running on his accomplishments with Bill Clinton. Result - he lost to a Putz - Bush Jr.
2) How can you sleep with one of the smartest politicians ever created, one who called himself the "FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT": yet loose because of a retreating Black Vote? Same way Biden probably will. These two idiots (Clinton and Biden) seem to have a problem being beholden to Blacks for electing them. As a result after election, they immediately start courting the Albino voters who originally spurned them, at the expense of the Blacks who supported them.
As Hillary found out, and Biden soon will, once you are identified with Black Voters it's best to continue in that direction as Cracker Voters will never trust you. As Biden himself has said recently: Remarks by President Biden at the Wisconsin Black Chamber of Commerce.
"And I want to thank everyone here at Milwaukee’s Black Chamber of Commerce for your partnership across the board on everything we’ve been working on. I come from a state that has the eighth-largest Black population in the country, and as they say — the saying goes where I come — “You brung me to the dance” early on." Actually the saying goes "You go home with the one who brung you to the dance." Too bad Biden is too stupid to take his own advice.
How did Hillary Clinton do in 2016? CNN, November 9, 2016: Hillary Clinton just couldn’t hold onto the Obama coalition. And that proved to be a large part of her undoing. African-American, Latino and younger voters failed to show up at the polls in sufficient numbers Tuesday to propel Clinton into the White House. Clinton conceded the race after 2 a.m. ET. Before polls closed her campaign had been confident of victory. In the end, however, she lost even some states thought to be safely in her column, like Wisconsin. She trailed in others, like Pennsylvania and Michigan. While she won the key demographic groups her campaign targeted, she underperformed President Obama across the board, even among women, according to exit poll data. Dumb Bitch!
Back to Biden: In the past several Albino politicians have sought help from prominent Black leaders in turning out the Black vote for their candidacy. These Black leaders have usually been worldly, urbane men with deep roots in Black communities.
When Jimmy Carter needed help, he called on Andrew Jackson Young Jr. (born March 12, 1932) an American politician, diplomat, and activist. Beginning his career as a pastor, Young was an early leader in the civil rights movement, serving as executive director of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) and a close confidant to Martin Luther King Jr. Young later became active in politics, serving as a U.S. Congressman from Georgia, United States Ambassador to the United Nations in the Carter Administration, and 55th Mayor of Atlanta. He was the first African American elected to Congress from Georgia since Reconstruction, as well as one of the first two African Americans elected to Congress from the former Confederacy since Reconstruction, alongside Barbara Jordan of Texas.
 |
| Andrew Jackson Young Jr. |
The Jews of Israel had extracted an agreement from the U.S. that the U.S. would not speak with the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization). On July 20, 1979 Young met with Zuhdi Labib Terzi, the UN representative of the PLO, at the apartment of the UN Ambassador from Kuwait. On August 10, news of the meeting became public when the Mossad (Israeli CIA) leaked its illegally-acquired transcript of the meeting first to Prime Minister Menachem Begin, and then through his office to Newsweek magazine. By August 14 the Israeli had succeeded in forcing Carter to fire Andrew Young. Interestingly today, Jews are still trying to get Black officials fired or not re-elected because they criticized the War in Gaza.
Jews coming after Blacks for not supporting Israel's slaughter of Palestinians.
American Israel Public Affairs Committee
 |
Quote: “Bowman is an anti-Israel extremist who traffics in conspiracy theories,” UDP spokesperson Patrick Dorton told Jewish Insider. “He vehemently disagrees with President Biden on the U.S.-Israel relationship and refused to condemn Hamas on the House floor. It’s clear that Bowman doesn’t represent the views of his district.”
Campaign finance disclosures released this weekend showed the Super Pac, called United Democracy Project (UDP), made up of billionaire Jews, is spending about $1m in support of Bowman’s opponent, the moderate Democrat George Latimer and $1m in negative advertisements opposing Bowman. If the group succeeds in defeating Bowman, it will deliver a significant blow to the progressive wing of the House.
“They don’t want Israel to be criticized, they don’t want Israel to be held accountable – they don’t want anyone to mention Palestine or speak up for Palestinian rights and lives,” said Bowman during an interview with MSNBC on Saturday.
Jewish AIPAC Corrupts Young Black Gay Congressman.
If you doubt the power of Jewish Billionaires; note this saga of a
formerly upright (though Homosexual) young Black man of humble beginnings.
formerly upright (though Homosexual) young Black man of humble beginnings.
 |
Before his defeat in 2022 (redistricting), Jones was described as a rising star on the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. He was an advocate for "Medicare for All" and the Green New Deal. In June 2020, he supported calls to defund the police, and said that his goal in running for Congress was to "fight systemic racism". Jones was born in Nyack, New York, and grew up in Spring Valley, New York, where he was raised by a single mother, who worked multiple jobs to support him, and his grandparents.
He graduated from public schools in the East Ramapo Central School District. He earned his bachelor's degree from Stanford University in 2009. After graduating from Stanford, Jones worked in the U.S. Department of Justice during the presidency of Barack Obama. He then earned his Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School in 2013. This year Jones is running to take back his old 17th. seat in 2024. But now along comes the Jewish PAC of billionaires (AIPAC); As you will recall, they are trying to bring-down Jamaal Bowman and other Blacks because they criticized Israel for the Palestinian Slaughter.
Poor Mondaire Jones, we can well image the Jews coming to him with a offer he couldn't refuse: "Betray Jamaal Bowman" or they would "Come after Him". On June 5, 2024: Jones, a former Bowman ally, endorsed his opponent George Latimer citing (“Jewish residents in my district who feel anxiety, fear, and anger due to Representative Bowman's words and actions in particular and an overall climate in this country” (New Republic). The problem with Cowards is that they instinctively act out of fear, not waiting to reason things out. As Mondaire will find out, the rest of us don't like cowards or Traitors.
We understand that a "Rich Jew" can only vote once, just like a Black person. In order for Rich Jews to extend their power, they have to pay others to tell lies for them - then they have to hope for enough fools to believe their lies. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Too bad for Mondaire Jones, too many people know what's going on, and as I said, we don't like cowards or Traitors.
The move has unleashed fury from within progressive ranks. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) lambasted Jones, and the Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC has rescinded its endorsement of him. Progressives in and out of Capitol Hill have soured on Jones. Progressive leaders who considered Jones one of their own were quick to condemn his boosting of Latimer, especially as Democrats have only a slim chance of regaining control of the House and see every seat as critical to their calculus.
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the chair of the CPC, told NBC News she was “disgusted” by Jones’s actions. “I’m not surprised that Congressman Mondaire Jones did what he did because he is bought and paid for like all the other grifters who take money from AIPAC,” said Nina Turner, who served as Sen. Bernie Sanders’s (I-Vt.) campaign co-chair. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who like Bowman is a former educator, endorsed him this week, while the United Auto Workers (UAW) and Working Families Party also backed his reelection bid. “We can’t keep electing people who are too scared to stand up to the billionaires,” UAW President Shawn Fain wrote on the social platform X in favor of Bowman.
When Bill Clinton needed help he called on Vernon Eulion Jordan Jr. (1935 – 2021) he was an American business executive and civil rights attorney who worked for various civil rights movement organizations before becoming a close adviser to President Bill Clinton. Jordan grew up in Atlanta, Georgia, and graduated in 1957 from DePauw University. In the early 1960s, he started his civil rights career, most notably being a part of a team of lawyers that desegregated the University of Georgia. He then continued to work for multiple civil rights organizations until the late 1980s. In the early 1990s, he became a close ally and friend of Bill Clinton and he served as part of Clinton's transition team.
 |
When Joe Biden needed help he called on James Enos Clyburn (born 1940 - South Carolina) he is an American politician and retired educator serving as a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from South Carolina. He previously served as House Majority Whip between 2007 and 2011 and between 2019 and 2023. Currently in his 16th term, Clyburn has served as the U.S. representative for South Carolina's 6th congressional district since 1993. His congressional district includes most of the majority-black precincts in and around Columbia and Charleston, as well as most of the majority-black areas outside Beaufort and nearly all of South Carolina's share of the Black Belt. Clyburn is the dean of South Carolina's congressional delegation, aside from the single term served by Joe Cunningham, Clyburn has been the only Democrat in South Carolina’s congressional delegation.
 |
The problem is that Clyburn, though accomplished, is not worldly or urbane. He was born and raised in South Carolina, one of the poorest and most rural states in the union. His thinking reflects that lack of sophistication. Blacks like Clyburn are used to having Albinos lead, even when the issues intimately effect Blacks. Point being; it is felt that if Clyburn had been a more sophisticated politician he would have been able to explain to even an idiot like Biden that his thinking was wrong.
ON THE MATTER OF DEFINITIONS: "ALBINO" IS "NOT"
A RACIAL EPITHET, IT IS A "MEDICAL" DESCRIPTION!
Racial epithets are derogatory expressions, understood
to convey contempt and hatred toward their targets.
 |
 |
 |
Merriam-Webster Inc.
Albino: an organism deficient in coloring matter.
Especially: a human being or animal that is born with a lack of pigment
and usually a milky skin, white or colorless hair, and eyes with BLUE iris.
Harvard Medical School.
Albinism: A group of inherited conditions that typically appear as a
reduction or absence of MELANIN pigments in the skin, hair, and eyes.
WHAT COLOR ARE "NORMAL" HUMANS?
American Association for the Advancement of Science.
How Europeans
evolved white skin - from Ancient DNA of skeletons. By Ann Gibbons (Ann
Gibbons is an author and a Science Magazine contributing correspondent.
She has served as a science writing instructor at Carnegie Mellon
University).
ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI—Most of us think of Europe as the ancestral home of white people. But a new study shows that pale skin, as well as other traits such as tallness and the ability to digest milk as adults, arrived in most of the continent relatively recently. The work, presented here last week at the 84th annual meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, offers dramatic evidence of recent evolution in Europe and shows that most modern Europeans don't look much like those of 8000 years ago.
The origins of Europeans have come into sharp focus in the past year as researchers have sequenced the genomes of ancient populations, rather than only a few individuals. By comparing key parts of the DNA across the genomes of 83 ancient individuals from archaeological sites throughout Europe, the international team of researchers reported earlier this year that Europeans today are a mix of the blending of at least three ancient populations of hunter-gatherers and farmers who moved into Europe in separate migrations over the past 8000 years. The study revealed that a massive migration of Yamnaya herders from the steppes north of the Black Sea (Central Asia) may have brought Indo-European languages to Europe about 4500 years ago.
When it comes to skin color, the team found a patchwork of evolution in different places, and three separate genes that produce light skin, telling a complex story for how European's skin evolved to be much lighter during the past 8000 years. The modern humans who came out of Africa to originally settle Europe about 40,000 years are presumed to have had dark skin, which is advantageous in sunny latitudes. And the new data confirm that about 8500 years ago, early hunter-gatherers in Spain, Luxembourg, and Hungary also had darker skin: They lacked versions of two genes—SLC24A5 and SLC45A2—that lead to depigmentation and, therefore, pale skin in Europeans today.
Ann - like most Albinos can't help lying about RACE, it's as if they are a race of Donald Trumps. Actually SLC24A5 and SLC45A2 are ALBINISM Genes, they "CAUSE" Albinism!
ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI—Most of us think of Europe as the ancestral home of white people. But a new study shows that pale skin, as well as other traits such as tallness and the ability to digest milk as adults, arrived in most of the continent relatively recently. The work, presented here last week at the 84th annual meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, offers dramatic evidence of recent evolution in Europe and shows that most modern Europeans don't look much like those of 8000 years ago.
The origins of Europeans have come into sharp focus in the past year as researchers have sequenced the genomes of ancient populations, rather than only a few individuals. By comparing key parts of the DNA across the genomes of 83 ancient individuals from archaeological sites throughout Europe, the international team of researchers reported earlier this year that Europeans today are a mix of the blending of at least three ancient populations of hunter-gatherers and farmers who moved into Europe in separate migrations over the past 8000 years. The study revealed that a massive migration of Yamnaya herders from the steppes north of the Black Sea (Central Asia) may have brought Indo-European languages to Europe about 4500 years ago.
When it comes to skin color, the team found a patchwork of evolution in different places, and three separate genes that produce light skin, telling a complex story for how European's skin evolved to be much lighter during the past 8000 years. The modern humans who came out of Africa to originally settle Europe about 40,000 years are presumed to have had dark skin, which is advantageous in sunny latitudes. And the new data confirm that about 8500 years ago, early hunter-gatherers in Spain, Luxembourg, and Hungary also had darker skin: They lacked versions of two genes—SLC24A5 and SLC45A2—that lead to depigmentation and, therefore, pale skin in Europeans today.
Ann - like most Albinos can't help lying about RACE, it's as if they are a race of Donald Trumps. Actually SLC24A5 and SLC45A2 are ALBINISM Genes, they "CAUSE" Albinism!
 |
 |
OUR RESEARCH SUGGESTS THAT "ORIGINAL" HOMO-SAPIENS AROUND THE WORLD,
Especially in the Americas 150,000 years ago, MAY HAVE LOOKED LIKE THESE PEOPLE.
(We know this from their Tomb Art; Mayans, Inca, and Aztec were all very Black people).
 |
|
 |
Mayan Tomb Mural
 |
American Mulattoes in Spanish Speaking areas.
 |
|
 |
|
 |
THE CASE AGAINST BIDEN
The following are the issues whose handling by President Joe Biden so angers us.
As we find it hard to believe that anyone can be this stupid and worthless.
Who else would even think to stick it to the people who put him in power.
Then again, what to say about the Negroes who still back him wholeheartedly?
 |
| President Joe Biden |
1) The Supreme Court
 |
| Conservatives like former Senate
Majority leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. Great friend of Biden - (Albino
Supremest all) Have Been Packing the Courts for Years. |
Please note: In general usage Albino Media prefers to use the WORD
"CONSERVATIVES" in place of Albino Supremacists and Racists. Its easier, so we will follow suit.
Public support for the U.S. Supreme
Court is at an all-time low. This dismal polling follows a Court term
that started with allowing Texas’ Senate Bill 8 to remain law so that
public citizens could police each other’s abortions and ended with
completely overturning Roe v. Wade, among other radical conservative
decisions. In so many areas of law, the Court is headed in a direction
completely out of step with the vast majority of Americans. The question for the moment is: How did we get here?
Many are noticing for the first time just how politicized our courts are, but the reality is that conservatives have been laying this groundwork for over half a century. In 1971, Justice Lewis Powell authored the now legendary Powell Memo. The memo, which is really more of a treatise for conservative takeover, reads like it could have been written yesterday. It is complete with invocations against liberal “Marxists” and “Communists,” a defense of “western society” and a threat that the media, universities and racial minorities are teaming up to defeat big business - read "White Power Structure". Calling for the kind of corporate influence over government that the Koch brothers would later perfect, the memo spoke of the need to better infiltrate aspects of society and secure power to protect the wealthy and powerful. It specifically highlighted a “neglected opportunity in the courts” and addressed the need for conservatives to do better in exploiting judicial action.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The court held 5–4 that the freedom of speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political campaigns by corporations, nonprofit organizations, labor unions, and other associations.
The majority held that the prohibition of all independent expenditures by corporations and unions in the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act violated the First Amendment. The ruling barred restrictions on corporations, unions, and nonprofit organizations from independent expenditures, allowing groups to independently support political candidates with financial resources. In a dissenting opinion, Justice John Paul Stevens argued that the court's ruling represented "a rejection of the common sense of the American people, who have recognized a need to prevent corporations from undermining self government".
A decade later, in 1982, youthful Reagan enthusiasts took up that opportunity and led the charge to found the (The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is an American conservative and libertarian legal organization (FedSoc). From the start, despite its academic pretensions, FedSoc had an insurgent mission (Albino supremest mission): to turn back the perceived excesses of Chief Justice Earl Warren’s Court on issues of race, religion and criminal procedure. These young lawyers wanted to be to the courts and justice system what President Ronald Reagan had been to the New Deal and Great Society — a sledgehammer.
Their movement began with fits and starts. While Reagan and his chief counselor Edwin Meese were successful in stacking the federal courts with judges like Alex Kozinski and justices like Antonin Scalia, there had been significant failures. Most significantly, in 1987, Democrats had blocked the Supreme Court nomination of Reagan nominee Robert Bork. Bork was a fierce opponent of civil rights — and a founding advisor of one of the first FedSoc chapters.
Then in 1990, conservatives made their greatest faux pas. President George H.W. Bush nominated David Souter to the Supreme Court, expecting him to be a conservative justice. But just two years later, he sided with Reagan appointees Sandra Day O’Conner and Anthony Kennedy in Planned Parenthood v. Casey to uphold Roe.
Conservatives were so incensed by Souter’s alleged betrayal that the next time a Republican president had a Supreme Court vacancy, “No More Souters!” became the conservative rallying cry. A 2005 Wall Street Journal editorial simply titled “No More Souters” urged President George W. Bush not to make the same mistake by nominating then-U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales because he similarly had a short paper trail. Instead, Bush nominated now-Chief Justice John Roberts.
Despite Roberts’ conservative record, particularly on voting rights, he was conspicuously not a FedSoc member, prompting FedSoc to play a more strident role in ensuring conservative nominees pledged allegiance to its legal orthodoxies. Today, those orthodoxies are commonly referred to as “originalism” and “textualism,” and FedSoc requires absolute adherence among its membership — or at least among those who seek power as federal judges.
Indeed, without fail, during each and every confirmation hearing for the federal judiciary, you will hear conservative U.S. senators like Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Mike Lee (R-Utah) or Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) (all FedSoc members themselves) ask nominees, under oath, whether they are originalists and textualists, as if it were the equivalent of asking the nominee whether they believe in gravity. If the nominee refuses to acquiesce, conservatives will claim they lack a “judicial philosophy” at all and insist on opposing their confirmation, possibly endangering their nomination — especially if they were dependent on conservative support.
FedSoc first demonstrated the strength of this orthodoxy — and its own political power — by dooming the 2005 nomination of White House Counsel Harriet Miers. Despite her connection to Bush and extensive legal experience, Miers was not a FedSoc member and had once even disavowed joining the organization. Knowing this nominee would be filling the seat of O’Connor, who ruled in favor of abortion, FedSoc wanted to leave absolutely nothing to chance. Bork himself took to the Wall Street Journal to excoriate Miers’ record, warning that her evangelical Christianity was no guarantee she’d overturn the “constitutional travesty” of Roe v. Wade.
Just 24 days after announcing Miers’ nomination, Bush withdrew it. Four days later, he instead announced the nomination of Justice Samuel Alito. Alito had come up through the FedSoc pipeline and, before becoming a justice, was the one judge in the federal appellate court that heard the Planned Parenthood v. Casey litigation who would have ruled that it was constitutional to force a woman to notify her husband if she intended to end her pregnancy. Alito’s vote against Roe was a lock, as would be proven 17 years after his nomination.
Since Alito’s confirmation, FedSoc has been on a relentless path to consolidate its power. It was therefore unsurprising that the next Republican president, Donald Trump, literally deferred to FedSoc to pick his judges. That included the three Supreme Court justices — Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — who helped overturn Roe. Trump also allowed FedSoc to direct a much more wide-ranging transformation of the judiciary, appointing more than a quarter of the current federal judges. FedSoc has sought to make the federal courts “unrecognizable” and, in just one Supreme Court term, seemed to have accomplished that feat.
Fighting back now means recognizing that conservatives have been playing a two-faced game for decades. They claimed to believe in an objective, neutral judiciary, but they were working very hard to radicalize the courts at the same time. In his concurring opinion in Dobbs, when Justice Clarence Thomas called for a review of all substantive due process cases, including marriage for same-sex couples and the right to contraceptives, this was not mere rhetoric. It was a rallying cry to a movement built over decades to transform America through the least democratic process possible in our constitutional system.
It’s time the progressive movement takes the steps necessary to win back our courts. We deserve a forward-thinking judiciary filled with movement lawyers who want to see progress for our nation. We shouldn’t pretend otherwise, as conservatives have for years. They accuse liberals of wanting to “pack” the court, but they were the ones who invented rules out of thin air to justify blocking now-U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland’s Supreme Court nomination during an election year and then rushed Barrett’s confirmation weeks before an election. We can’t undo the politicization of our courts, but we can work to counterbalance them — and by doing so, we can make them more representative of — and responsive to — the people they serve. Rakim Brooks is the president of Alliance for Justice and a public interest appellate lawyer.
Many are noticing for the first time just how politicized our courts are, but the reality is that conservatives have been laying this groundwork for over half a century. In 1971, Justice Lewis Powell authored the now legendary Powell Memo. The memo, which is really more of a treatise for conservative takeover, reads like it could have been written yesterday. It is complete with invocations against liberal “Marxists” and “Communists,” a defense of “western society” and a threat that the media, universities and racial minorities are teaming up to defeat big business - read "White Power Structure". Calling for the kind of corporate influence over government that the Koch brothers would later perfect, the memo spoke of the need to better infiltrate aspects of society and secure power to protect the wealthy and powerful. It specifically highlighted a “neglected opportunity in the courts” and addressed the need for conservatives to do better in exploiting judicial action.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The court held 5–4 that the freedom of speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political campaigns by corporations, nonprofit organizations, labor unions, and other associations.
The majority held that the prohibition of all independent expenditures by corporations and unions in the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act violated the First Amendment. The ruling barred restrictions on corporations, unions, and nonprofit organizations from independent expenditures, allowing groups to independently support political candidates with financial resources. In a dissenting opinion, Justice John Paul Stevens argued that the court's ruling represented "a rejection of the common sense of the American people, who have recognized a need to prevent corporations from undermining self government".
A decade later, in 1982, youthful Reagan enthusiasts took up that opportunity and led the charge to found the (The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is an American conservative and libertarian legal organization (FedSoc). From the start, despite its academic pretensions, FedSoc had an insurgent mission (Albino supremest mission): to turn back the perceived excesses of Chief Justice Earl Warren’s Court on issues of race, religion and criminal procedure. These young lawyers wanted to be to the courts and justice system what President Ronald Reagan had been to the New Deal and Great Society — a sledgehammer.
Their movement began with fits and starts. While Reagan and his chief counselor Edwin Meese were successful in stacking the federal courts with judges like Alex Kozinski and justices like Antonin Scalia, there had been significant failures. Most significantly, in 1987, Democrats had blocked the Supreme Court nomination of Reagan nominee Robert Bork. Bork was a fierce opponent of civil rights — and a founding advisor of one of the first FedSoc chapters.
Then in 1990, conservatives made their greatest faux pas. President George H.W. Bush nominated David Souter to the Supreme Court, expecting him to be a conservative justice. But just two years later, he sided with Reagan appointees Sandra Day O’Conner and Anthony Kennedy in Planned Parenthood v. Casey to uphold Roe.
Conservatives were so incensed by Souter’s alleged betrayal that the next time a Republican president had a Supreme Court vacancy, “No More Souters!” became the conservative rallying cry. A 2005 Wall Street Journal editorial simply titled “No More Souters” urged President George W. Bush not to make the same mistake by nominating then-U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales because he similarly had a short paper trail. Instead, Bush nominated now-Chief Justice John Roberts.
Despite Roberts’ conservative record, particularly on voting rights, he was conspicuously not a FedSoc member, prompting FedSoc to play a more strident role in ensuring conservative nominees pledged allegiance to its legal orthodoxies. Today, those orthodoxies are commonly referred to as “originalism” and “textualism,” and FedSoc requires absolute adherence among its membership — or at least among those who seek power as federal judges.
Indeed, without fail, during each and every confirmation hearing for the federal judiciary, you will hear conservative U.S. senators like Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Mike Lee (R-Utah) or Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) (all FedSoc members themselves) ask nominees, under oath, whether they are originalists and textualists, as if it were the equivalent of asking the nominee whether they believe in gravity. If the nominee refuses to acquiesce, conservatives will claim they lack a “judicial philosophy” at all and insist on opposing their confirmation, possibly endangering their nomination — especially if they were dependent on conservative support.
FedSoc first demonstrated the strength of this orthodoxy — and its own political power — by dooming the 2005 nomination of White House Counsel Harriet Miers. Despite her connection to Bush and extensive legal experience, Miers was not a FedSoc member and had once even disavowed joining the organization. Knowing this nominee would be filling the seat of O’Connor, who ruled in favor of abortion, FedSoc wanted to leave absolutely nothing to chance. Bork himself took to the Wall Street Journal to excoriate Miers’ record, warning that her evangelical Christianity was no guarantee she’d overturn the “constitutional travesty” of Roe v. Wade.
Just 24 days after announcing Miers’ nomination, Bush withdrew it. Four days later, he instead announced the nomination of Justice Samuel Alito. Alito had come up through the FedSoc pipeline and, before becoming a justice, was the one judge in the federal appellate court that heard the Planned Parenthood v. Casey litigation who would have ruled that it was constitutional to force a woman to notify her husband if she intended to end her pregnancy. Alito’s vote against Roe was a lock, as would be proven 17 years after his nomination.
Since Alito’s confirmation, FedSoc has been on a relentless path to consolidate its power. It was therefore unsurprising that the next Republican president, Donald Trump, literally deferred to FedSoc to pick his judges. That included the three Supreme Court justices — Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — who helped overturn Roe. Trump also allowed FedSoc to direct a much more wide-ranging transformation of the judiciary, appointing more than a quarter of the current federal judges. FedSoc has sought to make the federal courts “unrecognizable” and, in just one Supreme Court term, seemed to have accomplished that feat.
Fighting back now means recognizing that conservatives have been playing a two-faced game for decades. They claimed to believe in an objective, neutral judiciary, but they were working very hard to radicalize the courts at the same time. In his concurring opinion in Dobbs, when Justice Clarence Thomas called for a review of all substantive due process cases, including marriage for same-sex couples and the right to contraceptives, this was not mere rhetoric. It was a rallying cry to a movement built over decades to transform America through the least democratic process possible in our constitutional system.
It’s time the progressive movement takes the steps necessary to win back our courts. We deserve a forward-thinking judiciary filled with movement lawyers who want to see progress for our nation. We shouldn’t pretend otherwise, as conservatives have for years. They accuse liberals of wanting to “pack” the court, but they were the ones who invented rules out of thin air to justify blocking now-U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland’s Supreme Court nomination during an election year and then rushed Barrett’s confirmation weeks before an election. We can’t undo the politicization of our courts, but we can work to counterbalance them — and by doing so, we can make them more representative of — and responsive to — the people they serve. Rakim Brooks is the president of Alliance for Justice and a public interest appellate lawyer.
