This is a specific subject page, dealing exclusively with, or primarily with, the subject in the title. Because of need, there are many such pages at RHWW: usually, but not always, linked to primary pages. For those in a hurry, they enable a quick summary of many important subjects. The menu for these pages is here: Click>>>

 

 

Anthropology for Black Christians:

Tracing Jesus's people

The Black Hebrews

 

 


Why Papers like this are very important.


About two years ago, this writer happened across a sports show, and the question was asked by one Albino man to another: Why aren’t there more Black Swimmers? The other Albino answered; Blacks don’t like “Water”.


I smirked and thought, what a stupid ignorant Albino! Less than a year later, I saw a young Negro man asked if he could swim, he answered NO, Black people don’t like water. And just like that, the ignorant utterances of an Albino, had been taken up as gospel by some American Negroes.


Of course the aware Black American would simply remember that at least 90% of the Earths Beach Land is inhabited by Black and Brown people. And they aren’t there for fun; they are there to secure their daily food. Just the other day, the series Blue Planet II (Pacific) featured a Solomon Islander Father and Son who had to sometimes “Free-Dive” over 100 ft. to find Lobsters for their dinner – some Pacific people dive over twice that depth.


Then there is “Surfing” if you listen to Albinos, they invented it. But even the Albino boys at Wiki have to admit that’s a lie, just like the lie of those Mongol Mulattoes being Polynesians: Polynesians are Black People. The Mongol Mulattoes all over the Pacific (as in Hawaii) is the result of Chinese expansion over the last few hundred years – combined with the eradication of the Native Black people.


History of surfing – wiki:
In Tahiti and Samoa surfing was a popular past time that was often used as part of warriors training. Warriors often paddled to surf breaks and were recorded by early European historians in print as spending many hours bravely paddling head on into large surf and riding waves. Canoes often accompanied surfing parties and the men would often swap between canoeing, paddling boards and catch fish after their recreational activities. In Hawaii Surfing became more of a spiritual pastime and became ingrained into the very fabric of Hawaiian religion and culture.

 

 

Warning! Some religious people have found the following material to be Offensive and Unsettling because of logical deductions and conclusions drawn from analysis. Realizing and respecting that Religion is not about logic or science, but rather, it is about "Belief". We consequently provide these same facts "Without" the drawn conclusions in other parts of Realhistoryww. Thereby making it unnecessary to continue reading this page if logical/secular treatment of religion related material, with analysis and comment, might be upsetting to you.

 

 

Note: all of this material is already in Realhistoryww.com. Here we simply present the material in an orderly way that is hopefully helpful and meaningful to religious people who have asked for information on the origins of the Hebrews. HOWEVER: we neither encourage nor discourage the practice of religions. As a consequence, we present ALL material in a manner consistent with the "scientific method". Therefore some material may be at odds with religious dogma. In such cases, please be assured that we mean no offense or disrespect, we are simply relating the facts as they present themselves.

A note on the "Direction and Tone" of this presentation: Because our Albinos have so obfuscated "Real" history, and replaced it with their "Fantasy’s and Hatreds" so that today whether in school or in church, they bombard us with their nonsense that all ancient people were "White", and Blacks were found only in Africa. So of course Hebrews, Egyptians, Romans, Greeks, Mesopotamian's, Persians, etc. were all White.

For this bit of Albino "Fantasy" we have a very simple "Reality Test":
First find an Albino: or White man if you're unconvinced - not a mulatto. Then take off his hat and shirt, leaving him wearing only a Kilt (like the ancient Egyptians). Then send him out to work the fields anywhere in the world south of Monaco France: which is at about 40 degrees North latitude. (The area between 40 degrees North and 40 degrees South is the Earths unsafe zone for White people/Albinos: it stretches from Monaco south to the South coast of Australia - in the U.S. it corresponds to the Mason-Dixon Line {that is why Slaves were only needed below this line} southward to about Bahia Blanca Argentina). The exposure of bare White Skin to the Sun in this "unsafe zone" means outright death, or skin Cancer. As to the test: Now wait to see how long he lasts before the Sun kills him.

 

 

 

 

And it is the reality of this "Handicap" which is responsible for the racial hatreds we find in the World today and yesterday. No one likes to know that they can't do what everybody else can do, especially when it comes to something so "Basic" as being able to feed yourself, as normal people do by Farming. But in the "Unsafe Zone" that is exactly the case for our Albinos, the Sun would kill them, and piling on the clothing, like the Turks did, is fine for just walking around, but is a non-starter for spending the day in the Hot Sun doing hard work. Therefore they have had to Enslave "Pigmented" people, or in modern times, hire migrant workers, to do the Farming work for them. Clarification - Blacks are the parents of all Whites/Albinos, however European Albinos are mainly the Albinos of India's Black Dravidians who have what is commonly called "Caucasian" features.

On the clothing: For hundreds of years, Arabs and Berbers followed their masters (Turks) in clothing convention, though they didn't need it. But with the break-up of the Ottoman Empire, they are beginning to go back to "Normal" dress. And it's a good thing too, because there is something "unsettling" about seeing a "Jet-Black" Berber or Arab, wearing a "Thawb".

 

 

 

 

 

 

Of course, for the Albinos, the ignominy of looking out at people whom you have enslaved or hired,

and knowing that these poor wretched people, are in fact in some ways "Superior" to you,

must account for some of the Albinos mental instability.

 

 

 

 

Then there are their feelings of being further betrayed by the forces of "Nature": They think, how cruel that our beautiful Milky White skin, our beautiful Blonde or Red Hair, our beautiful Blue or Green Eyes: are not signs of our "Superiority" but rather, they are signs of our Albinism; our inferiority. Is it any wonder then why Albinos in the "unsafe zone" (Like the U.S. South) tend to be Resentful, Hateful, Murderous people?

 

______________________________________________________

 

 

There are five places in the world where the Albinos refuse to accept the fact that they have physical disadvantages as regards the Sun - Israel, Australia, New Zealand, California, and Argentina is coming on. In these places they inhabit beaches as if they were Black or Brown people. The results are often disastrous.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Of course these are all places where Albinos have no "Natural" reason nor right to be:

 

 

 

 

in all of these places they just Murdered the Black inhabitants and moved in.

 

 


The thing that makes Black people Black is called Melanin. It has many functions, and is essential for the full function of Homo Sapien-Sapien (Modern Man). But it's most important function is to protect Humans from the killer effects of the Suns UV rays. Albinism is the human body’s inability to make the substance Melanin due to disease. Some Albinos try to ignore this truth, and their skin Cancer numbers is the result.


Which brings us to the "Tone" of this entire site: the act of intentionally killing unknown hundreds of millions of fellow human beings (Blacks - their creators). And then trying to write their creators - we original Humans - out of history so that they (Albinos) can create a fantasy history so that they can feel good about themselves: is such a monstrous undertaking that most people really can't fully comprehend it - it's too big. Therefore some express a desire for a more conciliatory tone, because they can't fully understand what the Albinos have really done.


Likewise: many Albinos have complained that because we correctly identify them as Albinos, and succinctly and accurately expose their falsifications and "Crimes against Humanity" that means that we "Hate" them. Now isn't that an interesting assertion, telling the truth equals Hatred! Well I suppose if not for the Melanin in our bodies, we might very well be like them and hate. But the fact is, contrary to the warped beliefs of Americas Albino Rabble, and others around the world, Blacks don't spend their time hating on Albinos and plotting revenge. They would prefer that Albinos simply try to rise above the dictates of their disease, and try to act like "Normal" humans.

Because of hundreds of years of Albino falsifications - because they are the ones who have controlled media during that time - and still do to a scary extent: any Black presentation of history must first establish with scientific certainty that the involved people were Black people, NOT our Albinos. For that purpose, here we use the scientific Study "Cranial Discrete Traits in a Byzantine Population and Eastern Mediterranean Population Movements" (2008): which traces the first Africans entering and passing through the Middle East, then moving onward to Anatolia and then into Europe.

For Anatolia (now called Turkey) we begin with establishing the race of the original people there: Africans - original man. And the race of the LAST real civilization of the area - the Black Byzantine (also called the Eastern Roman Empire). As a corollary, this study also proves that the "Western Roman Empire" was Black also. Not to mention the Ancient Egyptians and "Middle Easterners". Which is probably the most absurd and delusional Albino claims of all: (That Egyptians and Levantine's were White).

 

 

 

 

 

Anatolia

(modern Turkey)

 

Background: The term Byzantine refers to Byzantium, which was an ancient Greek colony established in Anatolia aka Asia Minor circa 650 B.C. However the term has come to mean the entire Eastern Roman Empire. The city later became "Constantinople" capital city of the Eastern Roman Empire when the Romans conquered (330–1453). After the invading Turks conquered the city in 1453, it's name was changed to Istanbul. Istanbul is a transcontinental city in Turkey, straddling the Bosphorus strait (which separates Europe and Asia) between the Sea of Marmara and the Black Sea. Its commercial and historical center lies on the European side and about a third of its population lives on the Asian side.

 

 

 

Anatolia was home to many important Peoples and Cultures,

including the Hebrews in southern Anatolia:

the Bible tells us that Harran was the home of Abraham.

 

 

 

Harran


Also spelled Haran, Roman Carrhae, was an ancient city of strategic importance, now a village, in southeastern Anatolia (modern Turkey). It lies along the Balikh River southeast of Urfa. The town was located on the road that ran from Nineveh to Carchemish and was regarded as of considerable importance by the Assyrian kings. Its chief cult in Assyrian times was that of the moon god. It is frequently mentioned in the Bible; Abraham's family settled there when they left Ur of the Chaldeans (Genesis 11:31–32).

 


Note above; the Stele says that Ba'al is the God of Harran. But when the Hebrews establish their own (new) religion in Israel, the Old Gods of El and Ba'al are left behind for (Jehovah or Yahweh): But are they really? ISRAEL translated means "God Contended" that God being "EL".

 

 

 

Bible Gateway

 

Those wishing to cross reference Biblical passages given here with the Protestant Bible, may do so by using this link to the "Bible Gateway" site. Bible Gateway offers fully searchable Protestant Bibles (including King James) in every major language of the world (Click anywhere on this line).

 

 

 

Lets begin with the Africans who headed North instead of East:

 

 

 

The full study may be accessed at these sites.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19341322

https://www.jstor.org/stable/41466564?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents


Sagalassos

{Sagalassos is an archaeological site in southwestern Turkey, about 100 km north of Antalya (ancient Attaleia). Large-scale excavations started in 1990 under the direction of Marc Waelkens of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. The Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenA (in English: Catholic University of LeuvenB), is a research university in the Dutch-speaking town of Leuven in Flanders, Belgium}.


Quote: indirect contacts through geographically intermediary populations carrying“sub-Saharan” biological features in the late Pleistocene–Holocene period are discussion points.

Paleolithic period - relating to or denoting the early phase of the Stone Age, lasting about 2.5 million years, when primitive stone implements were used.
Mesolithic period - relating to or denoting the middle part of the Stone Age, between the Paleolithic and Neolithic. Approximately 11,700 B.C, to 2,700 B.C. (Depending on location).
Neolithic period - also called New Stone Age, final stage of cultural evolution or technological development among prehistoric humans. It was characterized by stone tools shaped by polishing or grinding, dependence on domesticated plants or animals, settlement in permanent villages, and the appearance of such crafts as pottery and weaving. The Neolithic followed the Paleolithic Period, or age of chipped-stone tools, and preceded the Bronze Age, or early period of metal tools.

Aurignacian culture - of or relating to an Upper Paleolithic culture marked by finely made artifacts of stone and bone, paintings, and engravings. It first appeared in Eastern Europe around 43,000 BP, and in Western Europe between 40,000 and 36,000 years BP. It was replaced by the Gravettian culture around 28,000 to 26,000 years ago.

Quote: We know from archeological data that in the upper Paleolithic period Anatolia was settled by populations with Aurignacian culture (Kuhn 2002). Recent genetic studies (Cinnioglu et al. 2004; Olivieri et al. 2006) based on the analysis of mtDNA (haplogroup M1 and U6) and the Y chromosome (R1b3-M269 lineage) suggest, in agreement with paleoenvironmental evidence (van Andel and Tzedakis 1996), that around 40,000–45,000 years ago, populations with Aurignacian culture may have spread by migration from the Levant and southwest Asia to Anatolia and further into Europe (Bar-Yosef 2002). With the exception of these scarce molecular data, almost nothing is known about the biological features of these early Paleolithic Anatolian foragers. Nevertheless, considering the important demographic processes and biological changes undergone by human populations as a result of later and major events (e.g., the Neolithic transition), we believe that the causes of the observed affinity patterns have to be determined from these later periods.

From the Mesolithic to the early Neolithic period different lines of evidence support an out-of-Africa Mesolithic migration to the Levant by northeastern African groups that had biological affinities with sub-Saharan populations.

{The Levant = Cyprus, Israel, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine, Syria, southern Turkey}.

From a genetic point of view, several recent genetic studies have shown that sub Saharan genetic lineages (affiliated with the Y-chromosome PN2 clade; Underhill et al. 2001) have spread through Egypt into the Near East, the Mediterranean area, and, for some lineages, as far north as Turkey (E3b-M35 Y lineage; Cinnioglu et al. 2004; Luis et al. 2004), probably during several dispersal episodes since the Mesolithic (Cinnioglu et al. 2004; King et al. 2008; Lucotte and Mercier 2003; Luis et al. 2004; Quintana-Murci et al. 1999; Semino et al. 2004; Underhill et al. 2001).

This finding is in agreement with morphological data that suggest that populations with sub-Saharan morphological elements were present in northeastern Africa, from the Paleolithic to at least the early Holocene, and diffused northward to the Levant and Anatolia beginning in the Mesolithic.

Indeed, the rare and incomplete Paleolithic to early Neolithic skeletal specimens found in Egypt—such as the 33,000-year-old Nazlet Khater specimen (Pinhasi and Semal 2000), the Wadi Kubbaniya skeleton from the late Paleolithic site in the upper Nile valley (Wendorf et al. 1986), the Qarunian (Faiyum) early Neolithic crania (Henneberg et al. 1989; Midant-Reynes 2000), and the Nabta specimen from the Neolithic Nabta Playa site in the western desert of Egypt (Henneberg et al. 1980)—show, with regard to the great African biological diversity, similarities with some of the sub-Saharan middle Paleolithic and modern sub-Saharan specimens.

This affinity pattern between ancient Egyptians and sub-Saharans has also been noticed by several other investigators (Angel 1972; Berry and Berry 1967, 1972; Keita 1995) and has been recently reinforced by the study of Brace et al. (2005), which clearly shows that the cranial morphology of prehistoric and recent northeast African populations is linked to sub-Saharan populations (Niger-Congo populations). These results support the hypothesis that some of the Paleolithic–early Holocene populations from northeast Africa were probably descendents of sub-Saharan ancestral populations.

A late Pleistocene–early Holocene northward migration (from Africa to the Levant and to Anatolia) of these populations has been hypothesized from skeletal data (Angel 1972, 1973; Brace et al. 2005) and from archeological data, as indicated by the probable Nile valley origin of the “Mesolithic” (epi-Paleolithic) Mushabi culture found in the Levant (Bar Yosef 1987). This migration finds some support in the presence in Mediterranean populations (Sicily, Greece, southern Turkey, etc.; Patrinos et al. 2001; Schiliro et al. 1990) of the Benin sickle cell haplotype. This haplotype originated in West Africa and is probably associated with the spread of malaria to southern Europe through an eastern Mediterranean route (Salares et al. 2004) following the expansion of both human and mosquito populations brought about by the advent of the Neolithic transition (Hume et al. 2003; Joy et al. 2003; Rich et al. 1998).

This northward migration of northeastern African populations carrying sub-Saharan biological elements is concordant with the morphological homogeneity of the Natufian populations (Bocquentin 2003), which present morphological affinity with sub-Saharan populations (Angel 1972; Brace et al. 2005). In addition, the Neolithic revolution was assumed to arise in the late Pleistocene Natufians and subsequently spread into Anatolia and Europe (Bar-Yosef 2002), and the first Anatolian farmers, Neolithic to Bronze Age Mediterraneans and to some degree other Neolithic–Bronze Age Europeans, show morphological affinities with the Natufians (and indirectly with sub-Saharan populations; Angel 1972; Brace et al. 2005), in concordance with a process of demic diffusion accompanying the extension of the Neolithic revolution (Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1994).

Following the numerous interactions among eastern Mediterranean and Levantine populations and regions, caused by the introduction of agriculture from the Levant into Anatolia and southeastern Europe (Bar-Yosef 2002; Keita and Boyce 2005; King et al. 2008), there was, beginning in the Bronze Age, a period of increasing interactions in the eastern Mediterranean, mainly during the Greek, Roman, and Islamic periods. These interactions resulted in the development of trading networks, military campaigns, and settler colonization (Cruciani et al. 2007; Edwards et al. 2000; Keita and Boyce 2005; King et al. 2008; Lucotte and Mercier 2003; Sahoglu 2005; Waelkens et al. 2006).

Major changes took place during this period, which may have accentuated or diluted the sub-Saharan components of the earlier Anatolian populations. The second option seems more likely, because even though the population from the Sagalassos territorywas interacting with northeastern African and Levantine populations [trade relationships with Egypt (Arndt et al. 2003), involvement of thousands of mercenaries from Pisidia (Sagalassos region) in the war around 300 b.c. between the Ptolemaic kingdom (centered on Egypt) and the Seleucid kingdom (Syria/Mesopotamia/Anatolia), etc.], the major cultural and population interactions involving the Anatolian populations since the Bronze Age occurred with the Mediterranean populations from southeastern Europe, as suggested from historical (cf. historical context) and genetic data (Berkman et al. 2008; Cinnioglu et al. 2004; Di Benedetto et al. 2001; Tambets et al. 2000).

Consequently, one may hypothesize as the most parsimonious explanation that sub-Saharan biological elements were introduced into the Anatolian populations after the Neolithic spread and have been preserved since this time, at least until the 11th–13th century a.d, in the population living in the Sagalassos territory of southwestern Anatolia.

This scenario implies that the affinity between Sagalassos and the two sub-Saharan populations (Gabon and Somalia) is more likely due to the sharing of a common ancestor and that the major changes and increasing interactions in the eastern Mediterranean beginning in the Bronze Age did not erase some of the sub-Saharan elements carried by Anatolian populations, as shown by genetic data (e.g., Cinnioglu et al. 2004; Luis et al. 2004) and the morphological features of our southwestern Anatolian sample.

 

 

The Beginning

 

 


The Khoisan type Africans who entered Europe through Gibraltar were great Artists,

their magnificent Cave Paintings still amaze us because of their great artistic quality from so long ago.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


But they appear not to have been so good at building;

the only ancient structure appears to be Stonehenge,

a prehistoric monument in Wiltshire, England, from about 3,000 B.C.

 

 

 

 

On the other hand: the Africans, who entered Europe through Anatolia,

show themselves to be great builders, but relatively unsophisticated artists.

 

 

 

 

In Anatolia there are signs of human habitation in caves from at least the Stone Age.

there are also rock paintings and engravings of people and animals on the walls of these caves,

such as those near Antalya and elsewhere.


 

 

Gobekli Tepe

To date, the most astonishing find is at Göbekli Tepe (Turkish for "Hill with a Tummy"), which is a hilltop sanctuary built on the highest point of an elongated mountain ridge about 15km northeast of the town of Şanlıurfa (Urfa) in southeast Turkey. This site, currently undergoing excavation by German and Turkish archaeologists, is said to have been erected by hunter-gatherers at perhaps 11,500 B.C.

 

 

 

Catal Huyuk

At the site of Çatal hüyük, there is evidence of a town that was occupied from about 7,500 B.C. Here apart from extensive evidence of the obsidian tool industry, we also find an early form of metallurgy. Lead and copper were shaped into ornaments like pendants, beads, rings and small utilitarian tools. Like at Lake Burdur, we find houses with very elaborate architectural features in each space; like wall paintings, platforms, and cult spaces. The small family houses are knitted together with no streets, occasional open spaces between the buildings were used as garbage disposal areas. The houses had their entrances through a hole in the roof, which was accessed by a ladder. The hearth and the oven were placed directly below this hole in the roof, so that the hole in the roof also acted as the chimney for the house.

The housetops were mud-plastered terraces, which also acted as the communal outdoor space for the family. The houses were mostly of the same size and arrangement; each house had a rectangular room with a narrow storage space or a compartmentalized space along one side. The large rectangular living room would also have a built-in platform, used for a variety of activities in the house. The houses were built of a timber frame of posts and beams, which divided the walls into a series of horizontal and vertical panels, which were then filled with mudbrick and plastered over.

Though the houses are built one against each other, they almost never share walls; each room has its own walls independent of the adjoining structure. Some of the more elaborately decorated rooms were shrine rooms, which have plaster reliefs on the walls: these were made on a framework of reeds. A goddess figure giving birth is the most famous one; Rams and Stags were also common. There were also pillars with plaster bull’s heads and horns, as well as some paintings that depict the daily life and the religious beliefs of the Catal Huyuk inhabitants. The walls and platforms were plastered with fine white mud plaster over and over again, in some cases 120 layers of plaster were found on a single wall. So re-plastering the walls and floors annually or seasonally must have had some symbolic value for the society. Some of the walls were painted with hunting scenes, dominated by a huge red bull, and a series of small male figures.

 

 

 

 

One of the most significant aspects of Çatal Huyük houses is the practice of burial under the floor of living spaces, usually with elaborate grave goods and sometimes, organic materials. At times, the burials are so intense that in one building, a total of 67 individuals were buried under one room, in a space of less than 30 square meters. Many fertility goddess figurines were also found, made of clay, and very fragile, (fired at low temperature), representing an obese female with exaggerated sexual organs: some depicted in the state of giving birth and accompanied by lions.

 

 

Ancestral Relationship between the early Anatolians, the Hebrews, and the Persians.

 

The ancient Anatolian Burial Practice of de-fleshing the body, and then placing the bones in a container for burial is unique and practiced by only two later cultures. Principal among them are the Persians of the Zoroastrian religion. Their practice was to place the body where it's flesh would be eaten by scavenging birds and animals, or weathered, to its bare bones, and then placed in a container for burial.

In Bombay India, the Parsis (as the Indian descendants of the Persian refugees from the Arab/Turk invasion are called) maintain “towers of silence” which are high circular towers. The dead are carried to the top, and funeral servants place them on stone beds surrounding a central pit. After the hovering vultures have stripped the flesh from the bones, the bones are gathered and placed into the central pit.

 

The Hebrew way

 

The Hebrews - Around two thousand years ago, during the time that Jesus Christ lived, Hebrew burial tradition shifted to include a secondary burial in Ossuaries. This burial practice involved collecting the deceased’s bones after the flesh had been left to decompose and desiccate, and then placing them inside an Ossuary. The Ossuary was then placed into a loculus – a type of satchel.

Gospel of Mark

In the earliest of the gospels, the Gospel of Mark, written around 70 A.D, on the evening of the Crucifixion, Joseph of Arimathea asked Pilate for the body, and, after Pilate granted his request, he wrapped it in a linen cloth and laid it in a tomb. Arimathea was a member of the Jewish Council – the Sanhedrin which had condemned Jesus – who wishes to ensure that the corpse is buried in accordance with Jewish law, according to which dead bodies could not be left exposed overnight. He puts the body in a new shroud and lays it in a tomb carved into the rock. The Jewish historian Josephus, writing later in the century, described how the Jews regarded this law as so important that even the bodies of crucified criminals would be taken down and buried before sunset. In this account, Joseph does only the bare minimum needed for observance of the law, wrapping the body in a cloth, with no mention of washing or anointing it. This may explain why Mark has a story prior to the Crucifixion, in which a woman pours perfume over Jesus (Mark 14:3-9): Jesus is thereby prepared for burial even before his death.

 

 

 

 

These precise burial practices are unique to those mentioned people, and to no other people of the world. Logically then, the question must be asked: are they related? It is no stretch to connect the Hebrews with these ancient Anatolians: From the time of the ancient Sumerians, the Hebrews (formally called Amorites), were known to be a nomadic people inhabiting the area formed by the conjunction of the borders of modern day Turkey, Syria, and Iraq. The Bible suggests that the city of Harran (which is in the center of that area) is the homeland of the Hebrews, and referrers to it by name.


Less sure is the connection with the ancient Persians (Medes (Mada) and Persians (Parsua), who appeared in ancient Elam around 900 B.C. In favor of their connection: aside from their unique burial practice, is Persia’s close proximity to Anatolia; and the great Persian King Cyrus’s benevolent treatment of the Hebrew captives when he took power: (He freed them and instructed them to return to their homeland and rebuild their temple – and paid for their journey). These things, combined with the fact that the origin of the Persians has never been ascertained – they had to come from somewhere - suggest an ancestral connection.

 

 

Anatolian Relief's and Coin

 

 

 

 

 

Note: Canaan is the ancient name of the lands occupied by

the modern countries of Lebanon, The Syrian Coast, Israel, and Palestine.

 

Note: at different times in history the Hebrews (being a part of a larger group of Anatolians),

are known as Mar-tu, Amorites, Hyksos, Hapiru/Habiru, Hebrews, (Judeans/Israeli), Aramaeans.

 

 

Ancient Sumer

We first hear of the Hebrews in Sumer (Iraq): Sumerian and Akkadian inscriptions of the latter part of the 3rd millennium B.C, refer to a people called (MAR.TU-Sumerian) or (Amurru-Akkadian), later called Amorite. These seem to have been a nomadic desert people, who moved systematically in from the west. Their homeland was northwest of Sumer in the area stretching from the west bank of the Euphrates River on westward along the northern fringe of the Syrian Desert. The Sumerians called this land "Tidnum" (Southern Anatolia). From the early part of the second millennium B.C. onward, these people became more aggressive. These Amorites were already well known to the Sumerians. They described them as, "people who know not grain and do not live in houses". This should not be taken as an indication of Anatolian civilization, it is in Anatolia that we find the oldest large scale building technique.

 

 

Black Marble Sculpture
 
White Marble Sculpture
 

 

 

By the time of King Shulgi (c. 2094–2047 B.C.), the Amorites had become ever more aggressive until finally, there was open warfare and constant raids. This situation prompts Shulgi, to send his envoy Aradju, out into the country to visit his cities, and ensure their defenses and the loyalty of his governors.

However Aradju, and this particular High-Official "Apillaca", do not get along. In previous letters to Shulgi, Aradju has complained to Shulgi that Apillaca has not made him welcome, and has been disrespectful to him (Aradju). This is Shulgi's letter of reply.

Letter from Shulgi to Aradju about Apillaca
Say to Aradju: this is what Shulgi, your lord, says:

The man to whom I have sent you is not your subordinate -- he will not accept orders from your hand! How can you ignore what he himself has done too, and that it is indeed so?

As I myself ordered, you were to secure the provinces, and to correctly guide the people and secure the foundations of the provinces. When you approach the cities of the provinces, inform yourself precisely of their intentions, and inform yourself of the words of their dignitaries. Let my roar be emitted over all the lands. Let my powerful arm, my heroic arm, fall upon all the lands. Let my storm be released over the Land. Make the (Amorites?) disappear into the desert, and the robbers into the fields! Until you reach Apillaca, my 'Sage of the Assembly', (missing) Let (missing). That was how I had instructed you. Why have you not acted as I ordered you?

If I do not make my 'Sage of the Assembly' feel just as important as I am, if he does not sit on a throne on a dais, furnished with a high-quality cloth cover, if his feet do not rest on a golden footstool, if he is not allowed by his own highest authority both to appoint and then to remove a governor from his function as governor, an official from his charge, if he does not kill or blind anyone, if he does not elevate his favorite over others -- how else can he secure the provinces? If you truly love me, you will not bear him a grudge!

You are important, and you even know the soldiers that are at Apillaca's disposal. Your eyes have learnt something about Apillaca's men, and about Apillaca's heroism. If you, Aradju and Apillaca, are indeed my servants, you should both pay attention to my written communications. Come to an understanding, you two! Secure the foundations of the provinces! It is urgent

 

After Shulgi died, his son Shu-Sin (2038 B.C.), became king, he also had himself deified. More wars were fought with the Amorites. Shu-Sin lost Assyria and erected a huge wall between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, just north of Babilla (later Babylon), to help keep out the Amorites. The wall was 170 miles long, and breached the banks of both rivers. He also campaigned in the Zagros mountains and defeated a coalition of local tribes there. He had extensive trade relations with the Indus Valley and elsewhere. Later he had to build additional walls around the cities of Ur and Nippur, to protect against the Amorites.

 

 

 

It was later, during the reign of Ibbi-Sin, the fifth ruler of Ur III, that raiders from the Mardu tribe (Amorites), finally broke through the walls. This resulted in widespread panic, and a general breakdown in communications throughout the Empire. With this Amorite attack, the realm began to disintegrate almost immediately.

 

Hammurabi

 

As time goes on, ever more wars are fought. Then in the previously unimportant Amorite city of Babilla, (later called Babylon), in the northern part of Sumer, One "Hammurabi" became's king. When Hammurabi succeeded his father, "Sin-muballit" as king of Babylon in 1792 B.C, he was still young. But as was customary in Mesopotamian royal courts of the time, he probably already had been entrusted with some official duties in the administration of the city.

 

 

 

So when he became king, he was ready to hit the ground running. He spent the next 29 years building coalitions and conquering other cities and territories, thereby building Babylon into a powerful state. The next 20 years were a time of relative calm. But the last 14 years of his life were spent in almost constant warfare. It should be understood that Amorite rule in Sumer, was not the result of invasion and conquest, but rather, the result of coalition building and conquest, as attested to by this excerpt of a letter found in Mari.

“There is no king who is powerful for himself: with Hammurabi, ‘the man of Babylon,' go 10 or 15 kings, so with Rim-Sin, ‘the man of Larsa'; with Ibalpiel, ‘the man of Eshunna,' go 20 kings.”

Samsuiluna, the son of Hammurabi, took control even before the death of his father, who had a long illness. But an outburst of revolts followed the death of Hammurapi, and this led to the disintegration of the Amorite Empire. Although he fought vigorously, Samsuiluna lost all but Babylonia proper, but Babylon still had some power.

 

[A Biblical reference here]: It would be at about this time, after the fall of the Amorite dynasty of Hammurabi, that (Terah or Thare) - Abraham’s father - and his family, would leave {Ur of the Chaldees}, and journey to Harran in Aram. The Amorites who had settled in Sumer, may have now found themselves unwelcome after the fall of the Amorite kings. This sets in motion the reverse migration that will take them to Aram, Canaan, Egypt, and then back to Canaan, culminating in the creation of the Hebrew state.

Genesis 11:31

"And Terah took Abram his son, and Lot the son of Haran his son's son, and Sarai his daughter in law, his son Abram's wife; and they went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the land of Canaan; and they came unto Harran, and dwelt there".

 

 

________________________________________________________________________

 

 

The Chaldees or Chaldeans

 


Were Sumerians who broke away from Amorite rule and formed a dynasty in the marshlands of southern Sumer (Persian Gulf) called the “Sealand”. They were so called till the time of the Captivity (2 Kings 25) (Isaiah 13:19)( 23:13), when, particularly in the book of Daniel (5:30)( 9:1), the name began to be used with special reference to a class of learned men ranked with the magicians and astronomers.

Magi (a Mede priest) denotes followers of Zoroastrianism or Zoroaster. The earliest known use of the word Magi (Magian) is in the trilingual inscription written by Darius the Great, known as the Behistun Inscription. Zoroaster was perceived by the Greeks to be the Chaldean founder of the Magi and inventor of both astrology and magic, a meaning that still survives in the modern-day words "magic" and "magician".

History - the Sumerians {now called Chaldeans}, who inhabited the coastal area of Sumer near the Persian Gulf, had never been entirely pacified by the Assyrians. Marduk-apla-iddina II (the biblical Merodach-Baladan - "Marduk has given me an Heir") (reigned 722 B.C. – 710 B.C.)( 703 B.C. – 702 B.C.) was a Chaldean prince who usurped the Babylonian throne in 721 B.C. He maintained Babylonian independence in the face of Assyrian military supremacy for more than a decade. Sargon II suppressed the allies of Marduk-apla-iddina II in Aram and Israel, and eventually drove him from Babylon in 710 B.C. After the death of Sargon II, Marduk-apla-iddina II returned from Elam and ignited all the Arameans in Babylon into rebellion. He was able to enter Babylon and be declared king again. Nine months later he was defeated near Kish, but escaped to Elam. He died in exile a couple of years later.

Sennacherib - Son of Sargon II (704 – 681 B.C.)
During his reign Sennacherib encountered various problems with Babylonia. His first campaign took place in 703 BC against Marduk-apla-iddina II who had seized the throne of Babylon and gathered an alliance supported by Chaldeans, Aramaeans, and Elamites. We can date the visit of Babylonian ambassadors to Hezekiah of Judah in this period. The allies wanted to make use of the unrest that arose at the accession of Sennacherib. In his attack, Sennacherib split his army and had one part attack the enemy stationed at Kish, while he and the rest of the army proceeded to capture the city of Cutha. After that was done the king returned swiftly to aid the rest of his army. The rebellion was defeated and Marduk-apla-iddina II fled. Babylon was taken, and its palace plundered but its citizens were left unharmed.

The Assyrians searched for Marduk-apla-iddina II, especially in the southern marshes, but he was not found. The rebellious forces in the Babylonian cities were wiped out, and a Babylonian named Bel-ibni, who was raised at the Assyrian court was placed on the throne. When the Assyrians left, Marduk-apla-iddina II started to prepare another rebellion. In 700 B.C. the Assyrian army returned to fight the rebels in the marshes again. Not surprisingly, Marduk-apla-iddina II fled again to Elam and died there.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bel-Ibni proved to be disloyal to Assyria and was taken back a prisoner. Sennacherib tried to solve the problem of the Babylonian rebellion by placing someone loyal to him on the throne, namely his son Ashur-nadin-shumi. It didn’t help, another campaign was led six years later in 694 B.C, to destroy the Elamite base on the shore of the Persian Gulf. To accomplish this, Sennacherib had obtained Phoenician and Syrian boats which sailed with the rest of his army down the Tigris to the sea. The Phoenicians were not used to the tide of the Persian Gulf which caused a delay.

 

 

 

 

Ur

Ur was one of the great cities of the ancient world, according to the Sumerian "King list" Ur had three dynasties. And no: the chronology of the Chaldeans and the biblical story of Abram does not match up - comment on this irregularity is found in many sources including wiki.

 

 

________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

MEANWHILE IN CANAAN

 

The introduction of "bronze" in the Early Bronze Age (3000–2000 B.C.) brought about a cultural revolution marked by the development of metallurgy, and a decline in pottery. By the Middle Bronze Age (2000–1550 B.C.), Amorites who were originally nomads from the desert regions to the east, and southern Anatolia (modern Turkey), had penetrated Canaan and were inhabiting the hilly areas around the cities. From these hills, they launched raids and harassment attacks against the cities.

In addition to the Amorites, other invaders included the the Hurrians (the Horites of the Old Testament), also came to Canaan from the north. The Late Bronze Age (1550–1200 B.C.) was marked by incursions of new Amorite marauders, these were Amorites displaced by the fall of the Hammurabian dynasty in Babylon. As it were, over time, the nomadic Amorites were joined by Amorites who had previously been in Mesopotamia. So that by now, the total of these Amorites had became the dominant element of the population in canaan.

Many of these Amorites, such as the Biblical Abraham, continued on to Egypt.

Genesis 11:27-32

Now these are the generations of Terah: Terah begat Abram, Nahor, and Haran; and Haran begat Lot. And Haran died before his father Terah in the land of his nativity, in Ur of the Chaldees (Sumer). And Abram and Nahor took them wives: the name of Abram's wife was Sarai; and the name of Nahor's wife, Milcah, the daughter of Haran, the father of Milcah, and the father of Iscah. But Sarai was barren; she had no child. And Terah took Abram his son, and Lot the son of Haran his son's son, and Sarai his daughter in law, his son Abram's wife; and they went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the land of Canaan; and they came unto Harran (Anatolian city), and dwelt there. And the days of Terah were two hundred and five years: and Terah died in Harran. Genesis 12:9-10 And Abram journeyed, going on still toward the south. And there was a famine in the land: and Abram went down into Egypt to sojourn there; for the famine was grievous in the land.

 

 

MEANWHILE IN EGYPT


There had been a big building boom in Egypt during the 12th dynasty. Many temples were built and much other construction work was done. This created a need for more workers, and many of the workers who answered the call, were the highly skilled workers of Mesopotamia. Prominent among these, would be the Amorites, (who are now out of work) as they had to flee Sumer because of the change of ruler. They are known in Egypt as "Hapiru" (one who sells his services), this word Hapiru will later become "Hebrew". The large-scale immigration of these foreigners into the Nile Valley during the Middle Kingdom, eventually spelled the end of the Middle Kingdom in Egypt.

 

 

The Hyksos

Because these foreigners (The rulers would have been Mesopotamian's mostly) had maintained their identity as "Asiatic's" (Asia begins at the eastern end of the Sinai Peninsula) and had not become Egyptians, they felt empowered to establish their own communities and live by their own laws. Eventually, as their numbers increased, they challenged the power of the Egyptian monarchy itself, and Egypt fell into disarray. We do not known exactly how the "Hyksos" took northern Egypt, but took it they did. The middle and last part of the Second Intermediate Period (15th-17th dynasty's) saw northern Egypt ruled by these foreign kings for hundreds of years.

During this time, Egypt was never under the control of a single monarch, but consisted largely of independent states under a variety of kings. The Egyptians called the foreign kings of northern Egypt - Heka-Khaswt - there is argument as to whether this translates to "Shepherd Kings" or "Rulers of the Foreign Lands." The Greeks later perverted this word to Hyksos. It might be of interest to note that in Sumer, the king was known in their hymns and poems as "the good Shepherd".

This second intermediate period, lasted for hundreds of years, until king "Tao" of Thebes took to battle in order to re-unify Egypt. After he fell in battle, his son Kamose carried on. King Kamose's throne name, Wadj-kheper-re means: "Flourishing is the Manifestation of Re". As Kamose picked up the battle-axe from his father in the war against the Hyksos, he tried to motivate the Egyptian people to break the status quo, but it was a hard task, their fighting spirit wasn't high. The Hyksos had apparently been good neighbors, they had incorporated Egyptian gods into their religious pantheon, and had many commercial agreements with Egyptians in upper Egypt. They were people who had lived in Egypt for hundreds of years, and aside from their desire to build their nation with the Pharaohs land, were in all other ways tolerable.

In order to hold-off the oncoming Egyptian army, the old Hyksos king, "Apepi I" tried to make an alliance with the Nubians (people south of Egypt), and engage King Kamose in a two-front war, but it didn't work out as planned. Instead the Nubians joined forces with Kamose and headed north to expel the Hyksos. However, all Egyptians did not support expulsion of the Hyksos, and these people were treated as traitors.

 

The Nubians

Obviously - as modern man expanded northward, from wherever they originated in Africa. Those who settled in Egypt, had passed through and left some of their kin behind in Nubia/Cush/Meroe/Sudan. For nothing else can explain the Love/Hate relationship on the part of Nubians for Egyptians. Seemingly, at every opportunity, Egyptians killed and abused Nubians: But every time Egypt was in trouble and in need, Nubians came to the rescue. One thousand years later, while in the throes of "The Third Intermediate Period" Nubia in the person of King Piye, once again saves Egypt - for a while anyway.

 

 

Apepa probably had the longest reign of all Hyksos kings. His personal name Apepy (Greek: Apopis) was obviously taken from the Egyptian god Apep and his throne name means - "Great and Powerful Like Re". He's believed to have been a well educated ruler who got into a war he was strongly opposed to.

He probably triggered it himself by sending a provocative letter (now in British Museum) where he addresses the Egyptian king Tao II in Thebes with a complaint that was really odd.

He wrote that he couldn't sleep at night because he was disturbed by the snoring and roaring of king Tao's hippopotami in Thebes 800 km to the south!. Soon after this message, king Tao is believed to have taken up arms against him and thereby the war of liberation was started. It's quite possible that his power at this late state of his reign had been going over to others, and the letter was a product of their will, and not his own. Manetho (by Flavius) gives him a 36 yearlong reign and scholars of today up to 42 years to around 1600-1559 B.C.

 

 

The Hyksos Expulsion

As the battles raged, the Hyksos were eventually forced to barricade themselves in their city of Avaris. Here they were besieged, but managed to hold out. Kamose, not wishing to maintain a protracted siege, offered a compromise. Whereby if the Hyksos would leave peacefully, they could take all of their possessions and receive safe conduct out of Egypt. This the Hyksos accepted, and they gathered up all of their possessions, (and all of the Egyptians possessions that they could), and left Egypt.

Finally the Hyksos were expelled, (they went into Canaan - Biblical Exodus?).

Subsequently though, a rebellion by unhappy quarry workers, encouraged the Hyksos to return to Egypt.

Here we are quoting Josephus Flavius from his book, Against Apion, where he is quoting passages concerning the Hyksos from Manetho's Aegyptiaca (Manetho is believed to have been an Egyptian priest who lived in the early 3rd century B.C. and authored the Aegyptiaca (History of Egypt), a major chronological source for the reigns of the ancient pharaohs). Josephus is a Hebrew traitor named Joseph, who upon going over to the Romans, was made a General and given the title Josephus Flavius. He subsequently commanded Roman troops in putting down the Hebrew rebellion. {Not all Hebrews, especially the wealthy, objected to Roman rule}. Josephus's writing is generally considered to be "self-serving", but since he is quoting Manetho, we will use it.

 

 

Quote: "Those sent to work in the quarries lived miserably for a long while, and the king was asked to set apart the city Avaris, which the Hyksos had left, for their habitation and protection; and he granted them their wish.

But when these men had entered it, and found it suitable for a revolt, they chose a ruler from among the priests of Heliopolis, whose name was Osarsiph (Moses). They swore an oath that they would obey him in all things. The first laws he gave them were that they should not worship the Egyptian gods, nor should they abstain from any of the sacred animals that the Egyptians held in the highest esteem, but could kill them, and that they should not ally themselves to any but those that were of their conspiracy.

After making such laws as these, and others contrary to Egyptian customs, he ordered that the many hands at their service to be employed in building walls around the city and prepare for a war with king Ahmose. He colluded with the other priests, and those that were polluted as well, (apparently many of the quarry workers were Lepers), and sent ambassadors to those Hyksos expelled by Kamose to Jerusalem, informing them of his own affairs, and of the state of those others that had been treated so shamefully, and desired that they would come united to his assistance in this war against Egypt.

 

Statues of Shepherd Kings Found at Tanis. Date: ca. 1860-1890

 

 

 

 

 

The New Kingdom

 

He also promised their return to their ancient city and land of Avaris, and plentiful support for their people; that he would protect them and fight for them if need be, and that the land would easily be subdued. The Hyksos were delighted with his message, and assembled two hundred thousand men. Shortly they arrived at Avaris.

This account goes on to tell of the Pharaohs sojourn to Nubia and his return 13 years later.

In any event, by now it was the reign of Kamose's son "Ahmose I" - founder of the Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt - and he offered no compromise. On his stella, Ahmose I proclaims that he chased the Hyksos out of Egypt, and as far east as the Euphrates river.

 

 

 

 

 

 

MOSES

 

The Egyptian historian "Manetho" (305–282 B.C.), writes about this expulsion: "And it was also reported that the priest, who ordained their polity and their laws, was by birth of Heliopolis, and his name was Osarsiph from Osyris, who was the god of Heliopolis; but that when he was gone over to these people, his name was changed, and he was called Moses".

Kamose's son, "Ahmose I" probably became ruler of Egypt around 1550 B.C. He was about the age of 10 when he came to the throne, and he ruled for a period of about 25 years.

 

 

_________________________________________________________________

 

 

It was with pharaoh Amenhotep III (c.1391 - c.1354 B.C.), the ninth king of the 18th dynasty. Who ruled Egypt for almost 40 years, that Egypt had one of its most prosperous and stable periods. However, the groundwork for this period of prosperity had been earlier laid by Amenhotep III's grandfather Tuthmosis III, who had earlier conquered Egypt's Canaanite, Nubian and Libyan neighbors.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amenhotep III, as is the case with the leader of any Superpower, had many foreign policy responsibilities. Chief of which, was insuring Egypt's security and promoting trade. In the ancient world, the best way to assure good relations between nations was by dynastic marriage. The problem was, Egyptians only "accepted" foreign wives. They never reciprocated with Egyptian princesses. Which led to the following correspondence....


Letter from Kadashman Enlil I, king of Babylon, To Amenhotep III


Kadashman Enlil of Babylon to Amenhotep of Egypt [..missing..] How is it possible that, having written to you in order to ask for the hand of your daughter - oh my brother, you should have written me using such language, telling me that you will not give her to me as since earliest times no daughter of the king of Egypt has ever been given in marriage? Why are you telling me such things? You are the king. You may do as you wish. If you wanted to give me your daughter in marriage who could say you nay?


But you, keeping to your principle of not sending anybody, have not sent me a wife. Have you not been looking for a fraternal and amicable relationship, when you suggested to me - in writing - a marriage, in order to make us become closer? Why hasn't my brother sent me a wife? [...] It is possible for you not to send me a wife, but how could I refuse you a wife and not send her to you, as you did? I have daughters, I will not refuse you in any way concerning this....


As to the gold about which I wrote you, send me now quickly during this summer [.... ] before your messenger reach me, gold in abundance, as much as is available. I could thus achieve the task I have undertaken. If you send me this summer [...] the gold concerning which I've written to you, I shall give you my daughter in marriage. Therefore, send gold, willingly, as much as you please. But if you do not send me gold [...] so I can achieve the task I have undertaken , why haven't you sent me any earlier willingly? After I have finished the task I have undertaken , why would I wish for gold? Even if you sent me 3000 talents of gold I would not accept them. I would return them and would not give you my daughter in marriage.

 

As stated: Tuthmosis III had earlier conquered Egypt's Canaanite, Nubian and Libyan neighbors, thereby bring these nations under Egyptian Suzerainty. To oversee their interest in these Vassal Nations, the Egyptian Kings installed Governors and commissioners.

 

 

 

 

 

Thus when the Hapiru (Hebrews) attacked in Canaan, they were in fact attacking Egypt.

 

A Letter from Abdu-Heba of Jerusalem (Amarna Letter)


To the king, my Lord, thus speaks Abdu-Heba, your servant. At the feet of the king, my Lord, seven times and seven times I prostrate myself. What have I done to the king, my Lord? They blame me before the king, my Lord, saying: " Abdu-Heba has rebelled against the king, my Lord ". I am here, as far as I am concerned, it was not my father, nor my mother, who put to me in this position; the arm of the powerful king lead me to the house of my father! Why would I commit a transgression against the king, my Lord?


While the king, my Lord, lives, I will say to the commissioner of the king, my Lord: " Why do you favour the Hapiru and are opposed to the rulers? " And thus I am accused before the king, my Lord. Because it is said: " Lost are the territories of the king, my Lord ". Thus am I calumniated before the king, my Lord! But may the king, my Lord know, that, when the king sent a garrison, Yanhamu seized everything (the Egyptian commissioner in Canaan), and... the land of Egypt... Oh king, my Lord, there are no garrison troops here! (Therefore), the king takes care of his land! May the king take care of his land! ! All the territories of the king have rebelled; Ilimilku caused the loss of all the territories of the king. May the king take care of his land!


I repeat: Allow me to enter the presence of the king, my Lord, and let me look into both eyes of the king, my Lord. But the hostility against me is strong, and I cannot enter the presence of the king, my Lord. May the king send garrison troops, in order that I may enter and look into the eyes of the king, my Lord. So certain as the king, my Lord, lives, when the commissioner’s come, I will say: Lost are the territories of the king. Do you not hear to me? All the rulers are lost; the king, my Lord, does not have a single ruler left. May the king direct his attention to the archers, and may the king, my Lord, send troops of archers, the king has no more lands. The Hapiru (Hebrews) sack the territories of the king. If there are archers (here) this year, all the territories of the king will remain (intact); but if there are no archers, the territories of the king, my Lord, will be lost!
To the king, my Lord thus writes Abdu-Heba, your servant. He conveys eloquent words to the king, my Lord. All the territories of the king, my Lord, are lost.

 

NOW IN CANAAN

 

The Canaanites were being squeezed out by new Amorite invaders. More pressure was being put on the Canaanites by another group of Amorites, this group had just been expelled from Egypt, where they were known as the Hyksos. These Amorites/Hyksos settled in Canaan also.

Hebrew numbers had already been greatly increased by the second wave of semi-nomadic Hebrew tribes. And also by many settled Canaanites, (i.e, the Gibeonites), who joined the invaders against their city dwelling neighbors. Now with the addition of these new Hyksos, who by virtue of their experiences in Sumer and Egypt, were educated and highly skilled, the Hebrews could now begin to build a country. Wars raged and cities were destroyed.

The Hebrews began building amid the ruins of the cities that they had destroyed, and new settlements sprang up rapidly all through the hill country. The first Hebrew king was selected by the prophet Samuel, a prophet of great influence and authority. Samuel is depicted in various biblical accounts, as either favoring or not favoring the reign of a human king over Israel. In any case, he anointed Saul, a courageous military leader of the tribe of Benjamin, as the first king - in about 1020 B.C. It is not clear if Samuel consulted with others, such as an assembly, before making this appointment

The immediate victims of Hebrew success was the Phoenicians, who were a people who occupied the coast of the Levant (eastern Mediterranean). Their major cities were Tyre, Sidon, Byblos, and Arwad. All were fiercely independent rival cities and unlike the neighboring inland states, the Phoenicians represented a confederation of maritime traders rather than a defined country. What the Phoenicians actually called themselves is unknown, though it may have been the ancient term Canaanite. The name Phoenician, used to describe these people in the first millennium B.C., is a Greek invention, from the word phoinix, possibly signifying the color purple-red and perhaps an allusion to their production of a highly prized purple dye. As more Hebrews entered Canaan, the Phoenicians were forced into Northern Canaan - what is now Lebanon.

 

 

 

 

 

 


The Philistines

 

Had events followed their normal course, the Canaanite's, who still controlled the coast and the Plain of Esdraelon, might have regrouped and expelled the scattered and unorganized Hebrew clans. But before this could happen, there occurred the great invasion of the "Sea Peoples", in the early decades of the 12th century B.C. {This was the forced exodus of some of the original Black inhabitants of Italy, Greece, and the Mediterranean Islands due to an invasion of Albinos from Central Asia}.

 

 

Where are the Ancient White People?

Note: The "REASON" given for the Sea Peoples exodus from the Mediterranean and European lands is a "Logical Deduction". The question was - what would cause many thousands of Black people in those lands, to pack up all of their families and possessions, load them unto ships, and make War to secure a return to Africa. An invasion of hostile people (Albinos) from Asia would fit the bill. Especially since we know that Albinos (called Aryans today) from Central Asia, had already crossed the Hindu Kush mountains and attacked Black India (Dravidians and others) circa 1,500 B.C. The theory being that if Albinos had attacked South, they would/could also attack West later. Which we know for sure they did in the "Modern Era" - circa 100 A.D. (Invasion of the Germanics, Slav's and finally the Turks).

But that excellent bit of detective work has been thrown into question by ONE salient FACT. Even using DNA, Albinos have so-far failed to find the SKELETON of ONE SINGLE ANCIENT WHITE PERSON/ALBINO IN EUROPE. As a reminder, though there is no such a thing as White DNA, the skeletons of Whites/Albinos are identifiable by the presence of the SLC45A2 gene and the SLC24A5 gene. However what the Albino scientists don't tell you is that they are both Albinism genes.

So basically they are looking at ancient skeletons in Europe, and searching for ancient people who had White skin, by searching for skeletons with Albinism genes. But of course they won't ever call them/themselves Albinos, ha,ha: they just happen to have Albinism genes. Please look-up the study "Derived immune and ancestral pigmentation alleles in a 7,000-year-old Mesolithic European" to confirm these statements. The same result was found with the analysis of the Cheddar Man Skeleton.

 

Of course Cheddar man didn't really look like that: that's just Albinos trying to make him look like someone who could "TURN" into "THEM".

 

 

Click here for the Egyptian records of the Sea Peoples journey >>

 

 

 

On the basis of these facts, it is beginning to appear that the Albinos lies and Falsehoods about history, and their participation in "Western History" (Europe), is even bigger lies than we thought. Funny thing is that it now appears that Albinos "Purposely" destroyed or buried their "Real" Asian history, so that their FAKE European history would be more believable.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

MORE LIES

It is almost a certainty that those statues were all made within the last few hundred years.

 

A "Real" Greek Statue!

 

 

Click here for the Egyptian records of the Sea Peoples journey >>

 

 

 

 

THE SEA PEOPLE

 

The great invasion of the "Sea Peoples" c. 1,100 B.C. was the forced exodus back to the safety of Africa by some of the original Black inhabitants of Italy, Greece, and the Mediterranean Islands. This was precipitated (we thought) by an earlier invasion of Albinos from Central Asia (c. 1,200 ???). WHETHER IT WAS 1,200 B.C. OR 700 A.D. - when things finally settled down, Europe was a Bi-Racial continent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As stated above, there are no ancient skeletons of White/Albino people in Europe, (though there are plenty of them in Asia - see Tarim mummy). All that we have to attest to the ancient presence of Albinos in Europe is statues and paintings like above. The problem is: WHO is dating artwork like that above? We know Albinos lie, and love to make FAKE artifacts of themselves pretending to be ancient Black people. The bottom line is that until further notice, we have to assume that the statues and paintings they show us, purporting to be of Whites/Albinos in ancient Europe, are FAKES, made in the "Modern Era". That is until if/when authentic proof is uncovered that they really did exist in ancient Europe. Since the ONLY way to tell WHO was present and WHEN they were present, is to find their skeletons. It now seems that there were no Albinos in ancient Europe. Thinking back, this outcome could have been predicted by the fact that the only ancient "Bog Mummies" were of Black men, while all of the Albino appearing mummies were from the modern era.

 

 

 

 

The Philistines are believed to have been Cretans who were a part of the "Sea Peoples" invasion of Egypt circa 1,200 B.C. After Rameses III defeated them, he allowed them to settle in Canaan. They settled in the southern coastal plain of Canaan, but within 150 years after their settlement, they would conquer much of the region.

Before that; Cretans - along with Egyptians - built the first modern city in Greece, called Mycenae, which evolved into the Mycenaean civilization. The connection between Mycenaean culture and Philistine culture was made clearer by finds at the excavation of Ashdod, Ekron, Ashkelon, and more recently Gath, four of the five Philistine cities in Canaan. The fifth city is Gaza. Especially notable is the early Philistine pottery, a locally made version of the Aegean Mycenaean Late Helladic IIIC pottery, which is decorated in shades of brown and black. This later developed into the distinctive Philistine pottery of the Iron Age I, with black and red decorations on white slip known as Philistine Bichrome ware.

The Philistine cities lost their independence to Tiglath-Pileser III of Assyria by 732 B.C, revolts in following years were all crushed. They were subsequently absorbed into the Babylonian and Persian empires, and disappear as a distinct group by the late 5th century B.C.

 

 

 

 

 

Bible Story Related to the Philistines

David and Goliath

 

 

1 Samuel 17: King James Version (KJV)

1) Now the Philistines gathered together their armies to battle, and were gathered together at Shochoh, which belongeth to Judah, and pitched between Shochoh and Azekah, in Ephesdammim.
2) And Saul and the men of Israel were gathered together, and pitched by the valley of Elah, and set the battle in array against the Philistines.
3) And the Philistines stood on a mountain on the one side, and Israel stood on a mountain on the other side: and there was a valley between them.
4) And there went out a champion out of the camp of the Philistines, named Goliath, of Gath, whose height was six cubits and a span.
5) And he had an helmet of brass upon his head, and he was armed with a coat of mail; and the weight of the coat was five thousand shekels of brass.
6) And he had greaves of brass upon his legs, and a target of brass between his shoulders.
7) And the staff of his spear was like a weaver's beam; and his spear's head weighed six hundred shekels of iron: and one bearing a shield went before him.
8) And he stood and cried unto the armies of Israel, and said unto them, Why are ye come out to set your battle in array? am not I a Philistine, and ye servants to Saul? choose you a man for you, and let him come down to me.
9) If he be able to fight with me, and to kill me, then will we be your servants: but if I prevail against him, and kill him, then shall ye be our servants, and serve us.
10) And the Philistine said, I defy the armies of Israel this day; give me a man, that we may fight together.
11) When Saul and all Israel heard those words of the Philistine, they were dismayed, and greatly afraid.
12) Now David was the son of that Ephrathite of Bethlehemjudah, whose name was Jesse; and he had eight sons: and the man went among men for an old man in the days of Saul.
13) And the three eldest sons of Jesse went and followed Saul to the battle: and the names of his three sons that went to the battle were Eliab the firstborn, and next unto him Abinadab, and the third Shammah.
14) And David was the youngest: and the three eldest followed Saul.
15) But David went and returned from Saul to feed his father's sheep at Bethlehem.
16) And the Philistine drew near morning and evening, and presented himself forty days.
SKIP
45) Then said David to the Philistine, Thou comest to me with a sword, and with a spear, and with a shield: but I come to thee in the name of the Lord of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel, whom thou hast defied.
46) This day will the Lord deliver thee into mine hand; and I will smite thee, and take thine head from thee; and I will give the carcases of the host of the Philistines this day unto the fowls of the air, and to the wild beasts of the earth; that all the earth may know that there is a God in Israel.
47) And all this assembly shall know that the Lord saveth not with sword and spear: for the battle is the Lord's, and he will give you into our hands.
48) And it came to pass, when the Philistine arose, and came, and drew nigh to meet David, that David hastened, and ran toward the army to meet the Philistine.
49) And David put his hand in his bag, and took thence a stone, and slang it, and smote the Philistine in his forehead, that the stone sunk into his forehead; and he fell upon his face to the earth.
50) So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and smote the Philistine, and slew him; but there was no sword in the hand of David.
51) Therefore David ran, and stood upon the Philistine, and took his sword, and drew it out of the sheath thereof, and slew him, and cut off his head therewith. And when the Philistines saw their champion was dead, they fled.
52) And the men of Israel and of Judah arose, and shouted, and pursued the Philistines, until thou come to the valley, and to the gates of Ekron. And the wounded of the Philistines fell down by the way to Shaaraim, even unto Gath, and unto Ekron.
53) And the children of Israel returned from chasing after the Philistines, and they spoiled their tents.

 

 

The divided Kingdom

 

Under David's son "Solomon" (922 B.C.), Israel became a thriving commercial power; numerous impressive buildings were erected, including the magnificent Temple (the symbol of the religious and political unity of Israel); a large harem of foreign princesses was acquired for Solomon, these marriages served the purpose of sealing relations with other states. The country had been divided into 12 districts for administrative, supply, and taxation purposes.

By now Amorites that were Not part of Israel, seem to have formed a federated state called Aram/Arum, centered in north central Syria - these people came to be known as Aramaeans, Damascus and Edom being cities of Aram.

 

 

 

The central and northern tribes, called Israel in the restricted sense, were especially galled by the oppressive policies of Solomon, and soon after Solomon's death, the northern part - Israel - split off to become a separate kingdom. The united monarchy thus became the divided monarchy of Israel, with Israel (the northern kingdom) and Judah (the southern kingdom).

 

 

 

BEGINNING OF THE END

 

 

In Judah, the Baal cult introduced by Athaliah, who was the queen mother, and effective ruler for a time: Was suppressed by a revolt led by the chief priests. Athaliah was killed and her grandson Joash (Jehoash) was made king. In the following period, Judah and Israel had alternating relations of conflict and amity, and were both involved in the alternating expansion and loss of power in their relations with neighboring states.

The Aramaeans of Damascus were the main enemy. Damascus annexed much of Israel's territory, and exercised suzerainty over the rest. They also exacted a heavy tribute from Judah. However, under Jeroboam II (783–741 B.C.) in Israel and Uzziah/Azariah (783–742 B.C.) in Judah, both of whom had long reigns at the same time, the two kingdoms cooperated to achieve a period of prosperity and tranquility, unknown since Solomon's reign.

The threat of the rising Assyrian Empire under Tiglath-Pileser III, soon reversed this situation. In 734 B.C, Tiglath-pileser invaded southern Syria and the Philistine territories in Canaan, going as far as the Egyptian border.

 

 

 

 

Damascus and Israel tried to organize resistance against him, to this end, they marched against Judah to force its participation in the fight against Assyria, the Judahite king Ahaz (735–720 B.C.) instead called on Assyria for protection; In 733 Tiglath-pileser devastated Israel and forced it to surrender large territories, captives were taken and tribute had to be paid. In 732 he advanced upon Damascus, first devastating the gardens outside the city and then conquering the capital and killing the king, whom he replaced with a governor.

 

 

 

 

In 721 B.C, the Assyrian king Sargon II, laid a protracted siege on the Israeli city of Samaria. After Samaria fell, the Samarian upper class was deported to Assyria and Babylon. Samaria was repopulated with Assyrians and Babylonians.

 

 

 

 

Meanwhile Judah became a vassal state of Assyria. In about 721 B.C, after an abortive revolt against Assyrian rule by King Hoshea. What was left of the Hebrew state of Israel, was annexed outright by Assyria, and thus became an Assyrian province. As was the custom of Assyria, Israel's elite citizens, amounting to nearly 30,000 people, according to Assyrian figures, were deported to Mesopotamia and Media (Iran), and new settlers were imported from other lands. Thus, the northern kingdom of Israel ceased to exist.

 

 

 

 

Assyrian and later Babylonian rule, left the kingdom of Judah, the sole heir to the past glories of David and Solomon. King Hezekiah (715–686 B.C.), lured by promises of Egyptian aid, attempted to resist Assyria, but he was defeated and compelled to pay a crushing tribute. It was probably only the timely intervention of an epidemic, which had decimated the Assyrian army of king Sennacherib, that saved Judah from total devastation.

 

 

 

 

It was only the eloquent guidance of Isaiah, that restored the morale of the people. And even the weakness of Hezekiah's son Manasseh, did not bring about complete ruin. Another strong king, Josiah (640–609 B.C.), arose in time to restore the ebbing fortunes of Judah, but only for a few years. During this time, much of the ancient territory of the united Israel was brought back under the rule of his dynasty. By now, Assyria was rapidly declining in power. And in 612 B.C. its hated capital "Nineveh", was destroyed by the Medes.

 

 

 

 

But Josiah's successful rebellion ended, when he fell in battle against pharaoh Necho (Nekau II - 26 dyn.), of Egypt. Who was intent on re-establishing Egyptian dominance in Canaan after Assyria's decline. At the same time, the Chaldean kings of Babylonia were rapidly gaining strength. King Nabopolassar of Babylon and King Cyaxares of Media divided the old Assyrian empire between themselves. After Nabopolassar's death, his son Nebuchadrezzar II, later gained control of Syria and Canaan in swift campaigns.

 

 

 

 


Isaiah: 39 King James Version (KJV)

39) At that time Merodachbaladan, the son of Baladan, king of Babylon, sent letters and a present to Hezekiah: for he had heard that he had been sick, and was recovered.

2) And Hezekiah was glad of them, and shewed them the house of his precious things, the silver, and the gold, and the spices, and the precious ointment, and all the house of his armour, and all that was found in his treasures: there was nothing in his house, nor in all his dominion, that Hezekiah shewed them not.

3) Then came Isaiah the prophet unto king Hezekiah, and said unto him, What said these men? and from whence came they unto thee? And Hezekiah said, They are come from a far country unto me, even from Babylon.

4) Then said he, What have they seen in thine house? And Hezekiah answered, All that is in mine house have they seen: there is nothing among my treasures that I have not shewed them.

5) Then said Isaiah to Hezekiah, Hear the word of the Lord of hosts:

6) Behold, the days come, that all that is in thine house, and that which thy fathers have laid up in store until this day, shall be carried to Babylon: nothing shall be left, saith the Lord.

7) And of thy sons that shall issue from thee, which thou shalt beget, shall they take away; and they shall be eunuchs in the palace of the king of Babylon.

8) Then said Hezekiah to Isaiah, Good is the word of the Lord which thou hast spoken. He said moreover, For there shall be peace and truth in my days.

 

 

 

 

The Egyptians however, continued to intrigue in Canaan, whose native states were repeatedly induced to join anti-Babylonian coalitions. All of which collapsed of themselves, or were crushed by the Chaldean armies. Jerusalem was twice besieged in 597 and again in 589 B.C. Finally in about 587/586 B.C, it was stormed and destroyed. The prophet Jeremiah, who had foreseen this tragic end, and who had repeatedly warned his people against their suicidal policy, died in Egypt. Judah was devastated and almost depopulated, with most of it's people sent off to Mesopotamia.

 

 

 

 

Psalm 137 tells the tale of the Hebrews in Babylon.

King James Version (KJV)

1) By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.
2) We hanged our harps upon the willows in the midst thereof.
3) For there they that carried us away captive required of us a song; and they that wasted us required of us mirth, saying, Sing us one of the songs of Zion.
4) How shall we sing the Lord's song in a strange land?
5) If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning.
6) If I do not remember thee, let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth; if I prefer not Jerusalem above my chief joy.
7) Remember, O Lord, the children of Edom in the day of Jerusalem; who said, Rase it, rase it, even to the foundation thereof.
8) O daughter of Babylon, who art to be destroyed; happy shall he be, that rewardeth thee as thou hast served us.
9) Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.

 

Song: The Rivers of Babylon by the Melodians

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-5E6_qtXAw

 

This all changed with the victory and ascension of the Persian King Cyrus II (Cyrus the Great). After Cyrus had taken Babylon, he ordered that all the captives there be freed, and returned to their homelands, this was to be financed by Cyrus! He ordered the Hebrews restored to Jerusalem, and bade them to rebuild their temple. This period of peace lasted for almost three hundred years, but then the Persian Empire was destroyed by the armies of Alexander of Macedon.

 

 

 

 

Short history of the Hebrew/Christian Bibles

 

With Alexander's annexation of Egypt, Greek officials, soldiers, merchants and immigrants from Greece and elsewhere in Europe, poured into Egypt. This would greatly change the population demographic. Alexander laid the groundwork for the first European city in Egypt, Alexandria, before leaving the country. After his death, his body was returned and entombed there. Egypt would remain a Greek possession for the next three centuries.

Ptolemy II Philadelphus 282-246 B.C.
Ptolemy II Philadelphus, which means 'Brother/Sister-loving', was the second ruler of the Ptolemaic Dynasty. He was married to his full sister Arsinoe II. According to the "Letter of Aristeas", Ptolemy II requested 70 Jewish scholars to come from Jerusalem to translate the Pentateuch (Hebrew Bible) into a Greek version to be placed into the Great Egyptian Library collection.


THE SEPTUAGINT


The Septuagint, derived from the Latin word for "Seventy," Septuagint, can be a confusing term, since it ideally refers to the mid 200 B.C. translation of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek in Alexandria, Egypt. There is a complicated story however, behind the translation and the various stages, amplifications, and modifications to the collection we now call the Septuagint.


The earliest, and best known source for the story of the Septuagint, is the Letter of Aristeas, a lengthy document that recalls how the Ptolemy’s – the Greek family that Alexander the Great set up to rule Egypt for him – specifically Philadelphus II (285–247 B.C.), who desiring to augment his library in Alexandria Egypt, commissioned a translation of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek. He wrote to the chief priest Eleazar in Jerusalem, and arranged for six translators from each of the twelve tribes of Israel to come to Egypt for that purpose.


In the document known as the Letter of Aristeas, which scholars believe was written by a Hellenistic Jew in the mid second century B.C, an elaborate story is related about how the translation of the Pentateuch was done, and the reasons for it, and the circumstances. The Aristeas document pretends to date from more than a century earlier, and the setting of the story is the court of Ptolemy Philadelpus in Alexandria. Some scholars view the work as fiction, but nevertheless, it is the basis for the name by which the Greek Bible has become known, the "Septuagint" or "LXX". It is also regarded as an important source document for the history of the period.

The seventy-two (altered in a few later versions to seventy or seventy-five) translators arrived in Egypt to the Ptolemy's gracious hospitality, and translated the Pentateuch: the first five books of the Hebrew Scriptures, believed to have been written by Moses, in seventy-two days. There is no information available, as to how differing versions between individuals and tribes were resolved. Although opinions as to when this occurred differ, scholars find 282 B.C. to be an attractive date.


As attested by the Dead Sea Scrolls (the oldest known Actual Hebrew scriptures – that small part that the Khazars in Israel and the Popes in the Vatican allow us to see): there was NO “ONE” Hebrew belief or Canon at this time. Rather there were many sects, each with their own beliefs – some quite radical. Thus Ptolemy's need for many translators from each tribe, in hope of getting a consensus of the Hebrew religion. How much of the material presented was written (and when it was written), and how much was oral is unknown.

 

Unfortunately neither the "Original" document nor any of it's original copies are known to exist.

 

THE PENTATEUCH (Torah)
Pentateuch: means the first five books of the Hebrew Bible supposedly written by Moses. These books are Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. The word Pentateuch comes from two Greek words that mean "five books" or "five scrolls". The Pentateuch (which Jews call the Torah) contain some of the oldest and most famous stories in the Bible, including those of Adam and Eve, Jacob and his brothers, and Moses, as well as some of the oldest codes of law known, including the Ten Commandments. One of the most famous stories in Genesis is the story of Noah:

 

Genesis 6: King James Version (KJV)


1) And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
2) That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
3) And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
4) There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
5) And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
6) And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
7) And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.
8) But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord.
9) These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.
10) And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

13) And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.
14) Make thee an ark of gopher wood; rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt pitch it within and without with pitch.
15) And this is the fashion which thou shalt make it of: The length of the ark shall be three hundred cubits, the breadth of it fifty cubits, and the height of it thirty cubits.

As proof of the time the Hebrews spent in Sumer (Mesopotamia):

the story of Noah is actually taken from the oldest written story known to man.

The Sumerian story of Gilgamesh.

 

The Epic of Gilgamesh (c. 3,000 B.C.)
Translated by Maureen Gallery Kovacs

Tablet XI
The Story of the Flood

Excerpt: O man of Shuruppak, son of Ubartutu:
Tear down the house and build a boat!
Abandon wealth and seek living beings!
Spurn possessions and keep alive living beings!
Make all living beings go up into the boat.
The boat which you are to build,
its dimensions must measure equal to each other:
its length must correspond to its width.
Roof it over like the Apsu.

Click here for the full story of Gilgamesh

 

As to the Pentateuch: Unfortunately neither the "Original" document nor any of it's original copies are known to exist.

 

Torah/The Masoretic text (MT) Creation:
The traditional Hebrew text of the Hebrew Bible, meticulously assembled and codified, and supplied with diacritical marks to enable correct pronunciation. This monumental work was begun around 600 A.D. and completed in 1000 A.D. by scholars at academies in Babylonia and Palestine, in an effort to reproduce, as far as possible, the original text of the Hebrew Old Testament. Their intention was not to interpret the meaning of the Scriptures but to transmit to future generations the authentic Word of God. To this end, they gathered manuscripts and whatever oral traditions were available to them at the time. During the middle years of the Masoretic’s creation, the powerful and influential Khazars, converted to the Hebrew religion. It is not known what input or effect, the Khazars had on the final version of the Masoretic text: suffice to say that the Khazars currently totally control the Hebrew religion, and in fact call themselves “Jews”.


The Vulgate Bible
(From the Latin editio vulgata: “common version”), Latin Bible used by the Roman Catholic Church, primarily translated by St. Jerome in 382 A.D. Pope Damasus commissioned Jerome, the leading biblical scholar of his day, to produce an acceptable Latin version of the Bible from the various translations then being used. His revised Latin translation of the Gospels appeared about 383 A.D. The Septuagint was an important basis for St. Jerome's translation of the Old Testament into Latin for the Vulgate Bible; and, although he had doubts about the authenticity of some of the apocryphal works that it contained (he was the first to employ the word apocrypha in the sense of “noncanonical”), he was overruled, and most of them were included in the Vulgate.

Other apocryphal writings, canonical only to Roman Catholicism, with an exception or two, include the Book of Baruch (a prophet) and the Letter of Jeremiah (often the sixth chapter of Baruch); the First and Second Books of Maccabees; several stories from Daniel, namely, the Song of the Three, Susanna, and Bel and the Dragon; and extensive portions of the Book of Esther. Certain other books found in the Septuagint—the Apocrypha for Protestants and Jews; the deuterocanonical books for Roman Catholics—were included. Deuterocanonical works are those that are accepted in one canon but not in all.

Various editors and correctors produced revised texts of the Vulgate over the years. The University of Paris produced an important edition in the 13th century. Its primary purpose was to provide an agreed standard for theological teaching and debate. The earliest printed Vulgate Bibles were all based on this Paris edition.
In 1546 the Council of Trent decreed that the Vulgate was the exclusive Latin authority for the Bible, and declared the canonicity of nearly the entire Vulgate, excluding only the Third and Fourth Books of Maccabees, the Prayer of Manasseh, Psalm 151, and the First and Second Books of Esdras.

Eastern Christendom, meanwhile, had accepted some of the Old Testament apocrypha—Tobit, Judith, the Wisdom of Solomon, and Ecclesiasticus (Wisdom of Jesus the Son of Sirach)—but rejected the rest. The so-called Clementine Vulgate, issued by Pope Clement VIII in 1592, became the authoritative biblical text of the Roman Catholic Church. From it the Confraternity Version was translated in 1941. Various critical editions have been produced in modern times; in 1965 a commission was established by the second Vatican Council to revise the Vulgate.

As a reminder – The Torah and the Catholic Vulgate Bibles are based on the Septuagint, as well of course, is the later European Protestant Bibles.

HOWEVER, NO AUTHENTIC COPY OF THE SEPTUAGINT CURRENTLY EXISTS, AND PERHAPS NEVER DID! Though like the "Dead Sea Scrolls" there are many fake copies available on-line.

 

Wiki:

Differences with the Latin Vulgate and the Masoretic text (Torah).


The sources of the many differences between the Septuagint, the Latin Vulgate and the Masoretic text have long been discussed by scholars. Following the Renaissance, a common opinion among some humanists was that the Septuagint translators bungled the translation from the Hebrew and that the Septuagint became more corrupt with time. The most widely accepted view today is that the Septuagint provides a reasonably accurate record of an early Hebrew textual variant that differed from the ancestor of the Masoretic text as well as those of the Latin Vulgate, where both of the latter seem to have a more similar textual heritage. This view is supported by comparisons with Biblical texts found at the Essene settlement at Qumran (the Dead Sea Scrolls).

 

There are many passages in the Christian AND Islamic "Holy" Books, which are claimed (in the case of Christian books) to originally be written by Hebrews, and based on the Hebrew religion, which CLEARLY denigrate Black People. Which is very strange indeed, as this would represent the first time in mans history, when a people of a particular ethnicity were openly insulting and denigrating to themselves.

 

 

As a Reminder, this is what Hebrews looked like:

 

 

Strange indeed:

The Albinos tell us what the Hebrew religion said,

But cannot produce the original documents upon which they base their assertions,

Even while original Hebrew documents like the "Dead Sea Scrolls" are in existence and are in good condition.

 

 

Then we have Black Arabs and Black Hebrews supposedly writing

religious books denigrating Black Arabs and Black Hebrews:

one would think that they would be praising themselves.

SEEMS TO MAKE NO SENSE!

 

 

King James Version (KJV) Ecclesiastes 12:

The Song of Solomon

 


1) The song of songs, which is Solomon's.
2) Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth: for thy love is better than wine.
3) Because of the savour of thy good ointments thy name is as ointment poured forth, therefore do the virgins love thee.
4) Draw me, we will run after thee: the king hath brought me into his chambers: we will be glad and rejoice in thee, we will remember thy love more than wine: the upright love thee.
5) I am black, but comely, O ye daughters of Jerusalem, as the tents of Kedar, as the curtains of Solomon.
6) Look not upon me, because I am black, because the sun hath looked upon me: my mother's children were angry with me; they made me the keeper of the vineyards; but mine own vineyard have I not kept.
7) Tell me, O thou whom my soul loveth, where thou feedest, where thou makest thy flock to rest at noon: for why should I be as one that turneth aside by the flocks of thy companions?
8) If thou know not, O thou fairest among women, go thy way forth by the footsteps of the flock, and feed thy kids beside the shepherds' tents.
9) I have compared thee, O my love, to a company of horses in Pharaoh's chariots.
10) Thy cheeks are comely with rows of jewels, thy neck with chains of gold.
11) We will make thee borders of gold with studs of silver.
12) While the king sitteth at his table, my spikenard sendeth forth the smell thereof.
13) A bundle of myrrh is my well-beloved unto me; he shall lie all night betwixt my breasts.
14) My beloved is unto me as a cluster of camphire in the vineyards of Engedi.
15) Behold, thou art fair, my love; behold, thou art fair; thou hast doves' eyes.
16) Behold, thou art fair, my beloved, yea, pleasant: also our bed is green.
17) The beams of our house are cedar, and our rafters of fir.

Clearly - Black Hebrews had no part in writing the above passages.

 

 

 

Biblical passages were God or Moses commands men to do Murder and Genocide:

 

 

Deuteronomy 20:16-17 King James Version (KJV)
16 But of the cities of these people, which the Lord thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:
17 But thou shalt utterly destroy them;
namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the Lord thy God hath commanded thee.

1 Samuel 15 King James Version (KJV)
3 Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.
4 And Saul gathered the people together, and numbered them in Telaim, two hundred thousand footmen, and ten thousand men of Judah.

Joshua 6 King James Version (KJV)
20 So the people shouted when the priests blew with the trumpets: and it came to pass, when the people heard the sound of the trumpet, and the people shouted with a great shout, that the wall fell down flat, so that the people went up into the city, every man straight before him, and they took the city.
21 And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword.

Deuteronomy 2 King James Version (KJV)
31 And the Lord said unto me, Behold, I have begun to give Sihon and his land before thee: begin to possess, that thou mayest inherit his land.
32 Then Sihon came out against us, he and all his people, to fight at Jahaz.
33 And the Lord our God delivered him before us; and we smote him, and his sons, and all his people.
34 And we took all his cities at that time, and utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none to remain:
35 Only the cattle we took for a prey unto ourselves, and the spoil of the cities which we took.

Hosea 13 King James Version (KJV)
16 Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.

 

Researchers have identified at least 40 such passages of Genocide in the Bible (Stephen Smith - 40 Bible Verses about Genocide). But the thing is, Black people have never used Genocide as a tool of conquest and the taking of other peoples lands. A perfect example is the Black Assyrians, known to be some of the cruelest conquerors in history. Yet what did they do to the people of conquered lands? They simply "MOVED" them to another country. The one exception in Black history is the Rwandan genocide of 1994. But that wasn't about TAKING LAND, that was about old hatreds and the Murder of a leader.

Whereas, Genocide has been a "LAND ACQUISITION" tool of the Albinos ever since their ascension in Europe. Even by their own tally they have murdered at least 130 million Black "Native Americans" including some "Mongol" Native Americans. They even have a Wiki page detailing their atrocities around the World - which we have incorporated into one of our own pages.

Click here for an accounting of the Genocide of Blacks around the World >>

 

Point being - like the Song of Solomon above: there is no way a Black person (Hebrew) wrote it. The explanation: As is to be expected, after Europe's Albinos had usurped Black Rule and Black Religion (c. 1500-1700), they then converted and adapted Black religion and Black religious Books to suit their own needs and realities: (Remember - the first Protestant Bible - The Tyndale Bible - was first published in Cologne, Germany in 1525).

Tyndale's Bible is credited with being the first English translation to work directly from Hebrew and Greek texts. 1525 is not exactly ancient, so where are the Hebrew and Greek texts used for the translations? Today, were authentic Hebrew writings to appear: all of these Albino falsifications would be exposed. Therefore the public will never see the "Real" Dead Sea Scrolls.

 

 

__________________________________________________________________

 

Back to History:

After Alexander the Great's conquest of Persia, Judah first came under the rule of the Ptolemy's (Greek kings of Egypt), and later under that of the Seleucids, (Greek kings of Mesopotamia). Opposition to the Seleucid attempts to suppress the Hebrew ancestral faith, led to the rise of a family of Hebrew leaders known as the Maccabees. They gradually drove the Seleucids from the country, and set up a revived kingdom of Judaea. Family disputes however, led to Roman intervention in 63 B.C.

Now under Roman control, Herod the Great was made king of Judaea in 37 B.C, and later of all Canaan (20-4 B.C.). After Herod's death, the country was ruled alternately by Herod's direct descendants and by Roman procurators. As the result of a Hebrew revolt that broke out in 66 A.D, the city of Jerusalem was destroyed by Romans in 70 A.D. The city was destroyed by Titus Flavius Vespasianus ( 39 – 81 A.D.), commonly known as Titus, he was Roman Emperor from 79 to 81. A member of the Flavian dynasty, Titus succeeded his father Vespasian upon his death.

Prior to becoming emperor, Titus gained renown as a military commander, serving under his father in Judaea during the First Jewish-Roman War. The campaign came to a brief halt with the death of emperor Nero in 68, launching Vespasian's bid for the imperial power during the Year of the Four Emperors. When Vespasian was declared emperor on 1 July 69, Titus was left in charge of ending the Jewish rebellion. In 70, he successfully laid siege to and destroyed the city and Temple of Jerusalem. For this achievement Titus was awarded a triumph; the Arch of Titus commemorates his victory to this day.

The Zealots - who were a Hebrew sect which opposed the pagan rule of Rome, and the polytheism that it professed, were an aggressive political party. Their concern for the national and religious life of the Hebrew people, led them to despise even Hebrews, who sought peace and conciliation with the Roman authorities. Some extremists among the Zealots, turned to terrorism and assassination, they became known as Sicarii (“dagger men”). They frequented public places with hidden daggers, ready to strike down persons friendly to Rome. In the first revolt against Rome (66–70 A.D.) the Zealots played a leading role, and at the mountaintop fortress of Masada, they committed suicide, rather than surrender the fortress (73 A.D.).

 

_________________________________________________________________

 

 

Dura-Europos

 

Dura-Europos was founded in 303 B.C. by the Seleucids on the intersection of an east-west trade route and the trade route along the Euphrates. The new city controlled the river crossing on the route between his newly founded cities of Antioch and Seleucia on the Tigris. The traditional view of Dura-Europos as a great caravan city is becoming nuanced by the discoveries of locally made manufactures and traces of close ties with Palmyra.

During the later 2nd century B.C. it came under Parthian control and it served as a frontier fortress of the Arsacid Parthian Empire. It had a multicultural population, as inscriptions in Greek, Latin, Aramaic, Hebrew, Syriac, Hatrian, Palmyrenean, Middle Persian and Safaitic Pahlavi testify. It was captured by the Romans in 165 and abandoned after a Sassanian siege in 256-257. After it was abandoned, it was covered by sand and mud and disappeared from sight.

Dura-Europos was a cosmopolitan society, controlled by a tolerant Macedonian aristocracy descended from the original settlers. In the course of its excavation, over a hundred parchment and papyrus fragments and many inscriptions have revealed texts in Greek and Latin (the latter including a sator square), Palmyrenean, Hebrew, Hatrian, Safaitic, and Pahlavi. The excavations revealed temples to Greek, Roman and Palmyrene gods. There was a Mithraeum, as one would expect in a Roman military city.

The Jewish synagogue, located by the western wall between towers 18 and 19, the last phase of which was dated by an Aramaic inscription to 244. It is the best preserved of the many ancient synagogues of that era that have been uncovered by archaeologists. It was preserved, ironically, when it had to be infilled with earth to strengthen the city's fortifications against a Sassanian assault in 256. It was uncovered in 1932 by Clark Hopkins, who found that it contains a forecourt and house of assembly with frescoed walls depicting people and animals, and a Torah shrine in the western wall facing Jerusalem. At first, it was mistaken for a Greek temple. The synagogue paintings, the earliest continuous surviving biblical narrative cycle, are conserved at Damascus.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Encyclopedia Britannica – The Siege of Jerusalem - The Jewish-Roman war of 70 A.D.


The fall of Jerusalem was a pivotal moment in the first Jewish-Roman war. It resulted in the destruction of the ancient temple of Solomon and much of the surrounding city by a fire started by the Roman army under the command of the future Emperor Titus.


The Jewish-Roman war of 66 to 73 A.D. was the first of three rebellions by Jews against Roman rule in Judaea and is referred to as "The Great Revolt." The revolt started in 66 A.D. following religious tensions between Greeks and Jews, but soon involved protests against taxation and attacks on Roman citizens. Shocked by the defeat of a legion under the command of Gallus, Emperor Nero sent military commander Vespasian, with a force of 60,000, to ensure that order was restored.
Despite victories elsewhere, Jerusalem proved difficult to take. Vespasian’s son, Titus, surrounded the city with a wall and a trench, and anyone caught trying to escape was crucified. Titus then put pressure on the food and water supply by allowing pilgrims to enter the city in order to celebrate Passover but not letting them out.


After a number of failed attempts to attack the city, the Romans set about the destruction of Jerusalem’s formidable defenses with a battering ram. Having breached these defenses, the Romans fought their way from street to street. Many Zealots sought sanctuary in the ancient temple of Solomon and in the fortress of Antonia. The Romans finally overwhelmed the fortress, and the ancient temple was destroyed by fire in the ensuing battle, reputedly against the wishes of Titus. The destruction of the temple is still mourned by Jews in the annual fast of Tisha be-Av, and the fall of Jerusalem is celebrated in Rome’s Arch of Titus. Losses: According to Jewish historian Josephus, Jewish, 1.1 million dead and 97,000 enslaved; Roman, unknown.

 

Tacitus

 

Publius Cornelius Tacitus c. 56 – c. 120 A.D.) was a senator and a historian of the Roman Empire. The surviving portions of his two major works—the Annals and the Histories—examine the reigns of the emperors Tiberius, Claudius, Nero, and those who reigned in the Year of the Four Emperors (69 AD). These two works span the history of the Roman Empire from the death of Augustus, in 14 AD, to the years of the First Jewish–Roman War, in 70 AD. There are substantial lacunae in the surviving texts, including a gap in the Annals that is four books long.

The Histories

Only the first four books and twenty-six chapters of the fifth book survive, covering the year 69 and the first part of 70. The work is believed to have continued up to the death of Domitian on September 18, 96. The fifth book contains—as a prelude to the account of Titus's suppression of the Great Jewish Revolt—a short ethnographic survey of the ancient Jews, and it is an invaluable record of Roman attitudes towards them.

 

 

The Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus (56-118 A.D.) had these thoughts on the origins and customs of the Hebrews, as the Romans prepared to destroy Jerusalem.

 

This is in the context of Titus Caesar, who had been selected by his father to complete the subjugation of Judaea.

 

Tacitus: History Book 5

1. EARLY in this year Titus Caesar, who had been selected by his father to complete the subjugation of Judaea, and who had gained distinction as a soldier while both were still subjects, began to rise in power and reputation, as armies and provinces emulated each other in their attachment to him. The young man himself, anxious to be thought superior to his station, was ever displaying his gracefulness and his energy in war. By his courtesy and affability he called forth a willing obedience, and he often mixed with the common soldiers, while working or marching, without impairing his dignity as general. He found in Judaea three legions, the 5th, the 10th, and the 15th, all old troops of Vespasian's. To these he added the 12th from Syria, and some men belonging to the 18th and 3rd, whom he had withdrawn from Alexandria. This force was accompanied by twenty cohorts of allied troops and eight squadrons of cavalry, by the two kings Agrippa and Sohemus, by the auxiliary forces of king Antiochus, by a strong contingent of Arabs, who hated the Jews with the usual hatred of neighbours, and, lastly, by many persons brought from the capital and from Italy by private hopes of securing the yet unengaged affections of the Prince. With this force Titus entered the enemy's territory, preserving strict order on his march, reconnoitring every spot, and always ready to give battle. At last he encamped near Jerusalem.

2. As I am about to relate the last days of a famous city, it seems appropriate to throw some light on its origin. Some say that the Jews were fugitives from the island of Crete, who settled on the nearest coast of Africa about the time when Saturn was driven from his throne by the power of Jupiter. Evidence of this is sought in the name. There is a famous mountain in Crete called Ida; the neighbouring tribe, the Idaei, came to be called Judaei by a barbarous lengthening of the national name. Others assert that in the reign of Isis the overflowing population of Egypt, led by Hierosolymus and Judas, discharged itself into the neighbouring countries. Many, again, say that they were a race of Ethiopian origin, who in the time of king Cepheus were driven by fear and hatred of their neighbours to seek a new dwelling-place. Others describe them as an Assyrian horde who, not having sufficient territory, took possession of part of Egypt, and founded cities of their own in what is called the Hebrew country, lying on the borders of Syria. Others, again, assign a very distinguished origin to the Jews, alleging that they were the Solymi, a nation celebrated in the poems of Homer, who called the city which they founded Hierosolyma after their own name. (The Solymi were supposedly a tribe from Pisidia, a region of ancient Anatolia/Asia Minor/Byzantium/Eastern Roman Empire/Turkey).

 

Watch out for Racist Translations!

Here we must pause and caution against using any translation of ancient texts without crosschecking it with others. In this case, the Racist Degenerates at the University of Chicago once again reveal their vile nature by conveniently leaving out Ethiopian as a possible origin of the Hebrews. The reason is quite simple, though the simple-minded might be fooled into believing that Cretans, Egyptians, Assyrians and Solymi were Albinos: Even the dumbest knows that Ethiopians are Black.

Do NOT use this Translation!

http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Tacitus/Histories/5A*.html

_____________________________________________________________________

This translation at Tufts University seems Okay.

http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0080%3Abook%3D5%3Achapter%3D2

 

3. Most writers, however, agree in stating that once a disease, which horribly disfigured the body, broke out over Egypt; that king Bocchoris, seeking a remedy, consulted the oracle of Hammon, and was bidden to cleanse his realm, and to convey into some foreign land this race detested by the gods. The people, who had been collected after diligent search, finding themselves left in a desert, sat for the most part in a stupor of grief, till one of the exiles, Moyses by name, warned them not to look for any relief from God or man, forsaken as they were of both, but to trust to themselves, taking for their heaven-sent leader that man who should first help them to be quit of their present misery. They agreed, and in utter ignorance began to advance at random. Nothing, however, distressed them so much as the scarcity of water, and they had sunk ready to perish in all directions over the plain, when a herd of wild asses was seen to retire from their pasture to a rock shaded by trees. Moyses followed them, and, guided by the appearance of a grassy spot, discovered an abundant spring of water. This furnished relief. After a continuous journey for six days, on the seventh they possessed themselves of a country, from which they expelled the inhabitants, and in which they founded a city and a temple.

4. Moyses, wishing to secure for the future his authority over the nation, gave them a novel form of worship, opposed to all that is practised by other men. Things sacred with us, with them have no sanctity, while they allow what with us is forbidden. In their holy place they have consecrated an image of the animal by whose guidance they found deliverance from their long and thirsty wanderings. They slay the ram, seemingly in derision of Hammon, and they sacrifice the ox, because the Egyptians worship it as Apis. They abstain from swine's flesh, in consideration of what they suffered when they were infected by the leprosy to which this animal is liable. By their frequent fasts they still bear witness to the long hunger of former days, and the Jewish bread, made without leaven, is retained as a memorial of their hurried seizure of corn. We are told that the rest of the seventh day was adopted, because this day brought with it a termination of their toils; after a while the charm of indolence beguilded them into giving up the seventh year also to inaction. But others say that it is an observance in honour of Saturn, either from the primitive elements of their faith having been transmitted from the Idaei, who are said to have shared the flight of that God, and to have founded the race, or from the circumstance that of the seven stars which rule the destinies of men Saturn moves in the highest orbit and with the mightiest power, and that many of the heavenly bodies complete their revolutions and courses in multiples of seven.

5. This worship, however introduced, is upheld by its antiquity; all their other customs, which are at once perverse and disgusting, owe their strength to their very badness. The most degraded out of other races, scorning their national beliefs, brought to them their contributions and presents. This augmented the wealth of the Jews, as also did the fact, that among themselves they are inflexibly honest and ever ready to shew compassion, though they regard the rest of mankind with all the hatred of enemies. They sit apart at meals, they sleep apart, and though, as a nation, they are singularly prone to lust, they abstain from intercourse with foreign women; among themselves nothing is unlawful. Circumcision was adopted by them as a mark of difference from other men. Those who come over to their religion adopt the practice, and have this lesson first instilled into them, to despise all gods, to disown their country, and set at nought parents, children, and brethren. Still they provide for the increase of their numbers. It is a crime among them to kill any newly-born infant. They hold that the souls of all who perish in battle or by the hands of the executioner are immortal. Hence a passion for propagating their race and a contempt for death. They are wont to bury rather than to burn their dead, following in this the Egyptian custom; they bestow the same care on the dead, and they hold the same belief about the lower world. Quite different is their faith about things divine. The Egyptians worship many animals and images of monstrous form; the Jews have purely mental conceptions of Deity, as one in essence. They call those profane who make representations of God in human shape out of perishable materials. They believe that Being to be supreme and eternal, neither capable of representation, nor of decay. They therefore do not allow any images to stand in their cities, much less in their temples. This flattery is not paid to their kings, nor this honour to our Emperors. From the fact, however, that their priests used to chant to the music of flutes and cymbals, and to wear garlands of ivy, and that a golden vine was found in the temple, some have thought that they worshipped father Liber, the conqueror of the East, though their institutions do not by any means harmonize with the theory; for Liber established a festive and cheerful worship, while the Jewish religion is tasteless and mean.

 

 

 

According to historians of the actual times,

the above is what a Jew (or Hebrew) actually looked like.

So who are the Albino people claiming to be Jews?

 

Encyclopedia Britannica - The Khazar people


Khazar, member of a confederation of Turkic-speaking tribes that in the late 6th century ce established a major commercial empire covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia. Although the origin of the term Khazar and the early history of the Khazar people are obscure, it is fairly certain that the Khazars were originally located in the northern Caucasus region and were part of the western Turkic empire (in Turkistan). The Khazars were in contact with the Persians in the mid-6th century ce, and they aided the Byzantine emperor Heraclius (reigned 610–641) in his campaign against the Persians. By the beginning of the 7th century, the Khazars had become independent of the Turkic empire to the east. But by the middle of that century, the expanding empire of the Arabs had penetrated as far northward as the northern Caucasus, and from then on until the mid-8th century the Khazars engaged in a series of wars with the Arab empire.


Although basically Turkic, the Khazar state bore little resemblance to the other Turkic empires of central Eurasia. It was headed by a secluded supreme ruler of semireligious character called a khagan—who wielded little real power—and by tribal chieftains, each known as a beg. The state’s military organization also seems to have lacked the forcefulness of those of the greater Turkic-Mongol empires. The Khazars seem to have been more inclined to a sedentary way of life, building towns and fortresses, tilling the soil, and planting gardens and vineyards. Trade and the collection of tribute were major sources of income.

But the most striking characteristic of the Khazars was the apparent adoption of Judaism in about 740 A.D. The circumstances of the conversion remain obscure, the depth of their adoption of Judaism difficult to assess; but the fact itself is undisputed and unparalleled in central Eurasian history. A few scholars have even asserted that the Judaized Khazars were the remote ancestors of many eastern European and Russian Jews.

 

 

The Balkan Turks refers to the Turkish people who have been living in the Balkans

since the Ottoman rule as well as their descendants who still live in the region today.

 

 

 

Many scientific studies also prove that the Turkic Khazar's

have nothing to do with Hebrews genetically.

 

 

 

 

As you will soon see, it is an Albanian Turk Army under the Albanian Muhammed Ali, who will subdue the native Blacks of Arabia and Sudan. However, the Albanian part of the Turk population in modern Arabia - like most things about modern Saudi Arabia - is unknown.

 

Wikipedia:

The House of Saud

The House of Saud is the ruling royal family of Saudi Arabia. It is composed of the descendants of Muhammad bin Saud, founder of the Emirate of Diriyah, known as the First Saudi state (1744–1818), and his brothers, though the ruling faction of the family is primarily led by the descendants of Ibn Saud, the modern founder of Saudi Arabia. The most influential member of the Royal family is the King of Saudi Arabia, currently King Salman, who chose first his nephew and then his son as crown prince without consulting the Allegiance Council. The family is estimated to comprise 15,000 members, but the majority of the power and wealth is possessed by a group of about 2,000 of them.

 

The Al ash-Sheikh

The Al ash-Sheikh also transliterated in a number of other ways, including Al ash-Shaykh, Al ash-Shaikh, Al al-Shaykh, or Al-Shaykh is Saudi Arabia's leading religious family. They are the descendants of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, the 18th-century founder of the Wahhabi sect of Islam which is today dominant in Saudi Arabia. In Saudi Arabia, the family is second in prestige only to the Saudi royal family, the Al Saud, with whom they formed a power-sharing arrangement nearly 300 years ago. The arrangement, which persists to this day, is based on the Al Saud maintaining the Al ash-Sheikh's authority in religious matters and the Al ash-Sheikh supporting the Al Saud's political authority.

 

The logical question to ask is: "Since both of these ruling families came into being less than three hundred years ago", what did the the rulership and culture of Arabia look like before then? Isn't it strange that the precise history of such an important Black country and culture is so opaque?

 

 

That is of course a retorical question: the reason Arab history is opaque is as with the Albino Bible,

the ruling Albino version is at odds with the truth. Take for instance the Arab Revolt of 1916:

 

 

The Arab Revolt was officially initiated by Hussein bin Ali, Sharif of Mecca, at Mecca on June 10, 1916. Although his sons ‘Ali (Faisal I of Iraq) and (Prince Faisal - of Saudi Arabia) had already initiated operations at Medina starting on 5 June with the aim of securing independence from the ruling Ottoman Turks and creating a single unified Arab state stretching from Aleppo in Syria to Aden in Yemen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Though the Sharifian revolt has tended to be regarded as a revolt rooted in a secular Arab nationalist sentiment, the Sharif did not present it in those terms; rather, he accused the Young Turks of violating the sacred tenets of Islam and called Arab Muslims to sacred rebellion against the ostensibly "impious" Ottoman government. Contrarily, Turks as well as many Arab leaders accused rebelling tribes of betraying the Muslim Caliphate during a campaign against imperialist powers which were trying to divide and govern the Muslim lands. Ultimately, the revolt failed to generate significant support from within the Ottoman Empire's Arab provinces, and remained largely limited to tribal levies from the Arabian Peninsula loyal to Sharif Hussein.

 

 

 

 

The only analogy for what happens in formerly Arab lands in West Asia, is what is currently happening on Indian lands in the United States. Whereby Albinos and their Indian Mulattoes dictate and determine what happens in regards to Indian property, both physical and cultural. But in the Americas it is somewhat understandable because so many Black Indians have been killed off.

Whereas in Arabia, we know of no Genocide. Though certainly in the early stages, as millions of Turks flooded in, the Arabs had no hope of holding power. But there it was in 1916, A Turk and his sons were calling for the overthrow of the Turks so that "THEY" (other Turks) could take control: AND BLACK ARABS WERE ANSWERING THE CALL FOR THEM! Don't know, but that seems very strange - as if Black Arabs have completely lost their sense-of-self.

 

 

And Albinos do their best to keep it lost

 

 

 

 

REALITY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Colonel Gerard E. Leachman

 

 

Brevet Lieut. Colonel Gerard E. Leachman CIE DSO (1880–1920), was a Black British soldier and spy who travelled extensively in Arabia.

Leachman was commissioned into the Royal Sussex Regiment and served in India and in the Boer War. He spent most of his career as a political officer and spy in Iraq, where he was instrumental in pacifying warring tribes to bring stability to the new country. Leachman also made various expeditions further south into Arabia, where he contacted Ibn Sa’ud on behalf of the British government. He travelled as a naturalist of the Royal Geographical Society, but was in fact a British agent. With his skill at riding a camel, Leachman was easily able to pass as a Bedouin and often travelled incognito.

Leachman’s first major expedition South into the Arabian Peninsula was in 1909, during which he was involved in a ferocious battle between the Anaiza and Shammar tribes near Ha’il. In 1912 Leachman made a second expedition with the intention of crossing the Rub Al Khali, but was refused permission by Ibn Sa’ud when he reached Riyadh and instead went to Hasa. He was the first Briton to be received by Ibn Sa’ud in his home city.

In December, 1915, during the Siege of Kut, the British commanding officer, Major General Charles Townshend, ordered Leachman to save the British cavalry by breaking out and riding south. This he did and the cavalry were the only British unit to escape before the fall of the city to the Ottomans.

Leachman was close to Gertrude Bell‘s friend Fahd Bey and fought with the Muntafiq tribal federation. After the war, he was made first military governor of Kurdistan. He was murdered by Sheikh Dhari, a tribal leader, near Fallujah (Iraq) on August 12, 1920.

 

A Movie about Colonel Gerard E. Leachman

 

Clash of Loyalties aka (The Great Question) is a 1983 Iraqi film focusing on the formation of Iraq out of Mesopotamia in the aftermath of the First World War. The film was financed by Saddam Hussain, filmed in Iraq (mainly at the Baghdad Film Studios in Baghdad's Mansour neighbourhood and on location at the Tigris-Euphrates marshlands, Babylon and Kut), at the height of the Iran–Iraq War, and starred Oliver Reed as Gerard Leachman.

Sometimes Albinos and their Mulattoes are a Hoot!

Reality is whatever they want it to be.

 

 

But in truth it's very hard to feel sorry for the Black Arab,

they went from being Great Conquers, to a people

"Hidden Away" by their current Turk rulers. And WHY??

 

 

 

 

Apparently their downfall was brought on by their seeming

"Insatiable" appetite for Albino Women!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jesus - Christianity and the Romans

 

Note: there is no known scientific evidence which proves that there was a deity in human form named Jesus.

 


Jesus

Most scholars assume a date of birth between 6 and 4 B.C, and that Jesus' preaching began around A.D. 27–29 and lasted one to three years. They calculate the death of Jesus as having taken place between A.D. 30 and 36.

 

Saint Paul, the Apostle
born AD 10?, Tarsus in Cilicia [Turkey] - died 67?, Rome

Original name Saul of Tarsus, 1st-century Hebrew who, after first being a bitter enemy of Christianity, later became an important figure in its history. Converted only a few years after the death of Jesus, he became the leading Apostle (missionary) of the new movement and played a decisive part in extending it beyond the limits of Judaism to become a worldwide religion. His surviving letters are the earliest extant Christian writings. Paul himself claimed the title of Apostle, apparently on the ground that he had seen the Lord and received a commission directly from him. This appears to be in agreement with the condition in Acts that a newly appointed Apostle should be capable of giving eyewitness testimony to the Lord's Resurrection. According to some early Christian writers however, some were called apostles after the period covered by the New Testament.

In the first Christian generation, authority in the church lay either in the kinsmen of Jesus or in those whom he had commissioned as Apostles and missionaries. The Jerusalem church under James, the brother of Jesus, was the mother church. Paul admitted that if they had refused to grant recognition to his Gentile converts; he would have labored in vain. If there was an attempt to establish a hereditary family overlordship in the church (by James’ descendants), it did not succeed, although among the Gentile congregations, the Apostles sent by Jesus enjoyed supreme authority. As long as the Apostles lived, there existed a living authoritative voice to which appeal could be made. But once they all had died, there was an acute question: who is in charge? The earliest documents of the 3rd. and 4th. Christian generations are mainly concerned with this issue: what is the authority of the ministerial hierarchy?

 

 

 

 

The Apostolic (European) congregations, had normally been served by elders called (presbyteroi,“priests”) or overseers (episkopoi, bishops”), assisted by attendants (diakonoi, deacons”). The clergy were responsible for preaching, administering baptism and Eucharist, and for distributing aid to the poor. In each city the president or senior member of the college (assembly) of presbyters naturally had some special authority; he corresponded with other churches and, when they were ordaining a new president, would go as the representative of his own community and as a symbol of the catholicity - the universality and unity - of the church of Christ.


Ignatius, bishop of Antioch early in the 2nd century, wrote seven letters on his way to martyrdom at Rome, that indicate how critical the centrifugal forces in the church had made the problem of authority. The bishop, he insisted, is the unique focus of unity without whose authority there is no sacrament and no church. A few years earlier, the letter of Bishop Clement of Rome (95 A.D.) to the church at Corinth based the hierarchy's authority on the concept of a historical succession of duly authorized teachers. Clement understood the clergy and laity to be essentially distinct orders within the one community, just as in the Old Testament there were high priests, priests, Levites (Temple functionaries), and laymen. The principles of Clement and Ignatius became important when the church was faced by people claiming recognition for their special charismatic (spiritual) gifts and especially by Gnostic heretics claiming to possess secret oral traditions whispered by Jesus to his disciples and not contained in publicly accessible records such as the Gospels.


Early Christianity was predominantly urban; peasants on farms were deeply attached to old ways and followed the paganism favored by most aristocratic landowners. By 400 A.D. some landowners had converted and built churches on their property, providing a “benefice” for the priest, who might often be one of the magnate's servants. In the East and in North Africa (now under Roman control), each township normally had its own bishop. In the Western provinces bishops were fewer and were responsible for larger areas, which from the 4th century onward, were called by the secular term dioceses (administrative districts). In the 4th century pressure to bring Western custom into line with Eastern, and to add more bishops was resisted on the ground that it would diminish the bishops' social status.

 

 

 


By the end of the 3rd century the bishop of the provincial capital was acquiring authority over his colleagues: the metropolitan (from the 4th century on, often entitled archbishop) was chief consecrator of his Episcopal (means-constituting government by bishops) colleagues. The bishops of Rome, Alexandria, and Antioch in the 3rd century were accorded some authority beyond their own provinces. Along with Jerusalem and Constantinople (founded in 330 A.D.), these three “sees” (means-seats of Episcopal authority) became, for the Greeks, the five patriarchates. The title Papa (“father”) was for 600 years, an affectionate term applied to any bishop to whom one's relationship was intimate; it began to be specially used for bishops of Rome, from the 6th. century, and by the 9th. century was almost exclusively applied to them.


From the beginning, the Christians in Rome assumed responsibilities for leading the church, (no doubt as a consequence of Roman military power), how this was viewed by James’ Church in Jerusalem, is not known. About 165 A.D, memorials were erected in Rome to the Apostles Peter and Paul - to Peter in a necropolis on the Vatican Hill, and to Paul on the road to Ostia. The construction of these memorials reflect a sense of being guardians of an apostolic tradition, a self-consciousness later expressed in another form, when about 190 A.D, Bishop Victor of Rome, threatened with excommunication, Christians in Asia Minor (Turkey) who, following the old custom, observed Easter on the day of the Hebrew Passover rather than (as at Rome), on the Sunday after the first full moon, and after the spring equinox. Stephen of Rome (256 A.D.) is the first known Pope, to base his claim to authority, on Jesus' commission to Peter (Matthew 16:18–19).

 

 

Saint Nicholas of Myra, also known as Nicholas of Bari, was an early Christian Bishop of the ancient Greek city of Myra in Asia Minor (modern-day Demre, Turkey) during the time of the Roman Empire. He is revered by many Christians as a saint Because of the many miracles attributed to his intercession, he is also known as Nicholas the Wonderworker. Saint Nicholas is the patron saint of sailors, merchants, archers, repentant thieves, children, brewers, pawnbrokers, and students in various cities and countries around Europe. His reputation evolved among the faithful, as was common for early Christian saints, and his legendary habit of secret gift-giving gave rise to the traditional model of Santa Claus ("Saint Nick") through Sinterklaas.   Santa Claus, also known as Saint Nicholas, Kris Kringle, Father Christmas, or simply Santa, is a legendary figure originating in Western Christian culture who is said to bring gifts to the homes of well-behaved ("good" or "nice") children on Christmas Eve (24 December). The modern Santa Claus grew out of traditions surrounding the historical Saint Nicholas ( gift-giver of Myra).
 

 

 


Bishops were originally elected by their congregations i.e., by the clergy and laity assembled together. But the consent of the laity decreased in importance, as recognition by other churches increased. The metropolitan and other provincial bishops soon became just as important as the congregation as a whole; and though they could never successfully impose the appointment of a man on a solidly hostile community, they could often prevent the appointment falling under the control of powerful lay families or factions. From the 4th century on, the emperors occasionally intervened to fill important sees, but such occurrences were not a regular phenomenon, (until the 6th century in Merovingian Gaul). After the initial problems regarding the continuity and authority of the Christian hierarchy, the greatest guarantee of true continuity and authenticity was found in the Scriptures. European Christians inherited (without debate at first) the Hebrew Scriptures as the Word of God to the people of God, but at a now superseded stage of their pilgrimage through history.


If St. Paul's Gentile mission was valid (the inclusion of Europeans), then the Old Testament Law was viewed as no longer God's final word to his people. Thus, the Hebrew Scriptures began to be called the old covenant. The new covenant, accepted by most, but not all, Gentile Christian communities was the Septuagintal canon. Though this Greek version of the Old Testament (called the Septuagint) included books (such as the Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus, and others) that were not accepted in the Hebrew canon. The 3rd century Greek theologian Origen and especially the Roman biblical scholar Jerome (4th–5th century) believed it imprudent to base theological affirmations on books enjoying less than universal recognition. The fact that in many English Bibles the parts of the Old Testament accepted in the Septuagint but not in the Hebrew canon are often printed separately under the title Apocrypha (of dubious authenticity – not canonical) is a tribute to these ancient hesitations.

 

The Romans


Traditional Roman religion was a public cult, not private mysticism, and was practiced because it was the perceived way of keeping heaven friendly. To refuse participation was viewed as disloyal. However, Hebrews could be excused for their refusal, by virtue of the undoubted fact that their monotheism was an ancient national tradition. Christians however, did everything in their power to dissuade people from following the customs of their fathers, whether they be Gentiles or Hebrews, and they seemed to threaten the cohesion of society, and the principle that each racial or ethnic group, was entitled to follow its national customs in religion.


Christians were not respectful toward ancestral pagan customs, their preaching of a new king sounded like revolution. The opposition of the Hebrews to Christians, often led to breaches of the peace, thus the Christians could very well be unpopular, and they often were. Paul's success at Ephesus (a Greek city in Turkey), provoked a riot to defend the cult of the goddess Artemis. In 64 A.D, a fire destroyed much of Rome; the emperor Nero killed a great many Christians as scapegoats.


Now for the first time, Rome was conscious that Christians were religiously distinct from Hebrews. But there probably was no formal senatorial enactment against Christianity at this time. Nero's persecution was local and short. Soon thereafter however, the profession of Christianity was defined as a capital crime, though of a special kind, because one gained pardon by apostasy, (rejection of a faith once confessed), which was demonstrated by offering sacrifice to the pagan gods or the emperor.


Popular gossip soon accused the Christians of secret vices, such as eating murdered infants (due to the secrecy surrounding the Lord's Supper and the use of the words body and blood), and also sexual promiscuity (due to the practice of Christians calling each other “brother” or “sister” while living as husband and wife). The governor of Bithynia (the younger Pliny 111 A.D.), told the emperor Trajan that to his surprise, he discovered the Christians to be guilty of no vice, only of obstinacy and superstition. Nevertheless, he executed without a qualm, those who refused to apostatize.


Early persecutions were sporadic, caused by local conditions and depending on the attitude of the governor. The fundamental cause of persecution was that the Christians conscientiously rejected the gods whose favor was believed to have brought success to the Roman Empire. But distrust was increased by Christian detachment and reluctance to serve in the imperial service and in the army. At any time in the 2nd or 3rd centuries, Christians could find themselves the object of unpleasant attention. A pogrom could be precipitated by a bad harvest, a barbarian attack, or a public festival of the emperor cult. Still, long periods of peace occurred.


Constantine



In 248–250 A.D, when Germanic tribes (Central Asian Albinos) threatened the Empire, popular hostility culminated in the persecution of Christians under the emperor Decius (reigned 249–251): by his edict all citizens were required to offer sacrifice, and to obtain from commissioners a certificate witnessing to the act, many of these certificates have survived. This requirement created an issue of conscience, especially because certificates could be bought by bribes. Under this renewed attack, the great bishop-theologian Cyprian of Carthage was martyred (257–259 A.D.). The persecuting emperor Valerian, however became a Persian prisoner of war, and his son Gallienus, issued an edict of toleration, restoring confiscated churches and cemeteries.

 

 

 

 

The church prospered from 261 to 303 A.D, but the empire suffered external attack, internal sedition, and rampant inflation. In February 303 A.D, the worst of all persecutions erupted under the co-emperors Diocletian and Galerius. The persecutions ended and peace was reached with the ascension of Emperor Constantine.

 

 

 

 

The conversion of Emperor Constantine to Christianity in about 300 A.D. set in motion events that made Palestine a major center of the Christian church. Before the fifth century A.D. very few Christians lived in Palestine. The non-Hebrew regions of the coast, the south, and Aelia Capitolina had several Roman and Greek Christian communities, and a few Minim (Hebrew Christians) lived in such Galilean towns as Sepphoris and Capernaum. But beginning in the fourth century the government responded to Roman Christian interest in the Holy Land; by embarking on a massive program of patronage, especially church-building, that was designed to encourage Christians to move to Palestine. There was also an imperial policy geared to encourage Hebrews to convert to Christianity; this by offering protection and rewards.

 

 

 

 

As a result of Christian settlement in the vicinities of Nazareth, Capernaum, and Tabgha, the region of Galilee lost its Hebrew majority. By about 400 A.D. there were ninety six Christian communities in Palestine. The sack of Rome in 410 A.D. caused a new round of migration to Palestine as a group of aristocratic Romans responded to Jerome's invitation to settle in Aelia Capitolina and Bethlehem, (Jerome was a Caucasian born in Stridon (a city in modern Croatia), he was probably of Turkish/Khazar ethnicity, he was later canonized a Saint by the catholic Church. In addition, numerous Christians came to Palestine not to settle but to visit holy sites on pilgrimage and to scour the land for relics to take home. On the other hand, the Hebrew population saw a constant and precipitous drop that lasted for centuries. In the second century, after the Bar Cochba Revolt, some two hundred Hebrew communities flourished in Palestine, but by the time of the Arab conquest in the late 630s we know of fewer than fifty. Except in the towns of Tiberias and Sepphoris and in the regions east of the Sea of Galilee, the Hebrews had become a minority in their own country.

The Christian and Hebrew leadership had encouraged their followers to have nothing to do with each other. Most Christian-Hebrew exchange took the form of vigorous attacks on the opinions and principles of each other. Now, after the conversion of Constantine, Christians found themselves in a position not merely to keep themselves separate from contamination by Judaism but to actively suppress it. The Roman Emperors codified the separation of the two religions by forbidding intermarriage and conversion from Christianity to Judaism. However, Hebrew converts to Christianity; received protection from Hebrew retribution. Increasingly the Hebrews lost civil status. Imperial legislation labeled Judaism a wild and nefarious sect. Until about 500 A.D. Roman emperors regularly reaffirmed the Hebrews right to the free exercise of their religion, but it became increasingly difficult to control violence against the Hebrews and their property.

 

 

 


The accession of Roman Emperor Justinian, in 527 A.D. initiated the last great phase of Roman persecution of the Hebrews. The new emperor redefined heretics to include the Hebrews and excluded them from military and civilian offices. They had never served in the army, but now they could not even serve even in local municipal government. The leadership of the last Hebrew cities, Tiberias and Sepphoris, passed into Greek and Roman hands. Justinian dealt a further blow to the Hebrews when the new compilation of Roman law, the Codex Iustinianus, omitted the ancient law declaring Judaism a legitimate religion, and began to attack Hebrew religious practices and to force baptism.

Meanwhile there appeared renewed resistance from the Samaritans (a sect practicing a strict and uncompromising version of the Hebrew religion), they had never received any of the privileges that the Romans afforded the more liberal Hebrews. They were forbidden to circumcise their children since the second century, and forced to sacrifice to the pagan gods during the Tetrarchy. Now they were suffering under the Christian empire, even greater oppression than the Hebrews.

 

The Samaritans

 

The Samaritans revolted against Emperor Zeno in 484 A.D. The Roman government put them down ruthlessly, and built a Christian church on their holy mountain, (Mt Gerizim) near Neapolis. Again in 529 A.D, they revolted after Justinian ordered the destruction of their synagogues. After they restored control, the Romans deported or forcibly baptized Samaritans and installed a garrison there. In both great revolts the Samaritans briefly set up their own royal state in the Davidic style.


In 603 A.D. the last war between Rome and Persia began. The Persians gradually occupied the eastern parts of the empire and in 613 A.D. they took Damascus. Then later, with Hebrew assistance, they occupied all of Palestine. They took Aelia Capitolina in 614 A.D. and gave it to the Hebrews. But within a few years they restored it to the Christians, because it was easier to deal with the majority population, which was Christian. In 622 A.D. Roman Emperor Heraclius turned the tide against Persia, and in 629 A.D. he recovered Palestine.

 

The Arab/Eurasian Invasion

 



Capture of Jerusalem

The Siege of Jerusalem was part of a military conflict which took place in the year 637 between the Byzantine Empire (The Black Eastern ROMAN Empire) and the Black Arab Caliphate. It began when the Arab army, under the command of Abu Ubaidah, besieged Jerusalem in November 636. After six months, the Patriarch Sophronius (of the Catholic Church) agreed to surrender, on condition that he submits only to the Arab Caliph. In April 637, Caliph Umar traveled to Jerusalem in person to receive the submission of the city. The Patriarch thus surrendered to him. The Muslim conquest of the city solidified Arab control over Palestine. The Muslims ended seven hundred years of Roman rule in Palestine.

 

 

 

 

Islam and the Black Arab

 

The Arabian Peninsula has always been a very large land with few people, that because it is overwhelmingly "Desert". As recently as 1960 it's population was only 4 million, though now it's 37 million. That as a result of millions upon millions more of Albinos pouring in to get some of the "Easy Money". Thereby making the real Arab even "More" invisible.

 

 

The military academics at the U.S.A.F. War College estimate that the force which attacked and subdued Egypt (640-642) numbered no more than 4,000 men. Religion in pre-Islamic Arabia was a mix of polytheism, Christianity, Judaism, and Iranian religions (Zoroastrian etc.). Arab polytheism, the dominant belief system, was based on the belief in deities and other supernatural beings such as djinn. Gods and goddesses were worshipped at local shrines, such as the Kaaba in Mecca.

 

The Black Tribesman were given a choice: convert to Islam - or Die.

 

When Muhammad tried to initially recruit Arab Tribsmen to Islam he was rebuffed. This Sura (a chapter or section of the Koran) speaks to the problem: Sura 9 - Al-Tawba (MADINA) : Verse 101: Certain of the desert Arabs round about you are Hypocrites, as well as (desert Arabs) among the Madinah folk: they are obstinate in hypocrisy: thou knowest them not: We know them: twice shall We punish them, and in addition shall they be sent to a grievous penalty. Translation : Eng-Yusuf Ali

Sura 9:5 says: And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah [Tax], let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful

Sura 9 - Al-Tawba (MADINA) :
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad SAW) (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah [Tax] with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. Translation : Eng-Dr. Mohsin


Strangely - Like Albino Christianity and the Black Hebrews:

Islam also has nothing good to say about Black people,

though in both cases the founding People are Black.

Isn't that Strange?

 

Tabari II:11 "Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were cousins of the Turks. Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth. He prayed that the African's color would change so that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks."

Tabari II:21 "Ham [Africans] begat all those who are black and curly-haired, while Japheth [Turks] begat all those who are full-faced with small eyes, and Shem [Arabs] begat everyone who is handsome of face with beautiful hair. Noah prayed that the hair of Ham's descendants would not grow beyond their ears, and that whenever his descendants met Shem's, the latter would enslave them."

Tabari IX:69 "Arabs are the most noble people in lineage, the most prominent, and the best in deeds. We were the first to respond to the call of the Prophet. We are Allah's helpers and the viziers of His Messenger. We fight people until they believe in Allah. He who believes in Allah and His Messenger has protected his life and possessions from us. As for one who disbelieves, we will fight him forever in Allah's Cause. Killing him is a small matter to us."

Ishaq:374 "The black troops and slaves of the Meccans cried out and the Muslims replied, 'Allah destroy your sight, you impious rascals.'"

Allah has made the Zanj black and misshapen so all will know they are cursed. For it is written: Like the crow among mankind are the Zanj for they are the worst of men and the most vicious of creatures in character and temperament.

If it (the pigeon) is black, then this can be brought back to too high temperatures in the ovaries when it was conceived and the limits of maturity have been passed. (in the egg). The same happens with the Zindj among the humans, because the body of the mother lives in bigger heat than normal they become dark and their hair shrinks and curls together.

Just like the intelligence of the Black people and the Red (white-people) people is smaller then the intelligence of the Braun ones, as well is with the godly guiding (instinct) of the black pigeons which is less then of the dark ones.

 

 

After their victory, the Muslims seem to have wasted no time in codifying

their relationship with the Hebrews, who were now under their control.

 

 

Qur'an 059.014
YUSUFALI: They (Hebrews) will not fight you (even) together, except in fortified townships, or from behind walls. Strong is their fighting (spirit) amongst themselves: thou wouldst think they were united, but their hearts are divided: that is because they are a people devoid of wisdom.

PICKTHAL: They will not fight against you in a body save in fortified villages or from behind walls. Their adversity among themselves is very great. Ye think of them as a whole whereas their hearts are divers. That is because they are a folk who have no sense.

SHAKIR: They will not fight against you in a body save in fortified towns or from behind walls; their fighting between them is severe, you may think them as one body, and their hearts are disunited; that is because they are a people who have no sense.

Qur'an 033.026
YUSUFALI: And those of the People of the Book (Hebrews) who aided them - Allah did take them down from their strongholds and cast terror into their hearts. (So that) some ye slew, and some ye made prisoners.

PICKTHAL: And He brought those of the People of the Scripture who supported them down from their strongholds, and cast panic into their hearts. Some ye slew, and ye made captive some.

SHAKIR: And He drove down those of the followers of the Book who backed them from their fortresses and He cast awe into their hearts; some you killed and you took captive another part.

Qur'an 033.027
YUSUFALI: And He made you heirs of their lands, their houses, and their goods, and of a land which ye had not frequented (before). And Allah has power over all things.

PICKTHAL: And He caused you to inherit their land and their houses and their wealth, and land ye have not trodden. Allah is ever Able to do all things.

SHAKIR: And He made you heirs to their land and their dwellings and their property, and (to) a land which you have not yet trodden, and Allah has power over all things.

 

Tabari VIII:121 Ali struck the Hebrew with a swift blow that split his helmet, neck protector, and head, landing in his rear teeth. And the Muslims entered the city. Muhammad conquered the [Hebrew] neighborhood. Safiyah was brought to him, and another woman with her. Bilal led them past some of the Hebrews we had slain including the woman's dead husband. When she saw them, the woman with Safiyah cried out, slapped her face, and poured dust on her head. When Allah's Prophet saw her, he said, Take this she-devil away from me!

 

Safiyah
Safiyah Bint Huyeiy Ibn Akhtab, was a Hebrew woman who was captured when Muhammads troops attacked Khaibar. Safiyah was seventeen and very beautiful when Muslims killed her father, husband and many of her relatives. She was brought to the Prophet as his share of the booty. The Prophet desired her, but Safiyah requested the Prophet to wait till he had gone a stage away from Khaibar. One mile from Khaibar, the Prophet married Safiyah.

 

Bilal
Bilal ibn Rabah was an Ethiopian slave born in Mecca in the late 6th century. Slavery was common in Mecca, and many slaves accepted Islam. When an ordinary free man accepted Islam, despite opposition, he would enjoy the protection of his tribe. For slaves however, there was no such protection, and they were subjected to persecution. Abu Bakr felt for these slaves, so he purchased eight slaves, four men and four women and set them free. Bilal ibn Rabah was one of the slaves purchased by Abu Bakr.

The Islamic prophet Muhammad, chose Bilal as his muezzin (The chosen person at the mosque who leads the call to Friday service and the five daily prayers.), effectively making him the first official muezzin of the Islamic faith. He was known for his beautiful voice with which he called people to their prayers.

 

 

There are many theories as to what happened to the surviving Hebrews.

It is known that many had over-time wound-up in Libya. This paper deals with that.

 

Click here for page on Libyan Hebrews >>

 

____________________________________________________________

 

 

Meanwhile, the Deserts of Israel are full of Black "Native" people.

The Albinos call them Bedouin's, but are they Really?

 

The point being, is that if these people are really Hebrews, (we don't know - between the regular Turks and Turk Mulattoes, they now have the Turkic Khazars as their rulers), so they can't speak for themselves. And from the Khazars point of view, having to admit that these Black people are the "True" Hebrews would even more; de-legitimize their claims.

 

 

These few pictures are of Black Natives of the Negev Desert in Israel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Israeli settlers solution to the problems Black people cause

 

 

 

Arabs and Hebrews

 

Historically, Arabia came be divided into three parts: the relatively advanced African Western part, the Northern Middle Eastern part, and the little known Eastern part (in the historical sense). The extreme south-west portion of the Arabian Peninsula supported three early kingdoms. The first, the Minaean, was centered in the interior of what is now Yemen, but probably embraced most of southern Arabia. Although dating is difficult, it is generally believed that the Minaean Kingdom existed from 1200 to 650 B.C. The second kingdom, the Sabaean (see Sheba), was founded around 930 B.C. and lasted until around 115 B.C; it probably supplanted the Minaean Kingdom and occupied substantially the same territory. The Sabaean capital and chief city, Ma’rib, flourished as did no other city of ancient Arabia, partly because of its controlling position on the caravan routes linking the seaports of the Mediterranean with the frankincense-growing region of the Hadhramaut, and partly because a large nearby dam provided water for irrigation.

 

 

Sun temple - The Bar'an temple in Ma'rib. Known as Bilqis Throne (the Arabic name for the Queen of Sheba), it was built in the 8th century B.C. dedicated to Wadd (Ilumquh) and performed its function for nearly 1000 years.

 

 

The Sabaean Kingdom was widely referred to as Saba, and it has been suggested that the Queen of Sheba mentioned in the Bible and the Quran, who visited King Solomon of Israel in Jerusalem in the 10th century B.C, was Sabaean. Both the Bible and the Quran mention that under Soloman's rule the Kingdom of Israel included territories on the peninsula east of the Jordan river. The Islamic view of Solomon, holds that those territories reached as far south as Yemen.

Hebrew-Roman historian Josephus describes a place called Saba, as a walled royal city of Ethiopia, which Persian king Cambyses afterwards named Meroe. He says "it was both encompassed by the Nile quite round, and the other rivers, Astapus and Astaboras" offering protection from both foreign armies and river floods. According to Josephus it was the conquering of Saba that brought great fame to a young Egyptian Prince, simultaneously exposing his personal background as a slave child named Moses.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Modern archaeological evidence increasingly supports Sheba being located in modern Yemen at or near the site of the famous Marib Dam, which was first built more than 2500 years ago. Some scholars suggest a link to the Sabaeans of southern Arabia. A number of sources claim that the people of Sheba controlled trade in the Red Sea, and expanded at some point from Arabia into Africa to found trading posts in the lands currently called Eritrea and Somalia.

In the medieval Ethiopian cultural work called the Kebra Nagast, Sheba was located in Ethiopia. Some scholars therefore point to a region in northern Tigray and Eritrea which was once called Saba (later called Meroe), as a possible link with the Biblical Sheba. Other scholars link Sheba with Shewa (also written as Shoa, modern Addis Ababa) in Ethiopia. Ruins in many other countries, including Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, Egypt, Eritrea and Iran have been credited as being Sheba, but with only minimal evidence. There has even been a suggestion of a link between the name "Sheba" and that of Zanzibar (“San-Sheba”).



 

 

The Banu Nadir


The Banu Nadir were a Jewish tribe who lived in northern Arabia until the 7th century at the oasis of Yathrib (now known as Medina). The tribe challenged Muhammad as the leader of Medina. and planned along with allied nomads to attack Muhammad and were expelled from Medina as a result. The Banu Nadir then planned the battle of the Trench together with the Quraysh. They later participated in the battle of Khaybar.


In early Medina, in addition to the Banu Nadir, there were two other major Jewish tribes: the Banu Qurayza and the Banu Qaynuqa. They were joined centuries later by two non-Jewish Arab tribes from Yemen, Banu Aus and Banu Khazraj.


Like other Medinese Jews, Banu Nadir bore Arabic names, but spoke a distinct dialect of Arabic. They earned their living through agriculture, money lending, and trade in weapons and jewels, maintaining commercial relations with Arab merchants of Mecca. Their fortresses were located half a day's march to the south of Medina. Banu Nadir were wealthy and lived in some of the best lands in Medina.

 


Ludovico di Varthema, also known as Barthema and Vertomannus (c. 1470 – 1517), was an Italian traveller, diarist and aristocrat known for being the first non-Muslim European to enter Mecca as a pilgrim. Nearly everything that is known about his life comes from his own account of his travels, Itinerario de Ludouico de Varthema Bolognese, published in Rome in 1510.

 

 

Wiki:

Battle of Khaybar/Khaibar:

The Battle of Khaybar was fought in the year 629 between Muslims and the Jews living in the oasis of Khaybar, located 150 kilometers (93 mi) from Medina in the north-western part of the Arabian peninsula, in modern-day Saudi Arabia. According to Muslim sources, the Muslims attacked Jews who had barricaded themselves in a fort. On the reasons for the attack, Scottish historian William Montgomery Watt notes the presence in Khaybar of the Banu Nadir, who were inciting hostilities among with neighboring Arab tribes against the Islamic community in Medina. Italian orientalist Laura Veccia Vaglieri, while giving full credence to Watt's view, claims other motives might have included the prestige the engagement would confer upon Muhammad among his followers, as well the booty which could be used to supplement future campaigns.

The Jews of Khaybar finally surrendered and were allowed to live in the oasis on the condition that they would give one-half of their produce to the Muslims. Jews continued to live in the oasis for several more years until they were expelled by caliph Umar. The imposition of tribute upon the conquered Jews served as a precedent for provisions in the Islamic law requiring the exaction of tribute known as jizya from non-Muslims under Muslim rule, and confiscation of land belonging to non-Muslims into the collective property of the Muslim community. In return, non-Muslim citizens were permitted to practice their faith, to enjoy a measure of communal autonomy, to be entitled to Muslim state's protection from outside aggression, and to be exempted from military service and the Zakat, which is obligatory upon Muslim citizens.

 

_________________________________________________________________

 

 

Meanwhile, Black Arabs felt that giving their Albino Slaves (Turk Mamluks) and other Fighters “Rights" would protect them from their MUCH more numerous, Non-Arab troops. It was under Umayyad Caliph Umar II (reigned 717-720), that these discontented mawali (non-Arab Muslims) were placed on the same footing with all other Muslims, without respect to Race or Nationality. This decree allowed Turks and other Eurasians to fully assimilate into the Muslim brotherhood.

 

 

 

 

 

Note: It should be remembered that European Black Christians

had no problem with Black Arab Islamists in the Holy lands.

The Crusades began only after Albino Turks took control of Islam and the holy lands.

 


It was during the rule of Abbasid caliph Harun ar-Rashid (ruled 786-809), that the caliphs began assigning Egypt to Turks rather than to Arabs. The first Turkish dynasty was that of Ibn Tulun who entered Egypt in 868.


The Ikhshidid dynasty: 935 A.D. ushered in the Ikhshidid dynasty of Muhammad ibn Tughj, a Turk from Uzbekistan in Central Asia. The Ikhshidid dynasty was usurped by their Abyssinian slave tutor named Kafur, he ruled Egypt with the caliphate's sanction.

The Fatimid Dynasty: When Kafur died in 968, the Fatimids (a contending force for the Caliphate), took advantage of the disorder in Egypt to attack, the attack was successful and led to the occupation of Egypt by a Berber army led by the Fatimid general Jawhar. The early Fatimids' reliance on Berber troops was soon replaced by the importation of Turkish, Sudanese, and Arab contingents. By the time of their decline however, the Fatimid army was under the leadership of Eurasian Armenian generals, (not Aramaean).

 

SEEING THE GROWING POWER OF ALBINOS IN THE HOLY LANDS MUST HAVE FRIGHTENED BLACK EUROPEAN KINGS.


The First Crusade by Black Europeans occurred in 1096-1099. By then Black Arab Muslims had ruled Jerusalem for 462 years. Clearly Religion was NOT the issue, RACE WAS! As it happens, Black Europe’s instincts were correct, the Asian Albinos were a seminal threat, and in time the Albinos would destroy them.

 

But of course the Arabs were very foolish to trust the Albinos; in 1055, the Arab caliph al-Qa'im (reigned 1031–75) was usurped by the Seljuq Turk Chieftain Toghril Beg; and after protracted negotiation ensuring restoration of the caliph's dignity, Toghril entered Baghdad in December 1055. The Black Arab Caliph enthroned him and married a Seljuq princess. The Turks then installed Al-Muqtadi as Abbasid caliph. Soon after, the Seljuk Turks took control of Jerusalem, and prevented Christian pilgrimages. They later moved against the Byzantine Roman Empire of Roman Emperor Alexus I.

 

 

 

 


The First Crusade did not commence until after Pope Urban's call at Clermont in 1095. While Christian kingdoms prepared their armies for departure, an ill-equipped mob of peasants under the leadership of the charismatic monk Peter the Hermit attempted to make the crusade on their own. This disorganized event known as the People's Crusade was marked by violence against Jews as the mob made its way across Europe and by its quick defeat at the hands of the Turks. Although the First Crusade was plagued with hardships ranging from hunger to disease, it nonetheless ended favorably for the Crusaders with the capture of Nicea, Antioch, and most importantly, Jerusalem in 1099.

 

 

 

 

The Ayyubid dynasty: In 1169 The Turkish governor of Syria sent an army lead

by Saladin (a "Real" (Black) Kurd, born in Tikrit Iraq), to occupy Egypt.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Eastern Roman Empire

The Byzantine Empire

 

 

 

Ultimately there were just too many Asian Albinos coming in:

(remembering that the Mongols were emptying ALL of them out of Asia)!

Thus the only path to Black survival was to accept "Dynastic" marriages with Albino Princesses.

 

 

 

 

 

But Black/Albino Dynastic marriages of course

led to Mulatto rulers like John VIII (above), all over Europe.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Fall of Constantinople

Britannica

 

The Fall of Constantinople, (29 May 1453). After ten centuries of wars, defeats, and victories, the Byzantine Empire came to an end when Constantinople fell to the Ottoman Turks in May 1453. The city’s fall sent shock waves throughout Christendom. It is widely quoted as the event that marked the end of the European Middle Ages. By the mid-fifteenth century the Byzantine Empire had long been in decline, but it remained an important bastion of Christian Europe facing Muslim Asia. The Ottoman Turks, however, had extended their territories to include the Balkans as well as Anatolia. Only Constantinople held out behind its supposedly impregnable walls, as the Ottoman Empire spread around it. For the Ottomans, the city had enormous prestige, both as a center of the rival Christian faith and a symbol of imperial power. A attempted siege conducted by Sultan Murad II in 1422 failed, but Murad’s young successor, Mehmed II, leader of the Ottomans from 1451, was determined to carry out the operation that would cap all previous Turkish triumphs.

 

 

 

 

When Mehmed II set out to take Constantinople in the spring of 1453, the city was a shadow of its former glory, but it remained highly difficult to capture by assault. Its formidable fortifications had held out through numerous sieges in the past. It was poorly garrisoned, its defenders, under Emperor Constantine XI, numbering around 8,000 men despite having been bolstered by the arrival of Christian volunteers from across western Europe. Mehmed besieged the city in early April with a force of between 75,000 and 100,000 and a large fleet. His preparations were extensive. He had built a castle on the Bosphorus with guns that would prevent any relief ships sailing to the city from the Black Sea. He also employed a Hungarian artillery expert, Urban, to build him the most powerful cannon ever seen to batter the city’s walls. Access to the inlet of the Golden Horn, Constantinople’s port alongside the walls, was blocked by a chain, so Mehmed had his ships dragged from the Bosphorus across land on logs, then refloated in the Golden Horn to menace the fortifications from the sea.

 

 

 

 

 

 

END OF BLACK RULE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Battle for Arabia and the lands the

Black Arabs originally conquered.

 

Muhammad Ali (Pasha): In March 1803 the British were evacuated in accordance with the Peace of Amiens. But the Ottomans, determined to reassert their control over Egypt remained, establishing their power through a viceroy and an occupying army of Albanians. The Albanians later mutinied and installed their own leader as acting viceroy. When he was assassinated shortly afterward, the command of the Albanians passed to his lieutenant, Muhammad Ali. The dynasty that he established would rule Egypt and Sudan until the Egyptian Revolution of 1952.

In Arabia, the domination of Mecca and Medina by puritanical Wahhabi Muslims was a serious embarrassment to the Ottoman sultan, who was the titular overlord of the Arabian territory of the Hejaz and the leading Muslim sovereign. At the invitation of Sultan Mahmud II (1808-39), Muhammad Ali sent an expedition to Arabia that between 1811 and 1813 expelled the Wahhabis from the Hejaz. In a further campaign (1816-18), Ibrahim Pasha, the viceroy's eldest son, defeated the Wahhabis in their homeland of Najd, and brought central Arabia under Albanian control.

In 1820-21 Muhammad Ali sent an expedition up the Nile and conquered much of what is now the northern Sudan. By so doing, he made himself master of one of the principal channels of the slave trade, and began an African Empire that was to be expanded under his successors. The conquest of the Sudan was intended to provide recruits. But the slaves, encamped at Aswan, died wholesale, and Muhammad Ali had to look elsewhere for his troops. In 1823 he took to conscripting Egyptian peasants for the rank and file of his new army. On the other hand, the officers were mostly Turkish Ottomans, while the director of the whole enterprise, Sulayman Pasha (Colonel Sève), was a former French officer. The conscription was brutally administered. In 1882 the British once again invaded and occupied Egypt. This occupation was to last until the end of WWI. After which, Egypt became a protectorate of Britain.

 

 

 

 

But it would get even worse: today in the Middle East and North Africa, Turks and other Asian Albinos (and their Mulattoes) have colluded to deny local Blacks knowledge of their history: as a result when the Albino rulers tell them that their presence in those lands is a result of them being brought there as SLAVES: the more intelligent can only mumble - it ain't so, and nothing more. The great irony here is that it is well documented history that it was the ancestors of the Albino rulers who came to the region as Slaves.

 

 

Geography of Southern Arabia by Baron von Maltzan
Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society of London
Vol. 16, No. 2 (1871 - 1872), pp. 115-123

 

 

It is the Arabs of Oman who are historically best known: because of their vile and degenerate "Arab" Slave Trade out of Zanzibar. Which is claimed to have enslaved more Africans, and killed more Africans, than the likewise vile and degenerate Slave trading kings and kingdoms of West Africa.

 

 

 

 

But it is the Arabs of Socotra who are the "Purest" Arabs: for whatever that's worth.

 

 

 

 

TODAY - THESE ARE ARABS!

(Not really - but thanks to Muhammad Ali and Albino media - the World thinks Turks and Turk Mulattoes are Arabs)

 

 


From the time of the Roman occupation, Canaanites and Hebrews and begun to leave Canaan. By the time of the Muslim invasion, with the majority of the population already killed or displaced by Romans and Greeks, there is no telling how many were left alive to flee. One group whose flight can be traced, is that of the Lemba tribe in Zimbabwe. They have maintained their Hebrew religion and traditions through the many centuries. {They were genetically tested, and confirmed to be Hebrews}. Hebrews also fled to Ethiopia and other countries.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hebrew writing and the Dead Sea Scrolls

 

One of the enduring mysteries of ancient Canaan is; what happened to the ancient writings of the Hebrews. The Hebrew’s were a very literate people, who wrote on many subjects. Yet today all that exists is the works of Josephus Flavius: who was a Hebrew traitor named Joseph, who upon going over to the Romans, was made a General and given the title Josephus Flavius. He subsequently commanded Roman troops in putting down the Hebrew rebellion.

Josephus, in his delusion, attempted to establish the greatness and antiquity of his people in his written works, even after he had aided in their destruction. His, and the works of a few other authors, written around the time of the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. is all that survives today.

Certainly history is replete with instances of Khazar/Jewish texts, some claimed to be ancient? Being burned in Europe, But what about the genuine ancient texts of the Hebrews? How could it be, that the self-written history of an entire nation, with thousands of years of ups and downs: and a people with arguably the most convoluted and eventful path to nationhood, be lost to all mankind?

Stranger still; is the absence of the original Septuagint. This is a work that was commissioned by the second Greek king of Egypt Ptolemy II, in 323 B.C. Ptolemy arranged for six translators from each of the twelve tribes of Israel to come to Egypt and translate the Hebrew Scriptures into a volume for his library in Alexandria.

This book is known as the “Septuagint” derived from the Latin word for "seventy". It is the first Bible, and the prototype for all other Bibles including the Masoretic text, which was begun around 600 A.D. and completed in 1000 A.D. (the Bible of the Khazars or Jews). All that remains of the Septuagint today is copies of copies, which have been reinterpreted and reworked so often, that its relationship to the original cannot be judged.

Roman desire to destroy anything and everything that might offer the Hebrew’s moral support is well known. Their destruction of Hebrew buildings and institutions is well documented. However, there is universal silence as to who destroyed all the Hebrew writings.
Roman culpability for at least some of it, was established with the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, which the Hebrew’s successfully hid for 2000 years, in order to prevent them from being destroyed by the Romans, (the Romans also burned the writings of the Etruscans in Italy).
The Dead Sea Scrolls

The first of the Dead Sea Scroll discoveries occurred in 1947 in Qumran, a village situated about twenty miles east of Jerusalem on the northwest shore of the Dead Sea. A young Bedouin shepherd, following a goat that had gone astray, tossed a rock into one of the caves along the sea cliffs and heard a cracking sound: the rock had hit a ceramic pot containing leather and papyrus scrolls that were later determined to be nearly twenty centuries old. Ten years and many searches later, eleven caves around the Dead Sea were found to contain tens of thousands of scroll fragments dating from app. 300 B.C. to 68 A.D. and representing an estimated eight hundred separate works.

 

 

 

 

The Dead Sea Scrolls comprise a vast collection of Hebrew documents written in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, and encompassing many subjects and literary styles. They include manuscripts or fragments of every book in the Hebrew Bible except the Book of Esther, all of them created nearly one thousand years earlier than any previously known biblical manuscripts. The scrolls also contain the earliest existing biblical commentary on the Book of Habakkuk, and many other writings, among them religious works pertaining to Hebrew sects of the time.

But were the Romans the only ones? It seems strange that the writings of the people whose religious beliefs are at the core of the great religions of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, could be made non-existent, without a clue as to how it happened, when it happened, or who did it. That the Romans would then turn around, and build their great religion of Catholicism upon the religious beliefs of the Hebrews, a people that they utterly destroyed, is truly bizarre.

Then there is the curiosity as to why the Vatican and the leadership in Israel will not allow the World to see the Dead Sea Scrolls, except for a few minor and unimportant pieces which have been loaned out. As the only surviving authentic Hebrew writings, they are invaluable for learning the true nature and beliefs of the ancient Hebrews, as well as ascertaining the fidelity of modern religious teachings.

Clearly then the refusal of the Catholic Church and the Israeli to make the Dead sea Scrolls public, is simply an attempt to hide what they had done: that being the usurpation of Black Hebrew religion and the replacement of it's people and images with Albino people and images. To help hide the fact that the Dead scrolls are still kept secret, the Albinos have produced "Fake" Books supposedly containing translations of the Dead Sea Scrolls.

 

 

Modern Christianity

Catholicism and Protestantism

 

 

Please Note: The scientific Study "Cranial Discrete Traits in a Byzantine Population and Eastern Mediterranean Population Movements," (Above):


Which proves that the Eastern Roman Empire (the Byzantine) was Black, and by corollary, the Western Roman Empire also; is presented in the "Anatolia" section of this site. The study also explains indirectly, why the Eastern Orthodox Catholic Church, which was not overcome by the Albino Turks from Asia until 1453, still presents it's Saints and other personages of honor as Black Skinned, while the Roman Catholic Church, which was overcome by the Albino Germanics from Central Asia much earlier, (476 A.D.), presents all related personages as White. This dichotomy is demonstrated by portraits of people Sainted before the schism. Note the case of Saint Vladimir the Great, who was a prince of Novgorod, grand prince of Kiev, and ruler of Kievan Rus' from 980 to 1015. Vladimir's father was prince Sviatoslav of the Rurik dynasty. (In Russia as everywhere else, the original Monarchs were Blacks).

 

 

 

 

 

 


The Great Schism (1054 A.D.) was the break of communion between what is now the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox church, which has lasted since the 11th century. THEY (Albinos) tell us that the irreconcilable issues were: The source of the Holy Spirit, whether leavened or unleavened bread should be used in the Eucharist, the Bishop of Rome's claim to universal jurisdiction, and the place of the See of Constantinople in relation to the Pentarchy.

 

 

 

But considering the great upheavals in Europe which were precipitated by the Mongols empting-out Asia of all of its Albinos, and chasing them into Black Europe: (the study establishes the truth that Europe was Black also): doesn't it seem more credible that the schism in the Catholic Church was really about RACE?

 

 

 

 

Adherents of the Orthodox Church are of course, themselves Albinos: just Slav’s instead of Germanic’s. So it really would be too much to expect them to depict some of their Black Saints with Negroid features, (Blacks of course have Caucasian, Mongol, and Negroid features). The fact that they depict them “Dark” shows that they are at least “Trying”.

 

 

Icon of All Saints of the British Isles and Ireland (Eastern Orthodox Church) - Saint Seraphim Church, Little Walsingham, Norfolk England. (They're all Black).

 

 

<<Click here for larger picture and the name of each Saint by position>>

 

 

 

 

 

 

Which brings up a very strange circumstance:

Today's Albino Russians are more Racist than just about anybody except American Albino Rabble.

Yet they tolerate Portraits of their past Emperors as they were - Blacks!

 

 

 

 

There is a separate page with all of the information about these Russian portraits:

Click anywhere on this line >>

 

 

If that had been a Portrait of a Black Western European King,

it would have been destroyed and hundreds of FAKE portraits made depicting the King as an Albino.

OR: he would be claimed to be an African Slave, befriended by some noble Albino.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The foundations of Modern Albino Christianity

 

 

Charlemagne (Charles I, the Great)

 

 

Please note this quote from the Albino boys at Wiki:

"By the 6th century, the western Germanic tribe of the Franks had been Christianised"

(This is a great example of Albinos stealing the identity of Blacks to create a false, fantasy history).

Franks were of course original Black Europeans: (Here you see the beauty of having "Artifacts".

 

 

 

 

Charlemagne (Charles I, the Great) was installed as the founding Holy Roman Emperor (based in Germany) by Pope Leo III, even while the Eastern Roman Empire, and the Western Roman Empire still existed. The reason was simple, since the start of the "Modern Era" (year "0" A.D.) "NEW" Albino Tribes from Central Asia (i.e. the Germanics, the Slav's, and the Turks) had been invading Europe. So that by the time of Charlemagne, the Albinos were running rampant. The Germanics had taken Rome and the Western Roman Empire: and had advanced even to North Africa. Meanwhile the Slav's and later the Turks, had the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) under constant pressure.

 

 

 

 

Charlemagne spent the rest of his life trying to bring the Albinos under control,

gaining territory, and advancing Christianity.

 

 

 

 

The Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus (56-118 A.D.)

Tacitus: Germany Book 1 [1]

1. Germany is separated from the Galli, the Rhæti, and Pannonii, by the rivers Rhine and Danube; mountain ranges, or the fear which each feels for the other, divide it from the Sarmatæ and Daci. Elsewhere ocean girds it, embracing broad peninsulas and islands of unexplored extent, where certain tribes and kingdoms are newly known to us, revealed by war.

The name Germany, on the other hand, they say, is modern and newly introduced, from the fact that the tribes which first crossed the Rhine and drove out the Gauls, and are now called Tungrians, were then called Germans. Thus what was the name of a tribe, and not of a race, gradually prevailed, till all called themselves by this self-invented name of Germans, which the conquerors had first employed to inspire terror.

4. For my own part, I agree with those who think that the tribes of Germany are free from all taint of intermarriages with foreign nations, and that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like none but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities throughout so vast a population. All have fierce blue eyes, red hair, huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion. They are less able to bear laborious work. Heat and thirst they cannot in the least endure; to cold and hunger their climate and their soil inure them.

 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________

 

 

Note these Black Kings, Popes, Saints, and Nobles:

Seen anything like these lately?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wonder if secretly worshipping a Black Mary

will really save their souls?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

One thing our Albinos are never short of is "Grevience". So it was not long after they had all been driven out of Asia by the Mongols, that they noticed they now far outnumbered Blacks in Europe, that they started complaining about Black religion being corrupt, and not serving them well.

 

 

 

 

In the 1500s Martin Luther and other Albinos rebelled against the Black Catholic Church, then under the protection of the "Black Holy Roman Empire" headquartered in Germany. The Reformation as the Albinos called it: specifically referred to as the Protestant Reformation, was a schism in Western Christianity initiated by Martin Luther and continued by John Calvin, Huldrych Zwingli, and other early Protestant Reformers in 16th-century Europe. It is usually considered to have started with the publication of the Ninety-five Theses by Luther in 1517 and lasted until the end of the "Thirty Years" War with the Peace of Westphalia in 1648. It was this war, where all the Albinos across Europe, ganged-up on the Black Holy Roman Empire, which killed-off millions of Black Europeans, and resulted in most of the survivors being shipped to the Americas as slaves or Indentures. This caused the fall of Black rule in Europe, and the usurping and rewriting of Black religion.

During the "Thirty Years" Race/Religious Wars, Martin Luthers Albinos killed hundreds of thousands - perhaps millions - of Black Europeans. When they got to the Americas, (by their own calculations), within two hundred years, they had killed (130 MILLION mostly Blacks, and some Mongols)!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The apparent first Protestant Bible was the "The Tyndale Bible".

Because of the influence of printing and a demand for scriptures in English, William Tyndale began working on a New Testament translation directly from the Greek in 1523. The work could not be continued in England because of political and ecclesiastical pressures, so the printing of his translation began in Cologne (Germany) in 1525. Again under pressure, this time from the city authorities, Tyndale had to flee to Worms, where two complete editions were published in 1525. Copies were smuggled into England where they were at once proscribed. Of 18,000 copies printed (1525–28), two complete volumes and a fragment are all that remain. When the New Testament was finished, Tyndale began work on the Old Testament. The Pentateuch was issued in Marburg in 1530, each of the five books being separately published and circulated.

Followed by The Coverdale Bible, On October 4, 1535.

Followed by The Matthew Bible in the same year.

Followed by The Great Bible in 1538 by injunction of Henry VIII

Followed by The Geneva Bible, also called Breeches Bible in 1560.

Followed by The The Bishops Bible in 1564.

Followed by The King James Bible in 1604.

Followed by The New English Bible in 1961.

 

 

According to Encyclopedia.com, these are the current Protestant Denominations:

Assumed; whose doctrines were founded by Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Huldrych Zwingli

Don't know why some have "Catholic" in their title.

 

Adventists
African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church
Amana Church Society
Anabaptists
Anglican Communion
Armenian Church
Arminianism
Assemblies of God
Baptist churches
Baptists
Bereans
Bible Christians
Bible societies
Brethren
broad church
Brownists
Burghers
Calvinism
Calvinistic Methodist Church
Catholic Apostolic Church
Catholicism
Christadelphians
Christian Catholic Church
Christian Endeavor
Christian Science
Christian socialism
Christians
Church of England
Church of Ireland
Church of Scotland
Church of the Nazarene
Church of the New Jerusalem
Churches of Christ
Confessing Church
Congregationalism
covenant
Covenanters
Diggers
Disciples of Christ
Dissenters
Doukhobors
Dukhobors
Dutch Reformed Church
Episcopal Church
Episcopalianism
Episcopalians
evangelical
Evangelical Alliance
Evangelical and Reformed Church
Evangelical United Brethren Church
Fifth Monarchy Men
Free Church of Scotland
Fundamental Orders
fundamentalism
German Catholics
high church
Huguenots
Hussites
Illuminati
Independents
Jehovahs Witnesses
Levellers
Low Church
Lutheranism
Lutherans
Mennonites
Methodism
Moravian Church
Mormons
New Thought
nonconformists
Oxford Group
Oxford movement
Peculiar People
Pentecostal churches
Pentecostalism
Pietism
Plymouth Brethren
presbytery
Protestantism
Puritanism
Quakers
quietism
Racovian Catechism
Ranters
Reformation
Reformed churches
Religious Society of Friends
Remonstrants
Sabbatarians
Salvation Army
Scientist Church of Christ
separatists
Seventh-Day Adventists
Shakers
Social Gospel
Socinianism
Solemn League and Covenant
Unitarians
United Church of Christ

Unity
Waldenses
World Council of Churches

 

 

 

Note that nowhere in the ancient relief's presented above, do we see even the slightest hint of the figure of an Asian or European Albino. The evidence indicates that there never was any Albino Emperors of Rome, that is until the Germanics took it in 476 A.D. It is only when we see the Tomb paintings at Tarquinia (c. 300-400 B.C.), and elsewhere that we see any Albinos at all; (and guess who is dating those paintings). We already know that most/all of those Roman and Greek statues of Albinos are FAKES. The problem is, WHEN did they (Albinos) really get to Europe? We can’t depend on Albinos to tell us, because they LIE: so we will have to keep digging.

 

 

FAKES!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click for Realhistoryww Home Page