This is a specific subject page, dealing exclusively with, or primarily with, the subject in the title. Because of need, there are many such pages at RHWW: usually, but not always, linked to primary pages. For those in a hurry, they enable a quick summary of many important subjects. The menu for these pages is here: Click >>>



Spanish and Portuguese Atrocities

During the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade era
and it's aftermath





This page is an addendum to the Maya Murals page. The Greatest Civilizations created by man were the
Egyptian, and related like Meroe. Sumer and related like Akkadia, Babylon, Assyria and Elam. Crete (Minoan) and related like Mycenaean, Greece and Rome. And in the Americas; the Olmec/Mayan and related. The Inca and related. The Aztec and Related. As a group, Albinos are responsible for destroying all of these Black created civilizations. But it is the Spanish and the Portuguese who wickedly and with Malice, tried to destroy not only the cultures, but the people as well; and put in place societal norms which would leave survivors in permanent servitude.


But first, a little background on Slavery:


Sumer in Mesopotamia and Egypt in Africa are the first documented Civilizations in the World. The first mentions of Slavery in each is as follows:
Sumer - 6,800 B.C. The world’s first city-state emerges in Mesopotamia. Land ownership and the early stages of technology bring war—in which enemies are captured and forced to work: slavery.
Egypt - 2,575 B.C. Temple art celebrates the capture of slaves in battle. Egyptians capture slaves by sending special expeditions up the Nile River.



x

x
Sorry - the earliest we could find documentation for relating to slavery is Ur-Nammu 4,000
years later. The Code of Ur-Nammu is the oldest known law code surviving today. It is from
Sumer and is written on tablets in the Sumerian language c. 2100–2050 B.C.

4 - If a slave marries a slave, and that slave is set free, he does not leave the household.
5 - If a slave marries a native [i.e. free] person, he/she is to hand the firstborn son over to his owner.

Ur-Nammu was a Sumerian King who created an Empire and eventually ruled all of Sumer, and much of Assyria, Elam, Syria and Ebla. Even Byblos (in Canaan), was forced to pay tribute. This was the beginning of Ur III, (because this is the third time that the kingship was taken by the kingdom of Ur).




x
The declaration of innocense from the “Book of the Dead”.

 Hail to thee, great lord of justice. I have come to you, my lord, that
thou may bring me so that I may see your beauty, for I know thou and I
know your name, and I know the names of the fourty-two Gods of those
who are with thou in this Hall of Justice. Lord of Truth is thy name.
Behold, I have come to you, I have brought you truth, I have repelled
falsehood for you. I have not done falsehood against men; I have not
impoverished my associates; I have done no wrong in the Place of
Truth, I have not learned that which is not; I have done no evil; I
have not daily made labor in excess of what is due to be done for me;
my name has not reached the offices of those who control slaves; I
have not slandered a servant to his master; I have not caused pain; I
have not made hungry; I have not made to weep; I have not killed; I
have not commanded to kill; I have not made suffering for anyone.
I am pure, pure, pure.

The “Book of the Dead” is the name given to a genre of mortuary spells, magical texts, and accompanying illustrations called vignettes. The Book of the Dead helped Egyptians prepare for the afterlife where Osiris, god of the underworld, would judge them.

Osiris had Green skin because he was a god of agriculture, vegetation, and fertility. As a god on earth, he was the first pharaoh and taught his people how to grow corn and make wine from grapes and bread and beer from wheat.

The group that we call the Book of the Dead developed from spells that were first inscribed on scarabs and coffins at the end of Egypt's Middle Kingdom period, around 1650 B.C.



Term to know: Mamluk - translated as "one who is owned", meaning "slave" it is a term most commonly referring to non-Arab (Black Arabs were the masters), ethnically diverse (mostly Albino Turkic, Southern Russian, Eastern and Southeastern European) slave-soldiers who were assigned military and administrative duties, serving the ruling Arab dynasties in the Muslim world.

Because of the ignorant racists at Wikipedia I must remind you that the "Word Slave" was born of the "Central Asian Albinos" who migrated into Eastern Europe in the modern era - "The Slavs". Can you believe that those sorry bastards at Wikipedia try to imply that mostly Blacks were enslaved? Only an Albino of the stupidest order would forget or not know that Blacks INVENTED Slavery - to our shame. Only civilized people in Cities and Towns have use for Slaves, whereas illiterate Nomads like the Albinos of Asia have little use for Slaves.



As an aside: "Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia" is a communal effort, anyone meeting certain basic criteria can post articles. But we detect an unmistakable anti-Black sentiment with most Wiki articles having to do with race. It makes us wonder if most of the guys at Wikipedia had been "Beat-up" as boys, by some Black kid. 



Napoleons Turkish Slave (Mamluk)
s
Raza Roustam was born in 1781 or 2 in Tiflis (known today as Tbilisi), capital of Georgia, son of a trader working in Armenia. He was abducted from his family aged either 7 or 13 and then purchased by a Bey from Cairo in whose service he took up as his Mamluk. He was later owned by Sheik El-Becri, who gave him (along with another Mamluk called Ali) to Bonaparte in August 1799. Returning from the Egyptian Campaign, Napoleon took Raza with him to Paris, making him his bodyguard. From this moment on, Roustam would sleep in front of the First Consul’s door. He also became Bonaparte’s valet. In addition to this, from 1802-1806, Roustam was added to the Corps des mamelouks de la Garde.



First mention of Turks in literature.


The Ghaznavids (Islamic Dynasty of Turkish slave origin [Mamluks]).

The Tajikistanian (Central Asian) poet Rudaki (858-941), in a poem about the Samanid emir's court, describes how “row upon row” of Turkish slave guards were part of its adornment (the Samanids may have been post Arab victory Persians). From these Turkic guard ranks two military families arose—the Simjurids and Ghaznavids—who ultimately proved disastrous to the Samanids. The Simjurids received an appendage in the Kuhestan region of southern Khorasan. Alp Tigin founded the Ghaznavids when he established himself at Ghazna (modern Ghazni, Afghanistan) in 962. He and fellow Turk, Abu al-Hasan Simjuri, as Samanid generals, competed with each other for the governorship of Khorasan and control of the Samanid Empire by placing on the throne emirs they could dominate. Abu al-Hasan Simjuri died in 961, but a court party instigated by men of the scribal class—civilian ministers as contrasted with Turkish generals—rejected Alp Tigin's candidate for the Samanid throne, Mansur I was installed, and Alp Tigin prudently retired to his fief of Ghazna. Thus the Simjurids enjoyed control of Khorasan south of the Oxus river only.

The struggles of the Turkish slave generals for mastery of the Samanid throne, with the help of shifting allegiance from the court's ministerial leaders, both demonstrated and accelerated the Samanid decline. Samanid weakness attracted into Transoxania the Qarluq Turks, who had recently converted to Islam. They occupied Bukhara in 992, and established in Transoxania the Qarakhanid or Ilek Khanid dynasty. Alp Tigin had been succeeded at Ghazna by Sebüktigin (died 997). Sebüktigin's son Mahmud made an agreement with the Qarakhanids whereby the Oxus river was recognized as their mutual boundary. Thus the Samanids' dominion was divided and Mahmud was freed to advance westward into Khorasan to meet the Buyids. The Samanid Empire was part of the "Iranian" Intermezzo, (Albino misinformation - the nation of Iran was founded on April 1, 1979, before that it was Black Persia), which saw the creation of a Persianate culture and identity that brought Persian speech and traditions into the fold of the Islamic world. This later contributed to the formation of the Turko-Persian culture. The brothers who founded the Samanid Empire were from Afghanistan.

Before going on, just one more "Dig" at the stupidity of some Albinos. Admittedly they have been made stupid by Albino media which refuses to show Blacks in numbers anywhere outside of Africa. And of course there are many more Blacks Outside of Africa, than there is inside of Africa. But ponder the ignorance of the question (below); then you understand why Trump is so popular, there is a segment of the Albino population which is quite happy and comfortable living in the fantasy world Albino media has created for them.



s
This is an example of the Albinos idiotic nature: in current times American Albinos constantly refer to Blacks as "Minorities". This is of course to instill the thought that Albinos are numerous and powerful. They use their monopoly over media to reinforce this falsehood by constantly showing images from all parts of the World of only other Albinos and their Mulattoes. Except for Africa, rarely are Blacks shown in international News Stories, or travelog's. But their Make-believe "Black free World" is just like their histories; pure fantasy.

Here is another example of how the Albinos use their power over what we are taught to mis-educate us: if you Google "What race has the largest population in the world?" The answer you are given is Quote: "The world's largest ethnic group is Han Chinese". Notice they replaced "Ethnic Group" with "Race". That's like saying that Germans are the largest racial population. Germans are of course NOT a Race! Just like Han Chinese are NOT a Race! Han Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Taiwanese, Cambodians, Thais, Vietnamese, etc. are "Mulattoes" of the "MONGOL" Race. All together these Mulatto Mongols account for a little less that Two Billion people.


o

The Han dynasty
was founded in 206 B.C. by Liu Bang, who led the revolt against the repressive policies of the preceding Qin dynasty and became the Gaozu emperor (reigned 206–195 B.C.).


The Han Chinese or Han people
, are an East Asian ethnic group native to China. They constitute the world's largest ethnic group, making up about 18% of the worlds population and consisting of various subgroups speaking distinctive varieties of the Chinese language.

The estimated 1.4 billion Han Chinese people worldwide are primarily concentrated in the People's Republic of China (including Hong Kong and Macau), where they make up about 92% of the total population. In Taiwan, they make up about 97% of the population.


Do this: Google – “White World Population” Being very careful with the syntax, remember you are asking an Albino source for truth. Naturally they will find any number of ways to lie to you if you use the wrong search words.

Answer from Wikipedia section titled “White People”:

Answer: 850,000,000+ (which is about) 11.5% of the total world population (world population of 7.5 to 7.7 billion).
(This is not counting partial European descent) – Meaning the millions of Black/Albino Mulattoes in Latin America and the Middle-East.
Regions with significant (White) populations are United States = 252,784,000, Russia = 132,516,000

(Of course there is nowhere near 252,784,000 Albinos in the United States, (typical Albino race lie).
Russia is a lie too; In 1300 A.D, the territory occupied an area of around 20,000 square kilometers (about the size of Nebraska); by 1462 A.D, that number increased to 430,000 square kilometers. By 1584 A.D, the territory had swelled to 5.4 million square kilometers. All of this expansion was accomplished by invading and subjecting Native Mongol people in the northern regions. During this time, Russia's government shifted as well. Russia, as the largest country in the world, has great ethnic diversity, is a multinational state, and is home to over 190 ethnic groups nationwide.It also has 21 national republics (intended as homes to a specific ethnic minority). Point being, how many Russians are White?


Facts and Figures:
The current population of Japan is 126,766,566 as of 2019, based on Worldometers elaboration of the latest United Nations data.
The current population of the Republic of Korea is 51,236,002 as of 2019,
North Korea population is estimated at 25,666,161 people at mid-year according to UN data.
The current population of China in 2019 is estimated at 1,433,783,686 people at mid-year according to UN data.
For a total East-Asian Mongol population of 1,637,452,415 people: which is about 21% of the Human population.

The current world population is 7.7 billion as of September 2019 according to the most recent United Nations estimates elaborated by Worldometers.

Here is another “Cold Water” of reality Albinos and Mongols: “YOUR” 21% + 11.5% = 32.5% of the Human population.
THE “OTHER” 67.5% or 5.19 BILLION IS BLACK!!! (or Mulatto).

Assuming about 540,000,000 (0.54 billion) Mulattoes world-wide, that means the "Pure-Black" population of the world is about 4.65 Billion.
Therefore YOU Albinos and Mongols are the "Minority": "YOU" are the outliers: "YOU" are the "Others". Please try to remember
this.


Addendum – the Southeast Asia countries of Cambodia, Burma, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, the Philippines, and Indonesia are a 645 million person part of the World population. These are all formerly Black countries (like Hawaii) which were invaded by Mongols, (sometimes by war, sometimes by migration). They are all ruled now by “Light-skinned” Mongols (who are of course Mulattoes themselves). But “Unlike Hawaii”: populations of native Blacks still survive there, and then there are the descendants of the “Light-skinned” Mongol invaders, plus the Mulattoes produced by the two. In Vietnam and the Philippine’s, French and Spanish colonizers also added to the gene pool, making it impossible to categorize these countries as Black, Mongol, Albino, or Mulatto.

The Middle East and North Africa: U.S. Federal government standards require the U.S. census to count people with roots in the Middle East or North Africa as white. But a new study finds many people of MENA descent do not see themselves as white.



Unlike Spanish and Portuguese trained Latinos,
Africans do not jump at the chance to be considered
"WHITE" They know it's going in the wrong direction.

z
These people are "North Africans" the Black ones are "Native" North Africans, the Albino ones are a result of the Germanic Vandal invasion, circa 400 A.D. or the result of France invading Algeria in 1830, or Italy invading Libya in September 1911, or the result of Spain's seizing of territory in North Africa and West Africa. The rest are Mulattoes.


Latin America: The U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requires federal agencies to use a minimum of two ethnicities in collecting and reporting data: Hispanic or Latino and Not Hispanic or Latino. OMB defines "Hispanic or Latino" as a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin regardless of race.


v
These are Latin Americans, the Black ones are "Native Americans" or to a much lessor extent African, the Albino ones are the result of Albino invasion from Europe. The others are Mulattoes. [Tables showing African Slave importation to Latin America and the Caribbean follows below].


The U.S. census sees Middle Eastern people as white.

v
The Black one is a Native Middle Easterner, the Albino one is a Sattagydian, Amyrgian, Scythian, Slav, Turk, or any one of the many Central Asian Albino tribes invading from the East. The other is a Mulatto.




THE ARAB SLAVE TRADE




f
                 
c


Omani history - Zanzibar was a valuable property as the main slave market of the

Swahili Coast as well as being a major producer of cloves, and became an increasingly
important part of the Omani empire, a fact reflected by the decision of the
Sayyid Sa'id bin Sultan, to make it the capital of the empire in 1837.
 


s
    
d
Qaboos bin Said Al Said was Sultan of Oman from 23 July 1970 until his death in 2020. A fifteenth-generation descendant of the founder of the House of Al Said, he was the longest-serving leader in the Middle East and Arab world at the time of his death, having ruled for almost half a century. Qaboos had no heir as he was widely believed by Omanis and Gulf Arabs to be homosexual. This belief was supported by Tony Molesworth, Oman's former second-most-senior intelligence officer. Qaboos' obituary in The Times described rumours throughout his life of "liaisons with elegant young European men". Wikipedia

Haitham bin Tariq Al Said is the current Sultan of Oman, reigning since January 2020 following the death of his cousin, Sultan Qaboos bin Said. After the death of Sultan Qaboos, Haitham's first cousin, on 10 January 2020, Haitham was named by the royal family and Qaboos's will as Sultan of Oman the next day and took an oath before an emergency session of the Council of Oman in Al-Bustan.




Like most Americans, we have always been interested in the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, because that effects us, but given little thought to the Arab Slave Trade. So we were quite surprised and confused by all the nonsense and just plain lies put forth by Albinos. Whereas before, we thought that most Albinos - not all, but some - were trying to present well researched history. Now after reading what they have put out about the Arab Slave Trade, it seems that most of what the Albinos have put out is made-up stuff that they think other Albinos will like. So we had to go searching to find a history that makes sense and fits in with what we already know. Not surprisingly, it was written in an African Magazine.


New African Magazine - 27/03/2018
 

Recalling Africa’s harrowing tale of its first slavers;
The Arabs – As UK Slave Trade Abolition is commemorated


Quote: In his book, Slaves and Slavery, published in 1998, the British writer Duncan Clarke defines slavery as “the reduction of fellow human beings to the legal status of chattels, allowing them to be bought and sold as goods”. This, in essence, is what both the Arabs and Europeans did to Africans, to justify the shipping of millions of Africans as slaves to far-away lands in Asia (in particular, the Middle East) and the Americas.

“The African slave trade, surely one of the most tragic and disturbing episodes in the history of mankind,” Clarke writes, “had its origins in the intervention of forces from the civilisations that developed in the regions of the Mediterranean sea — today’s Europe and the Middle East — into the arena of the more fragmented civilisations of sub-Saharan Africa.

“Africa became a source of slaves for the cultures of the Mediterranean world many centuries before the discovery of the Americas, but it was that discovery and the resulting shift in focus towards the Atlantic that prompted the culminating explosive growth in slavery with such tragic effect.” Slavery, in fact, was a central feature of life in the Mediterranean world, especially in Mesopotamia, ancient Egypt, Greece, Imperial Rome and the Islamic societies of the Middle East and North Africa.

“The most important source of slaves in medieval Europe,” Clarke’s research shows, “was the coast of Bosnia on the eastern shores of the Adriatic Sea. The word ‘slave’ and its cognates in most modern European languages is itself derived from ‘sclavus’ meaning ‘slav’, the ethnic name for the inhabitants of this region…“For various reasons, including the harshness of the terrain and endemic warfare among local clans, Bosnia proved the most convenient and long-lasting of these slave-supplying regions. Whichever clan gained a temporary upper hand was always willing to sell its captured rivals in exchange for the goods of the Mediterranean world in the markets of the ancient Romanised city of Ragusa (present day Dubrovnik - city in Croatia). From there, Slavs were shipped as slaves by Venetian merchants, to supply new markets in the Islamic world.”

Thus, “for the Islamic world,” Clarke continues, “Slavs provided the major source of slaves in the 250 or so years between the defeat at the battle of Poitiers in AD 732 that forced the consolidation of their dramatic conquests across North Africa and the Iberian peninsula, cutting back the flow of war captives, and the expansion of the import of black Africans across the Sahara from around AD 1000.”

The trade in slaves ended when the Ottoman Turks conquered the region in 1463. “The effective closure of the last major source of slaves on the European continent,” says Clarke, “this co-incidentally took place at the same time as the Portuguese explorations of the West African coast which were to open up the second and most devastating route for the exploitation of Africans as slaves.”
Figures on the Arab slave trade in Africa are hard to come by, but the historian Paul Lovejoy estimates that some 9.85 million Africans were shipped out as slaves to Arabia and, in small numbers, to the Indian subcontinent. Lovejoy breaks his figures down as follows:


When the Ottoman Army needed additional troops,
they turned to "Mercenaries" such as these Bashi-Bazouk.
They were responsible for many atrocities.
The fine silk garb of the first one, speaks to his profits.

c
    
c



Between AD 650 and 1600, an average of 5,000 Africans were shipped out by the Arabs. This makes a rough total of 7.25 million.
Then, between 1600 and 1800, another 1.4 million Africans were shipped out by the Arabs. The 19th century represented the highest point of the Arabian trade where 12,000 Africans were shipped out every year. The total figure for the 19th century alone was 1.2 million slaves to Arabia.

Thus, in terms of numbers, Arabia’s 9.85 million is not far behind the conservative estimate of nearly 12 million African victims of the Atlantic slave trade. Some African historians, though, reject these figures on the grounds that they are too low. They suggest over 50 million Africans were shipped out during the Atlantic trade alone. According to Lovejoy, another 4.1 million Africans were shipped across the Red Sea to the Persian Gulf and India. “This trade also, with the notable exception of some Portuguese involvement in the area of Mozambique, and of 18th and 19th century French exports to islands under their control in the Indian Ocean, was largely conducted by Muslims,” adds Duncan Clarke.

Throughout the 19th century, the Omani Arab rulers of Zanzibar shipped hundreds of thousands of African slaves to work on clove plantations on the island. It was this trade that gave Europe and America so much satisfaction, after abolishing their own trade in African slaves, to highlight the wickedness of the Arab slavers who continued to enslave Africans well into the first decades of the 20th century. Even to this day, Arab slavers are still at work in Sudan and Mauritania, buying and selling Black Africans.

David Livingstone, the British missionary/traveller/explorer was so upset by the way the Arabs treated their African slaves that he wrote back home in 1870: “In less than I take to talk about it, these unfortunate creatures — 84 of them, wended their way into the village where we were. Some of them, the eldest, were women from 20 to 22 years of age, and there were youths from 18 to 19, but the large majority was made up of boys and girls from 7 years to 14 or 15 years of age. “A more terrible scene than these men, women and children, I do not think I ever came across. To say that they were emaciated would not give you an idea of what human beings can undergo under certain circumstances. “Each of them had his neck in a large forked stick, weighing from 30 to 40 pounds, and five or six feet long, cut with a fork at the end of it where the branches of a tree spread out. “The women were tethered with bark thongs, which are, of all things, the most cruel to be tied with. Of course they are soft and supple when first striped off the trees, but a few hours in the sun make them about as hard as the iron round packing-cases. The little children were fastened by thongs to their mothers.

“As we passed along the path which these slaves had traveled, I was shown a spot in the bushes where a poor woman the day before, unable to keep on the march, and likely to hinder it, was cut down by the axe of one of these slave drivers. “We went on further and were shown a place where a child lay. It had been recently born, and its mother was unable to carry it from debility and exhaustion; so the slave trader had taken this little infant by its feet and dashed its brains out against one of the trees and thrown it in there.”


Such was the brutality meted out to the Africans by the Arabs. Like the Atlantic trade, the Arabian trade’s “middle passage” was equally as horrible and terrifying. The “middle passage” describes the harrowing journey lasting several months from Africa’s west coast to the Americas during which millions of Africans, packed like sardines in the slave ships, died of thirst, hunger, rough seas, and sometimes from the sheer brutality inflicted by the European slavers.



f



In the Arabian trade, the trudge across the Sahara, in leg and neck chains, and as Livingstone describes above, necks in large forked sticks and hands tied with bark thongs, was particularly harsh on the African slaves. Says Duncan Clarke: “The hardships of these long marches across the desert were considerable, and much later travelers reported that the routes were lined with the parched skeletons of those who succumbed to exhaustion and thirst along the way.” The Arab slavers did not only march their African captives to Arabia, they also sometimes sold them to European slavers.

In modern times, the popular image of African slavery springs from the vision of a tormented male suffering under the lash of unceasing labor on some “New World” sugar plantation. Yet the real face of servitude finds its focus in the forced migration of millions of girls and young women across the Sahara and the Horn of Africa in to the institutions of Islamic concubinage. While in the European “New World” the measure of a man’s stature was mapped out and calibrated on the physical dimensions of empire built upon the sinews of forced masculine labour, in the Islamic Orient wealth was a reflection of prestige, young girls the vessel of male hubris , the mats of male pleasure ground, the malleable material to be shaped to the master’s will. Thus, women slaves in the Arab world were often turned into concubines living in harems, and rarely as wives, their children becoming free. A large number of male slaves and young boys were castrated and turned into eunuchs who kept watch over the harems. Castration was a particularly brutal operation with a survival rate of only 10%.

“The combined effect of all these factors,” says Duncan Clarke, “was a steady demand for slaves throughout the Islamic world, which had cover story to be met from wars, raids or purchases along the borders with non-Islamic regions. Although some of these slaves came from Russia, the Balkans and Central Asia, the continuing expansion of Islamic regimes in sub-Saharan Africa made black Africans, the major source.”


So invasive was the practice of slavery into the economic, political, demographic, cultural, social and religious life of Africa and persisted for so many centuries, that while its effects varied both geographically and temporally in intensity, slavery out-distances in scale and scope any single or combination of disasters — natural or man-made, which descended upon the continent. Slavery unquestionably checked population growth in Africa and consequentially placed tremendous pressure upon gender and marital relationships during the three critical centuries of European expansion to global domination. In this sense, the feminine-oriented Arab slave trade, though neither motivated nor executed with economic benefits as prime objective, caused far greater demographic damage and consequently greater economic decline, with its excessive poaching of the reproductive potential of the harvested areas.
 
No people are blank slates upon which can be inscribed untold miseries and expect no account thereof. The Arab slave trade began long before the Islamic conquest of Africa, remained at relatively low level compared to the Atlantic slave trade and did not become illegal or abolished, and was maintained till well after the colonization of Africa. The Arabian trade was outlawed in Ethiopia only in 1935 in order to gain international support against the Italian invasion. In the Atlantic trade, the slaves came predominantly from Africa’s west coast with a male/female ratio of two-to-one. In the Arabian trade, the slaves were exclusively from the Savannah and the Horn of Africa, and favored females over males at a ratio nearing three-to-one. When slavery in the Black Sea area (the traditional source of the best grade female slaves for the Arab market) dried up, it triggered an even greater demand for Ethiopian “red” slaves, in particular the Galla and Oromo on account of their unquestioned beauty and willing sexual temperament.

And while the Europeans paid a higher price for male slaves than females, the reverse was the case with the Arabs. Moreover, while the European/New World slavers profited mainly from male labor, the Arabs saw profit in sexual satisfaction/reproductive potential. (Offspring of the union between Islamic master and female slave was born free, out of respect of the child’s Islamic paternity. Any offspring of the Atlantic trade were born into slavery).

“The laws of Islam,” as the historian Hugh Thomas attests, “were in some ways more benign in respect of slavery than were those of Rome. Slaves were not to be treated as if they were animals. Slaves and freemen were equal from the point of view of God. The master did not have power of life and death over his slave property.” But to the Africans shipped across the Red Sea, the “benign” Islamic laws provided little comfort — they were still slaves of Islamic masters who had unfettered sexual access to them (if they were female) or castrated and turned into eunuchs (if they were men).

The upshot of this gender profile of the respective slave-classes in the Atlantic/New World and the Arab/Oriental world explains the large and visible population of African origin in the New World where sexual relations between white and black was the exception while in the Arab world where miscegenation was the practice, the slave trade has left few visible traces.

So where are the descendants of the African slaves sent to Arabia/Orient? There are no large concentrations of them, anywhere in the Middle East or Asia.
Five years ago, a British TV documentary showed how poorly the descendants of African slaves in Pakistan are treated by the authorities. The racial discrimination was so bad that one of the African descendants recounted on camera how, even in sport, they were not picked to represent Pakistan at national and international levels no matter how good they were.

The demographic effects of Arabian slavery on the source population (those left behind) cannot be overlooked, and specifically when considering the palpable effects on African fertility as a consequence of the grossly reduced female numbers. To ensure survival, the Africans in the harvested areas adopted a variety of social measures, which were in practice as extreme as the circumstances called for. These revolved principally around the sexual purity of the population’s remaining female reproductive stock, as well as accelerating the female’s reproductive capacity. Though the number of female slaves exported per annum from the Savannah and the Horn was far smaller than the numbers taken from the west coast in the Atlantic trade, the proportionate impact of the remaining at-brink Savanna/Horn populations was far more severe.

The Arabian trade reached a total of perhaps 5-8% of the source populations – and as mentioned earlier — as the proportion of females harvested was exceptionally high, this resulted in a massive surplus of males in the non-harvested population. Consequently the area experienced demographic stagnation bordering decline. In 1600, the black African population was some 50 million — about 30% of the combined population of the New World, Europe, Middle East and North Africa. By 1800, the population had fallen to 20% of the total. In 1900, at the end of the slave trade, Africa’s population had fallen yet further to just over 10% of the total — the population now so collapsed as to negatively affect the continent’s labor intensive agricultural output.

In effect, while the populations of Europe and Asia increased year on year, Africa’s population declined dramatically due to the excessive poaching by the slavers, both Arab and European.
In Arabia, the slave class (principally female), unlike the New World slave class, could never maintain itself as a distinct social entity — principally because of miscegenation. This created an even greater demand for more and more new female slaves, and coupled with the frequent natural disasters of drought and famine in the Savannah/Horn, led many African families to offer their young girls in to slavery as a last hope of survival. There are many stories of long lines of hundreds of girls, mainly Oromos from Ethiopia, trudging across the Horn towards the Red Sea seeking enslavement.

Deprived of ideology, ritual, and the African rite of passage to adulthood and social membership, female slaves were uncommonly vulnerable to conversion to Islam (the benefits of manumission aside). Manumission describes a child born of a female slave and a free Islamic father is thus born free.
For the population remaining in Africa, it is in order to embark on some speculation as to what changes the trauma of slavery may have wrought on African thought. The experience of sudden turn of fate (a common experience when confronted by the ever-present threat of slavers) tended to systematically undermine any efforts at long-term planning beyond the constant need to replace lost members.

It is a mistake to equate the bare survival of Africa with cultural or social or economic stagnation, for the slave trade visited such panoply of tragically interconnected disasters into the lives of every African for centuries, that they have worked their way into the very “racial memory” of the continent and its people, particularly females, that only with time and kindness can it be expunged from the psyche o f Africa. As one commentator puts it: “Could it be true that the corrosive effects of four centuries of commerce in humans, with its temptation, its in-built opportunism, its reduction of humans to a cash value, its cycles of revenge and its inevitable physical brutality, have built lasting flaws into African pattern of thought and action?”


Some of the above sounds a little hysterical, but the events and time-lines coincide with the Arab
expansion after the conquest of Persia and Egypt by Muhammad's Army. And it certainly rings
true as regards
to Arab love of female genitalia, especially Albino genitalia.



d
        
c



By 652 A.D. the Arabs had completed their conquest of Azerbaijan,
(Next to Georgia on the Caspian Sea).



h



But then in 1299 A.D. the Turks began to Usurp their former masters, so that by 1517 A.D. the now Ottoman "Empire" extended its control over most of the Arab world. It was the Ottomans who in 1385 A.D. conquered Albania, then in 1463 A.D. conquered Bosnia and Herzegovina and made them Muslim countries.




n




Back to Slave History:

Throughout Muslim history, slaves served in various social and economic roles, from powerful emirs themselves, to harshly treated manual laborers. Slaves were widely employed in irrigation, mining, and animal husbandry, but most commonly as soldiers, guards, domestic workers, concubines (sex slaves). The use of slaves for hard physical labor early on in Muslim history led to several destructive slave revolts, the most notable being the Zanj Rebellion of 869–883, and led to the end of that practice. Many rulers also used slaves in the military and administration to such an extent that slaves could seize power, as did the Mamluks.

The Zanj Rebellion was a major revolt against the Abbasid Caliphate, which took place from 869 until 883. It Began near the city of Basra in present-day southern Iraq and was led by one Ali ibn Muhammad, the insurrection involved enslaved Bantu-speaking people (Zanj) who had originally been captured from the coast of Southeast Africa and transported to the Middle East, principally to drain the region's salt marshes. It grew to involve slaves and freemen, including both Southeastern Africans and Arabs, from several regions of the Caliphate, and claimed tens of thousands of lives before it was finally defeated.

Several Muslim historians, such as al-Tabari and al-Mas'udi, consider the Zanj revolt to be one of the "most vicious and brutal uprisings" of the many disturbances that plagued the Abbasid central government. Modern scholars have characterized the conflict as being "one of the bloodiest and most destructive rebellions which the history of Western Asia records," while at the same time praising its coverage as being among the "most fully and extensively described campaigns in the whole of early Islamic historical writing." The precise composition of the rebels remains a subject of debate, both as regards their identity and as to the proportion of slaves and free among them – available historical sources being open to various interpretations.



Arab Slave Trade - East Africa

Continued

 

Zanzibar (Island off the coast of Tanzania), was once East Africa's main slave-trading port, and under Omani Arabs in the 19th century as many as 50,000 slaves were passing through the city each year. Some historians estimate that between 11 and 18 million black African slaves crossed the Red Sea, Indian Ocean, and Sahara Desert from 650 A.D. to 1,900 A.D, compared with the 9.4 to 12 million Africans who were taken to the Americas.




s
    
d


Privateers

Privateering was an age-old practice in the Mediterranean. North African rulers engaged in it increasingly in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth century because it was so lucrative, and because their merchant vessels, formerly a major source of income, were not permitted to enter European ports. Although the methods varied, privateering generally involved private vessels raiding the ships of an enemy in peacetime under the authority of a ruler. Its purposes were to disrupt an opponent's trade and to reap rewards from the captives and cargo.



s



These Pirates destroyed thousands of French, Spanish, Italian and British ships, and long stretches of coast in Spain and Italy were almost completely abandoned by their inhabitants, discouraging settlement until the 19th century. From the 16th to 19th century, pirates captured an estimated 800,000 to 1.25 million Europeans as slaves, mainly from seaside villages in Italy, Spain, and Portugal, but also from France, Britain, the Netherlands, Ireland and as far away as Iceland and North America.


 

s



Before closing on the Arab Slave Trade; I thought it necessary to give one more example of why you
should take what Albinos, and in particular the Albinos at Wikipedia, tell you with a very large grain of salt.
Note the following Wikipedia article:



Arab views on African peoples

Main article: Medieval Arab attitudes to Black people

Quote: Though the Qur'an expresses no racial prejudice against black Africans, Bernard Lewis argues that ethnocentric prejudice later developed among Arabs, for a variety of reasons: their extensive conquests and slave trade; the influence of Aristotelian ideas regarding slavery, which some Muslim philosophers directed towards Zanj (Bantu) and Turkic peoples; and the influence of religious ideas regarding divisions among humankind. By the 8th century, anti-black prejudice among Arabs resulted in discrimination. A number of medieval Arabic authors argued against this prejudice, urging respect for all black people and especially Ethiopians. By the 14th century, a significant number of slaves came from sub-Saharan Africa; Lewis argues that this led to the likes of Egyptian historian Al-Abshibi (1388–1446) writing that "[i]t is said that when the [black] slave is sated, he fornicates, when he is hungry, he steals."

In 2010, at the Second Afro-Arab summit Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi apologized for Arab involvement in the African slave trade, saying: "I regret the behavior of the Arabs... They brought African children to North Africa, they made them slaves, they sold them like animals, and they took them as slaves and traded them in a shameful way. I regret and I am ashamed when we remember these practices. I apologize for this - Africans did not take Gaddafi seriously. But they did listen to him, he had Oil money.

Bernard Lewis, FBA was a British American historian specialized in Oriental studies. He was also known as a public intellectual and political commentator. Lewis was the Cleveland E. Dodge Professor Emeritus of Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University.

Bernard Lewis was also a Jew, a Turkic Kazar to be exact. Perhaps in support of his Turkic cousins the Seljuk Turks, Oghuz Turks, Uyghur Turks, etc. he was lying in support of their claims of being "Arabs" just as Jews lie in support of their claims to being Hebrews. We use the word "Lie" because Bernard Lewis was a very educated man, no way he didn't know that Arabs are Black People.




z
This Wikipedia is TRUE


Bernard Lewis continued:

To be clear, we are NOT saying that racist passages do not exist in the Qur'an, rather, we are saying that the liar Bernard Lewis would know good and well how they got there. They got there by Albino Turks like him and the so-called Egyptian historian Al-Abshibi, who was another Albino Turk, just like him - as we all know Al-Abshibi is NOT an Egyptian name.


Let us explain: You see, just as Albinos from Europe invaded the Americas and took over, and now call themselves "Americans". They started out somewhere else (Central Asia) where they called themselves Germanics, Slavs, and Turks. Once in Europe, they often took the name of people they conquered or assimilated with. That is the case with the Turks; the Turks started off as the Slave Soldiers of the Arabs (Mamluks), and the suppliers of Females for their Arab masters pleasure.


c


While their Arab masters were busy enjoying their women, the Albinos were steadily leaving Asia, under Mongol pressure, and moving to Europe and the Middle East. In the Middle East they became Muslims and took Arab names. Thus the Turk "Alp-Arslan" assumed the name of "Muhammad bin Da'ud Chaghri" when he embraced Islam. The Turks calling themselves Arabs of Saudi Arabia, will often take the name or nickname "Turki" in deference to their origins.

Above we gave the date of 1299 as when the Turks took political and military control of the ARAB WORLD, but they took control of Islam much sooner than that - 1055 to be precise. We often like to quote an Albino institution when they tell the "Truth". In this case we quote Encyclopćdia Britannica.


Britannica article - Toghrďl Beg - Muslim ruler

Toghrďl Beg, founder of the Seljuq dynasty, which ruled in Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Anatolia during the 11th– 14th centuries. Under his rule the Seljuqs assumed the leadership of the Islāmic world by establishing political mastery over the ʿAbbāsid caliphate in Baghdad. Toghril's Muslim name was "Abu Talib Muhammad Tughril ibn Mika'il". Once the Albino Turks gained control of Islam, all manner of Anti-Black material wound up in Muslim "Holy Books". They did then, what the lying Turk Bernard Lewis did today.

 


d
We often wonder why Albinos would make such outrageously false claims about Arabs and Africans; it's as if they don't believe that people know any Geography. So in case you are one of them, we offer this map. As you can see Africans and Arabs are Next-Door Neighbors. And over the thousands of years, have become genetically the same people. You can not look at them and tell any difference - see pictures below.




v
     
f



As an aside: it's a curiosity how the different Asian Albino Super-Tribes (Germanic, Slav, Turkic) handled Blacks once they defeated them. In the case of the Turks it was rather simple: Arabia has always been one of the least densely populated places on Earth. The Arab conquests were accomplished with Turkic Slave Soldiers and Mercenaries. So that when it came time for the Turks to take over, the Arabs simply didn't have the manpower to resist them. And because the Arabs had no cultural gifts to bestow upon the Turks, aside from Islam, Turks seemed uninterested in showing Arabs any particular respect.

The Germanics on the other hand, had to invent a new religion (Protestantism) AND fight one of the bloodiest wars in history (the thirty years war), plus the British Civil Wars, to wrest control of Europe from its Black rulers. Then after the deed was done, they simply made the Catholic Church Albino, and destroyed most art portraying Black Rulers and Saints and replaced them with fakes of Albinos. Below are examples of Black Catholic art that was not destroyed.



v
     
f



The Slavs on the other hand, went in a completely different direction: But first the split of Rome and then the split (schism) in the Catholic Church.  In 330 A.D. Emperor Constantine split the empire into two parts: the western half centered in Rome and the eastern half centered in Constantinople, a city he named after himself. Then on September 4, 476,  Romulus Augustus, the last Emperor of the Western Roman Empire, was deposed by Odoacer, a Germanic chieftain. It is now 799 A.D, and for the third time in half a century, a Pope is in need of help from the Frankish kings. After being physically attacked by his enemies in the streets of Rome (their stated intention is to blind him and cut out his tongue, to make him incapable of office), Pope Leo III makes his way through the Alps to visit the king of the Franks Charles I at Paderborn. It is not known what is agreed, but Charles I travels to Rome in 800 to support the pope. In a ceremony in St Peter's, on Christmas Day, Leo is due to anoint Charles I's son as his heir. But unexpectedly (it is maintained), as Charles I rises from prayer, the pope places a crown on his head and acclaims him emperor. Charles I (Charlemagne - Charles the great) expresses displeasure but accepts the honor. Charlemagne then embarks on many campaigns to suppress marauding Albino Germanic's.


f



Then in 1054 there is a Permanent split of the two Catholic churches into the modern-day Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Catholic Church - (Orthodox, (from Greek orthodoxos, “of the right opinion”).
As time went on, and more and more Albinos entered the West, Germanic's became Catholics (then created Protestantism), Turks became Muslims, and Slavs became Orthodox Catholics. And here we see a completely different approach to their former Black Rulers and religious leaders.



Rather than destroying the Artwork of their former Black Rulers and Saints,
the Slavs for centuries continued to show them as Black People.

c
       
x





And the Rus (Russians), another Slavic tribe, even display portraits of their greatest Czar,
the Black "Peter The Great" and his Son, in the Hermitage National Museum.



Peter the Great

Peter the greats Son
f
       
z





Happenings in the middle of the second Millennium A.D.

The second millennium of the Anno Domini or Common Era was
a millennium spanning the years 1001 to 2000 (11th to 20th centuries)


Portugal was founded in 1143 after being separated from the kingdom of Leon.

The Byzantine Empire, also referred to as the Eastern Roman Empire or Byzantium
Founded May 11, 330 A.D. - Ended - May 29, 1453 after conquest of Constantinople by Turkic Sultan Mehmed II of the Ottoman Empire.
The dwindling Byzantine Empire came to an end when the Ottomans breached Constantinople's ancient land wall after besieging the city for 55 days.


The last Byzantine Emperor, Constantine XI Palaiologos - A Mulatto - was last seen casting off his imperial regalia
and throwing himself into hand-to-hand combat after the walls of the city were breached.
Soon the Turkish Ottoman Empire would raise.

s



The Rulers of the Eastern Roman Empire  - Byzantium.

The Byzantine Empire traces its beginnings to the year 330 when
Emperor Constantine split the Roman Empire into a western and eastern half.
Constantine named his capitol Constantinople after himself.
But it had originally been an ancient Greek city.

The name "Byzantium" is a Latinization of the original name Byzantion.
The Eastern Roman Empire was mostly Greek speaking, though Latin is supposed the official language.


a
     
d
After hundreds of years of having to make dynastic marriages with Albino Princesses to maintain a
semblance of peace, the rulers of the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) were at the end, total Mulattoes.



January 2, 1492 - The Christian Kingdoms of Castile and Aragon conquered the Emirate of Granada (Moors),
ending nearly 800 years of Muslim rule and founding the modern kingdom of Spain as a united state.
Meanwhile 8 months earlier and 217 miles to the East, Columbus had sailed for the Americas.

On August 3, 1492, Italian explorer Christopher Columbus started his voyage across the Atlantic Ocean,
With a crew of 90 men and three ships—the Nińa, Pinta, and Santa Maria—he left from Palos de la Frontera, Spain.

Aug. 1, 1498 - Explorer Christopher Columbus (Third Voyage) sets foot on the American mainland for the first time, at the Paria
Peninsula in present-day Venezuela. Thinking it an island, he christened it Isla Santa and claimed it for Spain.


It was the Mulatto King of Aragon, Castile, and other kingdoms;
Ferdinand II who paid for the expedition.

h



This Dutch Painting shows what the city of
Lisbon Portugal looked like in the late 1500s



h


Notice that Lisbon has a Black King - can't be a Moor,
they were expelled almost a hundred years earlier.



d



The Portuguese arrived to the land that would become Brazil on April 22, 1500, commanded by Pedro Álvares Cabral a Portuguese explorer on his way to India under the sponsorship of the Kingdom of Portugal and the support of the Catholic Church. From the 16th to the early 19th century, Brazil was created and expanded as a colony, kingdom and an integral part of the Portuguese Empire. Brazil was briefly named "Land of the Holy Cross" by Portuguese explorers and crusaders before being named "Land of Brazil" by the Brazilian-Portuguese settlers and merchants dealing with Brazilwood.


In the first 250 years after the colonization of the land, roughly 70% of all immigrants to the colony were enslaved people. Indigenous slaves remained much cheaper during this time than their African counterparts. Although the average African slave lived to only be twenty-three years old because of terrible work conditions, this was still about four years longer than Indigenous slaves, which was a big contribution to the high price of African slaves.

African slaves were also more desirable due to their experience working in sugar plantations. In a particular mill in Săo Vicente in the 1540s, for example, African slaves were said to have held all the most skilled positions including the crucial role of sugar master, even though they were vastly outnumbered by native slaves at the time. It is impossible to pinpoint when the first African slaves arrived in Brazil but estimates range anywhere in the 1530s. Regardless, African slavery was established at least by 1549, when the first governor of Brazil, Tome de Sousa, arrived with slaves sent from the king himself.



We can tell from the "International Consortium Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database"
that the first African Slaves arrived in Brazil in the period 1551-1575
f
Please be advised: below you will be quoted some Slave numbers which are quite different from the "Slave Trade Database" numbers above. That is because before the"International Consortium Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database" all Slave numbers were "Estimates", there was just no way to obtain "Real" numbers. Now thanks to Emory University and the Consortium, we have well researched Slavery numbers. According to the latest numbers a total of 10,002,905 African Slaves left Africa. But only 8,698,000 made it to their Slavery Homes.



Article from Lowcountry Digital Library (LCDL) at the College of Charleston.
Funded through a pilot project grant from the Humanities Council of South Carolina.

The trans-Atlantic slave trade occurred within a broader system of trade between West and Central Africa, Western Europe, and North and South America. In African ports, European traders exchanged metals, cloth, beads, guns, and ammunition for captive Africans brought to the coast from the African interior, primarily by African traders. Many captives died just during the long overland journeys from the interior to the coast. European traders then held the enslaved Africans who survived in fortified slave castles such as Elmina in the central region (now Ghana), Goree Island (now in present day Senegal), and Bunce Island (now in present day Sierra Leone), before forcing them into ships for the Middle Passage across the Atlantic Ocean.



g



In the fifteenth century, Portugal became the first European nation to take significant part in African slave trading. The Portuguese primarily acquired slaves for labor on Atlantic African island plantations, and later for plantations in Brazil and the Caribbean, though they also sent a small number to Europe. Initially, Portuguese explorers attempted to acquire African labor through direct raids along the coast, but they found that these attacks were costly and often ineffective against West and Central African military strategies.

For example, in 1444, Portuguese marauders arrived in Senegal ready to assault and capture Africans using armor, swords, and deep-sea vessels. But the Portuguese discovered that the Senegalese out-maneuvered their ships using light, shallow water vessels better suited to the estuaries of the Senegalese coast. In addition, the Senegalese fought with poison arrows that slipped through their armor and decimated the Portuguese soldiers. Subsequently, Portuguese traders generally abandoned direct combat and established commercial relations with West and Central African leaders, who agreed to sell slaves taken from various African wars or domestic trading, as well as gold and other commodities, in exchange for European and North African goods.

Over time, the Portuguese developed additional slave trade partnerships with African leaders along the West and Central African coast and claimed a monopoly over these relationships, which initially limited access to the trade for other western European competitors. Despite Portuguese claims, African leaders enforced their own local laws and customs in negotiating trade relations. Many welcomed additional trade with Europeans from other nations.

When Portuguese, and later their European competitors, found that peaceful commercial relations alone did not generate enough enslaved Africans to fill the growing demands of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, they formed military alliances with certain African groups against their enemies. This encouraged more extensive warfare to produce captives for trading. While European-backed Africans had their own political or economic reasons for fighting with other African enemies, the end result for Europeans traders in these military alliances was greater access to enslaved war captives. To a lesser extent, Europeans also pursued African colonization to secure access to slaves and other goods. For example, the Portuguese colonized portions of Angola in 1571 with the help of military alliances from Kongo, but were pushed out in 1591 by their former allies. Throughout this early period, African leaders and European competitors ultimately prevented these attempts at African colonization from becoming as extensive as in the Americas.

The Portuguese dominated the early trans-Atlantic slave trade on the African coast in the sixteenth century. As a result, other European nations first gained access to enslaved Africans through privateering during wars with the Portuguese, rather than through direct trade. When English, Dutch, or French privateers captured Portuguese ships during Atlantic maritime conflicts, they often found enslaved Africans on these ships, as well as Atlantic trade goods, they sent these captives to work in their own colonies.

In this way, privateering generated a market interest in the trans-Atlantic slave trade across European colonies in the Americas. After Portugal temporarily united with Spain in 1580, the Spanish broke up the Portuguese slave trade monopoly by offering direct slave trading contracts to other European merchants. Known as the asiento system, the Dutch took advantage of these contracts to compete with the Portuguese and Spanish for direct access to African slave trading, and the British and French eventually followed. By the eighteenth century, when the trans-Atlantic slave trade reached its trafficking peak, the British (followed by the French and Portuguese) had become the largest carriers of enslaved Africans across the Atlantic. The overwhelming majority of enslaved Africans went to plantations in Brazil and the Caribbean, and a smaller percentage went to North America and other parts of South and Central America.




These are the major African Ports and the number of slaves that departed from each of them.


Gold Coast - British
292,487
Anomabo - Ghana - British

172,284
Costa da mina - Gold Coast – Portuguese
648,468
Ardra - Benin
80,333
Whydah Ouidah – Benin

407,958
Lagos, Nigeria

95,495
Bright of Benin

73,328
Bright of Biafra

433,281
Calabar – Nigeria

270,092
New Calabar – Nigeria

91,116
Săo Tomé – Portuguese

95,976
Ambriz – Angola

101,738
Bright of Biafra

82,813
Benguela - Angola

373,768
Cabinda – Angola

369,776
Congo North

92,558
Congo River

134,534
Loango – Gabon

118,407

Malembo – Angola

194,707

Gambia

124,846
Luanda – Angola
1,418,362
Cape Verde  Islands

129,947

West Central Africa & St. Helena Island – British

659,515

Sierria Leone

88,038
Mozambique – Portuguese

214,037




Quilimane - Mozambique

117,417




Africa - Port unspecified

2,088,814









Article:  Racialized Frontiers:
Slaves and Settlers in Modernizing Brazil
Princeton University.




Brazil LAB
(Luso-Afro-Brazilian Studies).

Brazil was built on the enslavement of indigenous peoples and millions of Black Africans. Of the 12 million enslaved Africans brought to the New World, almost half—5.5 million people—were forcibly taken to Brazil as early as 1540 and until the 1860s.

Even though slavery was formally abolished in 1888, the country’s exclusionary institutions, racist social fabric, and myopic national fantasies speak to the persistence of racialized domination to this day. This reality was buttressed by a deliberate effort at “whitening” Brazilian society through various state-sponsored immigration projects and frontier colonization plans throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries. In spite of the myth of being a “racial democracy,” Brazil has forged a stratified, unequal citizenship and everyday life is marked by an ongoing “poverty of rights.” Scholars in all fields decry the widespread police brutality against Black men (a genocide in the making), for example, and the impervious structural violence that impinges on morbidity and disparities in care and mortality among Blacks across the country.


The Brazil-Africa nexus and anti-racist struggles have been at the center of the LAB’s reflections from the start and, in the last two years, Visiting Professor Lilia M. Schwarcz, Miqueias Mugge and Joăo Biehl have developed the research hub Racialized Frontiers: Slaves and Settlers in Modernizing Brazil, in collaboration with Isadora Moura Mota (History) and Lúcia Stumpf (USP Postdoctoral Fellow). This initiative also includes other Princeton faculty and graduate students as well as Brazilian colleagues. The hub’s activities (workshops and visualization efforts) have been supported by a Magic Grant from the Humanities Council.




The Dutch

In 1630, the Dutch conquered the prosperous sugarcane-producing area in the northeast region of the Portuguese colony of Brazil. Although it only lasted for 24 years, the Dutch colony resulted in substantial art production. The governor Johan Maurits van Nassau-Siegen also encouraged scientific exploration and his palace in Mauritsstad (present-day Recife) included botanical gardens, a zoo, and a cabinet of curiosities. Maurits brought two artists, Albert Eckhout and the landscape painter Frans Post, to Brazil to document the local flora, fauna, people, and customs. Eckhout’s series of paintings record what he saw.




Native Americans, Mongol Americans,
and mixed race Americans
of Brazil,
by Dutch painter Albert Eckhout circa 1650.



5
    
6



3
         
2



1
         
4



As stated, the paintings above were painted in Brazil. You will rarely find mention of Brazil on Realhistoryww because we have for a long time considered the Black and Brown people of Brazil, a hopeless cause. Pay careful attention to what follows and perhaps you will see what we mean.







THE SILLY AND PATHETIC WORLD OF THE
SPANISH-PORTUGUESE and MEXICAN CASTE SYSTEM



The Casta System - The College of Wooster
Introduction

Beginning in 1492, conquistadors from the Iberian peninsula arrived in Latin America. They encountered the indigenous peoples who had been living on the land for centuries and deemed them barbaric and uncivilized and themselves as superior and god-like. They then colonized the region, forcing all to convert to Catholicism, taking control of the land and generally exploiting the people and the region. The Spanish and Portuguese forced indigenous peoples to acculturate to their own beliefs, they taught them Spanish, implemented the laws that were present in Spain and made Catholicism the ultimate belief system. Overtime, they passed laws creating a social hierarchy to maintain power known as the Casta System. This system ensured European superiority in all sections of life. They remained in control of the region until the 1820s, when countries began to fight and gain their independence. Despite gaining independence and no longer being under colonial rule, a social hierarchy remained in place leaving those of indigenous and African descent on the bottom.  The Casta System was created by the Spanish to maintain their power and superiority to other racial groups in the colonies. This system was used throughout their rule and continued to be unofficially in place after independence.



Please know that we are not offering this "Caste" material as serious Historical material, rather it is offered as an abject example of how much damage even a fool can do. The obvious reason for all of this foolishness is so one Spanish Speaker can claim superiority over another Spanish Speaker by claiming closer genetic ties to the "PURE WHITE" Spaniard. All of this of course does NOT work with Non-Spanish speaking Blacks, we look upon them all with pity and disdain, wondering what kind of people would WANT to be identified with people with a disease, not to mention the limitations Albinism places on the afflicted in the natural world. As for emulating excellence in all endeavors, when Blacks were rulers, we created all the worlds great civilizations. And when we were relegated to subservient class, we used our Physical gifts as a beginning to reclaim our rightful position. Meanwhile our Spanish speaking Black brethren have joined with our Mulattoes and other mixed breeds in dancing to the tune the Spanish Albinos lain down to ensure "Crabs-in-a-bucket" behavior by them, thereby ensuring that Albinos would stay in power forever - or so they hope.     

Re. above: When we say pure Spaniard we are of course talking about the Germanic tribe the Visigoths who marauded through southern Europe and into North Africa. Let us now revisit what they looked like: we quote the Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus (56-118 A.D.), from his book: Germany Book 1 [1]. (Naturally most Albino sources will not give you the true translation, but there are many University translations available).


Quote: 4. For my own part, I agree with those who think that the tribes of Germany are free from all taint of intermarriages with foreign nations, and that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like none but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities throughout so vast a population. All (are White) have fierce blue eyes, red hair, huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion. They are less able to bear laborious work. Heat and thirst they cannot in the least endure; to cold and hunger their climate and their soil inure them.
As we have told you a zillion times, now make it a zillion and one times, White people are of course Albinos.




d
s

w

z




Caste system definitions

Zambo - mix of native American and African

Mulatto - one Albino parent and one Black parent

Lobo
- It refers to mixed-race lineage, far down the racial hierarchy created by the Spanish colonial regime. Lobo and coyote are derogatory names for persons of mixed race, referred to by animal names. It could include persons of African and Indian ancestry and many related variations. Lobo does not have a fixed meaning, with possible parents being a Black and Indian woman.

Mestizo - Spanish and Indian produces mestizo

Criollos/Creoles - On the other hand, the criollos were children of Spanish parents but born in the colony, who had almost all the same rights as the peninsulares with the exception of the possibility of becoming viceroys. In fact, many of our independence heroes were Creoles.

Castizo - offspring of a Spaniard and an Indian woman)

Peninsular was a Spaniard born in Spain residing in the New World, Spanish East Indies, or Spanish Guinea.

Albarazado – whiteish

Canbujo – version of Black

Sanbaigo – multiply ethnic inputs

Calpamulato – Zambo and Lobo

Prieto - means people who are mid black in México and Latin america. You're so prieto like color of door wood.


         
Moor - means Black

Moriscos - a Moor in Spain, especially one who had accepted Christian baptism

Chino
- the term "chino" in most Mexican colonial documents is not a referent of Chinese, but to Afro-Mexicans. But still the word "chino" means Chinese: if you put the two together then "Chino" refers to the children of Mongols and Blacks.

Coyote - a Mestizo (mixed Spanish + Indigenous) and the other indigenous (indio). 

Indio - Native American, but most likely the Mongols. Can't see them Calling a Maya "Indio".

Tente en el Aire - Tent in the chaste air The name "tent in the air" clearly represented the futility of the practice of the caste system, even a few decades after the conquest. In metaphorical terms, a person belonging to this caste "floated" as if in limbo, unable to put down roots, without their own identity

Noteentiendo (No te entiendo) – Literial translation (I don't understand you - too many mixes) meaning it hurts the head to try and figure out how to discriminate against you.

Tornaatraz (Torna atras) – throwback - The term torna atrás (in English, similar in meaning to "throwback" or "harken back to") could also refer to the appearance of racial characteristics not visible in the parents.

Salta atras - This is what they call the great-grandson of a couple of mestizos when there is a mixture in the following generations. In order for this to be understood, it must be noted that from the union of a Spanish and Indian or black person, a mestizo or a mulatto , respectively, comes out. If he later marries someone Spanish, what is called a quadroon comes out , and if the quadroon later marries an Indian, etc. a saltatrás comes out , which means that he jumped or went back in order to have Spanish blood for taking more than one person of Indian or black race.

Gibaro - Thomas Hill listed jíbaros as one of four socio-economic classes he perceived existed in Puerto Rico at the time: "The native people, as a whole, may be divided into four classes: the better class of Creoles, who call themselves Spaniards; the lower class of white peasantry, known as gibaros; the colored people, or mestizos; and the blacks.


c

x

s

b


You may be thinking WOW how could Spanish Speaking people spend time on 16 such silly pieces of shit: well the Albinos from Spain taught them that this foolishness was important, and actually there are many more, just how many more we don't know. We add these two only because they are more bullshit than the rest, simply because they are impossible to exist. As you can see from the label on the painting, De Alvina and  y Espanol makes a Torna-atras. (translates as Albino plus Spanish = Torna-atras). First of all, we have no idea why they referrer to one Spanish as Albino, while the other is simply Spanish.


But all of that aside, TWO WHITE PEOPLE CAN NOT MAKE A BLACK BABY!!!

True Black people make White Babies Daily. But the reverse is NOT true.
White is Recessive, two Recessive genes can only make another Recessive.


b

j


f





So after all of that by Hispanics; trying to get ever closer to the "Holy Grail of Race" the PURE Albino.
Gee life can be so cruel, as it turns out in REAL History, the rulers were either Black or Mulatto.
All of that making a fool of yourself for nothing.



x




a
             
s




The National Cost of Racism and Colorism


If you wonder What is the cost of these silly race games played by Spanish speaking people - well here it is:
Brazil and Mexico are the countries most involved in race based social structure.
Brazil is the world's fifth-largest country by area and the seventh most populous, it has a population of 217 million people.
Note that its GNP is smaller than much smaller countries with much LESS in natural resources and Population.
Brazil is number 82 of 190 in the list of countries by GNP.

Mexico has a population of 126.7 million people, though they do better than Brazil, its still nothing to brag about.

There are several Black Caribbean ISLANDS which have a greater GNP than Mexico and Brazil.

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita shows a country's GDP divided by its total population.


Aruba # 33 on the list = $39,493

Trinidad and Tobago is # 44 on the list = $31,645
Bahamas is # 45 on list = $30,495
Mexico is # 70 on the list = $18,656
Barbados is # 71 on the list = $18,559
Dominican Republic is # 81 on the list = $16,064
Brazil is # 82 on the list = $15,553

Grenada is # 87 on the list = $15,156
Saint Lucia is # 91 on the list = $13,986
St. Vincent & Grenadines is # 101 on the list = $11,769
Haiti is # 173 on the list = $1,819

IT APPEARS THAT HOLDING BLACKS DOWN HAS THE EFFECT OF HOLDING EVERYONE DOWN. 
Having bad character seems to be very costly indeed.



Cuba is a late addition to the conversation because
reliable information about Cuba is hard to come by.


Below are questions and answers concerning Cuba.
Note the obvious racism in some answers, and the obvious need for Black Cubans to please their Albino masters in their choice of race.
As a reminder, the population of Cuba is 11.26 million. The number of African slaves imported into Cuba was 766,310.
It would seem that the Albinos did indeed murder all of the native people, and replaced them with African Slaves.


See the heading "Slavery in Cuba" the Taino genocide, in the main Mayan page: >>



Question: What is the majority race in Cuba?

Answer: WHITE
Cuba is a Caribbean island nation with a population of 11 million. It is a significantly diverse country, with 64% of the country identifying as white, 27% identifying as mixed race, and 9% identifying as Afro-Cuban. There are a significant number of Asians as well. Study.com

Another answer:
Estimates of the percentage of people of African descent in the Cuban population vary enormously. While the 2012 National Census concluded that the majority of the population (64.1 per cent) of Cuba was white, with 26.6 per cent mestizo (mixed race) and 9.3 per cent black, these figures are based on self-identification and so, in a context of widespread internalized racism and the entrenched stigma around race, are widely believed to significantly under-report the black and mestizo populations. Other assessments suggest that only around a third of Cubans are whites, with the remaining two–thirds composed roughly equally of mestizos and blacks. Taking all of this into consideration, the fact that there has been a significant exodus of ‘white’ Cubans from the island means that Afro-Cubans have now come to represent a larger proportion of the overall population and are now thought to constitute a significant majority of the population.  Minorityrights.org




d



Another take on the subject:
Amid sweeping changes in US relations, Cuba’s race problem persists. In 1959, Fidel Castro said he would work to erase racial discrimination, but inequality is still widespread. Official Cuban census figures say black and mixed-heritage people are about 35 percent of the island’s population, but a quick stroll around any Cuban town will provide visual confirmation of just how many Cubans of color deem themselves “white” when the government is asking. That may not be surprising, given that race is not an objective scientific category, but rather an organizing principle of political power — both before and after the revolution that brought Fidel Castro to power. The black and mixed-heritage share of Cuba’s population is closer to a two-thirds majority, according to other sources, including the U.S. State Department (which puts the figure at 62 percent), the University of Miami’s Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies (also 62 percent) and Cuban economist and political scientist Esteban Morales Domínguez (who says it may be as high 72 percent). Most of these assessments break down the population into roughly equal blocs of white, black and mixed.



f



Even the dominant Cuban terminology signals the issue’s knotty intricacy: the decidedly un-PC term mulatto is used tenderly in conversation, defiantly on official documents, and derisively by the concerned neighbor who asks what color skin a robber had. Now, as the country enters a new era of fast and sweeping change, a long-taboo political conversation about race is on the table as never before in art, music, film, and writing; in both official and dissident narratives; and in diverse circles across the socio-economic strata. This conversation is new. Cuba pre-Fidel had been a place where multiracial alliances coexisted with persistent, entrenched racism and vast racial inequality. The last pre-revolutionary president, Fulgencio Batista, was a mulatto who may have had some Chinese and Indian blood. While he may have firmly ruled that system of inequality, he was, demographically speaking, more inclusive than were the white revolutionaries who overthrew him.



f
Fulgencio Batista y Zaldívar was a Cuban military officer and politician who served as the Elected president of Cuba from 1940 to 1944 and as its U.S. backed military Dictator from 1952 to 1959, then he was overthrown in the Cuban Revolution by Fidel Castro.




From its start, Fidel Castro’s revolutionary movement was dominated by middle-class white men. So white were its ranks, in fact, that during initial clashes with Batista’s army, the government men were shocked. “When Captain Yańes came upon Castro hiding asleep in a bohío, it will be recalled that the soldier who found them cried: ‘Son blancos!’ ‘They are white!’ … It is not clear how many of the rebel army in the Sierra were black but a majority certainly were not, and Almeida, a mulatto, was the only officer of importance who was,” wrote Hugh Thomas in his encyclopedic history tome “Cuba, or, the Pursuit of Freedom.” But once the rebels won and tens of thousands of the wealthiest whites fled to Florida, Castro emphasized independence from American capitalism, improvements in healthcare, and literacy drives — and he also told American journalists in January 1959 that his new government would work to erase racial discrimination once and for all. In 1962, a North American survey found that 80 percent of black Cubans were wholly in favor of the revolution, compared to 67 percent of whites. Al Jazeera America.



d









Brazil Demographics


Brazil’s census addresses ethnicity and race by categorizing people mainly by skin color. It asks people to place themselves into one of a number of categories, some of which would seem unusual to an American or European. As well as ‘indigenous’ (the smallest category), Brazilians are asked to report whether they believe they are white, black, brown or yellow. The results of the census indicated that 92 million (48%) Brazilians were white, 83 million (44%) were brown, 13 million (7%) were black, 1.1 million (0.50%) were yellow and 536,000 (0.25%) were indigenous. This method of classifying race is controversial within Brazil, and IBGE (The Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics) has been criticized for continuing to use it.

Brazil has an official resident population of 215,000,000 in 2022. Brazil is the seventh most populous country in the world, and the second most populous country in the Americas. Brazilians are mainly concentrated in the eastern part of the country, which comprises the Southeast, South and Northeast. But it also has a significant presence in large cities in the Center-West and North. According with 2010 Census, Brazil had 91,051,646 White people, 82,277,333 Mixed people, 14,517,961 Black people, 2,084,288 Asian people, and 817,963 Indigenous people.

Brazilians of Spanish descent can be estimated as being 1.5 million people in the 6 main metropolitan areas (around 5% of their total population in 1998) or 10 and 15 million in the whole country, according to Brazilian media and the Spanish government respectively. Spanish immigration to Brazil was a direct result of the efforts of the Brazilian government to attract European workers to the country, in order to “whiten” the Brazilian population and to replace the African manpower. The Brazilian government spent large amounts of money paying passages of European immigrants by ship (subsidized immigration). A huge propaganda was conducted by the Brazilian government in Spain, with agents that worked for it (ganchos) who went to the country in order to persuade Spaniards to immigrate to Brazil.

Thus, the Spaniards who emigrated to Brazil were those who could not afford to pay a passage by ship to Cuba and Argentina, the poorest ones, and took advantage of the offer of free travel to Brazil. For the wretched Spanish peasants, the free passage by ship offered by the Brazilian government seemed a great opportunity to leave poverty.

Although present since the onset of the colonization, Portuguese people began migrating to Brazil in larger numbers and without state support in the 18th century. 5 million Brazilians (2.5% of the population) have recent Portuguese ancestry (at least one grandparent) and are eligible to obtain Portuguese citizenship.

Japanese families left economic hardship in their own country to seek new opportunities and a better life in Brazil as coffee growers and farmers. By the 1970s, Japanese Brazilians became leaders in architecture, business, politics, and the arts. Today, 2.3 million Brazilians are of Japanese descent.

Italian migration to Brazil began in 1875 when Brazil began to promote migration to the country in order to increase its population and therefore created 'colonies' mostly in rural areas for Italians and other Europeans to migrate to. Between 1880 and 1920, more than one million Italians immigrated to Brazil.

Germans immigrated mainly from what is now Germany, but also from other countries where German communities were established. From 1824 to 1969, around 250,000 Germans emigrated to Brazil, being the fourth largest immigrant community to settle in the country, after the Portuguese, Italians and Spaniards.

There are currently a total of around 350,000 Chinese immigrants and descendants in Brazil.

Brazil total Population = 215 million

Total Immigrant Population [Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, German, Japanese, Chinese], = 23.8 million

African Slaves landed in Brazil = 3,521,065

Total newcomers to Brazil = 27,321,065

Total current Brazil population = 215,000,000: minus Total newcomers 27,321,065 = 187,678,935 WHO?

Above the albinos say that there is 91,051,646 White people in Brazil; but when we break the numbers down we can only find about 22 million.

The Albinos say that there is 82,277,333 Mixed people and 14,517,961 Black people in Brazil = 96,795,294 total non-Albino people. That leaves 90,883,641 - that are Not Albino, Not Black, Not Mongol, and unaccounted for in Brazil. Only with the "Coloreds" of Brazil could the Albinos get away with such nonsense.

Here are some other reasons why Brazil's Blacks are so messed-up.


In 1888, Brazil, with a mostly black and mixed race or mulatto population, it was the last country in the Western Hemisphere to abolish slavery. During more than 300 years of slavery in the Americas, it was the largest importer of African slaves, bringing in seven times as many African slaves to the country, compared to the United States.

Another important difference was the extent of miscegenation or race mixture, resulting largely from a high sex ratio among its colonial settlers. In contrast to a family-based colonization in North America, Brazil's Portuguese settlers were primarily male. As a result, they often sought out African, indigenous and mulatto females as mates, and thus miscegenation or race mixture was common. Today, Brazilians often pride themselves on their history of miscegenation and continue to have rates of intermarriage that are far greater than those of the United States.

Miscegenation and intermarriage suggest fluid race relations and, unlike the United States or South Africa, there were no racially-specific laws or policies, such as segregation or apartheid, throughout the twentieth century. For these reasons, Brazilians thought of their country as a "racial democracy" from as early as the 1930s until recent years. They believed that racism and racial discrimination were minimal or non-existent in Brazilian society in contrast to the other multiracial societies in the world. A relatively narrow view of discrimination previously recognized only explicit manifestations of racism or race-based laws as discriminatory, thus only countries like South Africa and the United States were seen as truly racist. Moreover, there was little formal discussion of race in Brazilian society, while other societies were thought to be obsessed with race and racial difference.

At the time of the abolition, Brazil's population was mostly black or mixed race until the 1930s, when Brazil encouraged and received a large number of European immigrants as it sought to find new sources of labor. In the context of the scientific racism of the time, which deemed a non-white population as problematic to its future development, Brazilian officials explicitly encouraged European immigration while blocking Chinese and African immigrants. The growing population of European origin was also expected to mix with the non-white, further "whitening" the Brazilian population.


The Great Brazilian Soccer player "Pele" knew that he hadn't really made it, until he took a "White Wife"; he wound up taking three.

c
   
c
   
c

LOOKS LIKE ALL THE ALBINO WIVES IS TAKING IT'S TOLL ON PELE. SAMMY DAVIS jr. HAD TO TAKE A BLACK WIFE BEFORE HE COULD FIND PEACE. TAKING A ALBINO WOMAN BECAUSE YOU ARE ON A HEAD TRIP WILL NEVER WORK OUT. BEST TAKING HER BECAUSE YOU LOVE HER.


The racial hierarchy in Brazil generally idealizes those with lighter skin and denigrates those with darker skin (Caldwell 2007, 51; Twine 1998, 91). For much of its history, Brazil touted itself as a racial democracy where racism was incompatible with its mixed-race population, and the fundamental inequalities of Brazilian society could be fully understood only via class analysis. Nevertheless, racism and negative stereotypes against darker skinned and African descendant Brazilians continue to persist. Expressions such as ‘cleaning one’s belly’ or ‘improving the race,’ presumably by mixing African blood and white blood through racial intermarriage, are embedded in everyday discourse.


So far - Tiger has limited himself to one.

x


Choosing Blackness

Previous research suggests that younger Afro-Brazilians are more likely to choose the Negro category than older Afro-Brazilians. People with higher levels of education are more likely to choose the Negro category than the Moreno, (brown-skinned) instead of negro (black-skinned), category (Bailey and Telles 2006, 86). Bailey and Telles (2006) claim that for younger people, Negro is associated with a modern identity influenced by black American culture and music. They propose that more educated Afro-Brazilians claiming the Negro identity are more likely to have been exposed to black activists rhetoric that promotes a collective black identity than less-educated Afro-Brazilians.

Telles (2004) finds that less-educated Brazilians are two and a half times more likely to choose Moreno, a more ambiguous category, while the highly educated are nearly three times as likely to choose the Negro category (Telles 2004, 98–99). As Telles notes, in this case, ‘money’ (or education, as a proxy for class) darkens. The impact of education on self-classification as black is extremely important, given the high degree of stigmatization of blackness in Brazilian society

In 1991, Brazil changed its racial classifications on the census to Branca (White), Amarela (Yellow), Parda (Brown), Preta (Black), and Indígena (Indigenous). Before, there were over 200 categories of color self-identification such as Morena-clara (light skin mixed woman), sarará (blonde, light skin mixed woman with African features), cor de tânjura (dark skin woman with long hair like indigenous), and the list goes on.

Color was used instead of race in this system of self-identification because no one wanted to be labeled Black, or Negro or Preto. To be Black in Brazil means that one does not have any white ancestors. The one drop rule so prevalent in the United States, which considers a drop of African ancestry as denoting Blackness is the opposite in Brazil. A drop of white ancestry signifies that one is no longer Black, Negro or Preto, as these terms are loaded with social pathologies. Since people who are Black and Brown, are also poor, they are essentialized and stereotyped in the most offensive ways. They are considered filthy, stupid, degenerate, liars, thieves, criminals in general, and fit only for employment undertaking the basest tasks in the society.


Options for mobility are limited, and only with spectacular talent may one become a football player, a television or film star (often portraying stereotypical roles), or a singer, but even Afro-Brazilian singers are not the most popular. However, employment for most Afro-Brazilians is often limited to seamstresses, caterers, food vendors, construction workers, security workers, street sweepers, and doormen; for the more upwardly mobile, teachers, workers in NGOs or public educational/community programs, artists, journalists, academics, nuns and priests. Of course, one role that is not often spoken about is police officer, as many of the poor become police officers, because this is one of the few positions that will guarantee a salary beyond the minimum wage. Since poverty and Blackness go hand-in-hand in the nation, these modalities often align with a lack of education, substandard living conditions, little to no access to health resources, poor sanitary conditions, and such other social ills.


Sadly, it's not just the Brazilians who are Race confused:

ESPN: Woods said nothing to clarify his ancestral roots. Reportedly, he is one-quarter Thai,
one-quarter Chinese, one-quarter Caucasian, one-eighth African-American and one-eighth Native American.



a

s

a
    Lieutenant Colonel Earl Woods

Eldrick "Tiger" Woods

Kultida Woods


His mother, Kultida, is said to be of Thai, Chinese and Dutch descent.
His late father, Earl, said he was African-American, Chinese and Native American.

Realhistoryww has a section which explains Thailand.



My experience in Brazil
By Lulu Garcia-Navarro

There is a joke among Brazilians that a Brazilian passport is the most coveted on the black market because no matter what your background — Asian, African or European — you can fit in here. But the reality is very different.

I'm sitting in café with two women who don't want their names used because of the sensitivity of the topic. One is from the Caribbean; her husband is an expat executive. "I was expecting to be the average-looking Brazilian; Brazil as you see on the media is not what I experienced when I arrived," she tells me. As is the case for many people from the Caribbean basin, she self-identifies as multiracial. The island where she is from has a mixture of races and ethnicities, so she was excited to move to Brazil, which has been touted as one of the most racially harmonious places in the world.

"When I arrived, I was shocked to realize there is a big difference between races and colors, and what is expected — what is your role, basically — based on your skin color," she says. Moving to a new country can be difficult; when you throw racial issues into the mix things can get even more complicated. The other woman is from London, and she also relocated to Brazil because of her husband's job. She describes herself as black.

"My skin is very dark, so going out with my children, on occasions people would say to me, 'Are you the nanny for these children?' And I'd have to explain to them, no, these are my children, I look after them," she says.

A quick lesson on race and class in Brazil: The country was the last place in the Americas to give up slavery. It also imported more than 10 times as many slaves as the U.S. — some 4 million. That's meant that more than 50 percent of the population is of African descent, but those numbers haven't translated to opportunity.

For example, these days among the whiter, wealthier classes, it's common to have a nanny, or baba, who is darker-skinned. The woman from London says that the babas are required to wear all white. "I promptly stopped wearing white," she says, because it was tiresome to have to constantly explain that her children were in fact her children, despite Brazilians' assumptions. "I got rid of the white that's in my wardrobe, and I do not wear white anymore."

As a black woman with lighter-skinned children, she says she fears being stopped by the police, who regularly target people of color in Brazil. She always carries ID that shows she is the mother of her two kids — something she didn't have to do in London. Ky Adderley, an American from Philadelphia who runs an education consultancy in Rio de Janeiro, says he too was shocked when he moved to Brazil. "I feel like the racism here is much deeper than I've ever felt anywhere," he says. He says he knew how to navigate being a black man in the U.S — "regardless of people's skin tone, there was a sense in the black community that if you have a little bit in you, then you were black, and so then we were able to build community really quickly" — but in Brazil he found it really hard to find that same support network. So he created his own with other expatriate black men.

"We have a group called Bros in Brazil," he says. "And it is a group of maybe 15 guys now that come from Europe, Africa, the United States, and are living and working in Brazil as professionals." They talk about race a lot. Brazil, Adderley says, is deeply segregated along racial lines, especially in Rio. When he walks his dog, if he isn't wearing a suit, he often gets asked if he's a professional dog-walker. He says simply being an educated black man in Brazil feels like a subversive act.

"As a black person, what is your place in Rio de Janeiro? All the blacks that I see are in service jobs — and the darker you are, the less you're seen," he says. "So the role that you may have may be back in the kitchen and not out waiting a table." Most people in Brazil tell him there isn't a racism problem, and he says that's the root of the issue: People aren't addressing it. The worry for him is how the race question in Brazil will affect his daughter. A woman who was photographing his then-newborn told him that he needed to modify her features. "Well you can fix her nose, you know — you just pinch it. If you just pinch her nose every day and just keeppinching it, she won't have that wide nose," he recounts her telling him.

The woman from London says the racism in Brazil has started to affect her kids, too. "My 3-year-old has started to come home from school, and he's started to rub my arms and my skin," she says. "He'd say, 'Mummy, I'm trying to get the brown off.' But there is a positive side — the woman from the Caribbean says being in Brazil has made her a lot more conscious about issues of race. She refuses to stop wearing her favorite color, white. "Why should you let a color of clothing signify who you are, or your color of skin signify who you are?" she says. "I am who I am. I don't care what you think — this is who I am, I'm going to continue being me."

I have no positive feelings for Brazilians, but still, I do fell sorry for them. Brazil is Boer South Africa all over again. Maybe if they spent less time Playing Soccer or partying at Carnival,  they might notice that they are the majority population and their country is totally fucked-up.


v
      
a



One thing that always perplexed me, that I think I understand now after doing that bit of work on Brazil. Why do Black American athletes go out of their way to look hideous with their uncombed hair and un-groomed hair styles. It seems strange because whether in the jungle or the Savannah, Blacks the world over have always been fastidious about grooming. Now after reading about how Albino and Mulatto Brazilians react to Black attributes, it does kinda makes you want to rub your uncombed nappy hair in their faces. What silly people they are, they worship the indicators of Albinism and don't even know it. Which is the Super Power of the Albinos and their Mulattoes originally of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal), which is to convince not-too-bright Albino wantabes that their Albinism makes them superior. But is their stupidity reason to make yourself ridiculous?



African coiffure

f

c

x



By the way: for modern humans "Nappy" hair is "Normal" straight hair is "Recessive". Healthline: Straight hair is considered “recessive.” To put that in simple terms, that means that if one parent gives you a curly-haired gene and the other parent gives you a straight-haired gene, you'll be born with curly hair. Variation/mutation in the TCHH gene is often responsible for curly vs straight hair in people with European ancestry, while variation in the EDAR gene is often responsible for straight hair in people with Asian ancestry.


I remember the first time I ever saw a Black man with completely uncombed hair. It was Joe Morton in "The Brother from another Planet." "The Brother" is an alien and escaped slave on the run from his home planet. After he lands in New York City, he tries to adapt to life on the streets of Harlem. Although the Brother is mute, he does have great abilities at fixing machines, and he gets a job. As the Brother tries to blend in with his new culture, he finds an apartment and gradually makes friends. Meanwhile, he is pursued by two agents from his home world who are intent on returning there with him. I watched the movie and never saw where the brother being un-groomed played any part in the movie, and why was he a SLAVE?


x

g

g


Joe Morton in real life

The Albino writer/Director John Sayles



By now I'm suspecting that an Albino decided that the black brother from outer space should be un-groomed and a slave, so I checked, it was written and directed by the Albino John Sayles. Clearly John Sayles is the worst kind of racist, one who uses the ignorance of Blacks to demean them. And as is normal, the foolish used something intended to demean them, as an everyday thing. I suspect that those poor misguided Negroes are thinking that if whites put it in a movie, it must be all right then.

But getting back to John Sayles; how mentally beat-down must an Albino be to constantly harken back to the time when Blacks were enslaved and at the Albinos mercy. I watched the movie at least twice and never once saw where the plot required the hero to be a slave or un-groomed. These were attributes put in by John Sayles simply because he preferred to think and show Blacks in that way. Perhaps like the Albino boys at Wikipedia, John Sayles was beat-up as a boy by some Black kid. Seriously; do you think these Negroes (below) have "Mirrors" in their homes? (Not blaming Joe, he was just trying to get paid).




c
d


s
s




The Spanish in media

Spain and Portugal have never achieved anything of particular note Culturally or Politically, though their people seem particularly proud of their languages. Their one outstanding feature though has been in regards to race, there they have distanced themselves from all others in their total disregard for basic human feelings towards other Human beings. While pursuing the Gold, Silver, and Property of others, they used “Race” as the enabling factor. Wherever they have gone, "Genocide" and Racial Misogyny was sure to follow. Then they made sure that their racial Misogyny would be carried into the future by creating anti-black societal rules; and training their Albino mulattoes to honor them. I have seen jet-Black Spanish speaking people insist that they are not Black! So that today we not only have Racism, we also have “Colorism” thanks to the Spanish and Portuguese. This question was asked on Quora: Why are there so few black and brown people on the Spanish television networks? All together now - Racism and Colorism.

As far as we know the word Colorism was first used to describe what happened with the movie "In the Heights" by the Puerto Rican and Mexican descended Lin-Manuel Miranda, he is an American actor, singer, songwriter, rapper, producer, and playwright. He created and starred in the Broadway musicals "In the Heights" and "Hamilton." On November 7, 2008, Universal Pictures announced that they planned to adapt "In the Heights" as a feature film for release in 2011. However, the project was canceled in March 2011, reportedly due to the fact Universal was looking for a "bankable Latino star" like Shakira or Jennifer Lopez instead of unknown actors. Then it was originally intended to be released in 2020, this time In the Heights was postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The film finally had its world premiere at the Los Angeles Latino International Film Festival on June 4, 2021, and was released in the United States on June 10 in theaters and streaming on HBO Max under a 30-day simultaneous exhibition window. It received acclaim from critics, with praise for Jon M. Chu's direction (Chinese descent), the story, performances and musical numbers, but because of criticism for its lack of representation of Afro-Latino Americans; the film was a box office bomb, grossing just $41 million against its $55 million budget.




z



You see "In the Heights" the movie is about the BLACK "Washington Heights" neighborhood of Manhattan New York. The "Light" skinned Puerto Rican Miranda used Black Dominican music and culture to make his movie but forgot to put any Blacks in the Movie. After the release of in the Heights, its creator, Lin-Manuel Miranda posted not a congratulatory note but an apology. Over the weekend, the conversation around colorism and in the Heights reached a fever pitch as more viewers began to wonder why there weren't any dark-skinned Afro-Latinos in any of the leading roles to represent a place as diverse as Washington Heights. Lin-Manuel Miranda Apologizes For Lack Of Afro-Latinx Actors in 'In The Heights'. "I'm trying to hold space for both the incredible pride in the movie we made and be accountable for our shortcomings," Miranda said in a statement posted on social media. "Thanks for your honest feedback. I promise to do better in my future projects, and I'm dedicated to the learning and evolving we all have to do to make sure we are honoring our diverse and vibrant community."

Lets see now, a Puerto Rican/Mexican Mulatto steals cultural material from Black and Brown Dominicans, then gives it to a Chinese guy to direct: then the Spanish Mulattoes wonder why everybody is upset. Word to the Spanish Mulattoes, your Albino fathers and benefactors are no longer in absolute power, you may no longer do whatever you want to Blacks.



d


f



The Mexicans of Los Angles:

The implosion of the Los Angeles City Council this month, after three of its members were secretly recorded talking in racist terms, has thrown the political machinery of one of America's largest cities into crisis. As of now, there is one empty seat on the 15-member body after one of the three recorded members resigned, and the remaining members who weren't part of the racist conversation have all publicly demanded that the two others resign, going as far as stripping them of nearly all their committee assignments. And on Sunday, California Gov. Gavin Newsom said he is "looking forward" to an announcement of the two council members' departures soon.

But despite the outcry, Gil Cedillo and Kevin de León refuse to quit, expecting they can wait out the storm of fallout for their participation in a racist conversation in which they and former City Council President Nury Martinez disparaged a white colleague's adopted 2-year-old Black son and discussed strategies to consolidate their power at the expense of Black leadership. Martinez stepped down days after the audio was leaked.


d

x
The conversation includes Council President Nury Martinez, who is Latina, saying a white councilman handled his young Black son as though he were an “accessory” and describing the child as like a “changuito,” or little monkey. She also said, “F— that guy... He’s with the Blacks” while discussing Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. George Gascón, among other incendiary comments on the tape.




As we are writing this part, we are smirking: throughout the World there are Black Humans and Black Mongol Humans, and the Albinos of each.

According to the Albinos themselves, they coalesced into a separate Race, presumably in Central Asia 6-12,000 years ago. We are smirking because we wonder if those "Would-be Racists" from Mexico ever bothered to wonder why they look the way they do.

Ah, the hubris and stupidity of the Would-be Racists, so proud of having a disease (Albinism). Of course those Mexicans don't have Albinism, it has been bred out of them by reverse mating. Which gets us to an explanation of why we use the term "Albino Mulatto".

Strictly speaking a Mulatto is the offspring of a Black or Mongol and an Albino. But when a Mulatto mates with a Black, the offspring is likely to look like a normal Black. However when a Mulatto mates with an Albino, the offspring is likely to look like a "Tweener" just more Albino. The scientific term for these people are Quadroons. Clearly the Mexicans above are Quadroons.



Throughout these pages we speak derisively about Albino Mulattoes:
Note to the L.A. City Council Mexicans above;

YOU ARE ALL TOO DARK TO GET A LEAD IN
Lin-Manuel Mirandan's movie "In The Heights".

Check the picture above - Chumps!


How silly these "Colorists" are; the dark Mexicans are trying to look down on Blacks because they are closer to Whites, meanwhile, the lighter Latinos like Lin-Manuel are looking down on them because his type could pass for White.

Meanwhile us Blacks (non Spanish speaking of course), are saying, damn you all are some stupid MFs; play your stupid games, just be careful what you say to our face. What you say behind out backs is an indicator of the deference you must show to us, so we have no problem with that, plus we get a laugh at how ridiculous you are.

s




Luckily for us, the behavior of these Spanish and Portuguese people is easy to explain if you know something of their past. First of all, they are all Central Asian Albinos or descend from same, they of the Germanic super tribe, and the Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Vandals, and Alan subtribes tribes. They were all chased into the Black Roman world by the "HUNS", note the map below, the Huns are right in the middle of the Albinos.

To make understanding easier we like to use the example of the Turks, the "last" of the Albinos chased out of Asia. As a reminder, we think that the first Albinos in Europe circa 1,200 B.C. were of the Germanic tribe, but we are not sure. Later as ALL of the Albinos were being chased out of Asia, first came the second wave of Germanics, then the Slavs, and finally the Turks. The University of Calgary teaches an on-line course on the Turks - see below.


a



c
Note: Franks were NOT Albinos OR Asians.

To the Albinos who still cling to the fantasy that Albinos are native to Europe:

the simple truth is that you can't Go to a place that you are already AT! So if Albinos
are COMING to Europe, they must have started off somewhere ELSE! Asia of course.



Invasian of  North Africa by the Central Asian Albinos

The Roman military presence in North Africa was relatively small, consisting of about 28,000 troops and auxiliaries in Numidia and the two Mauretanian provinces. Starting in the second century A.D, these garrisons were manned mostly by local inhabitants.

Aside from Carthage, urbanization in North Africa came in part with the establishment of settlements of veterans under the Roman emperors Claudius (reigned 41-54 A.D.), Nerva (r. 96-98 A.D.), and Trajan. In Algeria such settlements included Tipasa, Cuicul (modern Djemila, northeast of Sétif), Thamugadi (modern Timgad, southeast of Sétif), and Sitifis. The prosperity of most towns depended on agriculture. Called the granary of the empire; North Africa, according to one estimate, produced 1 million tons of cereals each year, one-quarter of which was exported. Other crops included fruit, figs, grapes, and beans. By the second century A.D, olive oil rivaled cereals as an export item.

The beginnings of the decline of the Roman Empire were less serious in North Africa than elsewhere. There were uprisings, however. In A.D. 238, landowners rebelled unsuccessfully against the emperor's fiscal policies. Sporadic tribal revolts in the Mauretanian mountains followed from 253 to 288 A.D. The towns also suffered economic difficulties, and building activity almost ceased.

The towns of Roman North Africa had a substantial Hebrew population. Some Hebrews were deported from Palestine in the first and second centuries A.D. for rebelling against Roman rule; others had come earlier with Punic settlers (Phoenicians). In addition, a number of Berber tribes had converted to Judaism.

Christianity arrived in the second century and soon gained converts in the towns and among slaves. More than eighty bishops, some from distant frontier regions of Numidia, attended the Council of Carthage in 256. By the end of the fourth century, the settled areas had become Christianized, and some Berber tribes had converted en mass.

By the late classic period, both Greece and Rome were fundamentally Mulatto societies. The Romans occupying the Mediterranean parts of the African Continent left their traces in these beautiful mosaics, featuring the four seasons. The stamps below, from Algeria (1977), feature Roman mosaics from the now ruined city of Timgad, founded by the Roman emperor Trajan in 100 A.D.


v
v
v
v


The Visigoths

The Visigoths (western Goths); were an Asian Albino people, and are the ancestors of the modern Spanish and Portugese. They were one of two main branches of the Goths, the Ostrogoths being the other. Together these tribes were among the Germanic peoples from Central Asia who spread through the late Roman Empire during the Migration Period. The Romanized Visigoths first emerged as a distinct people during the 4th century, initially in the Balkans, where they participated in several wars with Rome. A Visigothic army under Alaric I eventually moved into Italy and famously sacked Rome in 410.

Eventually the Visigoths were settled in southern Gaul as foederati of the Romans, the reasons for which is still a subject for debate among scholars. They soon fell out with their hosts and established their own kingdom with its capital at Toulouse. They then slowly extended their authority into Hispania, displacing the Vandals and Alans. Their rule in Gaul was cut short at the Battle of Vouillé in 507 when they were defeated by the Franks under Clovis I. Thereafter the only territory north of the Pyrenees that the Visigoths held was Septimania, such that their kingdom became limited to Hispania. In 711 or 712 the Visigoths, were defeated in the Battle of Guadalete by a force of invading Arabs and Berbers (the Moors).

The Alans

The Alans or Alani were a group of White Asian tribes of nomadic pastoralists of the 1st millennium A.D. They spoke a Scytho-Sarmatian language. In 418 (or 426) the Alan king, Attaces, was killed in battle against the Visigoths in Iberia (Spain), and this branch of the Alans subsequently appealed to the Asding Vandal king Gunderic to accept the Alan crown. The separate ethnic identity of Respendial's Alans then dissolved. Although some of these Alans are thought to have remained in Iberia, most went to North Africa with the Vandals in 429. Later Vandal kings in North Africa styled themselves Rex Wandalorum et Alanorum ("King of the Vandals and Alans").

The Vandals (The first infusion of Albino blood into North Africa).

The Vandals were an Germanic tribe from Asia, that entered the late Roman Empire during the 5th century, perhaps best known for their sack of Rome in 455. Although they were not notably more destructive than other invaders of ancient times, Renaissance and Early Modern writers who idealized Rome tended to blame the Vandals for its destruction. According to Procopius, the Vandals came to Africa at the request of Bonifacius, the military ruler of the region. However, it has been suggested that the Vandals migrated to Africa in search of safety; they had been attacked by a Roman army in 422 and had failed to seal a treaty with them. Led by their king, Gaiseric, some 80,000 Vandals, crossed into Africa from Spain in 429. Advancing eastwards along the coast, the Vandals lay siege to Hippo Regius in 430. Inside Saint Augustine and his priests prayed for relief from the invaders, knowing full well that the fall of the city would spell conversion or death for many Roman Christians. On 28 August 430, three months into the siege, St. Augustine (who was 75 years old) died, perhaps from starvation or stress, as the wheat fields outside the city lay dormant and unharvested. After 14 months, hunger and the inevitable diseases were ravaging both the city inhabitants and the Vandals outside the city walls.

Peace was made between the Romans and the Vandals in 435 through a treaty giving the Vandals control of coastal Numidia. Geiseric chose to break the treaty in 439 when he invaded the province of Africa Proconsularis and laid siege to Carthage. The city was captured without a fight; the Vandals entered the city while most of the inhabitants were attending the races at the hippodrome. Genseric made it his capital, and styled himself the King of the Vandals and Alans, to denote the inclusion of the Alans of north Africa into his alliance. The Goth leader Theodoric the Great, king of the Ostrogoths and regent of the Visigoths, was allied by marriage with the Vandals as well as with the Burgundians and the Franks under Clovis I. Like the Goths, the Vandals, were continuators rather than violaters of Roman culture in Late Antiquity. Soon independent kingdoms emerged in mountainous and desert areas, towns were overrun, and the Berbers, who had previously been pushed to the edges of the Roman Empire, returned. Although the Vandals fended off attacks from the Romans and established hegemony over the islands of the western Mediterranean, they were less successful in their conflict with the Berbers. Situated south of the Vandal kingdom, the Berbers inflicted two major defeats on the Vandals in the period 496–530

The Byzantines (Eastern Roman Empire based in Anatolia (now Turkey).

Belisarius, general of the Byzantine emperor Justinian based in Constantinople, landed in North Africa in 533 with 16,000 men and within a year destroyed the Vandal kingdom. Local opposition delayed full Byzantine control of the region for twelve years, however, and imperial control, when it came, was but a shadow of the control exercised by Rome. Although an impressive series of fortifications were built, Byzantine rule was compromised by official corruption, incompetence, military weakness, and lack of concern in Constantinople for African affairs. As a result, many rural areas reverted to Berber rule.


The Moors

Albino historians, in their bid to make ancient Iberians seem White/Albino, have chosen to ignore the "obvious" relationships that must have existed between Berbers and the people of Iberia. When Grimaldi man crossed the Gibraltar straits to enter Europe; c. 45,000 B.C, all of his kind did not follow. When Humans move to new territories "Most" stay behind in the old territory, and they "maintain" their relationships; there is always back and forth travel for trade and communication. It is against this backdrop that the Berber invasion of Iberia must be viewed. The Berbers did not enter Iberia as destroyers, they entered as past owners and builders!


c



Thus, after Muhammad's Islamic army took Egypt in 640 A.D. and then went on to conquer all of North Africa. The Berbers no-doubt saw this new Black army as an opportunity; so rather than fight, the Berbers joined forces with the Islamic army. In 711 A.D. A Berber army led by general Tariq ibn Ziyad, invaded Iberia (Spain) and overthrew the White Visigoths (Western Goths): Who were one of two main branches of the Goths, an east Germanic tribe, who over the period of only one hundred years, had migrated from eastern Europe, thru Greece, thru Italy, and finally down into the Iberian peninsula.

In Iberia (Spain and Portugal), the Berbers, now known as Moors, created a highly advanced civilization and culture, famous for it’s art, architecture, and centers of learning. While having rule over Spain: The Berbers, who themselves fifty years earlier had been forced to accept Islam, now sometimes forced the inhabitants of Iberia to do the same. Though the number of original "Moors" remained small, many native Iberian inhabitants converted to Islam. According to Ronald Segal, some 5.6 million of Iberia's 7 million inhabitants were Muslim by 1200 A.D, virtually all of them native inhabitants. According to historian Richard A. Fletcher, the number of Arabs who settled in Iberia was very small. There were about 900,000 Berbers and about 90,000 Arabs in Iberia.

 When you think of European culture, one of the first things that may come to your mind is the renaissance. Many of the roots of European culture can be traced back to that glorious time of art, science, commerce and architecture. But did you know that long before the renaissance there was a place of humanistic beauty in Muslim Spain? Not only was it artistic, scientific and commercial, but it also exhibited incredible tolerance, imagination and poetry. Moors, as the Spaniards call the Muslims, populated Spain for nearly 700 years. As you'll see, it was their civilization that enlightened Europe and brought it out of the dark ages to usher in the renaissance. Many of their cultural and intellectual influences still live with us today.



c
                             
d



Way back during the eighth century, Europe was still knee-deep in the Medieval period. That's not the only thing they were knee-deep in. In his book, "The Day The Universe Changed," the historian James Burke describes how the typical European townspeople lived:

"The inhabitants threw all their refuse into the drains in the center of the narrow streets. The stench must have been overwhelming, though it appears to have gone virtually unnoticed. Mixed with excrement and urine would be the soiled reeds and straw used to cover the dirt floors.

This squalid society was organized under a feudal system and had little that would resemble a commercial economy. Along with other restrictions, the Catholic Church forbade the lending of money - which didn't help get things booming much. "Anti-Semitism, previously rare, began to increase. Money lending, which was forbidden by the Church, was permitted under Jewish law." (Burke, 1985, p. 32) Jews worked to develop a currency although they were heavily persecuted for it. Medieval Europe was a miserable lot, which ran high in illiteracy, superstition, barbarism and filth.

During this same time, Arabs entered Europe from the South. ABD AL-RAHMAN I, a survivor of a family of caliphs of the Arab Empire, reached Spain in the mid-700's. He became the first Caliph of Al-Andalus, the Moorish part of Spain, which occupied most of the Iberian Peninsula. He also set up the UMAYYAD Dynasty that ruled Al-Andalus for over three-hundred years. (Grolier, History of Spain).


a
                                                  
x



By the beginning of the ninth century, Moorish Spain was the gem of Europe with its capital city, Cordova. With the establishment of Abdurrahman III - "the great caliphate of Cordova" - came the golden age of Al-Andalus. Cordova, in southern Spain, was the intellectual center of Europe.


If you Google "Moorish Architecture in Spain" these are the structures you will see
d



At a time when London was a tiny mud-hut village that "could not boast of a single streetlamp" (Digest, 1973, p. 622), in Cordova "there were half a million inhabitants, living in 113,000 houses. There were 700 mosques and 300 public baths spread throughout the city and its twenty-one suburbs. The streets were paved and lit." (Burke, 1985, p. 38) The houses had marble balconies for summer and hot-air ducts under the mosaic floors for the winter. They were adorned with gardens with artificial fountains and orchards". (Digest, 1973, p. 622) "Paper, a material still unknown to the west, was everywhere. There were bookshops and more than seventy libraries." (Burke, 1985, p. 38).



d
        
d



This rich and sophisticated society took a tolerant view towards other faiths. Tolerance was unheard of in the rest of Europe. But in Moorish Spain, "thousands of Jews and Christians lived in peace and harmony with their Muslim overlords." (Burke, 1985, p. 38) The society had a literary rather than religious base. Economically their prosperity was unparalleled for centuries. The aristocracy promoted private land ownership and encouraged Jews in banking. There was little or no Muslim prostelyting. Instead, non-believers simply paid an extra tax!


s           
g



In Iberia, many of the ousted White nobles took refuge in the unconquered north Asturian highlands. From there they aimed to reconquer their lands from the Moors: this war of reconquest is known as the Reconquista. It began in about 900 A.D. when a small Christian enclave of Visigoths in northwestern Spain, named Asturias; initiated conflicts between Christians and Muslims. Soon after, Christian states based in the north and west slowly; in fits and starts, began a process of expansion and reconquest of Iberia over the next several hundred years. The end for the Moors came on January 2, 1492: the leader of the last Moorish City "Granada" (located in southern Spain) - surrendered to armies of a recently united Christian Spain (after the marriage of Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile). This ended the 800 year reign of the Moors in Iberia.



f


Albino Spain has never equaled the Genius and Beauty of Moor Architecture, these structures and many others like them are the reason tourist go to Spain. Yet modern Spanish and Portuguese denigrate Blacks - lets see if we can figure out why. First of all this disrespect must be "New" as you can see from the artwork, Iberian Kings were Black, and even at the time of Columbus, the Spanish king was a Mulatto - who would dare denigrate the King?

There is no history book which says that at a particular point in time Albino Iberians started to hate Blacks, whether because of fear (knowing how easily the Moors defeated them, or revenge for same, the hatred surely began. Now in modern times the hatred takes the form of trying to write Blacks out of History. How well we remember when American Black students had to take to the streets to protest the worlds Albinos claiming that the ancient Egyptians were White/Albinos.

Now the World Albinos have become more subtle, they now pack trusted encyclopedias with their racist lies. Above we took the boys at Wikipedia to task for their lies, then to our surprise we found the the Albinos at
Encyclopaedia Britannica were doing the same things. Below is the verbatim entry for "Moor" on Encyclopaedia Britannica.


MOOR - Written and fact-checked by The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica.

The term is of little use in describing the ethnic characteristics of any groups, ancient or modern. From the Middle Ages to the 17th century, however, Europeans depicted Moors as being black, “swarthy,” or “tawny” in skin colour. (Othello, Shakespeare’s Moor of Venice, comes to mind in such a context.) Europeans designated Muslims of any other complexion as “White Moors,” despite the fact that the population in most parts of North Africa differs little in physical appearance from that of southern Europe (in Morocco, for example, red and blonde hair are relatively common). We answer this idiot below. So what is the problem, are the boys at
Encyclopaedia Britannica just rabid lying racists, or are they simply stupid? Let us recount North African History as relates to Albinos, and you be the judge.


As mentioned above the first Albinos (the Visigoths) appeared circa early 400s.
Then the Vandals broke off and invaded North Africa, circa mid 400s.
After the Moors were expelled from Spain, the Spanish took revenge by invading and occupying North Africa several times in several places over many years.

The second infusion of Albino blood into North Africa.

In 1511, the Catholic Monarchy completed a series of campaigns that conquered an empire in the North African Maghrib. Spaniards first moved into the region in 1497 by seizing the coastal outpost of Melilla. Over the next 14 years, they captured other enclaves along the North African littoral, including Mers el-Kebir, Peńón de Vélez de La Gomera, Orán, Peńón de Árgel, and Bugía. In 1510, Spanish expansion achieved what would turn out to be its eastern-most limits when an armada took Tripoli. Spain's sway in the region reached an apex in 1511, the year that the Algerian coastal towns of Dellys, Mostaganem, and Cherchel, along with Tlemcen, the capital of the eponymous kingdom in western Algeria, accepted the status of vassals under the tutelage of the Catholic Monarchy. Though Spanish movement further eastward would later face the challenge of an expanding Ottoman Empire, Spain in the early 1510s looked poised to liberate the Holy Land and Constantinople, ambitions that some at court held dear.

Even before Spain moved into the region, Portugal was performing its own series of conquests along Morocco's western coast, starting with Ceuta in 1415 and followed by Alcazar el-Saghir (1458), Arcila and Tangiers (1471), Larache (1473), and Agadir (1505), among others. Like Spain, Portugal hoped to take control of these towns and the trans-Saharan trade that passed through them, and to secure the maritime routes it was pioneering to Asia as they skirted African shores. When the Spanish monarchy absorbed the Portuguese global empire in 1580, the presidios came under the rule of one Iberian state. Though Portugal revolted against Spain in 1640 and later regained control over Tangiers and Mazagán, Spain managed to hold on to Ceuta. Portugal lost Mazagán, its last presidio, in 1769.

Over the centuries following 1511, Iberians gradually lost, and at times retook or even took for the first time various enclaves on the North African coast. Still, their dominance in the region came to be contested soon after the Iberian kingdoms reached the high point of their expansion. In the second decade of the sixteenth century, Ottoman forces started sweeping into the western Mediterranean, taking control of Algiers and raiding the coasts of the Spanish Levant and the Baleares Islands. In Morocco, even though the Wattasid kingdom of Fez was disintegrating, the Sa'adi dynasty and then the Alawi constituted new states. The Sa'adis, based in the southern Atlas city of Marrakesh, conquered Fez in 1549, thereby unifying the south and the north. English, Dutch, French, and other smaller Mediterranean powers also made their interests felt along these shores starting in the seventeenth century. Military pressure from these powers forced the Iberians to retreat to their outposts and withdraw from a number of them, though Spain has maintained possession of Melilla and Ceuta until the present day. Spain even launched a new empire in northern Morocco in 1908, one that would last until 1956.


FRANCE IN ALGERIA - 1830-1962

The third infusion of Albino blood into North Africa.


In the period between Napoleon's downfall in 1815 and the revolution of 1830, the restored French monarchy was in crisis, and the dey was weak politically, economically, and militarily. The French monarch sought to reverse his domestic unpopularity. As a result of what the French considered an insult to the French consul in Algiers by the dey in 1827, France blockaded Algiers for three years. France used the failure of the blockade as a reason for a military expedition against Algiers in 1830.

Using Napoleon's 1808 contingency plan for the invasion of Algeria, 34,000 French soldiers landed twenty-seven kilometers west of Algiers, at Sidi Ferruch, on June 12, 1830. To face the French, the dey sent 7,000 janissaries, 19,000 troops from the beys of Constantine and Oran, and about 17,000 Kabyles. The French established a strong beachhead and pushed toward Algiers, thanks in part to superior artillery and better organization. Algiers was captured after a three-week campaign, and Hussein Dey fled into exile. French troops raped, looted (taking 50 million francs from the treasury in the Casbah), desecrated mosques, and destroyed cemeteries. It was an inauspicious beginning to France's self-described "civilizing mission," whose character on the whole was cynical, arrogant, and cruel. In 1834 France annexed the occupied areas, which had an estimated Muslim population of about 3 million, as a colony. Naturally millions of French clambered in to grab land and whatever else they could steal - and they are still there, just as the Albinos in the Americas are still here. The current population of Algeria is 44 million; Albinos say mostly Arab and Berber, but we know better.

Wikipedia Main article: Ethnic groups in Algeria

Ethnic groups in Algeria
  Arabs (73.6%)
  Berbers (23.2%)
  Arabized Berbers (3%)
  Others (0.2%)

Arabs make up 73.6% of the population of Algeria, Berbers make up 23.2%, Arabized Berbers make up 3%, and others make up 0.2%.
Phoenicians, Romans, Byzantines, Arabs, Turks as well as other ethnic groups have contributed to the ethnic makeup and genetic
structure of the Algerian population.


If you Google "People of Algeria" these are the pictures that you will be presented with.
c
Above - there is portraits of Berbers and Arabs - do any of them look like THESE people?
a





LIBYA COLONY OF ITALY

The fourth infusion of Albino blood into North Africa.


Italy, which became a unified state only in 1860, was a late starter in the race for colonies. For the Italians, the marginal Turkish provinces in Libya seemed to offer an obvious compensation for their humiliating acquiescence to the establishment of a French protectorate in Tunisia, a country coveted by Italy as a potential colony. Italy intensified its long-standing commercial interests in Libya and, in a series of diplomatic manuevers, won from the major powers their recognition of an Italian sphere of influence there. It was assumed in European capitals that Italy would sooner or later seize the opportunity to take political and military action in Libya as well.

In September 1911 Italy engineered a crisis with Turkey charging that the Turks had committed a "hostile act" by arming Arab tribesmen in Libya. When Turkey refused to respond to an ultimatum calling for Italian military occupation to protect Italian interests in the region, Italy declared war. After a preliminary naval bombardment, Italian troops landed and captured Tripoli on October 3, encountering only slight resistance. Italian forces also occupied Tobruk, Al Khums, Darnah, and Benghazi.

In the ensuing months, the Italian expeditionary force, numbering 35,000, barely penetrated beyond its several beachheads. The 5,000 Turkish troops defending the provinces at the time of the invasion withdrew inland a few kilometers, where officers such as Enver Pasha and Mustafa Kemal (Atatürk) organized the Arab tribes in a resistance to the Italians that took on the aspects of a holy war. But with war threatening in the Balkans, Turkey was compelled to sue for peace with Italy. In accordance with the treaty signed at Lausanne in October 1912, the sultan issued a decree granting independence to Tripolitania and Cyrenaica while Italy simultaneously announced its formal annexation of those territories. In the end, the Turks accepted a peace settlement, and Libya was annexed to the Kingdom of Italy. The Italians also occupied the island of Rhodes. Several hundred thousand Sicilians and other southern Italians settled in Tripoli and its environs in the decades to come. The sultan, in his role as caliph (leader of Islam), was to retain his religious jurisdiction there and was permitted to appoint the qadi of Tripoli, who supervised the sharia courts. But the Italians were unable to appreciate that no distinction was made between civil and religious jurisdiction in Islamic law. Thus, through the courts, the Turks kept open a channel of influence over their former subjects and subverted Italian authority.


But the Berbers were not done, in 1912 the Libyan hero Omar Mukhtar (1862 - September 16, 1931), of the Mnifa tribe, near Tobruk in eastern Barqa (Cyrenaica). Organized and for nearly twenty years, led a Berber resistance to Italian occupation of Libya.

 
s


During the Italian war and occupation of Libya, about 50% (YES 50%!) of the Libyan population,
mostly Blacks, died in the struggle for independence, mainly in prison camps.




Demographics of Libya - from Wikipedia

Population - 7+ million
97% of Libya's population is made up of Arabs and Berbers, of which 92% are Arabs and 5% are Berbers.



GOOGLE PEOPLE OF LIBYA


f
Above - there is portraits of Berbers and Arabs - do any of them look like THESE people?
d


War over the Truth Books

In America today there is a big war brewing about what schools are allowed to teach White/Albino children. One parent complained that she did not want Albino children taught that Albinos Hate Blacks. And maybe she's right, I mean look at stupid me, I thought that if you kill us, enslave us, brutalize us, deny us an education, deny us a decent living, deny us the right to vote, then that meant that you hated us, or at the least, didn't like us - silly me, looks like I got it all wrong.


Dear Albino lady - THIS IS "NOT" LOVE!    IT'S HATE!
c



Here is another:

New York Post Newspaper
Kids’ book ‘Our Skin’ in NYC schools blames racism on white people. By Bernadette Hogan, Conor Skelding and Melissa Klein May 7, 2022

Quote: “A long time ago, way before you were born, a group of white people made up an idea called race. They sorted people by skin color and said that white people were better, smarter, prettier, and that they deserve more than everybody else,” the book declares. It goes on to say “That isn’t true or fair at all!”

Brooklyn parent leader Vito LaBella called the text “inflammatory.” That page alone in my mind is just preaching hate, he said, referring to the text about sorting people by skin color.
A Manhattan parent of a kindergartener saw the book in his son’s school this week in a box marked “Mosaic curriculum.” The dad said he looked through the book and stopped cold at the page saying white people invented race.

“The book itself is fine and a lot of what is said in the book is productive and I think very helpful in a discussion of race,” he said. “However, there’s just an excerpt from it that I think is so damaging that it should disqualify the whole book.” “Racism should be talked about, but it should be talked about correctly,” he said. “I think that telling 5- and 6-year-olds that white people are all responsible for all racism is not helpful. It’s going to be very traumatic for many 5- and 6-year-olds who are going to blame themselves and blame their parents.”


THE ALBINO INVENTORS OF "RACE"

François Bernier (1625–1688) is believed to have developed the first comprehensive classification of humans into distinct races which was published in a French journal article in 1684, Nouvelle division de la terre par les différentes espčces ou races l'habitant, New division of Earth by the different species or races which inhabit it. (Gossett, 1997:32–33). Bernier advocated using the "four quarters" of the globe as the basis for providing labels for human differences. The four subgroups that Bernier used were Europeans, Far Easterners, Negroes (blacks), and Lapps.


Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752–1840) divided the human species into five races in 1779, later founded on crania research (description of human skulls), and called them (1793/1795):
the Caucasian or white race. Blumenbach was the first to use this term for Europeans, but the term would later be reinterpreted to also include Middle Easterners and South Asians.
the Mongolian or yellow race, including all East Asians.
the Malayan or brown race, including Southeast Asians and Pacific Islanders.
the Ethiopian or black race, including all sub-Saharan Africans.
the American or red race, including all Native Americans.




Remember this from above? Below is the verbatim entry for "Moor" on Encyclopaedia Britannica.

Quote: Europeans designated Muslims of any other complexion as “White Moors,” despite the fact that the population in most parts of North Africa differs little in physical appearance from that of southern Europe (in Morocco, for example, red and blonde hair are relatively common).

Now we answer the idiot from
Encyclopaedia Britannica.

Daily Mail
https://www.dailymail.co.uk › news › article-484176

What are the blonde tribes of Morocco?
About 19 million Berbers live in Morocco, where they make up almost a third of the population.
Many of their ancient ancestors were Europeans
- some of whom were brought to North Africa as slaves.
They also have lighter skin than many other Moroccans.





ON THE PAGE TITLED MOORS ON WIKIPEDIA WE FIND THESE PICTURES OF "MOORS"

c
    
v
     
c
The Moors request permission from James I of Aragón


Castillian ambassadors attempting to convince Moorish Almohad king Abu Hafs Umar al-Murtada to join their alliance (contemporary depiction from the Cantigas de Santa María).


Depiction of the Moors in Iberia, from The Cantigas de Santa Maria

ANYBODY SEE ANY BLACK PEOPLE HERE???

I MEAN, BOTH BERBERS AND ARABS WERE BLACK PEOPLE,
SO WHERE ARE THE BLACK PEOPLE IN THESE PICTURES?

Ordinarily we get angry at the blatant racism exhibited by the assholes at wikipedia,
but now we are getting used to it, so it's up to you readers to put a stop to it.

x
A large mural located on the ceiling of the Hall of Kings of the Alhambra which possibly depicts the first ten sultans of the Nasrid dynasty. It is a late-14th-century Gothic painting by a Christian Toledan artist.

The Nasrid dynasty was the last Muslim dynasty in the Iberian Peninsula, ruling the Emirate of Granada from 1230 until 1492. Its members claimed to be of Arab origin.




Well here we are, we started out to expose the pathetic Racism and Colorism of Hispanics
and what do you know, we wound up indicting just about all Albinos. Just goes to show,
when you follow the truth there is no telling where it will lead to.





x



Morocco Newspaper headline - Arab Barometer: 43% of Moroccans Consider
Anti-Black Racism a Problem, The data shows that almost a third of Moroccan
citizens state they were “targets of racist comments at least once.”



c


Morocco: UN expert urges action on anti-discrimination and racial equality commitments.
GENEVA (8 July 2019) – The Kingdom of Morocco must implement a comprehensive plan to
satisfy its obligations to eliminate discrimination and achieve racial equality,
the UN’s expert on racism and human rights said.



SOME MIGHT WONDER WHY THERE WOULD BE ANTI-BLACK PROBLEMS
IN A BLACK COUNTRY IN AFRICA WITH A BLACK, or at least MULATTO RULER?



s


 

Click here to link back to the original Maya page: >>









Click here for Realhistoryww Home page