This is a specific subject page,
dealing exclusively with, or primarily with, the subject in the title.
Because of need, there are many such pages at RHWW: usually, but not
always, linked to primary pages. For those in a hurry, they enable a
quick summary of many important subjects. The menu for these pages is
here: Click >>>
Spanish and Portuguese Atrocities
During the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade era
and it's aftermath
This page is an addendum to the Maya Murals page. The Greatest Civilizations created by man were the Egyptian, and related like Meroe. Sumer and related like Akkadia, Babylon, Assyria and Elam. Crete (Minoan) and related like Mycenaean, Greece and Rome. And in the Americas; the Olmec/Mayan and related. The Inca and related. The Aztec
and Related. As a group, Albinos are responsible for destroying all of
these Black created civilizations. But it is the Spanish and the
Portuguese who wickedly and with Malice, tried to destroy not only the
cultures, but the people as well; and put in place societal norms which
would leave survivors in permanent servitude.
But first, a little background on Slavery:
Sumer in Mesopotamia and Egypt in Africa are the first documented
Civilizations in the World. The first mentions of Slavery in each is as
follows:
Sumer - 6,800 B.C. The world’s first city-state emerges in Mesopotamia. Land
ownership and the early stages of technology bring war—in which enemies
are captured and forced to work: slavery.
Egypt - 2,575 B.C. Temple art celebrates the capture of slaves in battle.
Egyptians capture slaves by sending special expeditions up the Nile
River.
|
|
|
Sorry - the earliest we could find documentation for relating to slavery is Ur-Nammu 4,000
years later. The Code of Ur-Nammu is the oldest known law code surviving today. It is from
Sumer and is written on tablets in the Sumerian language c. 2100–2050 B.C.
4 - If a slave marries a slave, and that slave is set free, he does not leave the household.
5 - If a slave marries a native [i.e. free] person, he/she is to hand the firstborn son over to his owner.
Ur-Nammu was a Sumerian King who created an Empire and eventually ruled
all of Sumer, and much of Assyria, Elam, Syria and Ebla. Even Byblos
(in Canaan), was forced to pay tribute. This was the beginning of Ur
III, (because this is the third time that the kingship was taken by
the kingdom of Ur).
|
|
The declaration of innocense from the “Book of the Dead”.
Hail to thee, great lord of justice. I have come to you, my lord, that
thou may bring me so that I may see your beauty, for I know thou and I
know your name, and I know the names of the fourty-two Gods of those
who are with thou in this Hall of Justice. Lord of Truth is thy name.
Behold, I have come to you, I have brought you truth, I have repelled
falsehood for you. I have not done falsehood against men; I have not
impoverished my associates; I have done no wrong in the Place of
Truth, I have not learned that which is not; I have done no evil; I
have not daily made labor in excess of what is due to be done for me;
my name has not reached the offices of those who control slaves; I
have not slandered a servant to his master; I have not caused pain; I
have not made hungry; I have not made to weep; I have not killed; I
have not commanded to kill; I have not made suffering for anyone.
I am pure, pure, pure.
The “Book
of the Dead” is the name given to a genre of mortuary spells, magical
texts, and accompanying illustrations called vignettes. The Book of the
Dead helped Egyptians prepare for the afterlife where Osiris, god of
the underworld, would judge them.
Osiris had Green skin
because he was a god of agriculture, vegetation, and fertility. As a
god on earth, he was the first pharaoh and taught his people how to
grow corn and make wine from grapes and bread and beer from wheat.
The group
that we call the Book of the Dead developed from spells that were first
inscribed on scarabs and coffins at the end of Egypt's Middle Kingdom
period, around 1650 B.C.
|
Term to know: Mamluk - translated as "one who is owned", meaning
"slave" it is a term most commonly referring to non-Arab (Black Arabs were the masters), ethnically
diverse (mostly Albino Turkic, Southern Russian, Eastern and
Southeastern European) slave-soldiers who were
assigned military and administrative duties, serving the ruling Arab
dynasties in the Muslim world.
Because of the ignorant racists at
Wikipedia I must remind you that the "Word Slave" was born of the
"Central Asian Albinos" who migrated into Eastern Europe in the modern
era - "The Slavs". Can you believe that those sorry bastards at
Wikipedia try to imply that mostly Blacks were enslaved? Only an
Albino of the stupidest order would forget or not know that Blacks
INVENTED Slavery - to our shame. Only civilized people in Cities and
Towns have use for Slaves, whereas illiterate Nomads like the Albinos
of Asia have little use for Slaves.
As
an aside: "Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia" is a communal effort,
anyone meeting certain basic criteria can post articles. But we detect
an unmistakable anti-Black sentiment with most Wiki articles having to
do with race. It makes us wonder if most of the guys at Wikipedia had
been "Beat-up" as boys, by some Black kid.
|
Napoleons Turkish Slave (Mamluk)
|
Raza
Roustam was born in 1781 or 2 in Tiflis (known today as Tbilisi),
capital of Georgia, son of a trader working in Armenia. He was abducted
from his family aged either 7 or 13 and then purchased by a Bey from
Cairo in whose service he took up as his Mamluk. He was later owned by
Sheik El-Becri, who gave him (along with another Mamluk called Ali) to
Bonaparte in August 1799. Returning from the Egyptian Campaign,
Napoleon took Raza with him to Paris, making him his bodyguard. From
this moment on, Roustam would sleep in front of the First Consul’s
door. He also became Bonaparte’s valet. In addition to this, from
1802-1806, Roustam was added to the Corps des mamelouks de la Garde.
|
First mention of Turks in literature.
The Ghaznavids (Islamic Dynasty of Turkish slave origin [Mamluks]).
The Tajikistanian (Central Asian) poet Rudaki (858-941), in a poem
about the Samanid emir's court, describes how “row upon row” of Turkish
slave guards were part of its adornment (the Samanids may have been post Arab victory Persians). From these Turkic guard ranks
two military families arose—the Simjurids and Ghaznavids—who ultimately
proved disastrous to the Samanids. The Simjurids received an appendage
in the Kuhestan region of southern Khorasan. Alp Tigin founded the
Ghaznavids when he established himself at Ghazna (modern Ghazni,
Afghanistan) in 962. He and fellow Turk, Abu al-Hasan Simjuri, as
Samanid generals, competed with each other for the governorship of
Khorasan and control of the Samanid Empire by placing on the throne
emirs they could dominate. Abu al-Hasan Simjuri died in 961, but a
court party instigated by men of the scribal class—civilian ministers
as contrasted with Turkish generals—rejected Alp Tigin's candidate for
the Samanid throne, Mansur I was installed, and Alp Tigin prudently
retired to his fief of Ghazna. Thus the Simjurids enjoyed control of
Khorasan south of the Oxus river only.
The struggles of the Turkish slave generals for mastery of the Samanid
throne, with the help of shifting allegiance from the court's
ministerial leaders, both demonstrated and accelerated the Samanid
decline. Samanid weakness attracted into Transoxania the Qarluq Turks,
who had recently converted to Islam. They occupied Bukhara in 992, and
established in Transoxania the Qarakhanid or Ilek Khanid dynasty. Alp
Tigin had been succeeded at Ghazna by Sebüktigin (died 997).
Sebüktigin's son Mahmud made an agreement with the Qarakhanids whereby
the Oxus river was recognized as their mutual boundary. Thus the
Samanids' dominion was divided and Mahmud was freed to advance westward
into Khorasan to meet the Buyids. The Samanid Empire was part of the "Iranian" Intermezzo, (Albino
misinformation - the nation of Iran was founded on April 1, 1979,
before that it was Black Persia), which saw the creation of a
Persianate culture and identity that brought Persian speech and
traditions into the fold of the Islamic world. This later contributed
to the formation of the Turko-Persian culture. The brothers who founded
the Samanid Empire were from Afghanistan.
Before going on, just one more "Dig" at the stupidity of some Albinos.
Admittedly they have been made stupid by Albino media which refuses to
show Blacks in numbers anywhere outside of Africa. And of course there are
many more Blacks Outside of Africa, than there is inside of Africa.
But ponder the ignorance of the question (below); then you understand why Trump is
so popular, there is a segment of the Albino population which is quite
happy and comfortable living in the fantasy world Albino media has
created for them.
|
This is an example of the Albinos idiotic nature: in current times
American Albinos constantly refer to Blacks as "Minorities". This is of
course to instill the thought that Albinos are numerous and powerful.
They use their monopoly over media to reinforce this falsehood by constantly
showing images from all parts of the World of only other Albinos and
their Mulattoes. Except for Africa, rarely are Blacks shown in
international News Stories, or travelog's. But their Make-believe "Black
free World" is just like their histories; pure fantasy.
Here is another example of how the Albinos use their power over what we
are taught to mis-educate us: if you Google "What race has the largest
population in the world?" The answer you are given is Quote: "The
world's largest ethnic group is Han Chinese". Notice they replaced
"Ethnic Group" with "Race". That's like saying that Germans are the
largest racial population. Germans are of course NOT a Race! Just like
Han Chinese are NOT a Race! Han Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Taiwanese,
Cambodians, Thais, Vietnamese, etc. are "Mulattoes" of the "MONGOL" Race. All
together these Mulatto Mongols account for a little less that Two Billion people.
|
The Han dynasty was founded in 206 B.C. by Liu Bang, who led the revolt
against the repressive policies of the preceding Qin dynasty and became
the Gaozu emperor (reigned 206–195 B.C.).
The
Han Chinese or Han people, are an East Asian ethnic group native to
China. They constitute the world's largest ethnic group, making up
about 18% of the worlds population and consisting of various subgroups
speaking distinctive varieties of the Chinese language.
The estimated
1.4 billion Han Chinese people worldwide are primarily concentrated in
the People's Republic of China (including Hong Kong and Macau), where
they make up about 92% of the total population. In Taiwan, they make up
about 97% of the population. |
Do this: Google – “White World Population” Being very careful with the
syntax, remember you are asking an Albino source for truth. Naturally
they will find any number of ways to lie to you if you use the wrong
search words.
Answer from Wikipedia section titled “White People”:
Answer: 850,000,000+ (which is about) 11.5% of the total world population (world population of 7.5 to 7.7 billion).
(This is not counting partial European descent) – Meaning the millions
of Black/Albino Mulattoes in Latin America and the Middle-East.
Regions with significant (White) populations are United States = 252,784,000, Russia = 132,516,000
(Of course there is nowhere near 252,784,000 Albinos in the United
States, (typical Albino race lie).
Russia is a lie too; In 1300 A.D, the territory occupied an area of
around 20,000 square kilometers (about the size of Nebraska); by 1462
A.D, that number increased to 430,000 square kilometers. By 1584 A.D,
the territory had swelled to 5.4 million square kilometers. All of this
expansion was accomplished by invading and subjecting Native Mongol
people in the northern regions. During this time, Russia's government
shifted as well. Russia, as the largest country in the world, has great
ethnic diversity, is a multinational state, and is home to over 190
ethnic groups nationwide.It also has 21 national republics (intended as
homes to a specific ethnic minority). Point being, how many Russians
are White?
Facts and Figures:
The current population of Japan is 126,766,566 as of 2019, based on Worldometers elaboration of the latest United Nations data.
The current population of the Republic of Korea is 51,236,002 as of 2019,
North Korea population is estimated at 25,666,161 people at mid-year according to UN data.
The current population of China in 2019 is estimated at 1,433,783,686 people at mid-year according to UN data.
For a total East-Asian Mongol population of 1,637,452,415 people: which is about 21% of the Human population.
The current world population is 7.7 billion as of September 2019
according to the most recent United Nations estimates elaborated by
Worldometers.
Here is another “Cold Water” of reality Albinos and Mongols: “YOUR” 21% + 11.5% = 32.5% of the Human population.
THE “OTHER” 67.5% or 5.19 BILLION IS BLACK!!! (or Mulatto).
Assuming about 540,000,000 (0.54 billion) Mulattoes world-wide, that
means the "Pure-Black" population of the world is about 4.65 Billion.
Therefore YOU Albinos and Mongols are the "Minority": "YOU" are the outliers: "YOU" are the "Others". Please try to remember this.
Addendum – the Southeast
Asia countries of Cambodia, Burma, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, the
Philippines, and Indonesia are a 645 million person part of the World
population. These are all formerly Black countries (like Hawaii) which
were invaded by Mongols, (sometimes by war, sometimes by migration).
They are all ruled now by “Light-skinned” Mongols (who are of course
Mulattoes themselves). But “Unlike Hawaii”: populations of native
Blacks still survive there, and then there are the descendants of the
“Light-skinned” Mongol invaders, plus the Mulattoes produced by the
two. In Vietnam and the Philippine’s, French and Spanish colonizers
also added to the gene pool, making it impossible to categorize these
countries as Black, Mongol, Albino, or Mulatto.
The Middle East and North Africa:
U.S. Federal government standards require the U.S. census to count people
with roots in the Middle East or North Africa as white. But a new study
finds many people of MENA descent do not see themselves as white.
Unlike Spanish and Portuguese trained Latinos,
Africans do not jump at the chance to be considered
"WHITE" They know it's going in the wrong direction.
|
These
people are "North Africans" the Black ones are "Native" North Africans,
the Albino ones are a result of the Germanic Vandal invasion, circa 400
A.D. or the result of France invading Algeria in 1830, or Italy invading
Libya in September 1911, or the result of Spain's seizing of territory
in North Africa and West Africa. The rest are Mulattoes.
|
Latin America: The U.S.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requires federal agencies to use
a minimum of two ethnicities in collecting and reporting data: Hispanic or Latino and Not Hispanic or Latino. OMB defines "Hispanic or Latino" as a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin regardless of race.
|
These
are Latin Americans, the Black ones are "Native Americans" or to a much lessor extent African, the Albino
ones are the result of Albino invasion from Europe. The others are
Mulattoes. [Tables showing African Slave importation to Latin America and the Caribbean follows below].
|
|
The U.S. census sees Middle Eastern people as white.
|
The
Black one is a Native Middle Easterner, the Albino one is a
Sattagydian, Amyrgian, Scythian, Slav, Turk, or any one of the many
Central Asian Albino tribes invading from the East. The other is a
Mulatto.
|
|
THE ARAB SLAVE TRADE
Omani history - Zanzibar was a valuable property as the main slave market of the
Swahili Coast as well as being a major producer of cloves, and became an increasingly
important part of the Omani empire, a fact reflected by the decision of the
Sayyid Sa'id bin Sultan, to make it the capital of the empire in 1837.
|
|
|
Qaboos
bin Said Al Said was Sultan of Oman from 23 July 1970 until his death
in 2020. A fifteenth-generation descendant of the founder of the House
of Al Said, he was the longest-serving leader in the Middle East and
Arab world at the time of his death, having ruled for almost half a
century. Qaboos had no heir as he was widely believed by Omanis and
Gulf Arabs to be homosexual. This belief was supported by Tony
Molesworth, Oman's former second-most-senior intelligence officer.
Qaboos' obituary in The Times described rumours throughout his life of
"liaisons with elegant young European men". Wikipedia
|
|
Haitham
bin Tariq Al Said is the current Sultan of Oman, reigning since January
2020 following the death of his cousin, Sultan Qaboos bin Said. After
the death of Sultan Qaboos, Haitham's first cousin, on 10 January 2020,
Haitham was named by the royal family and Qaboos's will as Sultan of
Oman the next day and took an oath before an emergency session of the
Council of Oman in Al-Bustan.
|
Like most Americans, we have always
been interested in the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, because that effects us, but given little
thought to the Arab Slave Trade. So we were quite surprised and
confused by all the nonsense and just plain lies put forth by Albinos.
Whereas before, we thought that most Albinos - not all, but some - were
trying to present well researched history. Now after reading what they
have put out about the Arab Slave Trade, it seems that most of what the
Albinos have put out is made-up stuff that they think other Albinos
will like. So we had to go
searching to find a history that makes sense and fits in with what we
already know. Not surprisingly, it was written in an African Magazine.
New African Magazine - 27/03/2018
Recalling Africa’s harrowing tale of its first slavers;
The Arabs – As UK Slave Trade Abolition is commemorated
Quote: In his book, Slaves and
Slavery, published in 1998, the British writer Duncan Clarke defines
slavery as “the reduction of fellow human beings to the legal status of
chattels, allowing them to be bought and sold as goods”. This, in
essence, is what both the Arabs and Europeans did to Africans, to
justify the shipping of millions of Africans as slaves to far-away
lands in Asia (in particular, the Middle East) and the Americas.
“The African slave trade, surely
one of the most tragic and disturbing episodes in the history of
mankind,” Clarke writes, “had its origins in the intervention of forces
from the civilisations that developed in the regions of the
Mediterranean sea — today’s Europe and the Middle East — into the arena
of the more fragmented civilisations of sub-Saharan Africa.
“Africa became a source of slaves
for the cultures of the Mediterranean world many centuries before the
discovery of the Americas, but it was that discovery and the resulting
shift in focus towards the Atlantic that prompted the culminating
explosive growth in slavery with such tragic effect.” Slavery, in fact, was a central
feature of life in the Mediterranean world, especially in Mesopotamia,
ancient Egypt, Greece, Imperial Rome and the Islamic societies of the
Middle East and North Africa.
“The most important source of
slaves in medieval Europe,” Clarke’s research shows, “was the coast of
Bosnia on the eastern shores of the Adriatic Sea. The word ‘slave’ and
its cognates in most modern European languages is itself derived from
‘sclavus’ meaning ‘slav’, the ethnic name for the inhabitants of this
region…“For various reasons,
including the harshness of the terrain and endemic warfare among local
clans, Bosnia proved the most convenient and long-lasting of these
slave-supplying regions. Whichever clan gained a temporary upper hand
was always willing to sell its captured rivals in exchange for the
goods of the Mediterranean world in the markets of the ancient
Romanised city of Ragusa (present day Dubrovnik - city in Croatia). From there, Slavs were shipped as slaves by Venetian merchants, to supply new markets in the Islamic world.”
Thus, “for the Islamic world,”
Clarke continues, “Slavs provided the major source of slaves in the 250
or so years between the defeat at the battle of Poitiers in AD 732 that
forced the consolidation of their dramatic conquests across North
Africa and the Iberian peninsula, cutting back the flow of war
captives, and the expansion of the import of black Africans across the
Sahara from around AD 1000.”
The trade in slaves ended when the Ottoman Turks conquered the region
in 1463. “The effective closure of the last major source of slaves on
the European continent,” says Clarke, “this co-incidentally took place
at the same time as the Portuguese explorations of the West African
coast which were to open up the second and most devastating route for
the exploitation of Africans as slaves.” Figures
on the Arab slave trade in Africa are hard to come by, but the
historian Paul Lovejoy estimates that some 9.85 million Africans were
shipped out as slaves to Arabia and, in small numbers, to the Indian
subcontinent. Lovejoy breaks his figures down as follows:
When the Ottoman Army needed additional troops,
they turned to "Mercenaries" such as these Bashi-Bazouk.
They were responsible for many atrocities.
The fine silk garb of the first one, speaks to his profits.
|
|
|
Between AD 650 and 1600, an average of 5,000 Africans were shipped out by the Arabs. This makes a rough total of 7.25 million. Then,
between 1600 and 1800, another 1.4 million Africans were shipped out by
the Arabs. The 19th century represented the highest point of the
Arabian trade where 12,000 Africans were shipped out every year. The
total figure for the 19th century alone was 1.2 million slaves to
Arabia.
Thus,
in terms of numbers, Arabia’s 9.85 million is not far behind the
conservative estimate of nearly 12 million African victims of the
Atlantic slave trade. Some African historians, though, reject these
figures on the grounds that they are too low. They suggest over 50
million Africans were shipped out during the Atlantic trade alone. According
to Lovejoy, another 4.1 million Africans were shipped across the Red
Sea to the Persian Gulf and India. “This trade also, with the notable
exception of some Portuguese involvement in the area of Mozambique, and
of 18th and 19th century French exports to islands under their control
in the Indian Ocean, was largely conducted by Muslims,” adds Duncan
Clarke.
Throughout the 19th century, the
Omani Arab rulers of Zanzibar shipped hundreds of thousands of African
slaves to work on clove plantations on the island. It was this trade
that gave Europe and America so much satisfaction, after abolishing
their own trade in African slaves, to highlight the wickedness of the
Arab slavers who continued to enslave Africans well into the first
decades of the 20th century. Even to this day, Arab slavers are still
at work in Sudan and Mauritania, buying and selling Black Africans.
David Livingstone, the British
missionary/traveller/explorer was so upset by the way the Arabs treated
their African slaves that he wrote back home in 1870: “In
less than I take to talk about it, these unfortunate creatures — 84 of
them, wended their way into the village where we were. Some of them,
the eldest, were women from 20 to 22 years of age, and there were
youths from 18 to 19, but the large majority was made up of boys and
girls from 7 years to 14 or 15 years of age. “A
more terrible scene than these men, women and children, I do not think
I ever came across. To say that they were emaciated would not give you
an idea of what human beings can undergo under certain circumstances.
“Each of them had his neck in a large forked stick, weighing from 30 to
40 pounds, and five or six feet long, cut with a fork at the end of it
where the branches of a tree spread out. “The women were tethered with
bark thongs, which are, of all things, the most cruel to be tied with.
Of course they are soft and supple when first striped off the trees,
but a few hours in the sun make them about as hard as the iron round
packing-cases. The little children were fastened by thongs to their
mothers.
“As we passed along the path which these slaves had traveled, I was
shown a spot in the bushes where a poor woman the day before, unable to
keep on the march, and likely to hinder it, was cut down by the axe of
one of these slave drivers. “We went on further and were shown a place
where a child lay. It had been recently born, and its mother was unable
to carry it from debility and exhaustion; so the slave trader had taken
this little infant by its feet and dashed its brains out against one of
the trees and thrown it in there.”
Such was the brutality meted out to
the Africans by the Arabs. Like the Atlantic trade, the Arabian trade’s
“middle passage” was equally as horrible and terrifying. The “middle
passage” describes the harrowing journey lasting several months from
Africa’s west coast to the Americas during which millions of Africans,
packed like sardines in the slave ships, died of thirst, hunger, rough
seas, and sometimes from the sheer brutality inflicted by the European
slavers.
|
In the Arabian trade, the trudge
across the Sahara, in leg and neck chains, and as Livingstone describes
above, necks in large forked sticks and hands tied with bark thongs,
was particularly harsh on the African slaves. Says
Duncan Clarke: “The hardships of these long marches across the desert
were considerable, and much later travelers reported that the routes
were lined with the parched skeletons of those who succumbed to
exhaustion and thirst along the way.” The Arab slavers did not only march their African captives to Arabia, they also sometimes sold them to European slavers.
In modern times, the popular image
of African slavery springs from the vision of a tormented male
suffering under the lash of unceasing labor on some “New World” sugar
plantation. Yet the real face of servitude finds its focus in the
forced migration of millions of girls and young women across the Sahara
and the Horn of Africa in to the institutions of Islamic concubinage. While
in the European “New World” the measure of a man’s stature was mapped
out and calibrated on the physical dimensions of empire built upon the
sinews of forced masculine labour, in the Islamic Orient wealth was a
reflection of prestige, young girls the vessel of male hubris , the
mats of male pleasure ground, the malleable material to be shaped to
the master’s will. Thus,
women slaves in the Arab world were often turned into concubines living
in harems, and rarely as wives, their children becoming free. A large
number of male slaves and young boys were castrated and turned into
eunuchs who kept watch over the harems. Castration was a particularly
brutal operation with a survival rate of only 10%.
“The combined effect of all these factors,” says Duncan Clarke, “was a
steady demand for slaves throughout the Islamic world, which had cover
story to be met from wars, raids or purchases along the borders with
non-Islamic regions. Although some of these slaves came from Russia,
the Balkans and Central Asia, the continuing expansion of Islamic
regimes in sub-Saharan Africa made black Africans, the major source.”
So invasive was the practice of
slavery into the economic, political, demographic, cultural, social and
religious life of Africa and persisted for so many centuries, that
while its effects varied both geographically and temporally in
intensity, slavery out-distances in scale and scope any single or
combination of disasters — natural or man-made, which descended upon
the continent. Slavery
unquestionably checked population growth in Africa and consequentially
placed tremendous pressure upon gender and marital relationships during
the three critical centuries of European expansion to global domination. In
this sense, the feminine-oriented Arab slave trade, though neither
motivated nor executed with economic benefits as prime objective,
caused far greater demographic damage and consequently greater economic
decline, with its excessive poaching of the reproductive potential of
the harvested areas.
No people are blank slates upon
which can be inscribed untold miseries and expect no account thereof.
The Arab slave trade began long before the Islamic conquest of Africa,
remained at relatively low level compared to the Atlantic slave trade
and did not become illegal or abolished, and was maintained till well
after the colonization of Africa. The Arabian trade was outlawed in
Ethiopia only in 1935 in order to gain international support against
the Italian invasion. In the
Atlantic trade, the slaves came predominantly from Africa’s west coast
with a male/female ratio of two-to-one. In the Arabian trade, the
slaves were exclusively from the Savannah and the Horn of Africa, and
favored females over males at a ratio nearing three-to-one. When
slavery in the Black Sea area (the traditional source of the best grade
female slaves for the Arab market) dried up, it triggered an even
greater demand for Ethiopian “red” slaves, in particular the Galla and
Oromo on account of their unquestioned beauty and willing sexual
temperament.
And while the Europeans paid a
higher price for male slaves than females, the reverse was the case
with the Arabs. Moreover, while the European/New World slavers profited
mainly from male labor, the Arabs saw profit in sexual
satisfaction/reproductive potential. (Offspring of the union between
Islamic master and female slave was born free, out of respect of the
child’s Islamic paternity. Any offspring of the Atlantic trade were
born into slavery).
“The laws of Islam,” as the
historian Hugh Thomas attests, “were in some ways more benign in
respect of slavery than were those of Rome. Slaves were not to be
treated as if they were animals. Slaves and freemen were equal from the
point of view of God. The master did not have power of life and death
over his slave property.” But
to the Africans shipped across the Red Sea, the “benign” Islamic laws
provided little comfort — they were still slaves of Islamic masters who
had unfettered sexual access to them (if they were female) or castrated
and turned into eunuchs (if they were men).
The upshot of this gender profile
of the respective slave-classes in the Atlantic/New World and the
Arab/Oriental world explains the large and visible population of
African origin in the New World where sexual relations between white
and black was the exception while in the Arab world where miscegenation
was the practice, the slave trade has left few visible traces.
So where are the descendants of the
African slaves sent to Arabia/Orient? There are no large concentrations
of them, anywhere in the Middle East or Asia. Five
years ago, a British TV documentary showed how poorly the descendants
of African slaves in Pakistan are treated by the authorities. The
racial discrimination was so bad that one of the African descendants
recounted on camera how, even in sport, they were not picked to
represent Pakistan at national and international levels no matter how
good they were.
The demographic effects of Arabian
slavery on the source population (those left behind) cannot be
overlooked, and specifically when considering the palpable effects on
African fertility as a consequence of the grossly reduced female
numbers. To ensure survival,
the Africans in the harvested areas adopted a variety of social
measures, which were in practice as extreme as the circumstances called
for. These revolved principally around the sexual purity of the
population’s remaining female reproductive stock, as well as
accelerating the female’s reproductive capacity. Though the number of female slaves
exported per annum from the Savannah and the Horn was far smaller than
the numbers taken from the west coast in the Atlantic trade, the
proportionate impact of the remaining at-brink Savanna/Horn populations
was far more severe.
The Arabian trade reached a total
of perhaps 5-8% of the source populations – and as mentioned earlier —
as the proportion of females harvested was exceptionally high, this
resulted in a massive surplus of males in the non-harvested population.
Consequently the area experienced demographic stagnation bordering
decline. In 1600, the black
African population was some 50 million — about 30% of the combined
population of the New World, Europe, Middle East and North Africa. By
1800, the population had fallen to 20% of the total. In 1900, at the
end of the slave trade, Africa’s population had fallen yet further to
just over 10% of the total — the population now so collapsed as to
negatively affect the continent’s labor intensive agricultural output.
In effect, while the populations of Europe and Asia increased year on
year, Africa’s population declined dramatically due to the excessive
poaching by the slavers, both Arab and European. In Arabia, the slave class
(principally female), unlike the New World slave class, could never
maintain itself as a distinct social entity — principally because of
miscegenation. This created an even greater demand for more and more
new female slaves, and coupled with the frequent natural disasters of
drought and famine in the Savannah/Horn, led many African families to
offer their young girls in to slavery as a last hope of survival. There
are many stories of long lines of hundreds of girls, mainly Oromos from
Ethiopia, trudging across the Horn towards the Red Sea seeking
enslavement.
Deprived of ideology, ritual, and the African rite of passage to
adulthood and social membership, female slaves were uncommonly
vulnerable to conversion to Islam (the benefits of manumission aside).
Manumission describes a child born of a female slave and a free Islamic
father is thus born free. For
the population remaining in Africa, it is in order to embark on some
speculation as to what changes the trauma of slavery may have wrought
on African thought. The experience of sudden turn of fate (a common
experience when confronted by the ever-present threat of slavers)
tended to systematically undermine any efforts at long-term planning
beyond the constant need to replace lost members.
It is a mistake to equate the bare
survival of Africa with cultural or social or economic stagnation, for
the slave trade visited such panoply of tragically interconnected
disasters into the lives of every African for centuries, that they have
worked their way into the very “racial memory” of the continent and its
people, particularly females, that only with time and kindness can it
be expunged from the psyche o f Africa. As
one commentator puts it: “Could it be true that the corrosive effects
of four centuries of commerce in humans, with its temptation, its
in-built opportunism, its reduction of humans to a cash value, its
cycles of revenge and its inevitable physical brutality, have built
lasting flaws into African pattern of thought and action?”
Some of the above sounds a little hysterical, but the events and time-lines coincide with the Arab
expansion after the conquest of Persia and Egypt by Muhammad's Army. And it certainly rings
true as regards to Arab love of female genitalia, especially Albino genitalia.
By 652 A.D. the Arabs had completed their conquest of Azerbaijan,
(Next to Georgia on the Caspian Sea).
But then in 1299
A.D. the Turks began to Usurp their former masters, so that by 1517
A.D. the now Ottoman "Empire" extended its control over most of the
Arab world. It was the Ottomans who in 1385 A.D. conquered Albania,
then in 1463 A.D. conquered Bosnia and Herzegovina and made them Muslim
countries.
|
Back to Slave History:
Throughout Muslim history, slaves served in various social and economic
roles, from powerful emirs themselves, to harshly treated manual laborers. Slaves
were widely employed in irrigation, mining, and animal husbandry, but
most commonly as soldiers, guards, domestic workers, concubines (sex
slaves). The use of slaves for hard physical labor early on in Muslim
history led to several destructive slave revolts, the most notable
being the Zanj Rebellion of 869–883, and led to the end of that
practice. Many rulers also used slaves in the military and
administration to such an extent that slaves could seize power, as did
the Mamluks.
The Zanj Rebellion was a major revolt against the Abbasid Caliphate,
which took place from 869 until 883. It Began near the city of Basra in
present-day southern Iraq and was led by one Ali ibn Muhammad, the
insurrection involved enslaved Bantu-speaking people (Zanj) who had
originally been captured from the coast of Southeast Africa and
transported to the Middle East, principally to drain the region's salt
marshes. It grew to involve slaves and freemen, including both
Southeastern Africans and Arabs, from several regions of the Caliphate,
and claimed tens of thousands of lives before it was finally defeated.
Several Muslim historians, such as al-Tabari and al-Mas'udi, consider
the Zanj revolt to be one of the "most vicious and brutal uprisings" of
the many disturbances that plagued the Abbasid central government.
Modern scholars have characterized the conflict as being "one of the
bloodiest and most destructive rebellions which the history of Western
Asia records," while at the same time praising its coverage as being
among the "most fully and extensively described campaigns in the whole
of early Islamic historical writing." The precise composition of the
rebels remains a subject of debate, both as regards their identity and
as to the proportion of slaves and free among them – available
historical sources being open to various interpretations.
Arab Slave Trade - East Africa
Continued
Zanzibar (Island off the coast of Tanzania), was once East Africa's
main slave-trading port, and under Omani Arabs in the 19th century as
many as 50,000 slaves were passing through the city each year. Some
historians estimate that between 11 and 18 million black African slaves
crossed the Red Sea, Indian Ocean, and Sahara Desert from 650 A.D. to
1,900 A.D, compared with the 9.4 to 12 million Africans who were taken
to the Americas.
Privateers
Privateering was an age-old practice in the Mediterranean. North
African rulers engaged in it increasingly in the late sixteenth and
early seventeenth century because it was so lucrative, and because
their merchant vessels, formerly a major source of income, were not
permitted to enter European ports. Although the methods varied,
privateering generally involved private vessels raiding the ships of an
enemy in peacetime under the authority of a ruler. Its purposes were to
disrupt an opponent's trade and to reap rewards from the captives and
cargo.
|
These Pirates destroyed thousands of French, Spanish, Italian and
British ships, and long stretches of coast in Spain and Italy were
almost completely abandoned by their inhabitants, discouraging
settlement until the 19th century. From the 16th to 19th century,
pirates captured an estimated 800,000 to 1.25 million Europeans as
slaves, mainly from seaside villages in Italy, Spain, and Portugal, but
also from France, Britain, the Netherlands, Ireland and as far away as
Iceland and North America.
Before closing on the Arab Slave Trade; I thought it necessary to give one more example of why you
should take what Albinos, and in particular the Albinos at Wikipedia, tell you with a very large grain of salt.
Note the following Wikipedia article:
Arab views on African peoples
Main article: Medieval Arab attitudes to Black people
Quote: Though the Qur'an expresses
no racial prejudice against black Africans, Bernard Lewis argues that
ethnocentric prejudice later developed among Arabs, for a variety of
reasons: their extensive conquests and slave trade; the influence of
Aristotelian ideas regarding slavery, which some Muslim philosophers
directed towards Zanj (Bantu) and Turkic peoples; and the influence of
religious ideas regarding divisions among humankind. By the 8th
century, anti-black prejudice among Arabs resulted in discrimination. A
number of medieval Arabic authors argued against this prejudice, urging
respect for all black people and especially Ethiopians. By the 14th
century, a significant number of slaves came from sub-Saharan Africa;
Lewis argues that this led to the likes of Egyptian historian
Al-Abshibi (1388–1446) writing that "[i]t is said that when the [black]
slave is sated, he fornicates, when he is hungry, he steals."
In 2010, at the Second Afro-Arab
summit Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi apologized for Arab involvement in
the African slave trade, saying: "I regret the behavior of the Arabs...
They brought African children to North Africa, they made them slaves,
they sold them like animals, and they took them as slaves and traded
them in a shameful way. I regret and I am ashamed when we remember
these practices. I apologize for this - Africans did not take Gaddafi
seriously. But they did listen to him, he had Oil money.
Bernard Lewis,
FBA was a British American historian specialized in Oriental studies.
He was also known as a public intellectual and political commentator.
Lewis was the Cleveland E. Dodge Professor Emeritus of Near Eastern
Studies at Princeton University.
Bernard Lewis was also a Jew, a Turkic Kazar to be exact. Perhaps in
support of his Turkic cousins the Seljuk Turks, Oghuz Turks, Uyghur
Turks, etc. he was lying in support of their claims of being "Arabs"
just as Jews lie in support of their claims to being Hebrews. We use
the word "Lie" because Bernard Lewis was a very educated man, no way he
didn't know that Arabs are Black People.
|
This Wikipedia is TRUE
|
Bernard Lewis continued:
To be clear, we are NOT saying that racist passages do not exist in the
Qur'an, rather, we are saying that the liar Bernard Lewis would know good and
well how they got there. They got there by Albino Turks like him and
the so-called Egyptian historian Al-Abshibi, who was another Albino
Turk, just like him - as we all know Al-Abshibi is NOT an Egyptian name.
Let us explain:
You see, just as Albinos from Europe invaded the Americas and took
over, and now call themselves "Americans". They started out somewhere
else (Central Asia) where they called themselves Germanics, Slavs, and
Turks. Once in Europe, they often took the name of people they
conquered or assimilated with. That
is the case with the Turks; the Turks started off as the Slave Soldiers
of the Arabs (Mamluks), and the suppliers of Females for their Arab
masters pleasure.
|
While their Arab masters were busy enjoying their women, the Albinos
were steadily leaving Asia, under Mongol pressure, and moving to Europe
and the Middle East. In the Middle East they became Muslims and took
Arab names. Thus the Turk "Alp-Arslan" assumed the name of "Muhammad
bin Da'ud Chaghri" when he embraced Islam. The Turks calling themselves
Arabs of Saudi Arabia, will often take the name or nickname "Turki" in
deference to their origins.
Above we gave the date of 1299 as when the Turks took political and
military control of the ARAB WORLD, but they took control of Islam much
sooner than that - 1055 to be precise. We often like to quote an Albino
institution when they tell the "Truth". In this case we quote
Encyclopćdia Britannica.
Britannica article - Toghrďl Beg - Muslim ruler
Toghrďl Beg, founder of the Seljuq dynasty, which ruled in Iran, Iraq,
Syria, and Anatolia during the 11th– 14th centuries. Under his rule the
Seljuqs assumed the leadership of the Islāmic world by establishing political mastery over the ʿAbbāsid caliphate in Baghdad.
Toghril's Muslim name was "Abu Talib Muhammad Tughril ibn Mika'il".
Once the Albino Turks gained control of Islam, all manner of Anti-Black
material wound up in Muslim "Holy Books". They did then, what the lying Turk Bernard Lewis did today.
|
We
often wonder why Albinos would make such outrageously false claims
about Arabs and Africans; it's as if they don't believe that people
know
any Geography. So in case you are one of them, we offer this map. As
you can see Africans and Arabs are Next-Door Neighbors. And over
the thousands of years, have become genetically the same people. You can not look at them and tell any difference - see pictures below.
|
|
|
|
As an aside: it's a curiosity how the different Asian Albino
Super-Tribes (Germanic, Slav, Turkic) handled Blacks once they defeated
them. In the case of the Turks it was rather simple: Arabia has always
been one of the least densely populated places on Earth. The Arab
conquests were accomplished with Turkic Slave Soldiers and Mercenaries.
So that when it came time for the Turks to take over, the Arabs simply
didn't have the manpower to resist them. And because the Arabs had no
cultural gifts to bestow upon the Turks, aside from Islam, Turks seemed
uninterested in showing Arabs any particular respect.
The Germanics on the other hand, had to invent a new religion
(Protestantism) AND fight one of the bloodiest wars in history (the
thirty years war), plus the British Civil Wars, to wrest control of
Europe from its Black rulers. Then after the deed was done, they simply
made the Catholic Church Albino, and destroyed most art portraying
Black Rulers and Saints and replaced them with fakes of Albinos. Below
are examples of Black Catholic art that was not destroyed.
|
|
|
The Slavs on the other hand, went in a completely different direction:
But first the split of Rome and then the split (schism) in the
Catholic Church. In 330 A.D. Emperor Constantine split the empire
into two parts: the western half centered in Rome and the eastern half
centered in Constantinople, a city he named after himself. Then on
September 4, 476, Romulus Augustus, the last Emperor of the
Western Roman Empire, was deposed by Odoacer, a Germanic chieftain. It
is now 799 A.D, and for the third time in half a century, a Pope is in
need of help from the Frankish kings. After being physically attacked
by his enemies in the streets of Rome (their stated intention is to
blind him and cut out his tongue, to make him incapable of office),
Pope Leo III makes his way through the Alps to visit the king of the
Franks Charles I at Paderborn. It is not known what is agreed, but
Charles I travels to Rome in 800 to support the pope. In a ceremony in
St Peter's, on Christmas Day, Leo is due to anoint Charles I's son as
his heir. But unexpectedly (it is maintained), as Charles I rises from
prayer, the pope places a crown on his head and acclaims him emperor.
Charles I (Charlemagne - Charles the great) expresses displeasure but
accepts the honor. Charlemagne then embarks on many campaigns to
suppress marauding Albino Germanic's.
|
Then in 1054 there is a Permanent
split of the two Catholic churches into the modern-day Catholic Church
and the Eastern Orthodox Catholic Church - (Orthodox, (from Greek
orthodoxos, “of the right opinion”). As time went on, and more and more Albinos entered the West, Germanic's
became Catholics (then created Protestantism), Turks became Muslims,
and Slavs became Orthodox Catholics. And here we see a completely
different approach to their former Black Rulers and religious leaders.
Rather than destroying the Artwork of their former Black Rulers and Saints,
the Slavs for centuries continued to show them as Black People.
And the Rus (Russians), another Slavic tribe, even display portraits of their greatest Czar,
the Black "Peter The Great" and his Son, in the Hermitage National Museum.
Peter the Great
|
|
Peter the greats Son
|
|
|
|
Happenings in the middle of the second Millennium A.D.
The second millennium of the Anno Domini or Common Era was
a millennium spanning the years 1001 to 2000 (11th to 20th centuries)
Portugal was founded in 1143 after being separated from the kingdom of Leon.
The Byzantine Empire, also referred to as the Eastern Roman Empire or Byzantium
Founded May 11, 330 A.D. - Ended - May 29, 1453 after conquest of
Constantinople by Turkic Sultan Mehmed II of the Ottoman Empire.
The dwindling Byzantine Empire came to an end when the Ottomans
breached Constantinople's ancient land wall after besieging the city
for 55 days.
The last Byzantine Emperor, Constantine XI Palaiologos - A Mulatto - was last seen casting off his imperial regalia
and throwing himself into hand-to-hand combat after the walls of the city were breached.
Soon the Turkish Ottoman Empire would raise.
The Rulers of the Eastern Roman Empire - Byzantium.
The
Byzantine Empire traces its beginnings to the year 330 when
Emperor
Constantine split the Roman Empire into a western and eastern half.
Constantine named his capitol Constantinople after himself.
But it had originally been an ancient Greek city.
The name "Byzantium" is a Latinization of the original name Byzantion.
The Eastern Roman Empire was mostly Greek speaking, though Latin is supposed the official language.
After hundreds of years of having to make dynastic marriages with Albino Princesses to maintain a
semblance of peace, the rulers of the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) were at the end, total Mulattoes.
|
January 2, 1492 - The Christian Kingdoms of Castile and Aragon conquered the Emirate of Granada (Moors),
ending nearly 800 years of Muslim rule and founding the modern kingdom of Spain as a united state.
Meanwhile 8 months earlier and 217 miles to the East, Columbus had sailed for the Americas.
On August 3, 1492, Italian explorer Christopher Columbus started his voyage across the Atlantic Ocean,
With a crew of 90 men and three ships—the Nińa, Pinta, and Santa Maria—he left from Palos de la Frontera, Spain.
Aug. 1, 1498 - Explorer Christopher Columbus (Third Voyage) sets foot on the American mainland for the first time, at the Paria
Peninsula in present-day Venezuela. Thinking it an island, he christened it Isla Santa and claimed it for Spain.
It was the Mulatto King of Aragon, Castile, and other kingdoms;
Ferdinand II who paid for the expedition.
This Dutch Painting shows what the city of
Lisbon Portugal looked like in the late 1500s
Notice that Lisbon has a Black King - can't be a Moor,
they were expelled almost a hundred years earlier.
|
The Portuguese arrived to the land that would become Brazil on April
22, 1500, commanded by Pedro Álvares Cabral a Portuguese explorer on
his way to India under the sponsorship of the Kingdom of Portugal and
the support of the Catholic Church. From the 16th to the early 19th
century, Brazil was created and expanded as a colony, kingdom and an
integral part of the Portuguese Empire. Brazil was briefly named "Land
of the Holy Cross" by Portuguese explorers and crusaders before being
named "Land of Brazil" by the Brazilian-Portuguese settlers and
merchants dealing with Brazilwood.
In the first 250 years after the colonization of the land, roughly 70%
of all immigrants to the colony were enslaved people. Indigenous slaves
remained much cheaper during this time than their African
counterparts. Although the average African slave lived to only be
twenty-three years old because of terrible work conditions, this was
still about four years longer than Indigenous slaves, which was a big
contribution to the high price of African slaves.
African slaves were also more desirable due to their experience working
in sugar plantations. In a particular mill in Săo Vicente in the 1540s,
for example, African slaves were said to have held all the most skilled
positions including the crucial role of sugar master, even though they
were vastly outnumbered by native slaves at the time. It is impossible
to pinpoint when the first African slaves arrived in Brazil but
estimates range anywhere in the 1530s. Regardless, African slavery was
established at least by 1549, when the first governor of Brazil, Tome
de Sousa, arrived with slaves sent from the king himself.
We
can tell from the "International Consortium Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade
Database"
that the first African Slaves arrived in Brazil in the period
1551-1575
|
|
Please
be advised: below you
will be quoted some Slave numbers which are quite different from the
"Slave Trade Database" numbers above. That is because before
the"International Consortium Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database" all
Slave numbers were "Estimates", there was just no way to obtain "Real"
numbers. Now thanks to Emory University and the Consortium, we have
well researched Slavery numbers. According to the latest numbers a
total of 10,002,905 African Slaves left Africa. But only 8,698,000 made
it to their Slavery Homes.
|
Article from Lowcountry Digital Library (LCDL) at the College of
Charleston.
Funded through a pilot project grant from the Humanities
Council of South Carolina.
The trans-Atlantic slave trade occurred within a broader system of
trade between West and Central Africa, Western Europe, and North and
South America. In African ports, European traders exchanged metals,
cloth, beads, guns, and ammunition for captive Africans brought to the
coast from the African interior, primarily by African traders. Many
captives died just during the long overland journeys from the interior
to the coast. European traders then held the enslaved Africans who
survived in fortified slave castles such as Elmina in the central
region (now Ghana), Goree Island (now in present day Senegal), and
Bunce Island (now in present day Sierra Leone), before forcing them
into ships for the Middle Passage across the Atlantic Ocean.
|
In the fifteenth century, Portugal became the first European nation to
take significant part in African slave trading. The Portuguese
primarily acquired slaves for labor on Atlantic African island
plantations, and later for plantations in Brazil and the Caribbean,
though they also sent a small number to Europe. Initially, Portuguese
explorers attempted to acquire African labor through direct raids along
the coast, but they found that these attacks were costly and often
ineffective against West and Central African military strategies.
For example, in 1444, Portuguese marauders arrived in Senegal ready to
assault and capture Africans using armor, swords, and deep-sea vessels.
But the Portuguese discovered that the Senegalese out-maneuvered their
ships using light, shallow water vessels better suited to the estuaries
of the Senegalese coast. In addition, the Senegalese fought with poison
arrows that slipped through their armor and decimated the Portuguese
soldiers. Subsequently, Portuguese traders generally abandoned direct
combat and established commercial relations with West and Central
African leaders, who agreed to sell slaves taken from various African
wars or domestic trading, as well as gold and other commodities, in
exchange for European and North African goods.
Over time, the Portuguese developed additional slave trade partnerships
with African leaders along the West and Central African coast and
claimed a monopoly over these relationships, which initially limited
access to the trade for other western European competitors. Despite
Portuguese claims, African leaders enforced their own local laws and
customs in negotiating trade relations. Many welcomed additional trade
with Europeans from other nations.
When Portuguese, and later their European competitors, found that
peaceful commercial relations alone did not generate enough enslaved
Africans to fill the growing demands of the trans-Atlantic slave trade,
they formed military alliances with certain African groups against
their enemies. This encouraged more extensive warfare to produce
captives for trading. While European-backed Africans had their own
political or economic reasons for fighting with other African enemies,
the end result for Europeans traders in these military alliances was
greater access to enslaved war captives. To a lesser extent, Europeans
also pursued African colonization to secure access to slaves and other
goods. For example, the Portuguese colonized portions of Angola in 1571
with the help of military alliances from Kongo, but were pushed out in
1591 by their former allies. Throughout this early period, African
leaders and European competitors ultimately prevented these attempts at
African colonization from becoming as extensive as in the Americas.
The Portuguese dominated the early trans-Atlantic slave trade on the
African coast in the sixteenth century. As a result, other European
nations first gained access to enslaved Africans through privateering
during wars with the Portuguese, rather than through direct trade. When
English, Dutch, or French privateers captured Portuguese ships during
Atlantic maritime conflicts, they often found enslaved Africans on
these ships, as well as Atlantic trade goods, they sent these
captives to work in their own colonies.
In this way, privateering generated a market interest in the
trans-Atlantic slave trade across European colonies in the Americas.
After Portugal temporarily united with Spain in 1580, the Spanish broke
up the Portuguese slave trade monopoly by offering direct slave trading
contracts to other European merchants. Known as the asiento system, the
Dutch took advantage of these contracts to compete with the Portuguese
and Spanish for direct access to African slave trading, and the British
and French eventually followed. By the eighteenth century, when the
trans-Atlantic slave trade reached its trafficking peak, the British
(followed by the French and Portuguese) had become the largest carriers
of enslaved Africans across the Atlantic. The overwhelming majority of
enslaved Africans went to plantations in Brazil and the Caribbean, and
a smaller percentage went to North America and other parts of South and
Central America.
These are the major African Ports and the number of slaves that departed from each of them.
Gold Coast - British
|
|
292,487
|
Anomabo - Ghana - British
|
|
172,284
|
Costa da mina - Gold Coast – Portuguese
|
|
648,468
|
Ardra - Benin
|
|
80,333
|
Whydah Ouidah – Benin
|
|
407,958
|
Lagos, Nigeria
|
|
95,495
|
|
Bright of Benin
|
|
73,328
|
Bright of Biafra
|
|
433,281
|
Calabar – Nigeria
|
|
270,092
|
New Calabar – Nigeria
|
|
91,116
|
Săo Tomé – Portuguese
|
|
95,976
|
Ambriz – Angola
|
|
101,738
|
|
Bright of Biafra
|
|
82,813
|
Benguela - Angola
|
|
373,768
|
Cabinda – Angola
|
|
369,776
|
Congo North
|
|
92,558
|
Congo River
|
|
134,534
|
Loango – Gabon
|
|
118,407
|
|
Malembo – Angola
|
|
194,707
|
|
Gambia
|
|
124,846
|
Luanda – Angola |
|
1,418,362 |
|
Cape Verde Islands
|
|
129,947
|
West Central Africa & St. Helena Island – British
|
|
659,515
|
|
Sierria Leone
|
|
88,038
|
Mozambique – Portuguese
|
|
214,037
|
|
|
|
|
Quilimane - Mozambique
|
|
117,417
|
|
|
|
|
Africa - Port unspecified
|
|
2,088,814
|
|
|
|
|
Article: Racialized Frontiers:
Slaves and Settlers in Modernizing Brazil
Princeton University.
Brazil LAB (Luso-Afro-Brazilian Studies).
Brazil was built on the enslavement of indigenous peoples and millions
of Black Africans. Of the 12 million enslaved Africans brought to the
New World, almost half—5.5 million people—were forcibly taken to Brazil
as early as 1540 and until the 1860s.
Even though slavery was formally
abolished in 1888, the country’s exclusionary institutions, racist
social fabric, and myopic national fantasies speak to the persistence
of racialized domination to this day. This reality was buttressed by a
deliberate effort at “whitening” Brazilian society through various
state-sponsored immigration projects and frontier colonization plans
throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries. In spite of the myth of
being a “racial democracy,” Brazil has forged a stratified, unequal
citizenship and everyday life is marked by an ongoing “poverty of
rights.” Scholars in all fields decry the widespread police brutality
against Black men (a genocide in the making), for example, and the
impervious structural violence that impinges on morbidity and
disparities in care and mortality among Blacks across the country.
The Brazil-Africa nexus and anti-racist struggles have been at the
center of the LAB’s reflections from the start and, in the last two
years, Visiting Professor Lilia M. Schwarcz, Miqueias Mugge and Joăo
Biehl have developed the research hub Racialized Frontiers: Slaves and
Settlers in Modernizing Brazil, in collaboration with Isadora Moura
Mota (History) and Lúcia Stumpf (USP Postdoctoral Fellow). This
initiative also includes other Princeton faculty and graduate students
as well as Brazilian colleagues. The hub’s activities (workshops and
visualization efforts) have been supported by a Magic Grant from the
Humanities Council.
The Dutch
In
1630, the Dutch conquered the prosperous sugarcane-producing area in
the northeast region of the Portuguese colony of Brazil. Although it
only lasted for 24 years, the Dutch colony resulted in substantial art
production. The governor Johan Maurits van Nassau-Siegen also
encouraged scientific exploration and his palace in Mauritsstad
(present-day Recife) included botanical gardens, a zoo, and a cabinet
of curiosities. Maurits brought two artists, Albert Eckhout and the
landscape painter Frans Post, to Brazil to document the local flora,
fauna, people, and customs. Eckhout’s series of paintings record what he saw.
Native Americans, Mongol Americans,
and mixed race Americans of Brazil,
by Dutch painter Albert Eckhout circa 1650.
As stated, the paintings above were painted in Brazil. You will rarely
find mention of Brazil on Realhistoryww because we have for a long time
considered the Black and Brown people of Brazil, a hopeless cause. Pay
careful attention to what follows and perhaps you will see what we mean.
THE SILLY AND PATHETIC WORLD OF THE
SPANISH-PORTUGUESE and MEXICAN CASTE SYSTEM
The Casta System - The College of Wooster
Introduction
Beginning in 1492, conquistadors from the Iberian peninsula arrived in
Latin America. They encountered the indigenous peoples who had been
living on the land for centuries and deemed them barbaric and
uncivilized and themselves as superior and god-like. They then
colonized the region, forcing all to convert to Catholicism, taking
control of the land and generally exploiting the people and the region.
The Spanish and Portuguese forced indigenous peoples to acculturate to
their own beliefs, they taught them Spanish, implemented the laws that
were present in Spain and made Catholicism the ultimate belief system.
Overtime, they passed laws creating a social hierarchy to maintain
power known as the Casta System. This system ensured European
superiority in all sections of life. They remained in control of the
region until the 1820s, when countries began to fight and gain their
independence. Despite gaining independence and no longer being under
colonial rule, a social hierarchy remained in place leaving those of
indigenous and African descent on the bottom. The Casta System
was created by the Spanish to maintain their power and superiority to
other racial groups in the colonies. This system was used throughout
their rule and continued to be unofficially in place after
independence.
|
Please know that we are not offering this "Caste" material as serious
Historical material, rather it is offered as an abject example of how
much damage even a fool can do. The obvious reason for all of this
foolishness is so one Spanish Speaker can claim superiority over
another Spanish Speaker by claiming closer genetic ties to the "PURE WHITE" Spaniard.
All of this of course does NOT work with Non-Spanish speaking Blacks,
we look upon them all with pity and disdain, wondering what kind of people
would WANT to be identified with people with a disease, not to mention
the limitations Albinism places on the afflicted in the natural world.
As for emulating excellence in all endeavors, when Blacks were rulers, we created
all the worlds great civilizations. And when we were relegated to subservient
class, we used our Physical gifts as a beginning to reclaim our
rightful position. Meanwhile our Spanish speaking Black brethren have joined
with our Mulattoes and other mixed breeds in dancing to the tune the
Spanish Albinos lain down to ensure "Crabs-in-a-bucket" behavior by
them, thereby ensuring that Albinos would stay in power forever - or so
they hope.
Re. above: When we say pure Spaniard we are of course talking about the
Germanic tribe the Visigoths who marauded through southern Europe and
into North Africa. Let us now revisit what they looked like: we quote the Roman
historian Cornelius Tacitus (56-118 A.D.), from his book: Germany Book
1 [1]. (Naturally most Albino sources will not give you the true
translation, but there are many University translations available).
Quote: 4. For my own part, I agree with those who think that the tribes
of Germany are free from all taint of intermarriages with foreign
nations, and that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like none
but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities throughout
so vast a population. All
(are White) have fierce blue eyes, red hair, huge frames, fit only for
a sudden exertion. They are less able to bear laborious work. Heat and
thirst they cannot in the least endure; to cold and hunger their
climate and their soil inure them.
As we have told you a zillion times, now make it a zillion and one times, White people are of course Albinos.
|
Caste system definitions
Zambo - mix of native American and African
Mulatto - one Albino parent and one Black parent
Lobo - It refers to mixed-race lineage, far down the racial
hierarchy created by the Spanish colonial regime. Lobo and coyote are
derogatory names for persons of mixed race, referred to by animal
names. It could include persons of African and Indian ancestry and many
related variations. Lobo does not have a fixed meaning, with possible
parents being a Black and Indian woman.
Mestizo - Spanish and Indian produces mestizo
Criollos/Creoles - On the
other hand, the criollos were children of Spanish parents but born in
the colony, who had almost all the same rights as the peninsulares with
the exception of the possibility of becoming viceroys. In fact, many of
our independence heroes were Creoles.
Castizo - offspring of a Spaniard and an Indian woman)
Peninsular was a Spaniard born in Spain residing in the New World, Spanish East Indies, or Spanish Guinea.
Albarazado – whiteish
Canbujo – version of Black
Sanbaigo – multiply ethnic inputs
Calpamulato – Zambo and Lobo
Prieto - means people who are mid black in México and Latin america. You're so prieto like color of door wood.
|
|
Moor - means Black
Moriscos - a Moor in Spain, especially one who had accepted Christian baptism
Chino - the term "chino" in
most Mexican colonial documents is not a referent of Chinese, but to
Afro-Mexicans. But still the word "chino" means Chinese: if you put the
two together then "Chino" refers to the children of Mongols and Blacks.
Coyote - a Mestizo (mixed Spanish + Indigenous) and the other indigenous (indio).
Indio - Native American, but most likely the Mongols. Can't see them Calling a Maya "Indio".
Tente en el Aire
- Tent in the chaste air The name "tent in the air" clearly represented
the futility of the practice of the caste system, even a few decades
after the conquest. In metaphorical terms, a person belonging to this
caste "floated" as if in limbo, unable to put down roots, without their
own identity
Noteentiendo (No te entiendo) –
Literial translation (I don't understand you - too many mixes) meaning
it hurts the head to try and figure out how to discriminate against
you.
Tornaatraz (Torna atras) – throwback -
The term torna atrás (in English, similar in meaning to "throwback" or
"harken back to") could also refer to the appearance of racial
characteristics not visible in the parents.
Salta atras - This is what they
call the great-grandson of a couple of mestizos when there is a mixture
in the following generations. In order for this to be understood, it
must be noted that from the union of a Spanish and Indian or black
person, a mestizo or a mulatto , respectively, comes out. If he later
marries someone Spanish, what is called a quadroon comes out , and if
the quadroon later marries an Indian, etc. a saltatrás comes out ,
which means that he jumped or went back in order to have Spanish blood
for taking more than one person of Indian or black race.
Gibaro - Thomas Hill listed
jíbaros as one of four socio-economic classes he perceived existed in
Puerto Rico at the time: "The native people, as a whole, may be divided
into four classes: the better class of Creoles, who call themselves
Spaniards; the lower class of white peasantry, known as gibaros; the
colored people, or mestizos; and the blacks.
|
|
You may be thinking WOW how could Spanish Speaking people spend time on
16 such silly pieces of shit: well the Albinos from Spain taught them
that this foolishness was important, and actually there are many more,
just how many more we don't know. We add these two only because they
are more bullshit than the rest, simply because they are impossible to
exist. As you can see from the label on the painting, De Alvina
and y Espanol makes a Torna-atras. (translates as Albino plus
Spanish = Torna-atras). First of all, we have no idea why they referrer to one Spanish as Albino, while the other is simply Spanish.
But all of that aside, TWO WHITE PEOPLE CAN NOT MAKE A BLACK BABY!!!
True Black people make White Babies Daily. But the reverse is NOT true.
White is Recessive, two Recessive genes can only make another Recessive.
So after all of that by Hispanics; trying to get ever closer to the "Holy Grail of Race" the PURE Albino.
Gee life can be so cruel, as it turns out in REAL History, the rulers were either Black or Mulatto.
All of that making a fool of yourself for nothing.
|
|
|
|
The National Cost of Racism and Colorism
If you wonder What is the cost of these silly race games played by Spanish speaking people - well here it is:
Brazil and Mexico are the countries most involved in race based social structure.
Brazil is the world's fifth-largest country by area and the seventh most populous, it has a population of 217 million people.
Note that its GNP is smaller than much smaller countries with much LESS in natural resources and Population.
Brazil is number 82 of 190 in the list of countries by GNP.
Mexico has a population of 126.7 million people, though they do better than Brazil, its still nothing to brag about.
There are several Black Caribbean ISLANDS which have a greater GNP than Mexico and Brazil.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita shows a country's GDP divided by its total population.
Aruba # 33 on the list = $39,493
Trinidad and Tobago is # 44 on the list = $31,645
Bahamas is # 45 on list = $30,495
Mexico is # 70 on the list = $18,656
Barbados is # 71 on the list = $18,559
Dominican Republic is # 81 on the list = $16,064
Brazil is # 82 on the list = $15,553
Grenada is # 87 on the list = $15,156
Saint Lucia is # 91 on the list = $13,986
St. Vincent & Grenadines is # 101 on the list = $11,769
Haiti is # 173 on the list = $1,819
IT APPEARS THAT HOLDING BLACKS DOWN HAS THE EFFECT OF HOLDING EVERYONE DOWN.
Having bad character seems to be very costly indeed.
Cuba is a late addition to the conversation because
reliable information about Cuba is hard to come by.
Below are questions and answers concerning Cuba.
Note the obvious racism in some answers, and the obvious need for Black
Cubans to please their Albino masters in their choice of race.
As a reminder, the population of Cuba is 11.26 million. The number of African slaves imported into Cuba was 766,310.
It would seem that the Albinos did indeed murder all of the native people, and replaced them with African Slaves.
See the heading "Slavery in Cuba" the Taino genocide, in the main Mayan page: >>
Question: What is the majority race in Cuba?
Answer: WHITE
Cuba is a Caribbean island nation with a population of 11 million. It
is a significantly diverse country, with 64% of the country identifying
as white, 27% identifying as mixed race, and 9% identifying as
Afro-Cuban. There are a significant number of Asians as well. Study.com
Another answer:
Estimates of the percentage of people of African descent in the Cuban
population vary enormously. While the 2012 National Census
concluded that the majority of the population (64.1 per cent) of Cuba
was white, with 26.6 per cent mestizo (mixed race) and
9.3 per cent black, these figures are based on self-identification and
so, in a context of widespread internalized racism and the entrenched
stigma around race, are widely believed to significantly under-report
the black and mestizo populations. Other assessments
suggest that only around a third of Cubans are whites, with the
remaining two–thirds composed roughly equally of mestizos and
blacks. Taking all of this into consideration, the fact that there has
been a significant exodus of ‘white’ Cubans from the island means
that Afro-Cubans have now come to represent a larger proportion of
the overall population and are now thought to constitute a
significant majority of the population. Minorityrights.org
|
Another take on the subject:
Amid sweeping changes in US relations, Cuba’s race problem persists. In
1959, Fidel Castro said he would work to erase racial discrimination,
but inequality is still widespread. Official Cuban census figures say
black and mixed-heritage people are about 35 percent of the island’s
population, but a quick stroll
around any Cuban town will provide visual confirmation of just how many
Cubans of color deem themselves “white” when the government is asking.
That may not be surprising, given that race is not an objective
scientific category, but rather an organizing principle of political
power — both before and after the revolution that brought Fidel Castro
to power. The black and mixed-heritage share of Cuba’s population is
closer to a two-thirds majority, according to other sources, including
the U.S. State Department (which puts the figure at 62 percent), the
University of Miami’s Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies
(also 62 percent) and Cuban economist and political scientist Esteban
Morales Domínguez (who says it may be as high 72 percent). Most of
these assessments break down the population into roughly equal blocs of
white, black and mixed.
|
Even the dominant Cuban terminology signals the issue’s knotty
intricacy: the decidedly un-PC term mulatto is used tenderly in
conversation, defiantly on official documents, and derisively by the
concerned neighbor who asks what color skin a robber had. Now, as the
country enters a new era of fast and sweeping change, a long-taboo
political conversation about race is on the table as never before in
art, music, film, and writing; in both official and dissident
narratives; and in diverse circles across the socio-economic strata.
This conversation is new. Cuba pre-Fidel had been a place where
multiracial alliances coexisted with persistent, entrenched racism and
vast racial inequality. The last pre-revolutionary president, Fulgencio
Batista, was a mulatto who may have had some Chinese and Indian blood.
While he may have firmly ruled that system of inequality, he was,
demographically speaking, more inclusive than were the white
revolutionaries who overthrew him.
|
Fulgencio
Batista y Zaldívar was a Cuban military officer and politician who
served as the Elected president of Cuba from 1940 to 1944 and as its
U.S. backed military Dictator from 1952 to 1959, then he was overthrown
in the Cuban Revolution by Fidel Castro.
|
From its start, Fidel Castro’s revolutionary movement was dominated by
middle-class white men. So white were its ranks, in fact, that during
initial clashes with Batista’s army, the government men were shocked.
“When Captain Yańes came upon Castro hiding asleep in a bohío, it will
be recalled that the soldier who found them cried: ‘Son blancos!’ ‘They
are white!’ … It is not clear how many of the rebel army in the Sierra
were black but a majority certainly were not, and Almeida, a mulatto,
was the only officer of importance who was,” wrote Hugh Thomas in his
encyclopedic history tome “Cuba, or, the Pursuit of Freedom.” But once
the rebels won and tens of thousands of the wealthiest whites fled to
Florida, Castro emphasized independence from American capitalism,
improvements in healthcare, and literacy drives — and he also told
American journalists in January 1959 that his new government would work
to erase racial discrimination once and for all. In 1962, a North
American survey found that 80 percent of black Cubans were wholly in
favor of the revolution, compared to 67 percent of whites. Al Jazeera America.
|
Brazil Demographics
Brazil’s census addresses ethnicity and race by categorizing people
mainly by skin color. It asks people to place themselves into one of a
number of categories, some of which would seem unusual to an American
or European. As well as ‘indigenous’ (the smallest category),
Brazilians are asked to report whether they believe they are white,
black, brown or yellow. The results of the census indicated that 92
million (48%) Brazilians were white, 83 million (44%) were brown, 13
million (7%) were black, 1.1 million (0.50%) were yellow and 536,000
(0.25%) were indigenous. This method of classifying race is
controversial within Brazil, and IBGE (The Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics) has been criticized for
continuing to use it.
Brazil has an official resident population of 215,000,000 in 2022.
Brazil is the seventh most populous country in the world, and the
second most populous country in the Americas. Brazilians are mainly
concentrated in the eastern part of the country, which comprises the
Southeast, South and Northeast. But it also has a significant presence
in large cities in the Center-West and North. According with 2010
Census, Brazil had 91,051,646 White people, 82,277,333 Mixed people,
14,517,961 Black people, 2,084,288 Asian people, and 817,963 Indigenous
people.
Brazilians of Spanish descent can be estimated as being 1.5 million
people in the 6 main metropolitan areas (around 5% of their total
population in 1998) or 10 and 15 million in the whole country,
according to Brazilian media and the Spanish government respectively.
Spanish immigration to Brazil was a direct result of the efforts of the
Brazilian government to attract European workers to the country, in
order to “whiten” the Brazilian population and to replace the African
manpower. The Brazilian government spent large amounts of money paying
passages of European immigrants by ship (subsidized immigration). A
huge propaganda was conducted by the Brazilian government in Spain,
with agents that worked for it (ganchos) who went to the country in
order to persuade Spaniards to immigrate to Brazil.
Thus, the Spaniards who emigrated to Brazil were those who could not
afford to pay a passage by ship to Cuba and Argentina, the poorest
ones, and took advantage of the offer of free travel to Brazil. For the
wretched Spanish peasants, the free passage by ship offered by the
Brazilian government seemed a great opportunity to leave poverty.
Although present since the onset of the colonization, Portuguese people
began migrating to Brazil in larger numbers and without state support
in the 18th century. 5 million Brazilians (2.5% of the population) have
recent Portuguese ancestry (at least one grandparent) and are eligible
to obtain Portuguese citizenship.
Japanese families left economic hardship in their own country to seek
new opportunities and a better life in Brazil as coffee growers and
farmers. By the 1970s, Japanese Brazilians became leaders in
architecture, business, politics, and the arts. Today, 2.3 million
Brazilians are of Japanese descent.
Italian migration to Brazil began in 1875 when Brazil began to promote
migration to the country in order to increase its population and
therefore created 'colonies' mostly in rural areas for Italians and
other Europeans to migrate to. Between 1880 and 1920, more than one
million Italians immigrated to Brazil.
Germans immigrated mainly from what is now Germany, but also from other
countries where German communities were established. From 1824 to 1969,
around 250,000 Germans emigrated to Brazil, being the fourth largest
immigrant community to settle in the country, after the Portuguese,
Italians and Spaniards.
There are currently a total of around 350,000 Chinese immigrants and descendants in Brazil.
Brazil total Population = 215 million
Total Immigrant Population [Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, German, Japanese, Chinese], = 23.8 million
African Slaves landed in Brazil = 3,521,065
Total newcomers to Brazil = 27,321,065
Total current Brazil population = 215,000,000: minus Total newcomers 27,321,065 = 187,678,935 WHO?
Above the albinos say that there is 91,051,646 White people in Brazil;
but when we break the numbers down we can only find about 22 million.
The Albinos say that there is 82,277,333 Mixed people and 14,517,961
Black people in Brazil = 96,795,294 total non-Albino people. That
leaves 90,883,641 - that are Not Albino, Not Black, Not Mongol, and
unaccounted for in Brazil. Only with the "Coloreds" of Brazil could the
Albinos get away with such nonsense.
Here are some other reasons why Brazil's Blacks are so messed-up.
In 1888, Brazil, with a mostly black and mixed race or mulatto
population, it was the last country in the Western Hemisphere to abolish
slavery. During more than 300 years of slavery in the Americas, it was
the largest importer of African slaves, bringing in seven times as many
African slaves to the country, compared to the United States.
Another important difference was the extent of miscegenation or race
mixture, resulting largely from a high sex ratio among its colonial
settlers. In contrast to a family-based colonization in North America,
Brazil's Portuguese settlers were primarily male. As a result, they
often sought out African, indigenous and mulatto females as mates, and
thus miscegenation or race mixture was common. Today, Brazilians often
pride themselves on their history of miscegenation and continue to have
rates of intermarriage that are far greater than those of the United
States.
Miscegenation and intermarriage suggest fluid race relations and,
unlike the United States or South Africa, there were no
racially-specific laws or policies, such as segregation or
apartheid, throughout the twentieth century. For these reasons,
Brazilians thought of their country as a "racial democracy" from as
early as the 1930s until recent years. They believed that racism and
racial discrimination were minimal or non-existent in Brazilian society
in contrast to the other multiracial societies in the world. A
relatively narrow view of discrimination previously recognized only
explicit manifestations of racism or race-based laws as discriminatory,
thus only countries like South Africa and the United States were seen
as truly racist. Moreover, there was little formal discussion of race
in Brazilian society, while other societies were thought to be obsessed
with race and racial difference.
At the time of the abolition, Brazil's population was mostly black or
mixed race until the 1930s, when Brazil encouraged and received a large
number of European immigrants as it sought to find new sources of
labor. In the context of the scientific racism of the time, which
deemed a non-white population as problematic to its future development,
Brazilian officials explicitly encouraged European immigration while
blocking Chinese and African immigrants. The growing population of
European origin was also expected to mix with the non-white, further
"whitening" the Brazilian population.
The
Great Brazilian Soccer player "Pele" knew that he hadn't really made
it, until he took a "White Wife"; he wound up taking three.
LOOKS LIKE ALL THE ALBINO WIVES IS TAKING IT'S TOLL ON PELE. SAMMY
DAVIS jr. HAD TO TAKE A BLACK WIFE BEFORE HE COULD FIND PEACE. TAKING
A ALBINO WOMAN BECAUSE YOU ARE ON A HEAD TRIP WILL NEVER WORK OUT. BEST TAKING HER BECAUSE YOU LOVE HER.
|
The racial hierarchy in Brazil generally idealizes those with lighter
skin and denigrates those with darker skin (Caldwell 2007, 51; Twine
1998, 91). For much of its history, Brazil touted itself as a racial
democracy where racism was incompatible with its mixed-race population,
and the fundamental inequalities of Brazilian society could be fully
understood only via class analysis. Nevertheless, racism and negative
stereotypes against darker skinned and African descendant Brazilians
continue to persist. Expressions such as ‘cleaning one’s belly’ or
‘improving the race,’ presumably by mixing African blood and white
blood through racial intermarriage, are embedded in everyday discourse.
So far - Tiger has limited himself to one.
|
Choosing Blackness
Previous research suggests that younger Afro-Brazilians are more likely
to choose the Negro category than older Afro-Brazilians. People with
higher levels of education are more likely to choose the Negro category
than the Moreno, (brown-skinned) instead of negro (black-skinned), category (Bailey and Telles 2006, 86). Bailey and
Telles (2006) claim that for younger people, Negro is associated with a
modern identity influenced by black American culture and music. They
propose that more educated Afro-Brazilians claiming the Negro identity
are more likely to have been exposed to black activists rhetoric that
promotes a collective black identity than less-educated Afro-Brazilians.
Telles (2004) finds that less-educated Brazilians are two and a half
times more likely to choose Moreno, a more ambiguous category, while
the highly educated are nearly three times as likely to choose the
Negro category (Telles 2004, 98–99). As Telles notes, in this case,
‘money’ (or education, as a proxy for class) darkens. The impact of
education on self-classification as black is extremely important, given
the high degree of stigmatization of blackness in Brazilian society
In 1991, Brazil changed its racial classifications on the census to
Branca (White), Amarela (Yellow), Parda (Brown), Preta (Black), and
Indígena (Indigenous). Before, there were over 200 categories of color
self-identification such as Morena-clara (light skin mixed woman),
sarará (blonde, light skin mixed woman with African features), cor de
tânjura (dark skin woman with long hair like indigenous), and the list
goes on.
Color was used instead of race in this system of
self-identification because no one wanted to be labeled Black, or Negro
or Preto. To be Black in Brazil means that one does not have any white
ancestors. The one drop rule so prevalent in the United States, which
considers a drop of African ancestry as denoting Blackness is the
opposite in Brazil. A drop of white ancestry signifies that one is no
longer Black, Negro or Preto, as these terms are loaded with social
pathologies. Since people who are Black and Brown, are also poor, they
are essentialized and stereotyped in the most offensive ways. They are
considered filthy, stupid, degenerate, liars, thieves, criminals in
general, and fit only for employment undertaking the basest tasks in
the society.
Options for mobility are limited, and only with spectacular talent may
one become a football player, a television or film star (often
portraying stereotypical roles), or a singer, but even Afro-Brazilian
singers are not the most popular. However, employment for most
Afro-Brazilians is often limited to seamstresses, caterers, food
vendors, construction workers, security workers, street sweepers, and
doormen; for the more upwardly mobile, teachers, workers in NGOs or
public educational/community programs, artists, journalists, academics,
nuns and priests. Of course, one role that is not often spoken about is
police officer, as many of the poor become police officers, because
this is one of the few positions that will guarantee a salary beyond
the minimum wage. Since poverty and Blackness go hand-in-hand in the
nation, these modalities often align with a lack of education,
substandard living conditions, little to no access to health resources,
poor sanitary conditions, and such other social ills.
Sadly, it's not just the Brazilians who are Race confused:
ESPN: Woods said nothing to clarify his ancestral roots. Reportedly, he is one-quarter Thai,
one-quarter Chinese, one-quarter Caucasian, one-eighth African-American and one-eighth Native American.
|
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel Earl Woods
|
|
Eldrick "Tiger" Woods
|
|
Kultida Woods
|
His mother, Kultida, is said to be of Thai, Chinese and Dutch descent.
His late father, Earl, said he was African-American, Chinese and Native American.
Realhistoryww has a section which explains Thailand.
My experience in Brazil
By Lulu Garcia-Navarro
There is a joke among Brazilians that a Brazilian passport is the most
coveted on the black market because no matter what your background —
Asian, African or European — you can fit in here. But the reality is
very different.
I'm sitting in café with two women who don't want their names used
because of the sensitivity of the topic. One is from the Caribbean; her
husband is an expat executive. "I was expecting to be the
average-looking Brazilian; Brazil as you see on the media is not what I
experienced when I arrived," she tells me. As is the case for many
people from the Caribbean basin, she self-identifies as multiracial.
The island where she is from has a mixture of races and ethnicities, so
she was excited to move to Brazil, which has been touted as one of the
most racially harmonious places in the world.
"When I arrived, I was shocked to realize there is a big difference
between races and colors, and what is expected — what is your role,
basically — based on your skin color," she says. Moving to a new
country can be difficult; when you throw racial issues into the mix
things can get even more complicated. The other woman is from London,
and she also relocated to Brazil because of her husband's job. She
describes herself as black.
"My skin is very dark, so going out with my children, on occasions
people would say to me, 'Are you the nanny for these children?' And I'd
have to explain to them, no, these are my children, I look after them,"
she says.
A quick lesson on race and class in Brazil: The country was the last
place in the Americas to give up slavery. It also imported more than 10
times as many slaves as the U.S. — some 4 million. That's meant that
more than 50 percent of the population is of African descent, but those
numbers haven't translated to opportunity.
For example, these days among the whiter, wealthier classes, it's
common to have a nanny, or baba, who is darker-skinned. The woman from
London says that the babas are required to wear all white. "I promptly
stopped wearing white," she says, because it was tiresome to have to
constantly explain that her children were in fact her children, despite
Brazilians' assumptions. "I got rid of the white that's in my wardrobe,
and I do not wear white anymore."
As a black woman with lighter-skinned children, she says she fears
being stopped by the police, who regularly target people of color in
Brazil. She always carries ID that shows she is the mother of her two
kids — something she didn't have to do in London. Ky Adderley, an
American from Philadelphia who runs an education consultancy in Rio de
Janeiro, says he too was shocked when he moved to Brazil. "I feel like
the racism here is much deeper than I've ever felt anywhere," he says.
He says he knew how to navigate being a black man in the U.S —
"regardless of people's skin tone, there was a sense in the black
community that if you have a little bit in you, then you were black,
and so then we were able to build community really quickly" — but in
Brazil he found it really hard to find that same support network. So he
created his own with other expatriate black men.
"We have a group called Bros in Brazil," he says. "And it is a group of
maybe 15 guys now that come from Europe, Africa, the United States, and
are living and working in Brazil as professionals." They talk about
race a lot. Brazil, Adderley says, is deeply segregated along racial
lines, especially in Rio. When he walks his dog, if he isn't wearing a
suit, he often gets asked if he's a professional dog-walker. He says
simply being an educated black man in Brazil feels like a subversive
act.
"As a black person, what is your place in Rio de Janeiro? All the
blacks that I see are in service jobs — and the darker you are, the
less you're seen," he says. "So the role that you may have may be back
in the kitchen and not out waiting a table." Most people in Brazil tell
him there isn't a racism problem, and he says that's the root of the
issue: People aren't addressing it. The worry for him is how the race
question in Brazil will affect his daughter. A woman who was
photographing his then-newborn told him that he needed to modify her
features. "Well you can fix her nose, you know — you just pinch it. If
you just pinch her nose every day and just keeppinching it, she won't
have that wide nose," he recounts her telling him.
The woman from London says the racism in Brazil has started to affect
her kids, too. "My 3-year-old has started to come home from school, and
he's started to rub my arms and my skin," she says. "He'd say, 'Mummy,
I'm trying to get the brown off.' But there is a positive side — the
woman from the Caribbean says being in Brazil has made her a lot more
conscious about issues of race. She refuses to stop wearing her
favorite color, white. "Why should you let a color of clothing signify
who you are, or your color of skin signify who you are?" she says. "I
am who I am. I don't care what you think — this is who I am, I'm going
to continue being me."
I have no positive feelings for Brazilians, but still, I do fell sorry for them. Brazil is Boer South Africa all over again. Maybe if they spent less time Playing Soccer or partying at Carnival, they might notice that they are the majority population and their country is totally fucked-up.
|
|
|
One thing that always perplexed me, that I think I understand now after doing
that bit of work on Brazil. Why do Black American athletes go
out of their way to look hideous with their uncombed hair and un-groomed hair styles. It seems strange because whether in
the jungle or the Savannah, Blacks the world over have always been
fastidious about grooming. Now after reading about how Albino and
Mulatto Brazilians react to Black attributes, it does kinda makes you
want to rub your uncombed nappy hair in their faces. What silly people
they are, they worship the indicators of Albinism and don't even know
it. Which is the Super Power of the Albinos and their Mulattoes originally of the
Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal), which is to convince
not-too-bright Albino wantabes that their Albinism makes them superior.
But is their stupidity reason to make yourself ridiculous?
African coiffure
By the way:
for modern humans "Nappy" hair is "Normal" straight hair is
"Recessive". Healthline: Straight hair is considered “recessive.” To
put that in simple terms, that means that if one parent gives you a
curly-haired gene and the other parent gives you a straight-haired
gene, you'll be born with curly hair. Variation/mutation in the TCHH
gene is often responsible for curly vs straight hair in people with
European ancestry, while variation in the EDAR gene is often
responsible for straight hair in people with Asian ancestry.
I remember the first time I ever saw a Black man with completely
uncombed hair. It was Joe Morton in "The Brother from another Planet."
"The Brother" is an alien and escaped slave on the run from his home
planet. After he lands in New York City, he tries to adapt to life on
the streets of Harlem. Although the Brother is mute, he does have great
abilities at fixing machines, and he gets a job. As the Brother tries
to blend in with his new culture, he finds an apartment and gradually
makes friends. Meanwhile, he is pursued by two agents from his home
world who are intent on returning there with him. I watched the movie
and never saw where the brother being un-groomed played any part in the
movie, and why was he a SLAVE?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Morton in real life
|
|
The Albino writer/Director John Sayles
|
By now I'm suspecting that an Albino decided that the black brother
from outer space should be un-groomed and a slave, so I checked, it was
written and directed by the Albino John Sayles. Clearly John Sayles is
the worst kind of racist, one who uses the ignorance of Blacks to
demean them. And as is normal, the foolish used something intended to
demean them, as an everyday thing. I suspect that those poor misguided
Negroes are thinking that if whites put it in a movie, it must be all
right then.
But getting back to John Sayles; how mentally beat-down must an Albino
be to constantly harken back to the time when Blacks were enslaved and
at the Albinos mercy. I watched the movie at least twice and never once
saw where the plot required the hero to be a slave or un-groomed. These
were attributes put in by John Sayles simply because he preferred to
think and show Blacks in that way. Perhaps like the Albino boys at
Wikipedia, John Sayles was beat-up as a boy by some Black kid.
Seriously; do you think these Negroes (below) have "Mirrors" in their
homes? (Not blaming Joe, he was just trying to get paid).
|
|
|
|
The Spanish in media
Spain and Portugal have never achieved anything of particular note
Culturally or
Politically, though their people seem particularly proud of their languages.
Their one outstanding feature though has been in regards to race, there they
have distanced themselves from all others in their total disregard for
basic
human feelings towards other Human beings. While pursuing the Gold,
Silver, and Property of others, they used “Race” as the enabling factor.
Wherever they have gone, "Genocide" and Racial Misogyny was sure to follow. Then they made
sure that their racial Misogyny would be carried into
the future by creating anti-black societal rules; and training their
Albino mulattoes to honor them. I have seen jet-Black Spanish speaking
people insist that they are not Black! So that today we not only have
Racism,
we also have “Colorism” thanks to the Spanish and Portuguese. This
question was asked on Quora: Why are there so few black and brown
people on the Spanish television networks? All together now -
Racism and Colorism.
As far as we know the word Colorism was first used to describe what
happened with the movie "In the Heights" by the Puerto Rican and
Mexican descended
Lin-Manuel Miranda, he is an American actor, singer, songwriter,
rapper, producer, and playwright. He created and starred in the
Broadway musicals "In the Heights" and "Hamilton." On November 7, 2008,
Universal Pictures announced that they planned to adapt "In the
Heights" as a feature film for release in 2011. However, the project
was canceled in March 2011, reportedly due to the fact Universal was
looking for a "bankable Latino star" like Shakira or Jennifer Lopez
instead of unknown actors. Then it was originally intended to be
released in 2020,
this time In the Heights was postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The film finally had
its world premiere at the Los Angeles Latino International Film
Festival on June 4, 2021, and was released in the United States on June
10 in theaters and streaming on HBO Max under a 30-day simultaneous
exhibition window. It received acclaim from critics, with praise for
Jon M. Chu's direction (Chinese descent), the story, performances and
musical numbers, but
because of criticism for its lack of representation of Afro-Latino
Americans; the film was a box office bomb, grossing just $41 million
against its $55 million budget.
|
You see "In the Heights" the movie is about the
BLACK "Washington Heights" neighborhood of Manhattan New York. The
"Light" skinned Puerto Rican Miranda used Black Dominican music and
culture to make his movie but forgot to put any Blacks in the Movie.
After the release of in the Heights, its creator, Lin-Manuel Miranda
posted not a congratulatory note but an apology. Over the weekend, the
conversation around colorism and in the Heights reached a fever pitch
as more viewers began to wonder why there weren't any dark-skinned
Afro-Latinos in any of the leading roles to represent a place as
diverse as Washington Heights. Lin-Manuel Miranda Apologizes For Lack
Of Afro-Latinx Actors in 'In The Heights'. "I'm trying to hold space
for both the incredible pride in the movie we made and be accountable
for our shortcomings," Miranda said in a statement posted on social
media. "Thanks for your honest feedback. I promise to do better in my
future projects, and I'm dedicated to the learning and evolving we all
have to do to make sure we are honoring our diverse and vibrant
community."
Lets see now, a Puerto Rican/Mexican Mulatto steals cultural material
from Black and Brown Dominicans, then gives it to a Chinese guy to
direct: then the Spanish Mulattoes wonder why everybody is upset. Word
to the Spanish Mulattoes, your Albino fathers and benefactors are no
longer in absolute power, you may no longer do whatever you want to Blacks.
|
|
The Mexicans of Los Angles:
The implosion of the Los Angeles City Council this month, after three
of its members were secretly recorded talking in racist terms, has
thrown the political machinery of one of America's largest cities into
crisis. As of now, there is one empty seat on the 15-member body after
one of the three recorded members resigned, and the remaining members
who weren't part of the racist conversation have all publicly demanded
that the two others resign, going as far as stripping them of nearly
all their committee assignments. And on Sunday, California Gov. Gavin
Newsom said he is "looking forward" to an announcement of the two
council members' departures soon.
But despite the outcry, Gil Cedillo and Kevin de León refuse to
quit,
expecting they can wait out the storm of fallout for their
participation in a racist conversation in which they and former City
Council President Nury Martinez disparaged a white colleague's adopted
2-year-old Black son and discussed strategies to consolidate their
power at the expense of Black leadership. Martinez stepped down days
after the audio was leaked.
|
|
The conversation includes
Council President Nury Martinez, who is Latina, saying a white
councilman handled his young Black son as though he were an “accessory”
and describing the child as like a “changuito,” or little monkey. She
also said, “F— that guy... He’s with the Blacks” while discussing Los
Angeles County Dist. Atty. George Gascón, among other incendiary
comments on the tape.
|
As we are writing this part, we are smirking: throughout the World
there are Black Humans and Black Mongol Humans, and the Albinos of
each.
According to the Albinos themselves, they coalesced into a
separate Race, presumably in Central Asia 6-12,000 years ago. We are
smirking because we wonder if those "Would-be Racists" from Mexico ever
bothered to wonder why they look the way they do.
Ah, the hubris and stupidity of the Would-be Racists, so proud of
having a disease (Albinism). Of course those Mexicans don't have
Albinism, it has been bred out of them by reverse mating. Which gets us
to an explanation of why we use the term "Albino Mulatto".
Strictly
speaking a Mulatto is the offspring of a Black or Mongol and an Albino.
But when a Mulatto mates with a Black, the offspring is likely to look
like a normal Black. However when a Mulatto mates with an Albino, the
offspring is likely to look like a "Tweener" just more Albino. The
scientific term for these people are Quadroons. Clearly the Mexicans
above are Quadroons.
Throughout these pages we speak derisively about Albino Mulattoes:
Note to the L.A. City Council Mexicans above;
YOU ARE ALL TOO DARK TO GET A LEAD IN
Lin-Manuel Mirandan's movie "In The Heights".
Check the picture above - Chumps!
How silly these "Colorists"
are; the dark Mexicans are trying to look down on Blacks because they
are closer to Whites, meanwhile, the lighter Latinos like Lin-Manuel
are looking down on them because his type could pass for White.
Meanwhile us Blacks (non
Spanish speaking of course), are saying, damn you all are some stupid
MFs; play your stupid games, just be careful what you say to our face.
What you say behind out backs is an indicator of the deference you must
show to us, so we have no problem with that, plus we get a laugh at how
ridiculous you are.
|
|
|
Luckily for us, the behavior of
these
Spanish and Portuguese people is easy to explain if you know something
of their past.
First of all, they are all Central Asian Albinos or descend from same,
they of the Germanic super tribe, and the Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Vandals,
and Alan subtribes tribes. They were all chased into the Black Roman world
by the "HUNS", note the map below, the Huns are right in the middle of the
Albinos.
To make understanding easier we like to use the example of the Turks,
the "last" of the Albinos chased out of Asia. As a reminder, we think
that the first Albinos in Europe circa 1,200 B.C. were of the Germanic
tribe, but we are not sure. Later as ALL of the Albinos were being
chased out of Asia, first came the second wave of Germanics, then the
Slavs, and finally the Turks. The University of Calgary teaches an
on-line course on the Turks - see below.
Note: Franks were NOT Albinos OR Asians.
To the Albinos who still cling to the fantasy that Albinos are native to Europe:
the simple truth is that you can't Go to a place that you are already AT! So if Albinos
are COMING to Europe, they must have started off somewhere ELSE! Asia of course.
Invasian of
North Africa by the Central Asian Albinos
The Roman military presence in North Africa was relatively small,
consisting of about 28,000 troops and auxiliaries in Numidia and the two
Mauretanian provinces. Starting in the second century A.D, these
garrisons were manned mostly by local inhabitants.
Aside from Carthage, urbanization in North Africa came in part with
the establishment of settlements of veterans under the Roman emperors
Claudius (reigned 41-54 A.D.), Nerva (r. 96-98 A.D.), and Trajan. In
Algeria such settlements included Tipasa, Cuicul (modern Djemila,
northeast of Sétif), Thamugadi (modern Timgad, southeast of Sétif), and
Sitifis. The prosperity of most towns depended on agriculture. Called
the granary of the empire; North Africa, according to one estimate,
produced 1 million tons of cereals each year, one-quarter of which was
exported. Other crops included fruit, figs, grapes, and beans. By the
second century A.D, olive oil rivaled cereals as an export item.
The beginnings of the decline of the Roman Empire were less serious
in North Africa than elsewhere. There were uprisings, however. In A.D.
238, landowners rebelled unsuccessfully against the emperor's fiscal
policies. Sporadic tribal revolts in the Mauretanian mountains followed
from 253 to 288 A.D. The towns also suffered economic difficulties, and
building activity almost ceased.
The towns of Roman North Africa had a substantial Hebrew population.
Some Hebrews were deported from Palestine in the first and second
centuries A.D. for rebelling against Roman rule; others had come earlier
with Punic settlers (Phoenicians). In addition, a number of Berber tribes had
converted to Judaism.
Christianity arrived in the second century and soon gained converts
in the towns and among slaves. More than eighty bishops, some from
distant frontier regions of Numidia, attended the Council of Carthage in
256. By the end of the fourth century, the settled areas had become
Christianized, and some Berber tribes had converted en mass.
By the late classic period, both Greece and Rome were fundamentally
Mulatto societies. The Romans occupying the Mediterranean parts of the
African Continent left their traces in these beautiful mosaics,
featuring the four seasons. The stamps below, from Algeria (1977),
feature Roman mosaics from the now ruined city of Timgad, founded by
the Roman emperor Trajan in 100 A.D.
The Visigoths
The Visigoths (western Goths); were an Asian Albino people, and are
the ancestors of the modern Spanish and Portugese. They were one of two
main branches of the Goths, the Ostrogoths being the other. Together
these tribes were among the Germanic peoples from Central Asia who
spread through the late Roman Empire during the Migration Period. The
Romanized Visigoths first emerged as a distinct people during the 4th
century, initially in the Balkans, where they participated in several
wars with Rome. A Visigothic army under Alaric I eventually moved into
Italy and famously sacked Rome in 410.
Eventually the Visigoths were settled in southern Gaul as foederati
of the Romans, the reasons for which is still a subject for debate
among scholars. They soon fell out with their hosts and established
their own kingdom with its capital at Toulouse. They then slowly
extended their authority into Hispania, displacing the Vandals and
Alans. Their rule in Gaul was cut short at the Battle of Vouillé in 507
when they were defeated by the Franks under Clovis I. Thereafter the
only territory north of the Pyrenees that the Visigoths held was
Septimania, such that their kingdom became limited to Hispania. In 711
or 712 the Visigoths, were defeated in the Battle of Guadalete by a
force of invading Arabs and Berbers (the Moors).
The Alans
The Alans or Alani were a group of White Asian tribes of nomadic
pastoralists of the 1st millennium A.D. They spoke a Scytho-Sarmatian
language. In 418 (or 426) the Alan king, Attaces, was killed in battle
against the Visigoths in Iberia (Spain), and this branch of the Alans
subsequently appealed to the Asding Vandal king Gunderic to accept the
Alan crown. The separate ethnic identity of Respendial's Alans then
dissolved. Although some of these Alans are thought to have remained in
Iberia, most went to North Africa with the Vandals in 429. Later Vandal
kings in North Africa styled themselves Rex Wandalorum et Alanorum
("King of the Vandals and Alans").
The Vandals (The first infusion of Albino blood into North Africa).
The Vandals were an Germanic tribe from Asia, that entered the late
Roman Empire during the 5th century, perhaps best known for their sack
of Rome in 455. Although they were not notably more destructive than
other invaders of ancient times, Renaissance and Early Modern writers
who idealized Rome tended to blame the Vandals for its destruction.
According to Procopius, the Vandals came to Africa at the request of
Bonifacius, the military ruler of the region. However, it has been
suggested that the Vandals migrated to Africa in search of safety; they
had been attacked by a Roman army in 422 and had failed to seal a
treaty with them. Led by their king, Gaiseric, some 80,000 Vandals,
crossed into Africa from Spain in 429. Advancing eastwards along the
coast, the Vandals lay siege to Hippo Regius in 430. Inside Saint
Augustine and his priests prayed for relief from the invaders, knowing
full well that the fall of the city would spell conversion or death for
many Roman Christians. On 28 August 430, three months into the siege,
St. Augustine (who was 75 years old) died, perhaps from starvation or
stress, as the wheat fields outside the city lay dormant and
unharvested. After 14 months, hunger and the inevitable diseases were
ravaging both the city inhabitants and the Vandals outside the city
walls.
Peace was made between the Romans and the Vandals in 435 through a
treaty giving the Vandals control of coastal Numidia. Geiseric chose to
break the treaty in 439 when he invaded the province of Africa
Proconsularis and laid siege to Carthage. The city was captured without
a fight; the Vandals entered the city while most of the inhabitants
were attending the races at the hippodrome. Genseric made it his
capital, and styled himself the King of the Vandals and Alans, to
denote the inclusion of the Alans of north Africa into his alliance.
The Goth leader Theodoric the Great, king of the Ostrogoths and regent
of the Visigoths, was allied by marriage with the Vandals as well as
with the Burgundians and the Franks under Clovis I. Like the Goths, the
Vandals, were continuators rather than violaters of Roman culture in
Late Antiquity. Soon independent kingdoms emerged in mountainous and
desert areas, towns were overrun, and the Berbers, who had previously
been pushed to the edges of the Roman Empire, returned. Although the
Vandals fended off attacks from the Romans and established hegemony
over the islands of the western Mediterranean, they were less
successful in their conflict with the Berbers. Situated south of the
Vandal kingdom, the Berbers inflicted two major defeats on the Vandals
in the period 496–530
The Byzantines (Eastern Roman Empire based in Anatolia (now Turkey).
Belisarius, general of the Byzantine emperor Justinian based in
Constantinople, landed in North Africa in 533 with 16,000 men and
within a year destroyed the Vandal kingdom. Local opposition delayed
full Byzantine control of the region for twelve years, however, and
imperial control, when it came, was but a shadow of the control
exercised by Rome. Although an impressive series of fortifications were
built, Byzantine rule was compromised by official corruption,
incompetence, military weakness, and lack of concern in Constantinople
for African affairs. As a result, many rural areas reverted to Berber
rule.
The Moors
Albino historians, in their bid to
make ancient Iberians seem White/Albino, have chosen to ignore the "obvious"
relationships that must have existed between Berbers and the people of
Iberia. When Grimaldi man crossed the Gibraltar straits to enter
Europe; c. 45,000 B.C, all of his kind did not follow. When Humans move
to new territories "Most" stay behind in the old territory, and they
"maintain" their relationships; there is always back and forth travel
for trade and communication. It is against this backdrop that the
Berber invasion of Iberia must be viewed. The Berbers did not enter
Iberia as destroyers, they entered as past owners and builders!
|
Thus, after Muhammad's Islamic army
took Egypt in 640 A.D. and then went on to conquer all of North Africa.
The Berbers no-doubt saw this new Black army as an opportunity; so
rather than fight, the Berbers joined forces with the Islamic army. In
711 A.D. A Berber army led by general Tariq ibn Ziyad, invaded Iberia
(Spain) and overthrew the White Visigoths (Western Goths): Who were one
of two main branches of the Goths, an east Germanic tribe, who over the
period of only one hundred years, had migrated from eastern Europe,
thru Greece, thru Italy, and finally down into the Iberian peninsula.
In Iberia (Spain and Portugal), the
Berbers, now known as Moors, created a highly advanced civilization and
culture, famous for it’s art, architecture, and centers of learning.
While having rule over Spain: The Berbers, who themselves fifty years
earlier had been forced to accept Islam, now sometimes forced the
inhabitants of Iberia to do the same. Though the number of original
"Moors" remained small, many native Iberian inhabitants converted to
Islam. According to Ronald Segal, some 5.6 million of Iberia's 7
million inhabitants were Muslim by 1200 A.D, virtually all of them
native inhabitants. According to historian Richard A. Fletcher, the
number of Arabs who settled in Iberia was very small. There were about
900,000 Berbers and about 90,000 Arabs in Iberia.
When you think of European culture, one of the first things that
may come to your mind is the renaissance. Many of the roots of European
culture can be traced back to that glorious time of art, science,
commerce and architecture. But did you know that long before the
renaissance there was a place of humanistic beauty in Muslim Spain? Not
only was it artistic, scientific and commercial, but it also exhibited
incredible tolerance, imagination and poetry. Moors, as the Spaniards
call the Muslims, populated Spain for nearly 700 years. As you'll see,
it was their civilization that enlightened Europe and brought it out of
the dark ages to usher in the renaissance. Many of their cultural and
intellectual influences still live with us today.
|
|
|
Way back during the eighth century, Europe was still knee-deep in the
Medieval period. That's not the only thing they were knee-deep in. In
his book, "The Day The Universe Changed," the historian James Burke
describes how the typical European townspeople lived:
"The inhabitants threw all their refuse into the drains in the center
of the narrow streets. The stench must have been overwhelming, though
it appears to have gone virtually unnoticed. Mixed with excrement and
urine would be the soiled reeds and straw used to cover the dirt floors.
This squalid society was organized under a feudal system and had little
that would resemble a commercial economy. Along with other
restrictions, the Catholic Church forbade the lending of money - which
didn't help get things booming much. "Anti-Semitism, previously rare,
began to increase. Money lending, which was forbidden by the Church,
was permitted under Jewish law." (Burke, 1985, p. 32) Jews worked to
develop a currency although they were heavily persecuted for it.
Medieval Europe was a miserable lot, which ran high in illiteracy,
superstition, barbarism and filth.
During this same time, Arabs entered Europe from the South. ABD
AL-RAHMAN I, a survivor of a family of caliphs of the Arab Empire,
reached Spain in the mid-700's. He became the first Caliph of
Al-Andalus, the Moorish part of Spain, which occupied most of the
Iberian Peninsula. He also set up the UMAYYAD Dynasty that ruled
Al-Andalus for over three-hundred years. (Grolier, History of Spain).
|
|
|
By the beginning of the ninth century, Moorish Spain was the gem of
Europe with its capital city, Cordova. With the establishment of
Abdurrahman III - "the great caliphate of Cordova" - came the golden
age of Al-Andalus. Cordova, in southern Spain, was the intellectual
center of Europe.
If you Google "Moorish Architecture in Spain" these are the structures you will see |
At a time when London was a tiny mud-hut village that "could not boast
of a single streetlamp" (Digest, 1973, p. 622), in Cordova "there were
half a million inhabitants, living in 113,000 houses. There were 700
mosques and 300 public baths spread throughout the city and its
twenty-one suburbs. The streets were paved and lit." (Burke, 1985, p.
38) The houses had marble balconies for summer and hot-air ducts under
the mosaic floors for the winter. They were adorned with gardens with
artificial fountains and orchards". (Digest, 1973, p. 622) "Paper, a
material still unknown to the west, was everywhere. There were
bookshops and more than seventy libraries." (Burke, 1985, p. 38).
|
|
|
This rich and sophisticated society took a tolerant view towards other
faiths. Tolerance was unheard of in the rest of Europe. But in Moorish
Spain, "thousands of Jews and Christians lived in peace and harmony
with their Muslim overlords." (Burke, 1985, p. 38) The society had a
literary rather than religious base. Economically their prosperity was
unparalleled for centuries. The aristocracy promoted private land
ownership and encouraged Jews in banking. There was little or no Muslim
prostelyting. Instead, non-believers simply paid an extra tax!
|
|
|
In Iberia, many of the ousted White nobles took refuge in the
unconquered north Asturian highlands. From there they aimed to
reconquer their lands from the Moors: this war of reconquest is known
as the Reconquista. It began in about 900 A.D. when a small Christian
enclave of Visigoths in northwestern Spain, named Asturias; initiated
conflicts between Christians and Muslims. Soon after, Christian states
based in the north and west slowly; in fits and starts, began a process
of expansion and reconquest of Iberia over the next several hundred
years. The end for the Moors came on January 2, 1492: the leader of the
last Moorish City "Granada" (located in southern Spain) - surrendered
to armies of a recently united Christian Spain (after the marriage of
Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile). This ended the 800
year reign of the Moors in Iberia.
|
Albino Spain has never equaled the Genius and Beauty of Moor
Architecture, these structures and many others like them are the reason
tourist go to Spain. Yet modern Spanish and Portuguese denigrate Blacks
- lets see if we can figure out why. First of all this disrespect must
be "New" as you can see from the artwork, Iberian Kings were Black, and
even at the time of Columbus, the Spanish king was a Mulatto - who
would dare denigrate the King?
There is no history book which says that at a particular point in time
Albino Iberians started to hate Blacks, whether because of fear
(knowing how easily the Moors defeated them, or revenge for same, the
hatred surely began. Now in modern times the hatred takes the form of
trying to write Blacks out of History. How well we remember when
American Black students had to take to the streets to protest the
worlds Albinos claiming that the ancient Egyptians were White/Albinos.
Now the World Albinos have become more subtle, they now pack trusted
encyclopedias with their racist lies. Above we took the boys at
Wikipedia to task for their lies, then to our surprise we found the the
Albinos at Encyclopaedia Britannica were doing the same things. Below is the verbatim entry for "Moor" on Encyclopaedia Britannica.
MOOR - Written and fact-checked by The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica.
The term is of little use in describing the ethnic characteristics of
any groups, ancient or modern. From the Middle Ages to the 17th
century, however, Europeans depicted Moors as being black, “swarthy,”
or “tawny” in skin colour. (Othello, Shakespeare’s Moor of Venice,
comes to mind in such a context.) Europeans designated Muslims of any
other complexion as “White Moors,” despite the fact that the population
in most parts of North Africa differs little in physical appearance
from that of southern Europe (in Morocco, for example, red and blonde
hair are relatively common). We answer this idiot below. So what is the problem, are the boys at Encyclopaedia
Britannica just rabid lying racists, or are they simply stupid? Let us
recount North African History as relates to Albinos, and you be the
judge.
As mentioned above the first Albinos (the Visigoths) appeared circa early 400s.
Then the Vandals broke off and invaded North Africa, circa mid 400s.
After
the Moors were expelled from Spain, the Spanish took revenge by
invading and occupying North Africa several times in several places
over many years.
The second infusion of Albino blood into North Africa.
In 1511, the Catholic Monarchy completed a series of campaigns that
conquered an empire in the North African Maghrib. Spaniards
first moved into the region in 1497 by seizing the coastal outpost of
Melilla. Over the next 14 years, they captured other enclaves along the
North African littoral, including Mers el-Kebir, Peńón de Vélez de La
Gomera, Orán, Peńón de Árgel, and Bugía. In 1510, Spanish expansion
achieved what would turn out to be its eastern-most limits when an
armada took Tripoli. Spain's sway in the region reached an apex in
1511, the year that the Algerian coastal towns of Dellys, Mostaganem,
and Cherchel, along with Tlemcen, the capital of the eponymous kingdom
in western Algeria, accepted the status of vassals under the tutelage
of the Catholic Monarchy. Though Spanish movement further eastward
would later face the challenge of an expanding Ottoman Empire, Spain in
the early 1510s looked poised to liberate the Holy Land and
Constantinople, ambitions that some at court held dear.
Even before Spain moved into the region, Portugal was performing its
own series of conquests along Morocco's western coast, starting with
Ceuta in 1415 and followed by Alcazar el-Saghir (1458), Arcila and
Tangiers (1471), Larache (1473), and Agadir (1505), among others. Like
Spain, Portugal hoped to take control of these towns and the
trans-Saharan trade that passed through them, and to secure the
maritime routes it was pioneering to Asia as they skirted African
shores. When the Spanish monarchy absorbed the Portuguese global empire
in 1580, the presidios came under the rule of one Iberian state. Though
Portugal revolted against Spain in 1640 and later regained control over
Tangiers and Mazagán, Spain managed to hold on to Ceuta. Portugal lost
Mazagán, its last presidio, in 1769.
Over the centuries following 1511, Iberians gradually lost, and at
times retook or even took for the first time various enclaves on the
North African coast. Still, their dominance in the region came
to be contested soon after the Iberian kingdoms reached the high point
of their expansion. In the second decade of the sixteenth century,
Ottoman forces started sweeping into the western Mediterranean, taking
control of Algiers and raiding the coasts of the Spanish Levant and the
Baleares Islands. In Morocco, even though the Wattasid kingdom of Fez
was disintegrating, the Sa'adi dynasty and then the Alawi constituted
new states. The Sa'adis, based in the southern Atlas city of Marrakesh,
conquered Fez in 1549, thereby unifying the south and the north.
English, Dutch, French, and other smaller Mediterranean powers also
made their interests felt along these shores starting in the
seventeenth century. Military pressure from these powers forced the
Iberians to retreat to their outposts and withdraw from a number of
them, though Spain has maintained possession of Melilla and Ceuta until
the present day. Spain even launched a new empire in northern Morocco
in 1908, one that would last until 1956.
FRANCE IN ALGERIA - 1830-1962
The third infusion of Albino blood into North Africa.
In the period between Napoleon's downfall in 1815
and the revolution of 1830, the restored French monarchy was in crisis,
and the dey was weak politically, economically, and militarily. The
French monarch sought to reverse his domestic unpopularity. As a result
of what the French considered an insult to the French consul in Algiers
by the dey in 1827, France blockaded Algiers for three years. France
used the failure of the blockade as a reason for a military expedition
against Algiers in 1830.
Using Napoleon's 1808 contingency plan for the invasion of Algeria,
34,000 French soldiers landed twenty-seven kilometers west of Algiers,
at Sidi Ferruch, on June 12, 1830. To face the French, the dey sent
7,000 janissaries, 19,000 troops from the beys of Constantine and Oran,
and about 17,000 Kabyles. The French established a strong beachhead and
pushed toward Algiers, thanks in part to superior artillery and better
organization. Algiers was captured after a three-week campaign, and
Hussein Dey fled into exile. French troops raped, looted (taking 50
million francs from the treasury in the Casbah), desecrated mosques,
and destroyed cemeteries. It was an inauspicious beginning to France's
self-described "civilizing mission," whose character on the whole was
cynical, arrogant, and cruel. In 1834 France annexed the occupied
areas, which had an estimated Muslim population of about 3 million, as
a colony. Naturally millions of French clambered in to grab land and
whatever else they could steal - and they are still there, just as the
Albinos in the Americas are still here. The current population of
Algeria is 44 million; Albinos say mostly Arab and Berber, but we know
better.
Wikipedia Main article: Ethnic groups in Algeria
Ethnic groups in Algeria
Arabs (73.6%)
Berbers (23.2%)
Arabized Berbers (3%)
Others (0.2%)
Arabs make up 73.6% of the population of Algeria, Berbers make up 23.2%, Arabized Berbers make up 3%, and others make up 0.2%.
Phoenicians, Romans, Byzantines, Arabs, Turks as well as other ethnic groups have contributed to the ethnic makeup and genetic
structure of the Algerian population.
If you Google "People of Algeria" these are the pictures that you will be presented with.
|
Above - there is portraits of Berbers and Arabs - do any of them look like THESE people?
|
|
LIBYA COLONY OF ITALY
The fourth infusion of Albino blood into North Africa.
Italy, which became a unified state only in 1860, was a late starter in
the race for colonies. For the Italians, the marginal Turkish provinces
in Libya seemed to offer an obvious compensation for their humiliating
acquiescence to the establishment of a French protectorate in Tunisia,
a country coveted by Italy as a potential colony. Italy intensified its
long-standing commercial interests in Libya and, in a series of
diplomatic manuevers, won from the major powers their recognition of an
Italian sphere of influence there. It was assumed in European capitals
that Italy would sooner or later seize the opportunity to take
political and military action in Libya as well.
In September 1911 Italy
engineered a crisis with Turkey charging that the Turks had committed a
"hostile act" by arming Arab tribesmen in Libya. When Turkey refused to
respond to an ultimatum calling for Italian military occupation to
protect Italian interests in the region, Italy declared war. After a
preliminary naval bombardment, Italian troops landed and captured
Tripoli on October 3, encountering only slight resistance. Italian
forces also occupied Tobruk, Al Khums, Darnah, and Benghazi.
In the ensuing months, the Italian expeditionary force, numbering
35,000, barely penetrated beyond its several beachheads. The 5,000
Turkish troops defending the provinces at the time of the invasion
withdrew inland a few kilometers, where officers such as Enver Pasha
and Mustafa Kemal (Atatürk) organized the Arab tribes in a resistance
to the Italians that took on the aspects of a holy war. But with war
threatening in the Balkans, Turkey was compelled to sue for peace with
Italy. In accordance with the treaty signed at Lausanne in October
1912, the sultan issued a decree granting independence to Tripolitania
and Cyrenaica while Italy simultaneously announced its formal
annexation of those territories. In the end, the Turks accepted a peace
settlement, and Libya was annexed to the Kingdom of Italy. The Italians
also occupied the island of Rhodes. Several hundred thousand Sicilians
and other southern Italians settled in Tripoli and its environs in the
decades to come. The sultan, in his role as caliph (leader of Islam),
was to retain his religious jurisdiction there and was permitted to
appoint the qadi of Tripoli, who supervised the sharia courts. But the
Italians were unable to appreciate that no distinction was made between
civil and religious jurisdiction in Islamic law. Thus, through the
courts, the Turks kept open a channel of influence over their former
subjects and subverted Italian authority.
But the Berbers were not done, in 1912 the Libyan hero Omar Mukhtar
(1862 - September 16, 1931), of the Mnifa tribe, near Tobruk in eastern
Barqa (Cyrenaica). Organized and for nearly twenty years, led a Berber
resistance to Italian occupation of Libya.
|
During the Italian war and occupation of Libya, about 50% (YES 50%!) of the Libyan population,
mostly Blacks, died in the struggle for independence, mainly in prison camps.
Demographics of Libya - from Wikipedia
Population - 7+ million
97% of Libya's population is made up of Arabs and Berbers, of which 92% are Arabs and 5% are Berbers.
GOOGLE PEOPLE OF LIBYA
|
Above - there is portraits of Berbers and Arabs - do any of them look like THESE people? |
|
War over the Truth Books
In America today there is a big war brewing about what schools are
allowed to teach White/Albino children. One parent complained that she
did not want Albino children taught that Albinos Hate Blacks. And maybe
she's right, I mean look at stupid me, I thought that if you kill us,
enslave us, brutalize us, deny us an education, deny us a decent
living, deny us the right to vote, then that meant that you hated us,
or at the least, didn't like us - silly me, looks like I got it all
wrong.
Dear Albino lady - THIS IS "NOT" LOVE! IT'S HATE!
|
|
Here is another:
New York Post Newspaper
Kids’ book ‘Our Skin’ in NYC schools blames racism on white people. By
Bernadette Hogan, Conor Skelding and Melissa Klein May 7, 2022
Quote: “A long time ago, way before you were born, a group of white
people made up an idea called race. They sorted people by skin color
and said that white people were better, smarter, prettier, and that
they deserve more than everybody else,” the book declares. It goes on
to say “That isn’t true or fair at all!”
Brooklyn parent leader Vito LaBella called the text “inflammatory.”
That page alone in my mind is just preaching hate, he said, referring
to the text about sorting people by skin color.
A Manhattan parent of a kindergartener saw the book in his son’s school this week in a box marked “Mosaic curriculum.” The dad said he looked through the book and stopped cold at the page saying white people invented race.
“The book itself is fine and a lot of what is said in the book is
productive and I think very helpful in a discussion of race,” he said.
“However, there’s just an excerpt from it that I think is so damaging
that it should disqualify the whole book.” “Racism should be talked
about, but it should be talked about correctly,” he said. “I think that
telling 5- and 6-year-olds that white people are all responsible
for all racism is not helpful. It’s going to be very traumatic for many
5- and 6-year-olds who are going to blame themselves and blame their
parents.”
THE ALBINO INVENTORS OF "RACE"
François Bernier (1625–1688)
is believed to have developed the first comprehensive classification of
humans into distinct races which was published in a French journal
article in 1684, Nouvelle division de la terre par les différentes
espčces ou races l'habitant, New division of Earth by the different
species or races which inhabit it. (Gossett, 1997:32–33). Bernier
advocated using the "four quarters" of the globe as the basis for
providing labels for human differences. The four subgroups that Bernier
used were Europeans, Far Easterners, Negroes (blacks), and Lapps.
Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752–1840)
divided the human species into five races in 1779, later founded on
crania research (description of human skulls), and called them
(1793/1795):
the Caucasian or white race.
Blumenbach was the first to use this term for Europeans, but the term
would later be reinterpreted to also include Middle Easterners and
South Asians.
the Mongolian or yellow race, including all East Asians.
the Malayan or brown race, including Southeast Asians and Pacific Islanders.
the Ethiopian or black race, including all sub-Saharan Africans.
the American or red race, including all Native Americans.
|
Remember this from above? Below is the verbatim entry for "Moor" on Encyclopaedia Britannica.
Quote: Europeans designated Muslims of any
other complexion as “White Moors,” despite the fact that the population
in most parts of North Africa differs little in physical appearance
from that of southern Europe (in Morocco, for example, red and blonde
hair are relatively common).
Now we answer the idiot from Encyclopaedia Britannica.
Daily Mail
https://www.dailymail.co.uk › news › article-484176
What are the blonde tribes of Morocco?
About 19 million Berbers live in Morocco, where they make up almost a third of the population.
Many of their ancient ancestors were Europeans - some of whom were brought to North Africa as slaves.
They also have lighter skin than many other Moroccans.
ON THE PAGE TITLED MOORS ON WIKIPEDIA WE FIND THESE PICTURES OF "MOORS"
|
|
|
|
|
The Moors request permission from James I of Aragón
|
|
Castillian
ambassadors attempting to convince Moorish Almohad king Abu Hafs Umar
al-Murtada to join their alliance (contemporary depiction from the
Cantigas de Santa María).
|
|
Depiction of the Moors in Iberia, from The Cantigas de Santa Maria
|
ANYBODY SEE ANY BLACK PEOPLE HERE???
I MEAN, BOTH BERBERS AND ARABS WERE BLACK PEOPLE,
SO WHERE ARE THE BLACK PEOPLE IN THESE PICTURES?
Ordinarily we get angry at the blatant racism exhibited by the assholes at wikipedia,
but now we are getting used to it, so it's up to you readers to put a stop to it.
|
A
large mural located on the ceiling of the Hall of Kings of the Alhambra
which possibly depicts the first ten sultans of the Nasrid dynasty. It
is a late-14th-century Gothic painting by a Christian Toledan artist.
The Nasrid dynasty was the
last Muslim dynasty in the Iberian Peninsula, ruling the Emirate of
Granada from 1230 until 1492. Its members claimed to be of Arab origin.
|
Well here we are, we started out to expose the pathetic Racism and Colorism of Hispanics
and what do you know, we wound up indicting just about all Albinos. Just goes to show,
when you follow the truth there is no telling where it will lead to.
Morocco Newspaper headline - Arab Barometer: 43% of Moroccans Consider
Anti-Black Racism a Problem, The data shows that almost a third of Moroccan
citizens state they were “targets of racist comments at least once.”
Morocco: UN expert urges action on anti-discrimination and racial equality commitments.
GENEVA (8 July 2019) – The Kingdom of Morocco must implement a comprehensive plan to
satisfy its obligations to eliminate discrimination and achieve racial equality,
the UN’s expert on racism and human rights said.
SOME MIGHT WONDER WHY THERE WOULD BE ANTI-BLACK PROBLEMS
IN A BLACK COUNTRY IN AFRICA WITH A BLACK, or at least MULATTO RULER?
Click here to link back to the original Maya page: >>