(Civics - the study of the rights and duties of citizenship)
In these days of Trump, where what used to pass for decent White people, have turned the world of civilized norms upside down. Where lie is truth, and once honored people, and cherished traditions of selfless public service, and rule of law is trampled at will, (though in the odd instance, career public servants are indeed corrupt). In these times, as we hear ignorant Albinos/Republican legislators, talk with contempt about “Liberal Democrats” we can't help but ask; “Just how stupid are these intellectually substandard White people/Albinos, and their comrades - head scratching Negro supporters of Trump”? Don't they understand that “Liberal democracy” is the foundation of the United States Constitution? Now of course we know and understand that their main interest is really the preservation of White/Albino power and superiority, but still, the words must be confronted – sorry head scratching Negroes, you got duped again.
White Supremacy is the belief that Whites are superior to pigmented people: (people with a disease (Albinism) Superior??).
White Nationalism is the belief that the U.S. should be an "EXCLUSIVELY" White Nation.
Notice that wherever Albinos go,
the first thing the try to do is kill off as many local people as they can,
then enslave the rest?
Why? They enslave pigmented people because below 40 degrees latitude, the Sun's Rays are too strong for them to work outside for long periods. Therefore they can't Farm, and therefore they can't raise their own food: if they didn't enslave pigmented others to do that for them, they would starve.
Which brings up WHY they always try to have exclusively White lands or White controlled lands.
On equal ground, Albinos would not be able to successfully compete with anyone!
That is why they constantly yearn for White Supremacy and White Nationalism:
They "NEED" a stacked deck.
Civilization founding Blacks have always understood the corrosive power of the lie. Though not in a class with the original founders of civilization: Sumer, Egypt, Elam, and Anatolia. The Persians who were still nomads up to about 1,100 B.C. quickly learned the value of honesty in governance. Here is what the great Black Emperor “Darius the Great” of Persia had to say about the lie.
Behistun Inscription: 55. (4.36-40.). Darius the King says: You who shall be king hereafter, protect yourself vigorously from the Lie; the man who shall be a Lie-follower, him do you punish well, if thus you shall think, "May my country be secure!"
64. (4.67-9.) Darius the King says: You who shall be king hereafter, the man who shall be a Lie-follower or who shall be a doer of wrong -- to them do not be a friend, (but) punish them well.
As reported by various media; Trump and his supporters have indeed created a crisis in America that could well tear it apart – guess Darius knew what he was talking about.
Head scratching Negroes and everyone else were of course floored when they realized that Mueller, Rod Rosenstein, and Barr colluded to Whitewash the Trump affair. Damn Democrats and the Press are easy to fool by those with “Aristocratic High-toned Airs” like Mueller. Even though we intuitively know that nobody is really “That straight-laced” we still fall prey because we “Want” to believe. Rod Rosenstein went on to say, "In politics — as in journalism — the rules of evidence do not apply.” The summary of the Mueller Report he wrote with attorney general William Barr was roundly criticized for including misrepresentations. Before going on to his reward, Rosenstein praised President Trump for his respect for the rule of law; he also criticized the FBI and Congress for leaks regarding the investigation.
Though not totally surprised by the outcome of the Mueller report, we must admit that the constant assurances that Mueller and Rosenstein were “Pillars of Public Service Virtue and Honesty” (by people who claimed to know), did have effect. So that by the end; we also were naively hoping for an honest outcome. But alas there were no innocents there; even Comey only investigated Hillary Clinton because he was frightened that if he did not, the Republicans in the Congress would investigate him.
Under the heading “Maybe the Meek WILL Inherit the Earth”. As a result of seats gained in the 2010 elections, Republicans in the House went on a rampage of investigations. It seemed that every House Committee was investigating Democrats somewhere, somehow. And they were completely ruthless and unapologetic about it. But out of all of those ravenous investigations, they got nothing and accomplished nothing.
Contrast that with Democrats when they took power; they seemed to be afraid of their own shadows, frightened to offend anyone – even when they were being fed B.S. like with Mueller and Rosenstein. But wonder of wonders, unlike the Republicans, their investigations may well yield results.
And of course the whole world now knows and understands that almost 250 years of American Albinos waxing poetic about their love of freedom and democracy, was simply them using high sounding words to hide their true base nature. (Those high sounding words were intended to hide the fact that America's birth may have been the most violent, murderous, and atrocity filled, in human history). Because of that, good people all over the world hoped that the high sounding words of Americas Albinos was real, and indicated their ability to rise above base nature and violent beginnings. But as we see today, when their position of power and total control is threatened, they return to their base nature and turn for comfort and support to the form of government most antithetical to Liberal Democracy – Russian Communism!
In that regard, American Republicans have become so brazen with their “Culture of Lies” that they have even given rise to a new Slang Term “Gaslighting”: (concept taken from the 1938 play of the same name), meaning to manipulate by doubling-down and constantly repeating the same lie: or in the words of the Marx Brothers (and others): “Who you gonna believe, Me or your own lying eyes?” Another take on Trump and his Republicans is the concept of the "Big Lie" as defined by Adolf Hitler: quote - a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously".
And of course, now that the Albino Rabble once again feel threatened, long after they lost the fight to keep Blacks from Voting. They once again seek to form "Secret Societies" to pursue their nefarious goals. But whereas in the past they were allowed to walk around in Hoods and Masks by sympathetic fellow Albinos, today that wouldn't be tolerated. So they have taken to flashing secret signs to identify each other: (the horizontal or inverted okay sign).
New York Times - by Michael Levenson - Dec. 20, 2019
Military officials said on Friday that their investigations had found that Army cadets and Navy midshipmen who flashed hand symbols during a nationally televised football pregame show last week were playing a juvenile game known as “the circle game,” and not making hand gestures associated with white nationalists and other hate groups.
The United States Military Academy and the United States Naval Academy announced the finding in separate statements, less than a week after reports that the cadets and midshipmen were making racist gestures during ESPN’s broadcast of the Army-Navy game.
Hah hah hah hah, sure, sure.
On 23 January 2016, presidential candidate Donald Trump stated the following during a campaign rally in Iowa: “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters.” Clearly - even BEFORE he was elected by the White racist, White supremacists elements of the American electorate: (because Blacks in mass, did not participate in the election). Donald Trump correctly assumed by their acceptance of him, that his Albino people were going to give him “Despotic”, Not just Kingly, but Despotic Powers – because they were that afraid of losing power. Luckily rational Americans, Albino and otherwise, have objected to Trump and his minions, and they will impeach him.
But the fact of his supporter's ignorance of the true meanings of their own propaganda is so troubling that we felt it necessary to inform our readers of common basics of civics, so they will know and understand the various forms of governance, and not be like ignorant Albinos and their Republican Legislators who don't even know what they are lying about. To that end we have compiled this little cheat sheet.
First – the U.S. Constitution is based on the English Magna Carta. The English with their Magna Carta had sought to limit Kingly power in 1215. Proper name: Magna Carta Libertatum (Medieval Latin for "the Great Charter of the Liberties"), commonly called Magna Carta is a charter of rights agreed to by King John of England at Runnymede, near Windsor, on 15 June 1215. First drafted by the Archbishop of Canterbury to make peace between the unpopular King and a group of rebel barons, it promised the protection of church rights, protection for the barons from illegal imprisonment, access to swift justice, and limitations on feudal payments to the Crown, to be implemented through a council of 25 barons – but it did not last.
Later - jurists such as Sir Edward Coke used Magna Carta extensively in the early 17th century, arguing against the divine right of kings propounded by the Stuart monarchs. Both James I and his son Charles I attempted to suppress the discussion of Magna Carta, until the issue was curtailed by the English Civil War of the 1640s and the execution of Charles.
Pay close attention to Mary, note that she is a "Nappy-Headed" Black woman whose picture has been "Whitenized". Note also who her relatives are.
Mary, Queen of Scots, also known as Mary Stuart or Mary I of Scotland, reigned over Scotland from 14 December 1542 to 24 July 1567. Mary, the only surviving legitimate child of King James V of Scotland, was six days old when her father died and she acceded to the throne.
Sadly the Stuart's were Black Kings, (as can clearly be seen from these Portraits that luckily were not destroyed by Cromwell), and the English Civil Wars were the means by which the Albinos usurped Black rule and shipped surviving Black Britain's off to the Americas in Slavery. The "Thirty Years War" was how Black Rule on the Continent was usurped - likewise the survivors were shipped off to the Americas: see Black Britain section, (the British did most of the shipping).
The political myth of Magna Carta and its protection of ancient personal liberties persisted after the Glorious Revolution of 1688 (The Glorious Revolution, also called “The Bloodless Revolution,” took place from 1688 to 1689 in England. It involved the overthrow of the Catholic king James II, who was replaced by his Protestant daughter Mary and his Dutch nephew and Mary's husband, William III of Orange), until well into the 19th century. It influenced the early American colonists in the Thirteen Colonies and the formation of the American Constitution in 1787, which became the supreme law of the land in the new republic of the United States.
What - Albinos are degenerate liars?
Gee: I thought Trump was the only one!
What's that you say? The British Monarchy was until recently Black, as was ALL European Rulers - Preposterous! Well the only thing Preposterous is Albinos thinking that they could carry on their made-up history indefinitely. And the hilarious part is that their lies are being debunked by other Albinos who innocently believe they are only reporting history, and never guessing at what the real truth is behind their revelations. Long ago innocent Albinos reported that the first Europeans were Black. Then they reported that White people came from Asia. And of course after those revelations, other Albinos tried to come up with explanations of how all of that could not be. Of course only the really stupid or desperate accepted their nonsense.
Many pages here at Realhistoryww are dedicated to explaining and giving examples of how Albinos All over the World have destroyed ancient artifacts depicting the real Black people of Places and Times, and replaced them with fake artifacts with the same people depicted as Albinos.
Of course that is very hard to believe: After all, what kind of people would uniformly dedicate themselves to creating a FAKE history for themselves, complete with millions of FAKE artifacts depicting themselves as the heroic Black people of history? Albinos - that's who!
By Ben Arnold Yahoo Movies UK - December 23, 2019.
Terry Gilliam (director and former Monty Python member), has torn into Black Panther, saying he hated the movie, slating its message of positivity and questioning whether the filmmakers even went to Africa. In an interview with “Indiewire”, he said that watching it 'made my blood boil'. “I hated Black Panther, It makes me crazy,” he said. “It gives young black kids the idea that this is something to believe in. Bullshit. It’s utter bullshit. I think the people who made it have never been to Africa. Take a few moments to think about the highlighted part of his statement above:
Here is Terry Gilliam wearing a kente cloth Jacket to show his oneness with Blacks. But the reality is that this Albino is a degenerate liar and Racist! And worst of all, we don't think the dumb bastard even understands what he really is.
Remember when the San Francisco 49ers suspended announcer Tim Ryan following comments Ryan made about Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson? Remember how many Black mates of Ryan came forward to say he wasn't racist? That's how Albinos like Gilliam get over - dumb Negroes.
A few points - here we are talking about Thomas Cromwell, 1st Earl of Essex, (1485–1540): Not Oliver Cromwell (1599–1658): Who served as Lord Protector of the Commonwealth of England, Scotland, and Ireland "and of the dominions thereto belonging" from 1653 until his death.
Please remember that ALL of those Portraits in the National Portrait Gallery, St Martin's Place, London: DATED BEFORE Cromwell's death, are WHITE FAKES painted After his death!
As to the illuminated Religious Manuscripts in the British Library, we don't know what to say about them, some depict Blacks, which means that they are authentic (Albinos don't make fake artifacts depicting Blacks - obviously). But then again, even some of them show obvious "Whitenizing". And there is entirely too many of them that show Albinos, for them to be authentic - Blacks brought Christianity to the British Isles, therefore religious artifacts should be showing Blacks, not Albinos.
The illuminated Religious Manuscripts in the British Library should also reflect this truth...but they don't! Therefore those that don't, must be fakes.
The British Empire grew out of the colonial and trading ventures of Great Britain in the eighteenth century, and by the early twentieth century, it had become history's largest empire, covering a quarter of the world's surface—so large that the “sun never set” on the British Empire.
The republic (Latin: res publica, meaning “public affair”) is a form of government in which the country is considered a "public matter", not the private concern or property of the rulers. The primary positions of power within a republic are attained, through democracy, oligarchy, autocracy, or a mix thereof, rather than being unalterably occupied.
Antonyms: (a word opposite in meaning to another ), for republic.
Autocracy, dictatorship, monarchy, autarchy, tyranny, monocracy, despotism, totalitarianism.
Despotism is a form of government in which a single entity rules with absolute power. Normally, that entity is an individual, the despot, as in an autocracy, but societies which limit respect and power to specific groups have also been called despotic.
Oligarchy (from Greek ???a???a meaning 'few', and (arkho), meaning 'to rule or to command') is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people. These people may be distinguished by nobility, wealth, education or corporate, religious, political, or military control. Such states are often controlled by families who typically pass their influence from one generation to the next, but inheritance is not a necessary condition for the application of this term.
An autocracy is a system of government in which a single person or party (the autocrat) possesses supreme and absolute power. The decisions of this autocrat are subject to neither external legal restraints nor regularized mechanisms of popular control (except perhaps for the implicit threat of a coup d'état or mass insurrection). Absolute monarchies (such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Eswatini, Brunei, and Oman) and dictatorships (such as Turkmenistan, Eritrea, Equatorial Guinea, Belarus, and North Korea) are the main modern-day forms of autocracy.
Both totalitarian and military dictatorship are often identified with, but need not be, an autocracy. Totalitarianism is a system where the state strives to control every aspect of life and civil society. It can be headed by a supreme leader, making it autocratic, but it can also have a collective leadership such as a commune, junta, or single political party.
Democracy (Greek: demokratía, literally "rule by people") is a form of government in which the people have the authority to choose their governing legislation.
Albinos like to attribute all advanced societal systems (in this case Democracy) to the Greek and Roman Civilizations, because the have convinced themselves that THEY were Greeks and Romans. They were not! As were ALL advanced Civilizations, those civilizations were Black! However, as usual, Albinos can take credit for destroying Black Civilizations. In the case of Democracy, that was invented by one of the two "Founding" Civilizations of Man: Sumer and Egypt.
Ancient Sumers civic structure was comprised largely of freemen, who met in concert to govern themselves. The citizens initially held power, and decisions were made in an assembly. In times of need, such as war, a lugal (big man) was elected only for the duration of that threat. Over time however, this position became permanent and hereditary, a kingship: father to son.
The major difference between a democracy and a republic is that a republic is a form of government whereas a democracy is an ideology that helps shape how a government is run. Put another way: a republic is the system of government that allows a country to be democratic!
What is a Republican Government? The government of Rome was called a republican government.
The Founders read that republican government was one in which:
1) The power of government is held by the people. 2) The people give power to leaders they elect to represent them and serve their interests. 3) The representatives are responsible for helping all the people in the country, not just a few people.
Liberal democracy is a liberal political ideology and a form of government in which representative democracy operates under the principles of classical liberalism. Also referred to as Western democracy, it is characterized by elections between multiple distinct political parties, a separation of powers into different branches of government, the rule of law in everyday life as part of an open society, a market economy with private property and the equal protection of human rights, civil rights, civil liberties and political freedoms for all people. To define the system in practice, liberal democracies often draw upon a constitution, either formally written or uncodified, to delineate the powers of government and enshrine the social contract. After a period of sustained expansion throughout the 20th century, liberal democracy became the predominant political system in the world.
As shown by Trump and his supporters: in America today, the chief lovers of Liberal Democracy and the constitution are Americas Blacks. They are descended from the ancient inventors of all advanced forms of Government, while the Albinos were still illiterate Nomads in Asia.
Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterized by social ownership of the means of production and workers' self-management as well as the political theories and movements associated with them. Social ownership can be public, collective or cooperative ownership, or citizen ownership of equity. There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them, with social ownership being the common element shared by its various forms (Social ownership is the opposite of Private ownership).
Communism is a philosophical, social, political, and economic ideology and movement whose ultimate goal is the establishment of a communist society, which is a socioeconomic order structured upon the ideas of common ownership of the means of production and the absence of social classes, money, and the state.
Communism includes a variety of schools of thought, which broadly include Marxism and social anarchism (anarcho-communism), as well as the political ideologies grouped around both. All of these share the analysis that the current order of society stems from its economic system, capitalism; that in this system there are two major social classes; that conflict between these two classes is the root of all problems in society; and that this situation will ultimately be resolved through a social revolution. The two classes are the working class—who must work to survive and who make up the majority within society—and the capitalist class—a minority who derives profit from employing the working class through private ownership of the means of production. The revolution will put the working class in power and in turn establish social ownership of the means of production, which according to this analysis is the primary element in the transformation of society towards communism. Communists are ideologically and fundamentally opposed to class collaboration, advocating for class struggle and generally favoring a classless society instead.
Fascism is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultra-nationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. The first fascist movements emerged in Italy during World War I. “Benito Mussolini came up with the term fascism, he created the first one-party fascist state and he set the playbook and template for everything that came after,” Ben-Ghiat says (She is a scholar on fascism and authoritarian leaders). In fascist thought, the principle of Class Collaboration is combined with strong ultra-nationalism. The stability and the prosperity of the nation was seen as the ultimate purpose of collaboration between classes. An important part of that was the cult of personality that emerged around the Italian leader (compare the cult of personality that emerged around Trump).
In the words of Benito Mussolini, fascism "affirms the irremediable, fruitful and beneficent inequality of men". Given this premise, fascists conclude that the preservation of social hierarchy is in the interests of all classes and therefore all classes should collaborate in its defense. Both the lower and the higher classes should accept their roles and perform their respective duties. Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete.
Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty, consent of the governed and equality before the law. Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support limited government, individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), capitalism (free markets), democracy, secularism, gender equality, racial equality, internationalism, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion.
Fascists regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties. Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society. Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature and views political violence, war and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation. Fascists advocate a mixed economy, with the principal goal of achieving autarky (national economic self-sufficiency) through protectionist and interventionist economic policies.Conservative definition - holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion.
Reactionary definition - opposing political or social liberalization or reform. A reactionary can be defined as a person or entity holding political views that favor a return to a previous political state of society that they believe possessed characteristics that are negatively absent from the contemporary status quo of a society. As an adjective, the word reactionary describes points of view and policies meant to restore a past status quo. Example: Trump – Make America great again.
Take these loonies seriously: They're not kidding, they would gladly kill their fellow countrymen to avoid loosing their delusional sense of superiority. They did it before, and they will do it again.
According to historian David Rubenstein's book “The American Story” John Wilkes Booth originally intended to kidnap Abraham Lincoln. But after hearing Lincoln suggest that Blacks might be allowed to VOTE, Booth resolved to never let that happen, so he decided to murder Lincoln. Booth of course realized that if Blacks were allowed to vote without restrictions, with their great numbers hidden in every crevice of The United States due to their fear of Slavery and general distrust of Albinos, they would quickly wield great political power if allowed to vote. Booths fear was of course well founded, so after their defeat, Albinos in the South responded with “Jim Crow” laws. In other parts of the country, different methods were used to deny or suppress the Black Vote.
Choosing safety over possible political power, voter suppression was made easy by Blacks in the U.S. by them blending into the Background to avoid confrontations with Albinos who had the Military, the Police, and all the Guns; and whom they knew from experience, would gladly kill them. The chief way they had to disappear from the national consciousness was to NOT take part in the National Censuses. Officially, if people were not counted, then they weren't there, they didn't exist. This suited the Albinos fine indeed: in a so-called Democratic society, voting numbers mean political power, and political power means Military and Police power – which adds up to Total Power. So imagine the shock Albinos suffered when they saw all of those “Non-existent” Blacks came out of the woodwork to vote for Barack Obama. Their response was to cozy-up to the Russians who they saw as “Fellow travelers” in the fight for White Supremacy. Just how frightened Albinos are of the future, is told by the election of Donald Trump and the fact that they are willing to sacrifice all of their former virtuous beliefs to keep him in power.
America in the summer of 1919 ran red with blood from racial violence, and yet today, 100 years later, not many people know it even happened.
It flowed in small towns like Elaine, Arkansas, in medium-size places such as Annapolis, Maryland, and Syracuse, New York, and in big cities like Washington and Chicago. Hundreds of African American men, women and children were burned alive, shot, lynched or beaten to death by white mobs. Thousands saw their homes and businesses burned to the ground and were driven out, many never to return. It was branded "Red Summer" because of the bloodshed and amounted to some of the worst white-on-black violence in U.S. history. Beyond the lives and family fortunes lost, it had far-reaching repercussions, contributing to generations of black distrust of white authority.
Tulsa massacre Oka. 1921
Rosewood massacre Fla. 1923
Here is how the Albino Rabble hope to maintain power:
How many firearms are in the United States? The Small Arms Survey stated that U.S. civilians alone account for 393 million (about 46 percent) of the worldwide total of civilian held firearms. This amounts to "120.5 firearms for every 100 residents."
A Pew Research Center report from 2013 compiled in-depth statistics on people who said they owned guns or had guns in the household. It found that white males make up the bulk of America's gun owners. Example: Only 32 percent of Americans are white men. But white males make up 61 percent of gun owners.
|Click for Realhistoryww Home Page|