This is a specific subject page, dealing exclusively with, or primarily with, the subject in the title. Because of need, there are many such pages at RHWW: usually, but not always, linked to primary pages. For those in a hurry, they enable a quick summary of many important subjects. The menu for these pages is here: Click>>>







Barbados was the first super successful English economy based on Indenture and slavery in the new world. The settlement and development of Barbados, all happened at the same time that England was involved in many wars, including two civil wars, as it began to transition from Black to Albino rule. Perhaps it was at this time, with an eye toward Barbados, that the Albino people developed their systems of lies and subterfuge regarding issues of Race.

Background: In the beginning, as Humans started to leave Africa, included with the second (OOA) group were the Albinos of Caucasian phenotype Africans (Horn Africans, Dravidians (Indians) who were probably motivated by a quest for relief from the heat and burning Sunshine of southern Africa - and relief from the torment heaped upon them by normal Africans. Even today, superstitious Blacks of southern Africa; maim and mutilate Albinos in the ignorant belief that their body parts process magical properties, which they use in rituals. After they crossed the Arabian Peninsula and entered what is now India, the decided to head north and eventually ended up in Central Asia.

There they found a low sunlight intensity environment to their liking, and there they stayed, and flourished!

Then, at about 1,500 B.C. the Central Asian Albinos decided to start leaving their low sunlight intensity environment, and return to India as invading Aryans. Soon after, they headed WEST toward Europe. It can only be guessed at, but perhaps after Millennia in Central Asia, the Albinos forgot that they were Albinos, and what devastating effect strong Sunlight could have on them.

For after their conquest of Europe in the late medieval "Race Wars": Historically camouflaged as Civil Wars in Britain, and the supposedly Religious "Thirty Years Wars" on the continent. Note there really was a religious component to the "Thirty Years Wars": That being the original Black Europeans (Catholics) verses insurgent original Central Asian Albinos (Germanics & Slav's) under the banner of their newly created "PROTEST" or "Protestant" Religions. i.e. Anglican, Episcopalian, Presbyterian, Methodist, Lutheran, Baptist, Amish, Evangelicalism, Pentecostalism, Quakers, Seventh-Day Adventism, et al. After the conquest, the Catholic Church was also usurped, but the Slav's in the East (like the Rus (Russians), chose not to completely overhaul the Eastern Orthodox branch that they took from the Byzantines. As a result, their Holy icons still have "Dark" Skin. The later arriving Turks took over the Black Arabs newly created religion of Islam. After their conquest of Europe, the Albinos went on to conquer the entire WORLD, and each place they settled brought them the SAME problems: SUNBURN and SKIN CANCER. Because they don't belong in those places, their one and ONLY home is Central Asia!

Over the last several hundred years, the Albino people have greedily gobbled up as much of the world as they could. Not only for their material benefit, but because such command and control would allow them to create a new history for themselves, one which they could then "Force Feed" to the rest of the world. The original Albino people, being deficient of Melanin, could not venture very far from the Central Asian Homeland that they had claimed after the "Out of Africa" migrations. This because even in the Arctic regions, Sunburn is a danger due to reflected Sunlight off of the Snow.

Thus by the time the Albinos had acquired enough Melanin to venture out into the world, via admixture with Blacks in Eastern Europe, and The Dravidians of India, history had passed them by. The great civilizations had already been founded by Blacks, and all that was left to the Albinos was to learn as much as they could, and fit in. But as we now know, when people are in such a weak and inferior position, it makes them desperate for security, and capable of any atrocity in order to secure that which they consider to be safety. Blacks, having no knowledge of Racism: that is, alliances based on "Skin Color" rather than alliances based on Common State interests: And unaware of the Albinos "Self-conscious/Paranoid" sense of vulnerability, were completely unprepared for what was to come. As we know, the Albinos usurped Black rule all over the world, committed many expulsions and genocides against Blacks, and now claim to have been the people of Every Important Civilization on Earth - even civilizations where the Albinos in their "Purer State" could not survive. Today, some naive Negroes believe that this behavior is based on simple ignorance - the Albinos simply don't know any better - but that is NOT borne out by the facts. With the profusion of ancient Egyptian artifacts in European and American media today, which clearly shows what ancient Egyptians looked like:






The Albino man, in order to pump himself up, and make himself seem as fierce and indomitable as possible, had even taken the blame for atrocities that he did not commit. For many years he cultivated the notion that he had barged into Africa, and taken slaves at will. Only later, with the apologies of descendants of the former Slave Empires of Africa, do we find out that the Albinos simply bought Slaves from them. However, being idiots themselves, the Africans would soon be overcome and colonized by the Albinos. Their sins being not only cruelly and uncaringly selling their own kind, but being negligent in not acquiring firearms - the first of which were invented in Egypt circa 1250, and later used at the battle of Ain Jalut in 1260 A.D, the descendants of which were readily available in North Africa.

Clearly then, Albino history is rife with inaccuracies and lies of every kind. Since Albinos control most of the relevant artifacts and texts, all that is left to us is to try and piece together the truth, from the few pieces of evidence that are available to us.

The history of Barbados is the perfect example of Albinos exercising their power over media and information to disseminate as history, whatever they feel shows them as the important people of the world, the powerful people, the people at the center of everything. But even more importantly, to hide the existence of the Black original settlers of Europe: they who ruled the Albinos, and now are gone from Europe, victims of expulsions and Genocide. And those Black Europeans who survived in the "New World" all too often, having lost their history - but not always: are taught that they are Africans. Truth and facts are of no consequence to the Albinos, all that matters is that Albinos be seen as on top, always on top, and the Black man in general, but especially the Black European, must be written out-of-history. Of course, with each Albino institution having it's own license to say whatever it wants in that regard, the various versions of Barbados history vary widely.

Key to the Albinos version of history is that Black = Slave. Thus when a picture of a Black European appears, the Albino will declare that the Black person is a Slave or a Servant. But that is not true, and never was true. Note - the word Slave is derived from the name of certain Central Asian Albino tribes who entered Europe circa 2nd century A.D. - The Slav's. {Please see the relevant page, or the video, "Black History in Europe - A Synopsis" for more on the original Europeans}.

As to who were Slaves, up until the twentieth century, Berber Pirates were taking and enslaving Albino Europeans at will, and in huge numbers: These Pirates destroyed thousands of French, Spanish, Italian and British ships, and long stretches of coast in Spain and Italy were almost completely abandoned by their inhabitants, discouraging settlement until the 19th century. From the 16th to 19th century, pirates captured an estimated 800,000 to 1.25 million Europeans as slaves, mainly from seaside villages in Italy, Spain, and Portugal, but also from France, Britain, the Netherlands, Ireland and as far away as Iceland and North America.






Raisuni - "The last of the Barbary Pirates"

Wiki article:

Mulai Ahmed er Raisuni (1871-April 1925[?]) was the Sharif (descendant of Mohammed) of the Jebala tribe in Morocco at the turn of the 20th Century, and considered by many to be the rightful heir to the throne of Morocco. While regarded by foreigners and the Moroccan government as a brigand, some Moroccans considered him a heroic figure, fighting a repressive, corrupt government, while others considered him a thief. Historian David S. Woolman referred to Raisuni as "a combination Robin Hood, feudal baron and tyrannical bandit." He was considered by many as "The last of the Barbary Pirates".





In 1904, Raisuni was propelled onto the international stage during what was to be known as the "Perdicaris Incident." This is when he kidnapped the Greek-American expatriate Ion Perdicaris and his stepson Cromwell Varley and held them for a ransom of $70,000. American President Theodore Roosevelt, then running for re-election, made political capital out of the incident, sending a squadron of warships to Morocco to force Abdelaziz's compliance with Raisuni's demands, famously proclaiming "Perdicaris Alive or Raisuli Dead!" After a near-confrontation between the government of Morocco and troops of the United States of America, Raisuni received his ransom money and concessions; he was appointed Pasha of Tangier and Governor of Jibala province, and all of his imprisoned followers were released. However, Raisuni was ousted from the post in 1906 due to corruption and cruelty to his subjects; a year later he was again declared an outlaw by the Moroccan government.

An American film titled "The Wind and the Lion" ( 1975): was made about Mulai Ahmed er Raisuli - the last of the Berber Barbary pirates. In the movie Ion Perdicaris was replaced by his wife Ellen as the kidnap victim, and of course in the "Fantasy" world of Albino history, there were no Blacks, only Albinos and their "close" mulattoes.



Since there is currently no truthful and accurate history of Barbados, we will first offer conventional Albino accounts, and then offer researched material, both text and artifact: and common sense logic too, which contradicts and corrects the Albino accounts. This leads to a more truthful and realistic picture of what actually happened in Barbados.



Barbados Society

Encyclopedia Britannica

Society in Barbados was composed of three categories of persons: free, indentured, and enslaved. “Race” was a central determinant of status. There were three “racial,” or ethnic, groups—whites, coloureds (those of part-European and part-African parentage or ancestry), and blacks. Some whites were free and some were indentured; some coloureds were free and some were enslaved; and some blacks were free and some were enslaved. No whites were enslaved.




Ha, ha, ha, ha: Continuing on with Britannica's nonsense....


There was a twofold population movement between 1640 and 1700. Many small family farms were bought up and amalgamated into plantations. Consequently, there was a significant emigration of whites to Jamaica and to the North American colonies, notably the Carolinas. At the same time the Royal African Company (a British slaving company) and other slave traders were bringing increasing numbers of African men, women, and children to toil in the fields, mills, and houses. The ethnic mix of the population changed accordingly. In the early 1640s there were probably 37,000 whites and 6,000 blacks; by 1684 there were about 20,000 whites and 46,000 blacks; and in 1834, when slavery was abolished, there were some 15,000 whites and 88,000 blacks and coloureds. (Those statistics are of course meaningless).

Encyclopedia Britannica is typical of Albino sources, some truth, some falsehood. Example, they say no Whites were enslaved, but the central element of false conventional Barbados history, is that White Indentures, and White Slaves, started the Islands Sugar Economy. Of course there are a myriad of sources which document that Whites were indeed enslaved. (Hiding the fact that they enslaved their own, is a common behavior of today's Albinos). At least E.B. was careful not to say that all Blacks were Africans.





Barbados and Andrea Stuart’s ‘Sugar in the Blood’

Quote: "By century’s end, 80 percent of Barbados’s 85,000 inhabitants were Africans, giving rise to a rigid racial hierarchy: a small elite of whites on top; the masses of black workers on bottom; and, somewhere in between, a small caste of illegitimate mixed-race children, born to masters and their preyed-upon female slaves."

Sadly, if Andrea Stuart had just done a little research, instead of blindly accepting whatever the Albinos told her, she might have read this:




Link to Book online


Obviously, if only 7% of Barbados's Black slaves were Africans, then the other 93% MUST have been Europeans. Who were they, and where did they come from?


Immigrant Ships Transcribers Guild - Volume 1 - Jacobite Rebellion Ships

Between 1650 and 1775, many thousands of Scots were banished to the American colonies for political, religious, or criminal offenses. Following the English Civil War, Cromwell transported thousands of Scots soldiers to Virginia, New England and the West Indies. An additional 1700 Scots were expelled as enemies of the state after the Covenanter Risings and 1600 men, women and children were banished as a result of the Jacobite Rebellions of 1715 and 1745. A directory of Scots banished to the American plantations is available at Genealogical Publishing Company. Mr. Dobson, author, provides a list of these banished Scots who are the ancestors of thousands of Americans living today. (These people were of course mostly Black Europeans rebelling against the Albinos usurpation of power. See, Black Britain and History of the Holy Roman Empire sections).

The Jacobite Risings were a series of uprisings, rebellions, and wars in Great Britain and Ireland occurring between 1688 and 1746. The uprisings were aimed at returning James VII of Scotland and II of England (the second son of Charles I), and later his descendants of the Black House of Stuart, to the British throne after he was deposed by Parliament during the Revolution of 1688. The series of conflicts takes its name from Jacobitism, from Jacobus, the Latin form of James.








Jacobites, Redlegs, Indentures and House-Crackers





Short Sketches of Jacobites
The Transportation's in 1745



Click here for link to the free on-line book


There is also a page of pertinent pages from the book in the specific subject page area - click link at the Top above.


Below are excerpted pages from the book which tend to

illuminate the racist lies created by the Albinos

i.e. No Black Britain's, No Black royals, No Black Europeans, Blacks in the Americas are Africans etc.














In the page above, mention is made of the 1715 Jacobite upraising.

Here also we have documentation of what happened to those people.



This information is taken from "Immigrant Ships Transcribers Guild"



Jacobite Rebellion Ships

Ship Scipio
Liverpool, England to Antigua/Virginia, the Americas. Leaving Liverpool 30 March 1716 with 95 Prisoners.

Ship Wakefield
Liverpool, England to South Carolina, The Americas. Leaving Liverpool April 21, 1716 with 81 Prisoners.

Briggantine (type of ship) Two Brothers
Liverpool, England to Jamaica, West Indies, leaving Liverpool April 26, 1716 with 47 Prisoners, AND to Montserrat, June 1716 (unconfirmed):

Ship Susannah
Liverpool, England to South Carolina, the Americas, leaving Liverpool 7 May 1716 with 104 Prisoners.

Ship Friendship of Belfast
Liverpool, England to Annapolis (Maryland), Departing Liverpool May 24, 1716 with 81 Prisoners, Arriving Annapolis August 20, 1716. (Almost 3 Months, what was the delay?).

Ship Hockenhill
Liverpool, England to St. Christophers, Leeward Islands, West Indies. Leaving Liverpool June 25, 1716 with 30 Prisoners.

Ship Elizabeth and Anne
Liverpool 29 June 1716 - Quote: the arrival list of 113 rebels reported from Yorktown, Virginia, 14 January 1716, is both different and shorter than the departure list of 127 rebels reported leaving Liverpool, England, 29 June 1716 aboard the "Elizabeth and Anne". (Dates are obvious transcribing error).

Ship Goodspeed
Liverpool 14 July 1716 - A List of 54 Rebel Prisoners bound for Virginia.


Ship Anne
Liverpool, England to Virginia, the Americas. Date of Arrival: 31 July 1716 with 18 Prisoners.


Ship Africa Gally
Liverpool, England to Barbadoes, West Indies. Leaving Liverpool July 15, 1716 with {1 PRISONER}.
"Innis & Ayston to be transported Liverpool 15 July 1716 Recd James Innis, a Rebel Prisoner on board the Africa, Richd. Cropper Mar. for Barbadoes, and James Ayston, a Rebel Prisoner on board the Elizabeth and Anne, Edward Trafford Ma. for Virginia (in order to be transported) as witness our Hands Richd. Gildart Hrn: Trafford". Each ship carried only one prisoner, and they were split-up as far apart as they could be. Suggesting that James Innis and James Ayston were very important leaders.





Nothing more is known of James Ayston (above). But the fact that so circumspect a method was used to deliver him, ALONE, to Barbados instead of his being executed with other officers (see linked page of Jacobite trials), suggests that both James Ayston and James Innis were TRAITORS, who sold-out their own comrades to Cromwell, in order to save their own skins.

Jacobite Rebellions of 1715 and 1745

Jacobite trials - Click the links labeled "Trial papers" to see the actual transcripts and details of the executions - when occurred: Also testimony of "Turncoats" trying to save their own skins.

As to James Innes, the following is taken from "The Francis Corbin Research Project". Quote: James Innes was among the 637 Scottish rebels sentenced to transportation to the American colonies as indentured servants for a 7 year term after being captured at Preston, Lancashire, on 14 November 1715. His home parish is given as City Edinburgh, and he was prisoner # 048 in Chester prison. He was transported on 15 July 1716 from Liverpool to Barbados on board the Africa Gally (listed as Ennis, Ja). He was the only prisoner carried on this ship, which indicates that he must have received special treatment: the other 636 were packed into nine ships, none headed to Barbados.

He may have chosen to go to Barbados because of already having relatives there: a James Innis had been buried in St James Parish on 14 July 1679; and another James Innis married Mary Roy in St Michael Parish on 22 July 1709. After the end of their indentures, many people moved from Barbados to the American mainland. No record has been found of James Innes' move from Barbados to North Carolina. The fact that people in Scotland later thought that he lived in South Carolina may indicate that he came into Carolina through Charleston.


Here is how Albino media handles the issue of White Indentures in Barbados.


Quote: During the winter of 1636, a ship bearing a consignment of 61 men and women destined to be slaves on the plantations of Barbados slipped quietly out of Kinsale Harbor on Ireland’s rugged southern coast. By the time Captain Joseph West’s ship arrived in the Caribbean in January 1637, eight of the 61 had died. The remainder were sold, including ten to the governor of Barbados, for 450 pounds of sugar apiece. Captain West was instructed to return to London to sell the sugar and then proceed to Kinsale to procure another cargo of Irish slaves. That first small trickle soon became a human flood.

It was a lucrative business. An Irish white slave could be sold in Barbados for between £10 and £35. In all, more than 50,000 Irish were transported from Ireland to Barbados (more were sent to other islands in the West Indies), many of them prisoners captured by Oliver Cromwell during the wars in Ireland and Scotland and following the Monmouth Rebellion. The slaves became known as Redlegs, almost certainly a reference to the sunburn they picked up in the hot tropical sun.

By the mid-1700s most were free, their places taken by Africans. However, minute books from the island show that no more than a fifth of those who were freed became farmers, owners, or artisans. The remainder formed a wretched, poor and isolated community. In 1689, the governor of Barbados, Colonel James Kendall, described the Redlegs as being “dominated over and used like dogs.” He suggested to the local assembly that the emancipated slaves be given two acres (0.8 hectares) of land, as was their due, but the assembly contemptuously turned down the request.

REDLEG - Wikipedia: Quote - Redleg is a term used to refer to poor whites that live on Barbados, St. Vincent, Grenada and a few other Caribbean islands. Their forebears came from Ireland, Scotland and the West of England. According to folk etymology, the name is derived from the effects of the tropical sun on their fair-skinned legs (AKA sunburn). However, the term "Redlegs" and its variants were also in use for Irish soldiers of the same sort as those later transported to Barbados by the English. The variant "Red-shankes" is recorded as early as the 16th century by Edmund Spenser in his dialogue on the current condition of Ireland. In addition to "Redlegs", the term underwent extensive progression in Barbados and the following terms were also used: "Redshanks", "Poor whites", "Poor Backra", "Backra Johnny", "Ecky-Becky", "Poor Backward Johnnie", "Poor whites from below the hill", "Edey white mice" or "Beck-e Neck" (Baked-neck). Historically everything besides "poor whites" was used as derogatory insults.


As always, showing Albino history and media sources to be lies is a large part of our efforts to correct history.

Firstly, men working the Caribbean Fields would NOT have their LEGS exposed, they were given PANTS. Albinos in the NORTH, who hazarded working fields, were called REDNECKS, because that is the part of the body that was exposed to the Sun.

As a visual clue to just how dangerous the Sun is to White people: this is how people in the former Slave States of the U.S. (which have much lower UV strength than the Caribbean), had to dress in order to work the fields.









Then do the comparison below.





As a visual clue, compare the Ultra Violet (UV) radiation of the Sun in Delaware U.S.A.

(Along with Maryland - the northern-most Slave states):

To the UV strength in Barbados.








Clearly then: if Whites/Albinos could not survive working the fields during the one crop growing season in the Chesapeake Bay Colonies, where the Highest UV radiation is the SAME as the LOWEST UV radiation in Barbados. Then they stood NO chance of surviving in Barbados, which has YEAR-ROUND crop growing seasons.


Logically then, these so-called "Redlegs" were Gardeners, Fisherman, or HOUSE-CRACKERS (our word play on the U.S. term "HOUSE-NIGGER"). If half of them died in Maryland, imagine how short a time they would last in Barbados, if they worked the fields as is claimed.










It would seem that for most Redlegs, admixture was an obvious solution to ensure posterity.







The following proclamation accompanied the Jaobite Prisoners...



Note: this is a "True Copy" of the proclamation with spelling errors intact.

The proclamation about the 80 Rebbells Transported in the Ship Friendship, read in Governor Hart's office, April 28th, 1717. At a Council held at his Excellency's house, in the City of Annapolis, the 28th day of August, in the third year of his Majesties Reign, And the first of his Lordship's Dominion. Anno Domini, 1716.

Present: His Excellency John Hart, Esquire, Captain General & Governor in Chief, The Honorable Thomas Brooke, Esquire, Coll: Wm. Holland, Coll: Wm. Coursey, Lt:Coll: Saml. Young, Tho. Addison, Phi. Loyd, Esquire, Lt: Coll: Richd. Tilghman, Coll: Thomas Smyth, of his Lordship's Council.”


“Whereas his most Sacred Majesty, out of his aabundant Clemency, has caused eighty of the Rebbells (most of them Scotsmen) lately taken at Preston, in Lancashire, to be transported from Great Brittain in this province, in the Ship Friendship of Belfast, Michael Mankin, Commander, and Signified to me his Royall pleasure by one of his principall Secretaries of State, that the said Rebbells, to the number aforesaid, should be sold to the Assignes of the Merchants, who should purchase them for the full Term of Seven Years and not for any lesser time. And that I should cause the said Rebbells to enter in to Indentures to performe such service, or otherwise grant the respective purchasers proper Certificates of their being so sold them by his Majesties royall Command, and cause the said Certificates to be recorded, the better to enable them to detain them, least they should at any time attempt to make their escape not being bound. It appearing to be his Majesty's pleasure the aforesaid Rebbells should continue in this province for & dureing the whole term and Space of Seven Years aforesaid. And, whereas, the said Rebells, Notwithstanding his Majesty's Clemency & Pleasure, signified as aforesaid, have Obstinately refused to enter into such Indentures, And that the greatest part of them already have been sold, And the rest will, in all probability, be disposed of with such proper Certificates, by me granted to the respective purchasers, as by his Majesty directed, In order to enable them to retake any such of them who may at any time hereafter attempt to make their Escape.

I have thought fitt, by and with the advice of his Lordship's Councill to Issue this my proclamation, Notifying the same and Straitly requiring, charging, & enjoyning all and Singular the Sherriffs, Constables, Magistrates & their Officers, within this province, Military and Civill. And also all and every the Inhabitants thereof to be very vigilant in putting in due execution the Act of Assembly of this province relating to runaway Servants, and to use their utmost endeavors upon any suspicion notice or discovery of any of the said persons transported, attempting or endeavouring to get out of this province before the Expiration of the full time of seven years from their arrivall here, viz: the 20th of August instant, to stop and prevent them from so doing, and to apprehend and cause such fugitive Rebbells to be returned to their respective masters and Owners, who have so bought and purchased them as aforesaid, after such manner as is used in this province for the apprehending, secureing & returning runaway Servants to their respective Masters, Dames or Owners, and foreasmuch as it may probably happen that some of the persons so transported as aforesaid by themselves or friends, may purchase or otherwise obtain their freedomes from their respective Masters or Owners, and attempt to go out of this province to some other plantation or province, where they may not be known, and consequently have the greater opportunity to returne to Great Brittain in order to pursue their wicked and rebellious practices and designs against his Majesty and the Protestant succession.

I do heareby, with the advice of his Lordship's Councill aforesaid, direct, require, and comand the aforesaid Sheriffs, Magistrates, Constables, and all other Officers, Civill and Military, within this province, to use their utmost endeavours to prevent the same by using all possible diligence to apprehend all or any of them who shall so attempt to escape out of this province contrary to his Majesty's Intention and to take Care that they be brought before myself or the Governour for the time being in order to oblige them to give good security not to go out of the province until the Expiration of the aforesaid time of seven years; and that all persons within this province may have due and sufficient notice hereof, and use their faithfull endeavours for the apprehending and discovering the said Rebells, who shall, or may endeavor or attempt to escape from their Masters' Service or otherwise go out of this province, I do hereby Strictly Charge & comand the severall Sherriffs of the respective Counties within this province, to cause this my proclamation to be published at all Court houses, Churches & Chappells and others the most publick and frequented places whereof they are not to fail at their perills. Given at the City of Annapolis, under the great Scale, this 28th day of August, in the third year of the Reign of our Sovr Lord George of Great Brittain, France and Ireland, King, defender of the faith, and the first year of his Lordship's Dominion &c., Anno Domini, 1716."

JNO. BEARD, Cl. Council.
Vera Copia. (Definition of COPIA VERA: In Scotch practice.) A true copy.



Just more proof that the Histories taught by Albinos is pure fantasy and delusion;

intended to obfuscate their murderous nature and Albinism.

Which may very well be, "Cause and Effect".












Typical Ships entry

Briggantine Two Brothers
Liverpool, England to Jamaica, West Indies
Liverpool April 26, 1716 to Montserrat, June 1716

1. John Duncan.
2. Duncan Bean.
3. John McIntyre.
4. Alex. Smith.
5. Denis McIntyre.
6. Robt. Handyside.
7. Alex. Duncan.
8. Danl. Smith.
9. Angus McDermott.
10. Alex. McLear.
11. John Kenneyday.
12. Jno. McCoy.
13. Danl. McLean.
14. Danl. Robertson.
15. Mich. Trumball.
16. John McCullum.
17. Denis McDonall.
18. John Cannon.
19. Geo. Moody.
20. Duncan Robartson.
21. John Stewart.
22. Alex. Kenneyday.
23. John Stewart.
24. Duncan McNormer.
25. James Carmell.
26. Alex. McNabb.
27. Alex. McClaser.
28. James Robartson.
29. Peter Ferguson.
30. John Robartson.
31. Duncan Stewart.
32. Robt. McCullaugh.
33. Duncan McGibon.
34. John McFarlin.
35. Geo. Mortimore.
36. Philip McDorton.
37. John Scott.
38. Willm. McDonald.
39. Alex. McPherson.
40. John McNabb.
41. Duncan Shorter.
42. Robt. Wallis.
43. John Stewart.
44. Angus McDermott.
45. Duncan McInlier.
46. Edwd McCann.
47. Angus McIntosh

Recd. the above fourty seven Rebel Prisoners wch. were Ship’d on board the Two Brothers Briggantine Capt Edwd. Rathbon Comandr. for Jamaica the 26th. April 1716 in order for Transportation as Witness our hands Richd. Gildart Hen: Trafford.

Ship Hockenhill
Liverpool, England to St. Christophers,
Leeward Islands, West Indies
Liverpool June 25, 1716

1. Andrew Ramsey

2. Mark Benerman

3. Arch^d Christye

4. Walter Steward

5. James Currey

6. Lawrence Charters

7. James Heys

8. John Ridley

9. James Congleton

10. Rob^t Creswell

11. Patrick Gardner

12. James Congleton

13. Patrick Murry

14. Will^m Henderson

15. Henry Ogleby

16. Tho^s Dalmohoy

17. Will^m Hardwick

18. Walter McLearne

19. Will^m Murry

20. John Robinson

21. Don Cameron

22. Alex. Kenneyday

23. Alex McIntosh

24. Kenedy Beane

25. Don^d McPherson

26. John McCoy

27. Will^m Ramsey

28. Thos McKensey

29. Law Oliphant

30. Alex^n Lawley

Recd. 25 June 1716 the thirty Rebel Prisoners, mentioned in the above List, on board the Hockenhill Capt. Hockenhill Short Comander (in order to be Transported) as Witness our hands Richd. Gildart Hen: Trafford.

  Ship Scipio
Liverpool, England to Antigua/Virginia, the Americas

Liverpool 30 March 1716

1 Jos. Asking
2 Jos. Aughinbeck
3 Wm. Ballintine
4 James Blare
5 Pau. Briggs
6 Geo. Burdis
7 Jos. Burtton
8 Danl. Campbell
9 James Campbell
10 Jos. Coute
11 David Cowty
12 Peter Cummin
13 Peter Cummin
14 Peter Derritt
15 Danl. Dovice
16 Alex. Duff
17 John Duncan
18 Cha. Erwinn
19 Frans. Ferguson
20 Ha. Fersyth
21 Jno. Fraizer
22 Jno. Glass
23 Jno. Glessen
24 Geo. Gortey
25 Wm. Hall
26 Wm. Howard
27 Ed. Hunt
28 John Kenneyday
29 Jno. Kerr
30 Jno. Lindsey
31 Chas. Londey
32 Jno. McCook
33 Danl. McCoy
34 Paul McCoy
35 Danl. McDanell
36 John McDermott
37 Jno. McGilveray
38 Lang McIntosh
39 Mail. McIntosh
40 Willm. McIntosh
41 Wm. McIntosh
42 Coul. McKenney
43 Peter McLane
44 Alex. McLearins
45 Alex. McLearn
46 Danl. McLearn
47 Jno. McLearn
48 Jno. McLearn
49 Danl. McPherson
50 Danl. McQuinn
51 Geo. Meldrem
52 James Morrison
53 Henry Murray
54 John Nicholson
55 James Nimmo
56 Jos. Oswell
57 Jos. Procter
58 Alex. Reed
59 Jos. Richey
60 Alex. Ridley
61 Jno. Ridley
62 Alex. Robertson
63 Danl. Robertson
64 Dunc. Robertson
65 Frans. Robertson
66 James Robertson
67 John Robertson
68 Hugh Ross
69 Walter Scott
70 Thos. Selbie
71 James Selkeld
72 Danl. Setton
73 Jno. Shaw
74 John Shields
75 John Sotherland
76 Alex. Stewart
77 Charles Stewart
78 Danl. Stewart
79 Danl. Stewart
80 Danl. Stewart
81 John Stewart
82 John Stewart
83 John Stewart
84 John Stewart
85 William Stewart
86 Jos. Strock
87 James Taylor
88 Thos. Tett
89 Wm. Thorburn
90 John Todd
91 Petr. Watson
92 Wm. Watson
93 Wm. Watson
94 Willm. Woofe
95 Wm. Young

"Recd. 30 March 1716 ninety five Rebel Prisoners (according to
the above list) on board the Scipio John Scaisbrick Comr. in order
for transportation. Richd. Gildart Hen. Trafford.

On the same CO 5 190, page 369 in the summary information table:
95 rebels, shipped March 30th, Scipio, master Jno. Scasbick, bound
for Virginia.

Link to Transcribers Guild online

Note: Barbados current demographics are - Black 93%, White 3.2%, mixed 2.6%, East Indian 1% and other 0.2% (2000) census. CIA Factbook.










Whence the (‘Black Irish” of Jamaica? JOSEPH J. WILLIAMS, S.J., Ph.D., Litt. D.,
F.R.S.A., F.R.G.S., F.A.G.S. ($2.00, New York: Dial Press, 1932.)
Five years residence in Jamaica impressed Father Williams with the fact that
the Jamaica Negroes were unlike all other Negro types that he had seen. Particularly
among those of Gold Coast origin he found claims and remnants of
Judaism. His resultant studies led to his Hebrewisms of West Africa (1930).
But another outstanding fact was the large number of Negroes with pure Irish
names. These negroes could not be explained as descendants of slaves owned by
early Irish colonists, for no such names appear among the land-owners in the survey
of 1670. So Father Williams turns to English records of the crushing of the Irish,
by Cromwell, with consequent deportations of large numbers of Irish as bondmen
or bondmaids to the West Indies-especially Barbados, where such names as
Cavan, Collins, Connolly, Donovan, Duffey, Dunn, Grogan, Kelly, McCann,
McSwiney, McDermott, Moriarity, O’Brien, O’Neal, O’Halloran, Walsh, abound
in the old cemeteries. Father Williams gives pictures of Jamaica negro children
named Collins, Walsh, McKeon, McDermott, Burke, Mackey, McCormack,
Kennedy. His bibliography on the deportations and barbarities includes 175
sources. Beyond this his 100-page monograph does not go.





The Irish arrived in Jamaica over 350 years ago in the mid-1600s at the time of British Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell's capture of Jamaica. When British Admirals Penn and Venables failed in their expedition to take Santo Domingo from the Spanish, they turned their attention to Jamaica, not wanting to return to Cromwell empty-handed. With reinforcements from British-held Barbados (many of whom were Irish) they made quick work of dispatching the weak Spanish defence and soon realized that they needed workers to support their new prize. They looked eastward to islands already under British control, Barbados, St. Lucia, St. Kitts and Montserrat, and imported young, mainly male, bonded servants, many of whom were Irish.

In 1641 Ireland's population stood close to 1.5 million. Following a 1648 battle in Ireland known as the "Siege of Drogheda" in which Irish rebels were brutally subdued, Oliver's son, Henry, was named Major General in command of English forces in Ireland. Under his jurisdiction, thousands of Irish men and women were shipped to the West Indies to provide a source of indentured labour. Between 1648 and 1655, over 12,000 political prisoners alone were sent to Barbados. This was the first set to come involuntarily as prior to that the Irish had willingly chosen to subject themselves to terms of indenture for the chance to start a new life in the New World upon completion of their contracts.

By 1652, Ireland's population had dwindled to a little over half a million famine, rebellion and forced deportation, all factors.Throughout the early years of the 1650s there was a push to send young men and women to the colonies in what the English believed was a "measure beneficial to the people removed, who might thus be made English and Christians; and a great benefit to the West India sugar planters, who desired the men and boys for their bondsmen, and the women and Irish girls in a country where they had only Maroon women and Negresses to solace them" (Williams, 1932, pp. 10-11). The 13-year war from 1641-1654 had left behind large numbers of widows and deserted wives. In addition, many Irish men, their properties confiscated by Cromwell had no means of making a living. By 1655 some 6,400 Irish had been shipped off when in March all orders to capture "all wanderers, men and women and other such Irish in their possession" were revoked (Williams, pp. 12-13).


The first stop for many of the Irish, Catholic and non-Catholic, was Barbados where they worked from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. with a two-hour lunch break, under the command of an overseer. Shirt and drawers were their only clothes and their homes, cabins made of sticks and plantain leaves (Williams, 1932, p. 42).
Following the 1655 British conquest of Jamaica, Irish labourers were largely sent from Barbados as well as Ireland to get the island up and running under British control. Within a decade, when many Irish had served their terms or indenture, their names begin to appear among the lists of Jamaican planters and settlers (Williams, p. 53).


It is estimated that somewhere between 30,000 and 80,000 Irish were shipped from Ireland. One of the last shipments was made in 1841 from Limerick aboard the Robert Kerr. The Gleaner noted of these arrivals: "They landed in Kingston wearing their best clothes and temperance medals," meaning they did not drink alcohol (as quoted in Mullally, 2003, part 2, pg. 1). The Gleaner also noted of another set of arrivals in 1842: "The Irish are repeatedly intoxicated, drink excessively, are seen emerging from grog shops very dissolute and abandoned and are of very intemperate habits" (as quoted in Mullally, 2003, part 3, p. 2). So the Irish gained a reputation for being something of a mixed blessing ¬ saints and sinners.

However, other European immigrants did not seem to fare as well as the Irish in the tropical climate. In the mid-1830s, for example, when the government was particularly concerned about replacement labour for the newly-freed slaves on the sugar and coffee plantations, the over 1,000 Germans and close to 200 Portugese from Madeira, the Azores and Portugal notched a high mortality rate. The idea was to eventually create townships for the European immigrants in the island's highlands where the temperature was cooler and they would work as small farmers, labourers and artisans on coffee estates and cattle pens.

{Comment: Clearly Albino Europeans could not withstand working under the "Burning Caribbean Sun". This proves the lie that "Indentures" in the Caribbean were White}.

However, this would take time and in order to maintain pre-abolition levels of production, labour was needed in Jamaica's low-lands where the best land for sugar cultivation was located. Hence the implementation of bounties for European immigrants and the institution of ships like the Robert Kerr, known as "man-traps" and sub-agents who wandered into quiet Irish towns and attracted people with the promise for free passage, high wages and the hope of bettering their lives. The immigration of Europeans never filled the abolition labour gap and so by 1840 the government began to look to the Maltese, the free Negroes in the United States and the Asians. In 1842 laws to break up what had been completed of the townships were passed and the idea of highland colonization was abandoned.





Since the actual history of Barbados is not the issue here, we merely wish to familiarize everyone with Barbados history. Thus we will use the history of Barbados (edited to save space) done by one John R. Moore - whose race is unknown.


Barbados History

by John R. Moore

Arawaks - Caribs

Barbados, called Ichirouganaim by the Native American nomads commonly known as Amerindians, has been inhabited from as far back as 1623 B.C. or 4000 years ago, according to recent archaeological discoveries unearthed at a site at Port St. Charles. The first movement of Native Americans known as the Saladoid-Barrancoid, came from Venezuela - South America, and crossed the Atlantic Ocean in dugout canoes to reach Barbados around 350 c.e. They were farmers, fishermen, and ceramists.

The second movement of Amerindian migrants known as the Lokono or Arawak, arrived around 800 c.e. The Arawaks were a short tribe of agriculturalists who grew cotton, cassava, guavas, corn, papaws, and peanuts. They also used harpoons, nets, and hooks to fish.

BARBADOS: Carib The third movement of migrants from South America were the Caribs who were a taller and more violent Amerindian tribe than the Arawaks. The Spanish called this tribe "Caribes" (Caribs) which means cannibals, the word from which the region got its name Caribbean. The Caribs were exceptionally precise bowmen who utilized potent venom to paralyze their victims. They were a warlike, savage group who were said to have barbecued their captives and washed them down with cassava beer. Textbooks continue to promote this legend of Carib cannibalism, but in fact human flesh was not actually eaten as food, but was used as a ritual practice to gain control over the dead enemies' or ancestors' qualities. This type of ritual was usually performed prior to a raiding mission or during an induction, when it was believed that young men would take over the spirit of an illustrious warrior.

The Arawaks were a peace-loving tribe who lived on one side of the island, while the Caribs occupied the other side. Around 1200 AD both the Arawak and the Salodoid-Barrancoid inhabitants were displaced by the warrior-natured Carib Indians whose control lasted for almost 300 years, until Amerindian existence was disrupted in 1492 by the Spanish conquistadors who began capturing them throughout the Caribbean to work on plantations as slaves.

The Caribs soon disappeared off the island as a result of emigration to other islands to escape enslavement, famine, the contagious European small pox and tuberculosis brought in by the conquerors, abduction to and enslavement in larger islands by the Spanish who systematically captured and took them to Hispaniola to work in gold mines as slave labourers. This combination of events left the island desolate by the time the first British ship arrived. (The evidence suggests that Europeans were unable to enslave or completely enslave, Black Indians/Native Americans).






Hispaniola = Haiti/Dominican Republic







The Taíno people were among the indigenous people of the Caribbean and Florida. At the time of European contact in the late 15th century, they were the principal inhabitants of most of Cuba, Trinidad, Jamaica, Hispaniola (Haiti and the Dominican Republic), and Puerto Rico. In the Greater Antilles, the northern Lesser Antilles, and the Bahamas, they were known as the Lucayans. They speak the Taíno language (one of the Arawakan languages).

The ancestors of the Taíno entered the Caribbean from South America and their culture is closely linked to that of Mesoamericans. At the time of contact, the Taíno were divided into three broad groups, known as the Western Taíno (Jamaica, most of Cuba, and the Bahamas), the Classic Taíno (Hispaniola and Puerto Rico) and the Eastern Taíno (northern Lesser Antilles), and other groups of Taíno nations of Florida, such as the Tequesta, Calusa, Jaega, Ais, and others. Taíno groups were in conflict with the Caribs of the southern Lesser Antilles.


Mesoamerica was a region and cultural area in the Americas, extending approximately from central Mexico to Belize, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and northern Costa Rica, within which pre-Columbian societies flourished before the Spanish colonization of the Americas in the 15th and 16th centuries. It is one of six areas in the world where ancient civilization arose independently, and the second in the Americas along with Norte Chico (Caral-Supe) in present-day northern coastal Peru.







Pedro a Campos gave the island the name "Os Barbados" when the Portuguese stopped by in 1536 en-route to Brazil, but choosing not to stay, left wild pigs behind that greeted the first British colonizers. It is believed that "Os Barbados" was derived from the Iberians' fascination with the hanging, aerial roots of the Bearded Fig Tree (A Ficus), which resembled a long, thick beard. "Barba" translates as"beard" and "barba-dos" translates as the "bearded ones", hence "Barbados." Another viewpoint points out that the reference was not to any trees on the island but to actual bearded men who may have been earlier Afrikan explorers, or their offspring through unions with the Amerindians.

It was not until May 14, 1625 that a ship stopped on the island as a result of the navigational blunders of Captain John Henry Powell, and after confirming that it was deserted, returned to England to formalize a plan to introduce a permanent settlement on the island. Two years later on February 17, 1627, a British ship carrying 10 African slaves and over 80 British colonists landed at a site called Jamestown now Holetown to claim the island in the name of king James 1st. This settlement was funded by Sir William Courteen, a London merchant who owned the title to Barbados and other unclaimed islands.

Courteen later lost his title to the Earl of Carlisle Bay in what was known as the "Great Barbados Robbery." Carlisle then chose Henry Hawley as governor, who laid the foundation for the first parliament - House of Assembly - in 1639, which along with a nominated advisory Council and the Governor of the island, ruled the island in partnership with the Anglican Church, the state sanctioned religion, establishing the third oldest parliament in the world following the British House of Commons, and the Bermuda House of Assembly.

Barbados' House of Assembly was always very loyal to the British crown, so when Charles I was executed in 1649, Barbados declined to accept the leadership of Oliver Cromwell, who as a result sent a fleet to seize control of Barbados in 1651. However, the settlers kept his forces at bay during six months of heavy resistance until he was forced to sign the Articles of agreement in Oistins town, Christ Church on January 11th 1652, which were later recognized as the Charter of Barbados by the Parliament in England.





Barbados had become a destination for military prisoners and Irish natives in the early years of the colony's growth. Oliver Cromwell"barbadosed" any Irish who refused to clear their land, while allowing other Irish to be kidnapped from the streets of Ireland and shipped to Barbados as slaves. Many West Country men were also exiled or "barbadosed" by Judge Jeffreys and were also sold as slaves or indentured servants to British planters, where they lived in slave conditions with no control over the number of years they had to serve.

The number of "barbadosed" Irish is not exact but estimates vary from as low as 12,000 to as high as 60,000. Persecuted Catholics from Ireland also worked the plantations. Barbados quickly acquired the largest white population of any of the English colonies in the Americas, and became the springboard for English colonisation in the Americas, also playing a leading role in the settlement of Jamaica and the Carolinas, while sending a steady flow of settlers to other destinations during the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. Not only did Barbados become the most populated of England's overseas colonies, but also one of the most heavily populated places in the world.

European indentured servants were the main source of labour during most of the island's history: as poor, uneducated labourers were recruited in England, Scotland, and Europe to work on tobacco and cotton plantations. Under the law these indentured servants could not be enslaved but were deemed tenants at will. They were not permitted to own the land they cultivated or to leave the plantation without permission from their employer. The harsh conditions of indentured servitude gradually made it more difficult for Barbadian tobacco and cotton planters to recruit white labour, causing the labour supply to drop, and the capacity of the island's tobacco and cotton producers
to compete with their international competitors to fall.






Cultivation of tobacco, cotton, ginger and indigo was handled primarily by European indentured labour until the start of the sugar cane industry in the 1640s, which was introduced by Pieter Blower in 1637. As sugar developed into the main commercial enterprise, Barbados was divided into large plantation estates that soon replaced the smaller holdings of the early British settlers by the wealthy planters.




However, with the disappearance of Carib populations combined with the skyrocketing cost of white labour in England, it meant that external labour had to be imported to work on the increasing number of sugar plantations. So, on the advice of Dutch and Sephardic-Jewish merchants, planters turned mainly to West Afrika as their source of manpower.

Captives Tribal clans from Ghana were imported in huge numbers as slaves into Barbados, with the Asante, Ga, Ewe, Fon and Fante tribes providing the bulk of those importations. Nigeria also provided slaves for Barbados with the Yoruba, Igbo, Efik, and Ibibio being the major ethnic clans targeted. The Ivory Coast, Benin, Sierra Leone, Guinea, Senegal/Gambia, Angola and Cameroon also supplied human cargo to Barbados. During the days of slavery and colonialism, these different Black African tribes intermarried among themselves and with the white British slave masters.

Barbados was a leading participant in the slave trade, and one of the most profitable European colonies in the world. In 1645, there were an estimated 5,680 Black slaves in Barbados, by 1667 there were more than 40,000, and by 1685, the numbers had grown to around 60,000. In 1700 it was estimated that there were about 135,000 African-born slaves in Barbados. 387,601 Africans were shipped to Barbados between 1626 and 1826.





The Slave Voyages Consortium at Emory University has been updated for 2021.

The latest version is Slave Voyages v2.2.13. A facsimile of the Table of number of

Slaves landed, and where they were disembarked, and the associated Map, is located here: Click>>>





Barbados is the only one of the major Islands, whose modern population is less than the sum of the African Slaves landed on the Island. And whose modern population is not bolstered by descendants of indigenous Blacks who lived there before the Europeans arrived. These descendants of indigenous Blacks are today taught that they descend from Maroons/Escaped African Slaves, rather than native people. This population incongruity on Barbados, would seem to prove that there were events in Barbados, which were not repeated elsewhere.



Cuba = 744,247 Slaves landed: Current population = 11,400,730

Saint-Domingue (Haiti) = 692,854 Slaves landed: Current population = 10,848,175

Hispaniola (Dominican Republic) = 29,900 Slaves landed: Current population = 10,596,332

Puerto Rico = 25,839 Slaves landed: Current population = 3,411,307

Jamaica = 934,264 Slaves landed: Current population = 2,803,362

Barbados = 374,601 Slaves landed: Current population = 285,006



The English conquered Jamaica in 1655 with a force that involved 1000 Leeward islanders and 2811 Barbadians, many of whom then settled permanently in Jamaica, followed later by more settlers from Barbados. It is estimated that Barbados delivered a third of all Jamaican slaves up to 1674, and about a fourth for the remainder of the 17th century.

St Kitts was the first English colony in the Leeward group of islands from where most of the other Leeward Islands were settled with the partial exception of Antigua, which received a great number of immigrants from Barbados and Suriname, though settled initially from St Kitts. Suriname was first permanently settled in 1650 by settlers from Barbados and the Leeward Islands

Slaves in Barbados were forced to work on sugar plantations cutting and processing sugar cane in conditions of severe heat while being subjected to cruel and inhumane treatment, but one of the most physically demanding aspects of sugar production was the grinding of the sugar cane, which the slaves were forced to do by hand.

The above is the Albino mans "Fantasy and Delusion":
We will now douse it with the water of "PHYSICAL REALITY".


Barbados is 13 degrees from the equator. The Suns Ultra Violet (UV) intensity is the maximum of 11 or 12 (Depending on scale) almost year round.




By comparison, London reaches it's maximum of (UV-6) in the months of June and July. Europeans who lack the protection of Melanin (Dark Skin), are given
this Warning from MeteoVista UK. Quote: "Safe Sunning in Barbados": A summer’s day is only really complete when the sun makes an appearance and
cheers us up. On the beach, on a café terrace or in the back garden: the sun is always welcome. However the sun is also dangerous. Long
exposure to the sun’s rays increases the chance of skin cancer. When the sun is strong it is sensible to regularly move into the shade and
to protect your skin from the damaging rays. See the UV danger table below.



So then, we know that Barbados reached the heights of prosperity on the backs of indentured and enslaved Europeans. But Albino history tells us that the "SAME" people, who are advised to seek shade from the Barbados Sun today - after only a few minutes of exposure: are incredibly said to have worked from "Dawn to Dusk" in that SAME Sun, only a few hundred years ago?



More nonsense from the Albinos


Now that Blacks are researching and analyzing their own history, Albino Europeans have been forced to amend their earlier versions of history - though they still won't tell the truth. Note these comments from a speech given at the University of Glasgow on the subject of Barbados.

Speaking during the bicentennial commemoration in 2007 of the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade, the UK Culture Minister (James Purnell?) stated that ‘Understanding the slave trade and its legacy is vital to broadening our history and recognition of the challenges we still face as a society today.’ I am engaged in a study of the origins and development of slave labour in the British Americas. My research suggests that the development of racial slavery in the forms we know was anything but a foregone conclusion. I begin with the British slave trading forts and castles on the Gold Coast of West Africa, and the nature of the work undertaken by blacks and whites (some free, some bound), which facilitated the slave trade. I explore the remarkable fluidity of categories of race and of bound and free labour on the Gold Coast: the work of blacks and whites in West Africa bore little relation to the work of slaves and whites institutionalized in the Americas by the late-eighteenth century. Labour and race were similarly complicated on slave ships themselves, as revealed in descriptions of the lives and work of the black and white, free and bound sailors who crewed these infernal vessels. Only sailors in the Royal Navy were treated more harshly, and although these sailors were in a better position than the Africans they transported, many cannot be described as fully free labourer.

The first port of call for most British slave ships was Barbados, the first place in the British Americas to develop integrated plantation economies. By the mid-1600s Barbados was the richest colony in the Caribbean, and the practices developed there spread throughout Britain’s American colonies. However, my research is helping to demonstrate that the vital early stages of the Barbados ‘sugar revolution’ was largely fuelled by bound white labour. In their thousands, English, Irish and Scottish men and women were sent to the colony. Few volunteered, and many were convicts, vagrants and prisoners of war or captives from unsuccessful rebellions, from Cromwell’s captives from Drogheda in the mid-1600s to Scots captured after the Jacobite rebellions of 1715 and 1745. Given very lengthy terms of servitude, and with little hope of survival let alone land or work at the end of their tenure, these white labourers were often referred to as slaves. Only slowly, and for a variety of reasons, did African slavery come to replace this white workforce, whose remaining survivors lived in abject poverty. By integrating research into slave and free labour in coastal West Africa, aboard slave ships and in Barbados, my work will help us to rethink the origins and development of racial slavery in the British world. Historians of slavery in the Caribbean and mainland North America have explored and explained the development of inter-related categories of race and bound labour in terms of local needs and conditions. My work shows that the experiences, the standard practices, and the developing traditions of work in West Africa, on slave ships and in early Barbados all pointed towards the creation of far less fixed categories of both race and labour. The eventual development of remarkably rigid categories of race and labour by the late-eighteenth required the systematic rejection of virtually all pre-existing patterns and experiences of black and white labour.

Link to Glasgow article online


Whites did it, but there were all of these mysterious Roles and relationships between Whites and Blacks, and also, a melding of these roles, which we will tell you about later: Really?

All of these twists, turns, and nuance, from what Whites say was the single most brutal Slave system in the world!

Has anyone ever heard such meandering, confusing, conflicted, bull-dung before? That's what people do when they don't want to tell the truth. When it comes to the role of Blacks in the world, Albinos can't help but lie.



The White mans stated reason for Slavery


Throughout the pages of Realhistoryww we harp on the fact that the only reason for Black Slavery was the White/Albino Mans inability to stay out in the Sun long enough to do normal farming. This meant that without help, White people/Albinos could not feed themselves. Thus without Blacks/pigmented people to do outside work for them, Whites/Albinos would starve or die in the fields.

When we deduced that reality from an analysis of the evidence, we thought that we had achieved a great breakthrough in understanding not just American history, but also World History.

Silly us, once again we had failed to take into account the abject worthlessness of the Negro: as opposed to the Black and even the "Colored" Man. For you see dear reader, unknown to the everyday Black person, and even the average White/Albino person, the Albinos reason for Black Slavery has been known all along. One hundred and sixty years ago, the Southern Albinos themselves, told us in surprising honesty their reasons for enslaving Blacks.

Later Albinos didn't repeat it for obvious reasons, and the Negroes, especially those associated with Negro Institutions (Like Negro Colleges), didn't broadcast it, also for obvious reasons - Albino contributions to their Institutions. The result of this withholding of the "Truth" has been the psychological torturing of Blacks, with many of them wondering why their God had abandoned them, and why they were so lacking as Humans, that they find themselves in such a condition. With many wishing they were White, like what they were taught is "Normal" people.



Yes it was the Albino man, but with the silent collaboration of Negro institutions of higher learning. They knew and did not tell you WHY the Albinos hated you: they knew that it had nothing to do with YOUR failings, but rather with the Albinos failings and potentially deadly WEAKNESS. Like ALL Albinos, strong Sunlight Kills them. Therefore below the 40th parallel they cannot Farm the fields to feed themselves. They must either PAY pigmented people to do the work for them, or ENSLAVE pigmented people to do the work for them. So as Malcolm would have told you, if he knew: Your Skin, Your Hair (straight hair is recessive, just like White Skin), are representative of your PERFECTION, not your defect: that's their issue.


These feelings of despair and worthlessness were encouraged and exasperated by the Albinos recently created religion of "Protestantism" (that is a religion in “Protest” by the Albinos over their treatment by the Black Catholic Church. The first Bible of this Protest religion was the "Tyndale Bible" which was printed in Germany in 1525. Protestantism was itself a derivative of the Black Roman Christianity called Catholicism.

This new Protestant religion and the racial conflicts it represented, is seen as the reason for usurpation by the Germanic and Slavic Albinos of Black Rule in Europe as a result of their victory in the “Thirty Years War” on the continent: and the “English Civil Wars” in Britain. Catholicism was itself a derivative of the Black Hebrew religion of Judaism, which was previously usurped by the Turkic Khazar's. These Albino versions of Black religions: Enslaved Blacks of every kind, from everywhere, were required to accept as their own. (Background: Islam had been usurped by the Turkic Seljuq Chieftain Toghril Beg in 1055 A.D.).

After the Albino defeat of the heavily outnumbered Black forces in Europe, (the Mongols emptied Asia of its Dravidian Albinos - millions upon millions were forced into Europe), the survivors were shipped to the Americas as Slaves or Indentures. For many years English ships ran the route of the Ship Jamaica Galley, which was Rotterdam Germany to pickup Palatines (Blacks), then to Cowes in England to pickup British Blacks, then on to American ports to deliver the Slaves and indentures.

The Protestant Albinos used two particular passages in their newly created Bible to justify their atrocities. Genesis 9, 18–27: (The curse of Ham), and the other favorite came from the Apostle Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians, VI, 5-7: Quote - “Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ; not with eye-service, as men-pleasers; but as the servants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart; with good will doing service, as to the Lord, and not to men: knowing that whatsoever good thing any man doeth, the same shall he receive of the Lord, whether he be bond or free.” (Paul repeated himself, almost word for word, in the third chapter of his Epistle to the Colossians.)

The Albino Catholic Atrocities:
Newsstory, Friday 10 July 2015. On his first papal visit to his native Latin America (the Pope is of course NOT a native American, his family are Italian immigrants to Argentina), Pope Francis issued an historic apology to the native peoples of the Americas for sins committed by the Catholic Church during the conquest of the continents.
In his speech, Francis said that many Latin American Catholic leaders have previously addressed the "grave sins committed against the native peoples of America in the name of God". He also recalled that, during a visit to the Dominican Republic in 1992, Pope John Paul II had apologised for the "pain and suffering" over the hundreds of years since the Church arrived at American shores. But Francis went further: He said: "I humbly ask forgiveness, not only for the offences of the church herself, but also for crimes committed against the native peoples during the so-called conquest of America."


This painting is housed in the Museo Nacional Thyssen-Bornemisza, Madrid Spain


Many paintings like this one, showing the Black Political and Religious Rulers of Europe before the Albino conquest, still exist in some European Museums, and the old Castles of Black nobility. In Britain it is another story entirely, there almost all Black Paintings and other art, or Black depictions, were destroyed by the government of Oliver Cromwell. Oliver Cromwell was an English general and statesman who led England's armies against King Charles I during the English Civil War and ruled the British Isles as Lord Protector from 1653 until his death in 1658: (king Charles was of course Black). Today there is no shortage of paintings and other art in the British Isles: because like everywhere else in the Albino world, these are recent paintings and statues of Albinos, who they pass-off with the names of the usurped Blacks. But descriptions in books of Black Nobility survived: << Click here for examples >>


When the Confederate States seceded from the Union, they all wrote their reasons for secession, this is Mississippi's stated reason.

Mississippi: Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery—the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an “imperious” (meaning power or authority without justification); one arrogant and domineering law of nature, none but the Black Race can bear exposure to the Tropical Sun: (today they claim to be the most pious Americans, “The Good, God Fearing People”. Yet they call the supposed works of God “imperious”??) . These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin. << Click here for other Confederate States manifesto quotes >>

The results of all of these machinations has been the Albinos using their military might to force or coerce subject peoples to adopt their newly created or acquired religions, so that those people may be controlled by simply telling them what God wants them to do. Of course the Black Romans did the same thing to Albinos as they streamed into Europe from their homes in Central Asia. Hebrews however did not seem eager to share their religion. So for these past hundreds of years, Blacks cursed their Blackness, when in truth it was they who were the most "Perfect" Humans, and Whites were simply unfortunate people, with the disease of Albinism. And as such, could not even feed themselves once they traveled below the 40th. degree parallel. If only learned Negroes had told us!



Our Human Genes

Each gene resides at a specific locus (location on a chromosome) in two copies, one copy of the gene inherited from each parent. As a simplistic example: When two Chinese mate, the child will look Chinese because all the genes are healthy and all the genes are the same. But if a Chinese and a White European mate, the children will look like some combination of the two, because the "Appearance" genes are not all the same. Gene copies, however, are not always healthy. When the copies of a gene differ from each other, as through deleterious mutation or failure: Then in this heterozygous condition, we call the two parts “Alleles” and the undamaged or un-mutated allele is dominant, and the organism’s appearance and function is normal. The damaged "other" allele has no noticeable effect on the organism’s appearance, and is called the “Recessive” allele.

When BOTH alleles of a gene become recessive, then the gene cannot complete its assignment. As an example: many Black people have alleles of their “P” gene which are heterozygous and they look normal in every way: (The “P” gene controls the production of Melanin in the skin for protection from the Sun). But if TWO of these people with heterozygous alleles in their “P” gene MATE, then one or more, of their children will be an Albino. If two Albinos mate, there is only damaged or recessive “P” genes to inherit; therefore ALL of their children will be White. The trait for curly hair (which is the normal for humans) follows the same rules, two damaged or recessive allele’s of the "TCHH" gene means straight hair. Same for the genes which control eye color and hair color: (Blonde and Red hair is recessive, as is Blue, Green, and Gray eyes).

Note: The trait for Curly/Kinky hair (which is the "Normal" for humans): is produced by two "Undamaged" TCHH genes. That means that "Curly Hair" is "ANCESTRAL" to Modern Humans. You might keep that in mind the next time you see the White mans depictions of ancient humans shown with "Straight" hair.





Interestingly, now that Blacks are researching their own history, certain "Little White Lies" like Albinos could really survive daylong work in tropical fields are starting to melt away in mainstream media, as evidenced by this entry on titled "The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade":

Quote: Why did the Trade Begin?

Expanding European empires in the New World lacked one major resource -- a work force. In most cases the indigenous peoples had proved unreliable (most of them were dying from diseases brought over from Europe), and Europeans were unsuited to the climate and suffered under tropical diseases. Africans, on the other hand, were excellent workers: they often had experience of agriculture and keeping cattle, they were used to a tropical climate, resistant to tropical diseases, and they could be "worked very hard" on plantations or in mines.

It should be noted that this does not indicate a change of heart among Albinos, where they will now begin to tell history truthfully. Rather, it is just an acceptance that Black researchers will point out these simple and self evident truths, so why not get in front of it. The rest of the article bears that out.


Fake Portraits of Past Black Rulers

The Albinos have created fake portraits and statues of their former Black Kings, depicting them falsely as Albinos. But sometimes, innocuous seeming remnants survived, and when they are discovered, and the Albinos cannot destroy them for one reason or another: the Albinos concoct outrageously stupid scenarios to explain their existence. Such is the case with the Barbados Penny: The Albinos want us to believe that the English would continually mint coins with the head of one of their chattel Slaves, in Kingly fashion, wearing the sacred symbol of the British People and Empire - a British crown - which one by the way, is still in the royal collection. Ridiculously they want us to believe that they would so honor their Slaves, the very same Slaves, who when they were not brutalizing or killing them, they worried that the Slaves would rise up and kill them.

Here is an entry from the "Bolton museum and archive service" on the 1788 Barbados Penny which was minted during the rein of King George III, House of Hanover, Reign 25 October 1760 – 29 January 1820. Note the current Monarch is of the house of Windsor.



Quote: This penny coin was struck in 1788 for use in Barbados and was the first coin to be used on the island. It is thought to have been privately commissioned by Sir Philip Gibbs, a local plantation owner, and is therefore considered to be a token rather than legal tender. The reverse side features an image of a pineapple. As pictured, the obverse has the profile of a black African man or woman with a crown and three plumes with the text "I SERVE" below. The African head probably represents a slave. Slaves worked the sugar plantations of the island, and these predominantly originated from Africa by this time. The crown and plumes are harder to explain. The plumes are those usually associated with the Prince of Wales, and his motto is “I serve”. This double-entendre therefore suggests the design is intended to be humorous or satirical.




Contrary to the purpose implied by the "Bolton museum and archive service", and ignoring Major Fred Pridmore's conjectured writing in his book ‘The Coins of the British Commonwealth of Nations – Part 3 West Indies: The Barbados penny was not meant as a frivolous curiosity. As indicated by research done by David Vice and Published in Spink’s Numismatic Circular, November 1977: The 1792 coin was minted in England in such numbers (second minting, 40,000 ordered) that it had to be intended as legal tender, not to mention that a third minting was planned.

Both coins were struck in England from dies engraved by John Milton. This information is obtained from the writings of the Rev. Roger Ruding who himself is quoting an ‘Extract from the late Mr Milton’s MS List of his works. The first issue (5,376), made by Sir Philip Gibbs in 1788, must have proved popular and encouraged a different issuer (William Arnot, 1791) to risk ordering a much larger quantity.


At this point, for those struggling to make sense of it all, it might be illuminating to see what King George III and his Queen actually looked like: and what the Albinos have done to hide that fact.





As is typical, the Albinos have created many fake portraits of Queen Charlotte, like these, which show her to be an Albino woman.





The Hanoverians

The Hanoverians came to power in difficult circumstances that looked set to undermine the stability of British society.

The first of their Kings, George I, was only 52nd in line to the throne, but the nearest Protestant according to the Act of Settlement. Two descendants of James II, the deposed Black Stuart king, threatened to take the throne, and were supported by a number of 'Jacobites' throughout the realm.

The Hanoverians

George I (r. 1714-1727)
George II (r. 1727-1760)
George III (r. 1760-1820)
George IV (r. 1820-1830)
William IV (r. 1830-1837)
Victoria (r. 1837-1901)

For all that, the Hanoverian period was remarkably stable, not least because of the longevity of its kings. From 1714 through to 1837, there were only five monarchs, one of whom, George III, remains the longest reigning king in British History. The period was also one of political stability, and the development of constitutional monarchy. For vast tracts of the eighteenth century, great Whig families dominated politics, while the early nineteenth century saw Tory domination. Britain's first 'Prime' Minister, Robert Walpole, dates from this period, and income tax was introduced. Towards the end of the Hanoverian period, the Great Reform Act was passed, which amongst other things widened the electorate.

It was also in this period that Britain came to acquire much of her overseas empire, despite the loss of the American colonies, largely through foreign conquest in the various wars of the century. By the end of the Hanoverian period, the British Empire covered a third of the globe. The theme of longevity was set to continue, as the longest reigning monarch in British history, Queen Victoria, prepared to take the throne.

Victoria was born at Kensington Palace, London, on 24 May 1819. She was the only daughter of Edward, Duke of Kent, fourth son of George III. Her father died shortly after her birth and she became heir to the throne because the three uncles who were ahead of her in succession - George IV, Frederick Duke of York, and William IV - had no legitimate children who survived.

The name Saxe-Coburg-Gotha came to the British Royal Family in 1840 with the marriage of Queen Victoria to Prince Albert, son of Ernst, Duke of Saxe-Coburg & Gotha. Queen Victoria herself remained a member of the House of Hanover. The only British monarch of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha was King Edward VII, who reigned for nine years at the beginning of the modern age in the early years of the twentieth century.

King George V replaced the German-sounding title with that of Windsor during the First World War. The name Saxe-Coburg-Gotha survived in other European monarchies, including the current Belgian Royal Family and the former monarchies of Portugal and Bulgaria.








As can be seen by this cartoon, the Albinos mocked King George III: Was that because he was a Mulatto man (note Albino treatment of Barack Obama). Or was it because he married a Black woman? The Albinos over the last few hundred years, have created so many fake artifacts (Portraits, Statues, Drawings, etc.) that it is impossible to definitively say what anyone was racially, unless the person is clearly depicted as Black. The Portraits of George III below, suggest that he was a Mulatto. But as was seen with the White Portraits of Queen Charlotte, there is just no telling!










More disrespect for king George and Queen Charlotte.





As to the Barbados Penny, a new theory has emerged regarding the identity of the person pictured on the coin. It has to do with how George III came to the throne. In 1745, supporters of the Black Catholic claimant to the British throne, James Francis Edward Stuart, attempted and failed to depose George II in the last of the Jacobite rebellions. George II's son Frederick died unexpectedly in 1751, leaving George's grandson, George III, as heir apparent and ultimately king. It might well be that those in Barbados responsible for the coins issuance, were Jacobite's who were nostalgic for a time of Black rule. Those people choosing as emblematic of those glorious past times, none other than Edward, the Black Prince: aka Edward of Woodstock, Prince of Wales, Duke of Cornwall, Prince of Aquitaine (1330–1376). He was the eldest son of King Edward III of England and his wife Philippa of Hainault, as well as father to King Richard II of England. Protocol would undoubtedly have precluded placing the likeness of Edward III on the coin, as he was not the current king.


Wiki article:

Prince of Wales's feathers.

The Prince of Wales's feathers is the heraldic badge of the Heir Apparent to the Commonwealth realms thrones. It consists of three white feathers emerging from a gold coronet. A ribbon below the coronet bears the motto Ich dien (a contraction of the German for "I serve", ich diene). As well as being used in royal heraldry, the badge is sometimes used to symbolise Wales.



Origins of the badge

The badge has no connection with the current Princes of Wales. Its use is generally traced back to Edward, the Black Prince (1330–1376), eldest son and heir apparent of Edward III of England. Edward bore (as an alternative to his differenced royal arms) a shield of Sable, three ostrich feathers argent, described as his "shield for peace": this probably means it was the shield he used for jousting. These arms can be seen several times on his tomb chest in Canterbury Cathedral, alternating with his royal arms. The prince also used badges of one or more ostrich feathers in a number of other contexts. The feathers had first appeared at the marriage of Edward III to Philippa of "Hainault" (in the Low countries - Belgium and the Netherlands), and it is therefore likely that the Black Prince inherited the badge from his mother. Philippa was descended from the Counts of Hainault, whose eldest son bore the title "Count of Ostrevent".

Wiki article:

Philippa of Hainault

King Edward II had decided that an alliance with Flanders would benefit England and sent Bishop Stapledon of Exeter on the Continent as an ambassador. On his journey, he crossed into the county of Hainaut to inspect the daughters of Count William of Hainaut, in order to determine which daughter would be the most suitable as an eventual bride for Prince Edward. The bishop's report to the king as regards Philippa (who was about eight years old at that time) reads in part: "The lady ..... has not uncomely hair, betwixt blue-black and brown. Her head is clean-shaped; her forehead high and broad, and standing somewhat forward. Her face narrows between the eyes, and the lower part of her face is still more narrow and slender than the forehead. Her eyes are blackish-brown and deep. Her nose is fairly smooth and even, save that it is somewhat broad at the tip and flattened, yet it is no snub-nose. Her nostrils are also broad, her mouth fairly wide. Her lips somewhat full, and especially the lower lip. Her teeth which have fallen and grown again are white enough, but the rest are not so white. The lower teeth project a little beyond the upper; yet this is but little seen. Her ears and chin are comely enough. Her neck, shoulders, and all her body and lower limbs are reasonably well shapen; all her limbs are well set and unmaimed; and nought is amiss so far as a man may see. Moreover, she is of brown skin all over like her father; and in all things she is pleasant enough, as it seems to us." Four years later Philippa was betrothed to Prince Edward when, in the summer of 1326, Queen Isabella arrived at the Hainaut court seeking aid from Count William to depose King Edward. Prince Edward had accompanied his mother to Hainaut where she arranged the betrothal in exchange for assistance from the count. As the couple were second cousins, a Papal dispensation was required; and it was sent from Pope John XXII at Avignon in September 1327. Philippa and her retinue arrived in England in December 1327 escorted by her uncle, John of Hainaut. On 23 December she reached London where a "rousing reception was accorded her"

Clearly Edward and Philippa were "Brown Skinned" Black people: but true to form, the Albinos have created Fake artifacts with "Fake" likenesses of her; same as with all other Blacks in history.




Edward III himself occasionally used ostrich feather badges, as did other members of the royal family in the 14th and 15th centuries. The Black Prince's younger brother, John of Gaunt, used the feathers in several contexts, including on a very similar coat of arms to Edward's "shield for peace", although in this case the feathers were ermine. Edward's illegitimate son, Sir Roger de Clarendon, bore arms of Or, on a black bend, three ostrich feathers argent; while his legitimate son, King Richard II, used ostrich feather badges in several different colours. Henry IV used a badge of a single ostrich feather with a scroll entwined around it bearing the motto "Ma sovereyne" or "Sovereygne"; while, of Henry's sons, Henry V used ostrich feathers as a secondary royal badge at various times, Thomas, Duke of Clarence used an ermine ostrich feather labelled; John, Duke of Bedford an ostrich feather with the "Sovereygne" scroll; and Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester an ostrich feather studded with fleurs-de-lis. Similar badges were used by other royal princes.

Since a key factor in the English army's victory at Crécy was the use of Welsh archers, it is also sometimes said to have been Edward's pride in the men of Wales which led him to adopt a symbol alluding to their assistance. The German motto "Ich Dien" (= "I serve") is a near-homophone for the Welsh phrase "Eich Dyn" meaning "Your Man", which might have helped endear the young Black Prince to the Welsh soldiers in particular. Again, however, there is no historical evidence to support this theory.









Wiki article

Thomas Thistlewood

Thomas Thistlewood (16 March 1721 – 30 November 1786) was a British landowner and estate overseer who migrated to western Jamaica. He is remembered for his diary, which became an important historical document on slavery and history of Jamaica. Thomas Thistlewood was born in Tupholme, Lincolnshire, UK. In 1750 he left Britain and migrated to Jamaica, where he lived until his death in 1786. He became a small landowner and the overseer of the Egypt sugar plantation, which was located near the Savanna la Mar. His diary, "The Diary of Thomas Thistlewood" is a detailed record of his life and daily activities, providing a rare and detailed insight into plantation life, from agricultural techniques to slave-owner relations. With almost no restraints placed on their personal freedom, whites ruled their slaves with a degree of violence that left outside observers aghast. Thistlewood routinely punished his slaves with fierce floggings and other harsh punishments, some of them sickeningly ingenious. One of his favorites was "Derby's dose," in which a slave was forced to defecate into the offending slave's mouth, which was then wired shut for four or five hours.



Barbados art helps us differentiate between "Real" History, and the falsehoods of Albino history.


Richard Newton (1777–1798) was an English caricaturist.

This short-lived but brilliant 18th-century caricaturist published his first caricature at thirteen. His work included definitive caricatures expressing the English prejudice of the Scots. He worked for radical publisher William Holland, producing powerful anti-slavery works among his output. This caricature of his is important in "Who" it depicts as the brutal Slave Master.





Agostino Brunias (1730 – 1796) was a London-based Italian painter from Rome. Strongly associated with West Indian art, he left England at the height of his career to chronicle Dominica and the neighboring islands of the West Indies. Note the difference between what Albino historians depict in the colonial caribbean, and what Augostino Brunias depicts. To explain away these differences, the Albinos declare that his art was escapist and romantic.















Some have described these Black Carib Indians as the offspring of Runaway African Slaves and Non-Black native Indians - even some Black institutions have stupidly accepted that nonsense, which is no surprise. As always when dealing with what the lying Albinos say, one must always think "Critically". i.e. The British outlawed the Slave trade in 1807, but did not outlaw Slavery until 1833. The painter of these paintings "Augustin Brunias" died in 1796: at the time he painted those people, if what the Albinos say was true: they and their still living parents, would have been subject to re-capture and a return to Slavery. They would certainly not have been allowed such easy movement and social intercourse, for fear their example would have fomented rebellion among Slaves.










More Paintings by Agostino Brunias















Clearly the evidence indicates that life and society in the colonial Caribbean was different from what the Albinos say. So what does all of this mean? It means that Blacks need to do a lot more research into their own history!



The Americas were first peopled by Blacks from what appears to be many different locations around the world, circa 100,000 B.C. Then by Mongols who came across the Bering Straits, circa 12,000 B.C.

Naturally Albinos do their best to confuse the issue, often by simply misidentifying people.

See the Pre-historic America section.








Black North American Indians were also exported to Barbados:


Please see the article:

"Hunting North American Indians in Barbados"

by Patricia Penn Hilden, Professor Emerita

Ethnic Studies Department, University of California, Berkeley



Click here for link to the article: >>







Follow-up: Click here for a racial analysis of the entire American Hemisphere

using the Emory University Voyages Database.







Click for Realhistoryww Home Page