Affirmative Action

This is a specific subject page, dealing exclusively with, or primarily with, the subject in the title. Because of need, there are many such pages at RHWW: usually, but not always, linked to primary pages. For those in a hurry, they enable a quick summary of many important subjects. The menu for these pages is here: Click>>>

JEWS - SLAVERY and

THE CASE FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

In the beginning the "Americas" was a Hemisphere of industrious people and advanced Cultures. If you Google "List of Top 10 Most Ancient Civilizations in the World" the three main American Civilizations will alwaya be included. List of Top 10 Most Ancient Civilizations in the World: Last Updated : 13 Feb, 2024. The top 10 most ancient civilizations in the world are Mesopotamian Civilizations (Sumer, Akkadia, Assyria, Elam): Indus Valley Civilizations (Harappa & Mohenjo-daro): Egyptian Civilization, Ancient Greek Civilization, Chinese Civilization, Persian Civilization, Roman Civilization, Maya Civilization, Incan Civilization, and Aztec Civilization.

That all changed when the Americas were Invaded by "Central Asian Albinos" via Europe, which had just been recently overrun by these same Albinos as they were being chased out of Asia by the Mongols. The first Invaders of the Americas were the Spanish and the Portuguese. Albinos were known in Europe since the time of the "Sea Peoples" troubles (1,200 B.C.), but were not common in the Middle-East until the Black Arabs brought them in as "Mamlukes" (Slave Soldiers - Mostly Turk).

For Albinos the whole point of the Invasion was "Booty" (valuable stolen goods, especially those seized in war).
Problem is, the Invaders are ALBINOS and Albinos CAN'T STAY OUT IN THE "SUN"!

The Albinos quickly surmised that to make their Invasion Profitable they would have to make "Pigmented People" (Sun proof Black people) do all the outside work. The Albinos just happened to know some backwards, Do Anything for Money kingdoms in West Africa, who would be very pleased indeed to sell them some Slaves for their American fields.

Military, political, and religious authority within West Africa determined who controlled access to the Atlantic slave trade. And some African elites, such as those in the Dahomey and Ashanti empires, took advantage of this control and used it to their profit by enslaving and selling other Africans to European traders.

Many nations such as the Bono State, Ashanti of present-day Ghana and the Yoruba of present-day Nigeria were involved in slave-trading. Groups such as the Imbangala of Angola and the Nyamwezi of Tanzania would serve as intermediaries or roving bands, waging war on African states to capture people for export as slaves.

TransAtlantic Slave Trade

In the fifteenth century, Portugal became the first European
nation to take significant part in African slave trading.

Slavery in Portugal and Spain

By the 15th century, slavery had existed in the Iberian Peninsula (Portugal and Spain) throughout recorded history. The Roman Empire had established its system of slavery in ancient times. Since the fall of the Western Roman Empire, various systems of slavery continued in the successor Islamic and Christian kingdoms of the peninsula through the early modern era of the Atlantic slave trade. In 1441–1444, Portuguese traders first captured Africans on the Atlantic coast of Africa (in what is today Mauritania), taking their captives to slavery in Europe, and established a fort for the slave trade at the Bay of Arguin.

In the Middle Ages, religion and not race was a determining factor for who was considered to be a legitimate target of slavery. While Christians did not enslave Christians and Muslims did not enslave Muslims, both allowed the enslavement of people they regarded to be heretics or insufficiently correct in their religion, which allowed Catholic Christians to enslave Orthodox Christians, and Sunni Muslims to enslave Shia Muslims; similarly both Christians and Muslims approved of enslaving Pagans, who came to be a preferred and comparatively profitable targets of the slave trade in the Middle Ages: Spain and Portugal were provided with non-Catholic slaves from Eastern Europe via the Balkan slave trade and the Black Sea slave trade.

Pagans believe that nature is sacred and that the natural cycles of birth, growth and death observed in the world around us carry profoundly spiritual meanings. Human beings are seen as part of nature, along with other animals, trees, stones, plants and everything else that is of this earth.

In the 15th century, when the Balkan slave trade was taken over by the Ottoman Empire (Turkey) and the Black Sea slave trade was supplanted by the Crimean slave trade and closed off from Europe, Spain and Portugal replaced this source of slaves by importing Pagan slaves first from the conquered Canary Islands and then from Africa; initially from Arab slave traders via the Trans-Saharan slave trade from Libya, and then directly from the African West coast through Portuguese outposts, which developed into the Atlantic slave trade and expanded significantly after the establishment of the colonies in the Americas in 1492.

In the 15th century Spain enacted a racially discriminatory law named Limpieza de sangre, which translates as "blood purity" or "cleanliness of blood", a proto-racial law. It prevented people with Jewish and Muslim ancestry from settling in the New World. Limpieza de sangre did not guarantee rights for Jews or Muslims who converted to Catholicism. Jews and Muslims who converted to Catholicism were respectively called conversos and moriscos. Some Jews and Muslims converted to Christianity hoping it would grant them rights under Spanish laws. After the "discovery" of new lands across the Atlantic, Spain did not want Jews and Muslims immigrating to the Americas because the Spanish Crown worried Muslims and non-Christians might introduce Islam and other religions to Native Americans.

The law also led to the enslavement of Jews and Muslims, prevented Jews from entering the country and from joining the military, universities and other civil services. Although Jewish conversos and Muslims experienced religious and racial discrimination, some also participated in the slave trade of Africans. In Lisbon during the 16th and 17th centuries, Muslims financed by Jewish conversos traded Africans across the Sahara Desert and enslaved Africans before and during the Atlantic slave trade in Europe and Africa. In New Spain, Spaniards applied limpieza de sangre to Africans and Native Americans and created a racial caste system, believing them to be impure because they were not Christian.

Europeans enslaved Muslims and people practicing other religions as a justification to Christianize them. In 1452, Pope Nicholas V issued papal bull Dum Diversas which gave the King of Portugal the right to enslave non-Christians to perpetual slavery. The clause included Muslims in West Africa and legitimized the slave trade under the Catholic church. In 1454, Pope Nicholas issued Romanus Pontifex. "Written as a logical sequel to Dum Diversas, Romanus Pontifex allowed the European Catholic nations to expand their dominion over 'discovered' land. Possession of non-Christian lands would be justified along with the enslavement of native, non-Christian 'pagans' in Africa and the 'New World.' Dum Diversas and Romanus Pontifex may have had an influence with the creation of doctrines supportive of empire building.

In 1493, the Doctrine of Discovery issued by Pope Alexander VI, was used as a justification by Spain to take lands from non-Christians West of the Azores. The Doctrine of Discovery stated that non-Christian lands should be taken and ruled by Christian nations, and Indigenous people (Africans and Native Americans) living on their lands should convert to Christianity. In 1493, Pope Alexander VI issued a papal bull called Inter Caetera which gave Spain and Portugal rights to claim and colonize all non-Christian lands in the Americas and enslave Native Americans and Africans. Inter Caetera also settled a dispute between Portugal and Spain over those lands. The declaration included a north–south divide 100 leagues West of the Cape Verde Islands and gave the Spanish Crown exclusive rights to travel and trade west of that line.

THE ARAB SLAVE TRADE

THE KINGDOM OF OMAN

There have been discoveries of Palaeolithic stone tools in caves in southern and central Oman, and in the United Arab Emirates close to the Straits of Hormuz at the outlet of the Persian Gulf. These stone tools, some up to 125,000 years old, resemble those made by humans in Africa around the same period. This is the southern route ‘out of Africa’.

Sumerians traded with Oman, and the Persian Achaemenid dynasty controlled and/or influenced the Omani peninsula. This influential control was most likely exerted from a coastal center such as Sohar. From the 3rd century B.C. to the arrival of Islam in the 7th century A.D, Oman was controlled by two other Iranian dynasties, the Parthians (Whites) and the Sassanids (normal Black Persians: the term"Iran" is new, it did not exist before 1935). During this period Oman's administrative name was Mazun. By about 250 B.C, the Parthian dynasty brought the Persian Gulf under their control and extended their influence as far as Oman. Because they needed to control the Persian Gulf trade route, the Parthians established garrisons in Oman. In the 3rd century A.D, the Sassanids succeeded the Parthians and held the area until the rise of Islam four centuries later. This agricultural and military contact gave people exposure to Persian culture, as reflected in certain irrigation techniques still used in Oman.

Oman adopted Islam in the 7th century, during the lifetime of the prophet Muhammad. Ibadism became the dominant religious sect in Oman by the 8th century; Ibadhism is known for its "moderate conservatism". One distinguishing feature of Ibadism is the choice of ruler by communal consensus and consent. Oman is currently the only country in the Islamic world with a majority Ibadi population.

Arab tribes migrated eastward to Oman, coinciding with the increasing presence in the region of peoples from present-day Iran. In the 6th century, Arabs succeeded in repelling encroachments of these ethnic groups; the conversion of Arab tribes to Islam in the 7th century resulted in the displacement of the settlers from Iran.

But Oman was nonetheless conquered by several foreign powers, having been controlled by the Qarmatians between 931–932 and then again between 933–934. The Qarmatians ("Those Who Wrote in Small Letters" also transliterated "Carmathians", "Qarmathians", "Karmathians" etc.) were a Shi'a Ismaili group centered in eastern Arabia, where they attempted to established a utopian republic in 899 A.D. They are most famed for their revolt against the Abbasid Caliphate.

Between 967 and 1053, Oman was part of the domain of the Iranian Buyyids: The Buyyids/Deylamites/Dailamites were a possibly Persian people, inhabiting the mountainous regions of northern Persia on the southern shore of the Caspian Sea. The earliest Zoroastrian and Christian sources indicate that the Dailamites originally came from Anatolia near the Tigris River. They spoke the Deilami language, a northwestern Persia dialect similar to that of the neighbouring Gilites.

Between 1053 and 1154, Oman was part of the Great Seljuk Turk Empire.

In 1154, the indigenous Nabhani dynasty took control of Oman, and the Nabhani kings ruled Oman until 1470, with an interruption of 37 years between 1406 and 1443.

The capital Muscat was taken by the Portuguese on 1 April 1515, and was held until 26 January 1650, although the Ottoman Turks controlled Muscat between 1550–1551 and 1581–1588. In about the year 1600, Nabhani rule was temporarily restored to Oman, although that lasted only to 1624, when fifth imamate, which is also known as the Yarubid Imamate. The Yarubid recaptured Muscat from the Portuguese in 1650 after a colonial presence on the northeastern coast of Oman dating to 1508.

The Yarubid dynasty expanded, acquiring former Portuguese colonies in East Africa - including Zanzibar - and engaging in the slave trade. By 1719 dynastic succession led to the nomination of Saif ibn Sultan II. His candidacy prompted a rivalry among the ulama and a civil war between the two major tribes, the Hinawi and the Ghafiri, with the Ghafiri supporting Saif ibn Sultan II. He assumed power in 1748 after the leaders of both factions had been killed in battle, but the rivalry continued, with the factionalization working in favor of the Iranians, who occupied Muscat and Sohar in 1743.

The Iranians had occupied the coast before—indeed the coast was often the possession of various empires. These empires brought order to the religious and ethnic diversity of the population of this cosmopolitan region. Yet the intervention on behalf of an unpopular dynasty brought about a revolt. The leader of the revolt, Ahmad ibn Said al Said, was elected sultan of Muscat upon the expulsion of the Iranians.

Like its predecessors, Al Said dynastic rule has been characterized by a history of internecine family struggle, fratricide, and usurpation. Apart from threats within the ruling family, there was the omnipresent challenge from the independent tribes of the interior who rejected the authority of the sultan, recognizing the imam as the sole legitimate leader and pressing, by resort to arms, for the restoration of the imamate.

Schisms within the ruling family were apparent before Ahmad ibn Said's death in 1783 and were later manifest with the division of the family into two main lines, the Sultan ibn Ahmad Al Said (r. 1792–1806) line controlling the maritime state, with nominal control over the entire country; and the Qais branch, with authority over the Al Batinah and Ar Rustaq areas.

During the period of Sultan Said ibn Sultan Al Said's rule (1806–1856), Oman cultivated its East African colonies, profiting from the slave trade. As a regional commercial power in the 19th century, Oman held territories on the island of Zanzibar off the coast of East Africa, the area along the coast of East Africa known as Zanj including Mombasa and Dar es Salaam, and until 1958 in Gwadar (in present-day Pakistan) on the coast of the Arabian Sea. But when the British declared slavery illegal in the mid-19th century, the sultanate's fortunes reversed. The economy collapsed, and many Omani families migrated to Zanzibar. The population of Muscat fell from 55,000 to 8,000 between the 1850s and 1870s. Most of the overseas possessions were seized by the United Kingdom and by 1850 Oman was an isolated and poor area of the world.

When Sultan Sa'id bin Sultan Al-Busaid died in 1856, his sons quarreled over the succession. As a result of this struggle, the empire—through the mediation of the British Government under the Canning Award—was divided in 1861 into two separate principalities: Zanzibar (with its East African dependencies), and Muscat and Oman.

The death of Sa'id bin Sultan in 1856 prompted a further division: the descendants of the late sultan ruled Muscat and Oman (Thuwaini ibn Said Al-Busaid, r. 1856–1866) and Zanzibar (Mayid ibn Said Al-Busaid, r. 1856–1870); the Qais branch intermittently allied itself with the ulama to restore imamate legitimacy. In 1868 Azzam ibn Qais Al-Busaid (r. 1868–1871) emerged as self-declared imam. Although a significant number of Hinawi tribes recognized him as imam, the public neither elected him nor acclaimed him as such.

During the period of Sultan Said ibn Sultan Al Said's rule (1806–1856), Oman cultivated its East African colonies, profiting from the slave trade. As a regional commercial power in the 19th century, Oman held territories on the island of Zanzibar off the coast of East Africa, the area along the coast of East Africa known as Zanj including Mombasa and Dar es Salaam, and until 1958 in Gwadar (in present-day Pakistan) on the coast of the Arabian Sea. But when the British declared slavery illegal in the mid-19th century, the sultanate's fortunes reversed. The economy collapsed, and many Omani families migrated to Zanzibar. The population of Muscat fell from 55,000 to 8,000 between the 1850s and 1870s. Most of the overseas possessions were seized by the United Kingdom and by 1850 Oman was an isolated and poor area of the world.

Muscat and Oman was the object of Franco-British rivalry throughout the 18th century. During the 19th century, Muscat and Oman and the United Kingdom concluded several treaties of friendship and commerce. In 1908 the British entered into an agreement of friendship. Their traditional association was confirmed in 1951 through a new treaty of friendship, commerce, and navigation by which the United Kingdom recognized the Sultanate of Muscat and Oman as a fully independent state.

THE UNITED STATES

In the United States there was no "Advanced" cultures like the Aztec, Maya, or the Inca; these were cultures expert in mathematics, art and writing. Where the civilizations south of the United States built Pyramids and lavishly decorated Tombs and Temples, in the United States the more advanced people were "Mound Builders".

Mound Builders

Many pre-Columbian cultures in North America were collectively termed "Mound Builders", but the term has no formal meaning. It does not refer to specific people or archaeological culture but refers to the characteristic mound earthworks that indigenous peoples erected for an extended period of more than 5,000 years. The "Mound Builder" cultures span the period of roughly 3500 BCE (the construction of Watson Brake) to the 16th century CE, including the Archaic period (Horr's Island), Woodland period (Caloosahatchee, Adena and Hopewell cultures), and Mississippian period. Geographically, the cultures were present in the region of the Great Lakes, the Ohio River Valley, Florida, and the Mississippi River Valley and its tributary waters.

Mound usage: Conical mounds were frequently constructed primarily for mortuary purposes. Rectangular, flat-topped mounds were primarily built as a platform for a building such as a temple or residence for a chief. Many later mounds were used to bury important people. Mounds are often believed to have been used to escape flooding.

The most prominent tribes in Illinois were the Illinois, Miami, Winnebago, Fox and Sacs (Sauk), Kickapoo, and Pottawatomie tribes. Other tribes known to have also lived on and used the lands of southern Illinois included the Delaware, Shawnees, Potawatomie, Miami, Eel River (the Miami), Wea, Kickapoos, and Piankashaw.

Modern

Central American Pyramids

According to Guinness World Records, the title of world's oldest pyramid is shared between the Djoser Step Pyramid of Saqqara, Egypt, built in approximately 2630 B.C. and the Caral Pyramids of Caral, Peru, built between 2700 and 2600 B.C.

South American Pyramid

Egyptian Pyramid

Want to make your head hurt? Try this, what are the chances of us and our African cousins, whom we haven't SEEN IN 145,000 YEARS! Knowing HOW and DECIDING to MAKE Pyramids at the same time? No great mystery really, we got together the SAME way we did when we went APART. A look at the Atlantic Ocean depth levels chart tells us that at about 19,000 years ago we were coming out of the "WISCONSINAN" glacial period - Hell the Ocean levels were even LOWER than they were when we originally parted ways. This no doubt allowed us to carry on trade and communications for Hundreds, perhaps even thousands more years with our African cousins.

And this time we didn't have to MESS-AROUND
with "Island Hopping" because we had THESE BABIES!

Off on a Tangent - Ancient Boats

The 8000-Year-Old Dufuna Canoe

Note the following: the design of the Dufuna Canoe with its SHARP Prow and Streamline shape is far advanced of anything else in the World for perhaps thousands of years to come. Sadly, noting the deteriorated condition of the boat in the museum, the modern people are not as advanced.

The Dufuna Canoe was found on May 28, 1987 by a local Fulani herdsman, who, in search of pastures, entered one of the barren valleys in the northern Yobe State region of Northern Nigeria. Dufuna is next to the Komadugu Gana River in Yobe State’s Fune local government area. The boat was located five metres below the surface of the land. It had various changes towards the top and measured 8.4 metres long, 0.5 metres wide, and roughly 5 cm thick. It is said to be the oldest boat in both Africa and the entire world, dating back at least 8000 years (6000 BC). The boat was successfully removed from the ground in March 1998 due to the efforts and cooperation of archaeologists from German and Nigerian universities.

The Dufuna Canoe was found water-logged on a sandy base with intermittent intervals of clay and inaccessible to oxygen; circumstances most favourable for most organic materials, as described by Abubakar Garba, an associate professor of archaeology at the Centre for Trans-Saharan Studies, University of Maiduguri in Borno state. The National Commission for Museums and Monuments (NCMM) constructed a museum complex in Damaturu, the capital of Yobe State, where the unearthed canoe is displayed.

In 1860 the Slave population of the United States was a little over 4 million+. Of that number about 4 million of the Slaves were Black Native Americans and the rest: 306,726 were imported Africans.

So moving forward the "Native" people in the United States had to depend on their Conquerors, the Albinos, to educate them. After the slave revolt led by Nat Turner in 1831, all slave states except Maryland, Kentucky, and Tennessee passed laws against teaching slaves to read and write.

The United States imported few African Slaves (306,726), because North American Tribes were so fractured that
Albinos could enslave them at will. By the end of the Civil War, Albinos held over 4 million Native Americans as Slaves.
The ratio was about 13 Indian Slaves for each African Slave.

BRAZIL

The Portuguese Invaders of what is now Brazil imported 3,169,124 African Slaves;
apparently often for frivolous Albino hubris purposes. Weak People with Swords
and Guns find it easy to make "Unarmed People" do what they demand.

Apparently Native Americans were unwilling to do that kind of work.

How former slaves established schools and educated their population after the Civil War.

A conversation with Christopher Span, professor of educational policy studies at Illinois University.

Question: It's easy to believe that former slaves, most of whom had been prevented from even learning to read, might have little sense of the value of education. Was that the case?
No, just the opposite. During enslavement many Slaves witnessed firsthand the value of literacy and knowledge, how it assisted others in their everyday existence, and how it could assist them. This value for being educated was firmly rooted in the African-American experience, and freedpeople everywhere in the South appeared to hold it for nearly identical reasons. My research suggests it may have been entrenched in the culture as early as the mid-1700s, when nearly 90 percent of all enslaved African-Americans lived in the Chesapeake Bay region, and that it was passed on from one generation to the next.

It's also easy to believe that they lacked the means or ability to set up schools on their own, without outside help. How did schools get established?
Most schools established for freedpeople arose from the efforts of teachers from the North. These schools were not the first, however. Freedpeople had already established a network of grassroots schools for themselves and their children. Those who had acquired some degree of literacy in secrecy during enslavement served as teachers, and those denied an education became their pupils. None were too young or old to learn. They built, furnished, and maintained these schools, and most paid tuition. In Mississippi, these self-supporting schools flourished throughout the state and repeatedly flabbergasted northerners when they discovered them.

But by 1885 blacks in the South were quickly losing the power and many of the freedoms they had gained during Reconstruction.
Whereas African-Americans emerged from slavery with a belief that schools would educate them for citizenship, the schools
afforded to them by Albinos after 1885 primarily educated them for domestic and agricultural servitude.

Those laws forbidding education of Slaves and later "Jim Crow Laws" created a "Baseline" of Illiteracy that persists till today.
IN THE "CIVIL RIGHTS LEGISLATION OF 1964, CONGRESS SOUGHT TO AMELIORATE THE PERMANENT STATE OF BLACK
BACKWARDNESS DUE TO SLAVERY AND THEN RACIAL DISCRIMINATION WITH THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM.

The Rouge and Corrupt United States Supreme Court under the watchful eye of the Cracker President Joe Biden
systematically dismantled the Affirmative Action program until finally - it was no more!

For over 200 years the people of the United States felt secure in the knowledge that their country was guided by the concepts of Freedom, Justice, Fairness, and the rule of law. EXCEPT when the Albino rulers of the country felt threatened by Non-Albinos. This happened in the 1860s when there was a country-wide movement to set all enslaved people free. The Civil War resulted

It happened again when Japan attacked the U.S. at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. Fearing that U.S. citizen Japanese would launch an insurrection in support of the Japanese attack, the U.S. interred its Japanese citizens in camps for the duration of the War.

It happened one more time just recently - wait for it; In Nov. 2016 Barack Obama (a Black man) was elected the 44th. President of the United States. Since the founding of the Republic the various federal agencies, especially the Census Bureau, had cultivated the lie that of the 100 million original Black native Americans (Albinos show them as everything "but" Black) Albinos found here upon their arrival, European DISEASES for which they had no immunity, and overwork killed 90 million of them. First of all: ALBINOS HAVE DISEASE IMMUNITY THAT THEIR CREATORS "BLACKS" DO NOT?? Fat chance!

Scientific Proof that Blacks have Immunity to Disease that Albinos don't.

(Keeping in mind that Albinism itself is a "Disease").

Well, now we know that disease didn't kill off 90 million Native Americans, so what DID happen?
Thinking logically, we do know that our creations - our Albinos - often display a streak of Inhumanity
when they feel that they are not getting enough of whatever, or their ability to "Take" is threatened.

The clear indication from historical records is that Albinos certainly did Murder
and Kill through overwork, many of the Black people they found in the Americas.

But how Many?

According to our notoriously dishonest Census Bureau, there is 236,190,336 Albinos in the United States, and 41,371,902 Blacks. That means there are 194,818,434 MORE Albinos than Blacks in the United States: which is a (5.7 to 1) ratio. So would somebody please explain this: At every opportunity, Albinos in Cracker States pass legislation designed to "SUPPRESS" the Black Vote!

But if there really was almost 6 (5.7 rounded) Albinos for every 1 Black in the United States, then 4 Albinos could go on Vacation come Election Time and still keep the Niggers in their place. Apparently Crackers are so stupid that they can't even count. He,he, well not quite: Crackers can count pretty good, and their count tells them that they are in trouble.

Their first SURE indicator of it was 2008 when Barack Obama was elected President. At first Albinos were "shell shocked" (the Census Bureau didn't tell other Albinos that their numbers were a lie) so Albinos initially scrambled around with numbers that said that "they" Albinos, had actually elected him. But that didn't last long, then finally Albinos had to admit that it was the Niggers that did it. Worst yet, the Niggers did it again in 2016.

When that realization hit; the Cracker portion of the Albino population got angry and mean,
this was the beginnings of the "Tea Party" which was itself the beginning of Trumps MAGA movement.

Words for Crackers to ponder while perusing the Trump years:

A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters,
thieves and traitors are not victims... but accomplices.

George Orwell, 1903-1950, British writer.

After the GOP lost the presidential election in 2012, the Republican National Committee mounted an autopsy that it called the “most comprehensive post-election review” ever made of an electoral loss. That postmortem concluded that the party had a weak message and a lousy ground game and needed to better pitch its policies to reach out to women, voters of color, and gay Americans. Of course, the party did none of that and in 2016 allowed itself to become a cult that celebrated a bigoted and misogynistic demagogue with little allegiance to principle or policy. Now in the aftermath of the GOP’s 2020 loss, rather than conduct another dissection, the party is feasting on its own entrails, as it reconfirms it is mostly a party for pissed-off white people who are obsessed with grievances, real or imagined.

Following Joe Biden’s victory, no GOP leader has suggested the party ought to take a hard look at itself. Donald Trump continues to reign supreme within Republican and conservative circles. The RNC retained Ronna McDaniel, a Trump loyalist, as its chairperson. Congressional Rs act as if the Trump-inspired attack on the Capitol didn’t happen. (Though Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell blamed Trump for inciting the seditious riot, he subsequently said he would support Trump should he become the GOP’s presidential nominee in 2024.) It’s no surprise that Republican pols who acted cravenly during the Trump years are continuing to genuflect before the former president, who still holds sway with their party’s base. But the real sign of the party’s debasement is that base. Many of these people, to put it kindly, are living within a world of paranoid psychosis. And the GOP has become a vehicle to exploit and fuel their irrational resentment.

Look at this survey that came out a few days ago. The Pew Research Center surveyed Americans on their beliefs about discrimination. Asked if there is “a lot” of discrimination against Black people, 17 percent of Republicans agreed. Yet 26 percent of Republicans said there is “a lot” of bias against white people. An additional 37 percent of Republicans noted that there is “some” discrimination against white folks.

Hold on. Republicans, as a group, think white people more than Black people are the targets of racism? That’s what the poll indicates. And a quarter of Republicans also believe evangelical Christians confront “a lot” of discrimination, and only 12 percent said Hispanic people have to deal with this level of bias. (Seventy-one percent of Democrats said there was a great amount of discrimination against Black people, and a negligible amount of Ds concurred that whites face significant bias.)

About 83 percent of Republicans are white (with 3 percent or so Black), and one out of four Republicans believe that white people have to contend with powerful forces of discrimination. This is 50 percent more than the number of GOPers who recognize that Black people encounter substantial discrimination. That is a stark departure from reality—and a disturbing view into the mindset of many Republicans. As far as they see it, they (or white people in general) are the injured party. And with that distorted perspective, these Americans, naturally, will turn to champions who signal that they realize this. This grievance—we are the victims—has become the core notion of the GOP.

Once it became clear that Albinos were going to loose their "Voting Majority" (whether real or contrived)
some of the countries most devout Racists set about to set the country up for "MINORITY RULE" using the courts.
Chief among these Racists was Mitch McConnell, senator from Kentucky.

How McConnell’s Bid to Reshape the Federal
Judiciary Extends Beyond the Supreme Court

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) is widely credited with cementing a conservative majority on the Supreme Court. But McConnell’s crowning achievement may extend past the Supreme Court. Experts in FRONTLINE’s upcoming documentary McConnell, the GOP & the Court, said that McConnell sees his role in filling the federal judiciary with conservative judges as one of the strongest parts of his legacy.

When President Trump took office and McConnell served as Senate majority leader, Trump had more than 100 vacancies to fill in the lower courts, including 17 in the U.S. courts of appeals — all of them lifetime appointments. The Supreme Court hears around 80 cases a year, while the courts of appeals handle tens of thousands of cases annually — often making them the last word in most cases that impact the lives of Americans.

“[McConnell] has calculated, correctly, that most of the most contentious issues in our society eventually wind up in the courts,” conservative columnist and author Mona Charen told FRONTLINE in a 2023 interview for McConnell, the GOP & the Court. “It is critical, if you want certain outcomes, to be sure that you have the right mix of judges.”

McConnell’s Strategy During Obama’s Presidency

During the first 2020 presidential debate on Sept. 29, President Trump boasted of the “record” number of judges he had appointed, adding that one of the reasons he had the chance to appoint so many was because former President Barack Obama had left so many vacancies. “When you leave office, you don’t leave any judges,” Trump said. “That’s like, you just don’t do that.”

It wasn’t President Obama’s decision to leave the judicial vacancies, however. Just as McConnell helped cement a conservative majority on the Supreme Court for decades to come, judicial experts and journalists who spoke to FRONTLINE for Supreme Revenge, a 2019 documentary examining the political battle over the highest court, credited McConnell with holding open vacancies that Trump then filled with conservative federal judges at a breakneck pace.

McConnell himself took credit for the strategy in a December 2019 interview with Sean Hannity of Fox News. When Hannity wondered why President Obama left so many vacancies, McConnell said: “I’ll tell you why. I was in charge of what we did the last two years of the Obama administration.”

McConnell “completely changed the nature of congressional warfare against Obama and Democratic judicial nominees,” Norman Ornstein, a political scientist at the conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute, told FRONTLINE in 2019.

McConnell was exposed to the machinations of judicial appointments early in his career, when he worked for Marlow Cook, a U.S. senator from Kentucky who sat on the Senate Judiciary Committee. During his time as a staffer for Cook, McConnell saw two of President Richard Nixon’s Supreme Court nominees rejected.

“It was in those years that McConnell really came to understand the importance, the centrality of judicial nominations in our political system, both the Supreme Court nominations and also … federal lower-court nominations,” Alec MacGillis, a ProPublica reporter and author of “The Cynic: The Political Education of Mitch McConnell,” told FRONTLINE in 2019.

The young McConnell also learned “what it takes to get these nominations through the Senate, to really kind of figure out how to win that game, the game of judicial politics,” MacGillis said.

Those lessons proved useful when McConnell took on leadership positions in the Senate. Senate Republicans were in the minority for much of Obama’s tenure, but under McConnell’s leadership they employed filibusters to slow down or block the confirmation of judicial nominees — a tactic Democrats had used under President George W. Bush. GOP senators also withheld “blue slips,” which were traditionally given to the two senators from the home state of a judicial nominee for their approval or rejection.

In order to overcome those efforts to stall appointments, in November 2013 then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and the Democrats changed the rules, eliminating filibusters for federal judicial and executive branch nominees, with the exception of Supreme Court nominees.

At the time, McConnell told the Democrats, “You’ll regret this, and you may regret this a lot sooner than you think.” When Republicans took control of the Senate in 2015, confirmations of Obama’s judicial nominees slowed to a crawl.

According to the Congressional Research Service, only 28.6 percent of Obama’s judicial nominees were confirmed during the last two years of his presidency, the lowest percentage of confirmations from 1977 to 2022, the years the report covered.

Trump’s Judicial Appointments, With McConnell’s Help

When Trump won the 2016 election, Senate Majority Leader McConnell employed the “nuclear option” when Senate Republicans ended filibusters for Supreme Court nominees — stymieing attempts from Democrats to block Neil Gorsuch’s confirmation.

Thirty of President Trump’s appeals court nominees were confirmed during his first two years of office. According to CRS, that was the greatest number of appeals court nominees confirmed by the Senate in the first two years of any presidency since it started tracking that data.

President Trump maintained his pace through the last two years of his term and appointed 54 appeals court judges during his 4-year tenure — a higher number than any other recent president, with the exception of President Jimmy Carter. (By comparison, President Obama appointed 55 appeals court judges over the course of eight years.)

By the end of his term, Trump confirmed a total of 228 judges across the appeals and district courts. They were mostly young, white and male. They would go on to decide cases about elections, voting rights, immigration, the environment, labor, abortion, gun control and other issues that impact the lives of Americans. They will remain on the courts for their lifetimes.

THE CHARGES

THE CONVICTION

IT DIDN'T TAKE LONG FOR THE LUNATIC AND CRIMINAL DONALD TRUMP TO MAKE GOOD
USE OF THE CORRUPT SUPREME COURT THAT MITCH McCONNELL HAD SET UP FOR HIM.

TRUMPS APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT

JUST WHAT THE CROOKED SUPREME COURT WANTED AND EXPECTED.

Now to get Trump off the hook, just like the
Criminals on the supreme Court Intended.

Donald Trump is trying to leverage a Supreme Court decision holding that presidents are immune from federal prosecution for official actions to overturn his conviction in a New York State criminal case.

A letter to the judge presiding over the New York case was made public on Tuesday. It was filed Monday after the Supreme Court's landmark holding further slowed the former president's criminal cases.

"[T]he Trump decision confirmed the defense position that [the district attorney] should not have been permitted to offer evidence at trial of President Trump's official acts," Trump attorneys Todd Blanche and Emil Bove wrote.

"The verdicts in this case violate the presidential immunity doctrine and create grave risks of 'an Executive Branch that cannibalizes itself,'" the wrote, quoting from the Supreme Court's decision. "After further briefing on these issues beginning on July 10, 2024, it will be manifest that the trial result cannot stand."
Lawyers from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office responded in a letter of their own on Tuesday, telling the judge they disagreed with the Trump attorneys' argument but did not oppose delaying Trump's July 11 sentencing date. They asked for a deadline of July 24 to respond to the defense's motion.

Trump's criminal case in New York is the only one of four against him to go to trial. On May 30, a unanimous jury concluded Trump was guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in an effort to cover up reimbursements for a "hush money" payment to an adult film star. Trump signed off on falsifying the records while he was in the White House in 2017.

Monday's Supreme Court decision extended broad immunity from criminal prosecutions to former presidents for their official conduct. But the issue of whether Trump was engaged in official acts has already been litigated in his New York case.

Trump sought in 2023 to move the case from state to federal jurisdiction. His lawyers argued that the allegations involved official acts within the color of his presidential duties.

That argument was rejected by a federal judge who wrote that Trump failed to show that his conduct was "for or relating to any act performed by or for the President under color of the official acts of a president."

"The evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the matter was purely a personal item of the president — a cover-up of an embarrassing event," U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein wrote. "Hush money paid to an adult film star is not related to a president's official acts. It does not reflect in any way the color of the president's official duties."

Trump initially appealed that decision, but later dropped it.

His case went to trial in April, and soon after the jury's unanimous decision finding him guilty, Trump vowed to appeal the conviction.

Judge dismisses classified documents case against Donald Trump.

Mon July 15, 2024.
A federal judge on Monday dismissed the classified documents case against Donald Trump, a shock ruling that clears away one of the major legal challenges facing the former president.

In a 93-page ruling, District Judge Aileen Cannon said the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith violated the Constitution. She did not rule on whether Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents was proper or not.

“In the end, it seems the Executive’s growing comfort in appointing ‘regulatory’ special counsels in the more recent era has followed an ad hoc pattern with little judicial scrutiny,” Cannon wrote.

The ruling by Cannon, a judge Trump appointed in 2020, comes on the first day of the Republican National Convention and as the nation reels from the failed attempt on Trump’s life over the weekend. Even though a trial before the presidential election was considered highly unlikely, many legal experts had viewed the classified documents case as the strongest one of the four cases that were pending against the former president.

Trump on Truth Social said the dismissal “should be just the first step” as he called for the other cases facing him also to be dismissed, claiming that the charges were “political attacks.”

In a statement Monday evening, Peter Carr, spokesman for the special counsel’s office, said that the Justice Department has approved plans to appeal.

“The dismissal of the case deviates from the uniform conclusion of all previous courts to have considered the issue that the Attorney General is statutorily authorized to appoint a Special Counsel,” Carr said. “The Justice Department has authorized the Special Counsel to appeal the court’s order.”

The White House referred requests for comment to the Justice Department. Smith had charged Trump last year with taking classified documents from the White House and resisting the government’s attempts to retrieve the materials. He pleaded not guilty.

In a separate criminal case brought by Smith against Trump in Washington, DC, the special counsel was pursuing federal charges stemming from Trump’s attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Trump also faces a state-level election subversion case in Georgia and he was convicted of state crimes in New York earlier this year for his role in a hush money payment scheme before the 2016 election.

Trump’s efforts to dismiss the case under the appointments clause was seen as a long shot, as several special counsels – even during his own presidential administration – were run the same way.

But the fringe argument gained steam when Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas threw his support behind the theory, writing in a footnote in the high court’s presidential immunity decision that there are “serious questions whether the Attorney General has violated that structure by creating an office of the Special Counsel that has not been established by law. Those questions must be answered before this prosecution can proceed he said.

EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW - USCIS

What does the Constitution say about obeying the law?
Another important idea is the “rule of law.” The rule of law
means that everyone must obey the law and no one is above the law.
This means that the government and its leaders must also obey the law.
Our Constitution was written in 1787.

Well, here we are. We made the case for Affirmative action,
just like the Congress did in 1964, yet here we stand with nothing!
HOW DID THAT HAPPEN??

JEWS - From the very beginning Jews hated Affirmative Action because
they said that they were afraid quotas would be used against them; that - and whatever
else they could think of to say to protect their advantage. Funny, isn't it that of the many
Albino ethnicities, ONLY Khazar Turk Jews felt moved and "Entitled" to Block Black advancement.

<< Click here for on-line Article mentioning many of the Jewish Hypocrisies and untruths put forth to destroy Affirmative Action >>

As we have seen with the anti-Gaza genocide protests in the nations universities,
when Jews are criticized they become afraid, and when they become
afraid, the world must come to a stop until they are reassured.
Here is how it all began:

In 1971, Marco Defunis, a twenty-two-year-old Sephardic Jew and native of Seattle, Washington, brought suit against the University of Washington Law School (UWLS) over its refusal to admit him. An investigation by Defunis’ attorneys into the UWLS’ admission record revealed that the University employed “preferential admissions policies” for minorities, also known as affirmative action policies. Defunis claimed that these policies created a situation in which unqualified minorities were admitted above him, therefore making affirmative action discriminatory against non-minorities. By the time Defunis v Odegaard reached the United States Supreme Court, the issue of the use of affirmative action in university admissions had been catapulted into national debate, with minorities and non-minorities arguing over the validity, necessity, and constitutionality of such policies. In the midst of this debate, the Jewish community found itself in an incredibly tenuous position. Jews, who for decades had been subjected to quotas limiting their participation in education, were now proportionally over-represented in both undergraduate and graduate studies in colleges and universities throughout the nation, thus creating the fear on the part of some that Jews’ hard-won gains might be negatively affected by affirmative action. However, supporting Defunis pitted the Jewish community against other minorities, especially African Americans, who were strong supporters of affirmative action, and threatened the longstanding alliance between Jews and African Americans on issues of civil rights and social justice.

For the next 60 years Jews worked undercover and overcover to insure that Blacks
get no advantage that they the Jews do not get. Even though, like any other Albinos; Jews
enjoy the benefits of living in a society created by Slavery and an economy that was built on Slavery.
If you doubt that, just threaten a Jew or even just make one of them fell uncomfortable as the protesters
at NYU did. The Jewish students are still demanding expulsions for making them feel uncomfortable.

Guess Jews just feel they have a RIGHT to it because their RELIGION was discriminated against.
It was not even THEM - all they had to do was NOT say that they were JEWS. In Spain that is all
that was required to be a NORMAL Albino with ALL normal rights. Just imagine a Black Slave NOT
mentioning he is a Black Slave to get ALL societal benefits and privileges. That would never happen.

Of course because Blackness was not the reason for Slavery,
it was the reason for Slavery in the Americas; and that was because
the INVADERS were ALBINOS and Albinos CAN'T work in the SUN!

And of course JEWS aren't disliked because of their RELIGION,
that would be pretty stupid considering ALL Western religions-
INCLUDING Islam - are BASED on the HEBREW religion.

As a child that incongruity struck me,
so I asked an Albino WHY they disliked the JEWS?

The answer was:

BECAUSE THEY KILLED JESUS!

Clearly Albino Jews and Gentiles are equally
BULLSHIT as to WHY they dislike each other.
Our bet is on MONEY!
And the use of that money to gain POWER!

Picture: Blum and Fisher.

In 23-year-old Abigail Noel Fisher they've put forward their version of the perfect plaintiff to challenge the use of race in college admissions decisions.

Publicly, Fisher and her supporters, chief among them the conservative activist who conceived of the case, have worked to make Fisher the symbol of racial victimization in modern America. As their narratives goes, she did everything right. She worked hard, received good grades, and rounded out her high school years with an array of extracurricular activities. But she was cheated, they say, her dream snatched away by a university that closed its doors to her because she had been born the wrong color: White.

The daughter of suburban Sugar Land, Texas, played the cello. Since the second grade, she said, she dreamed of carrying on the family tradition by joining her sister and father among the ranks of University of Texas at Austin alumni.

And the moment for her to lend her name to the lawsuit might never be riper: The Supreme Court has seated its most conservative bench since the 1930s. The Court is expected to issue a decision any week now in what is considered one of the most important civil rights cases in years.

On a YouTube video posted by Edward Blum, a 1973 University of Texas graduate whose nonprofit organization is bankrolling the lawsuit, she is soft-spoken, her strawberry blond hair tucked behind one ear. Not even a swipe of lip gloss adorns her girlish face.

Edward Jay Blum (born 1952 into a Jewish family in Benton Harbor, Michigan) is an American conservative litigant who opposes diversity programs such as affirmative action based on race and ethnicity. Blum is the director of the Project on Fair Representation which he founded in 2005. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill says he is the only member of this organization, However Slate disputes this characterization, describing Blum and his organization as the recipients of wealthy and powerful right-wing benefactors. The Harvard Crimson reported that his work is funded by conservative trusts and foundations, including Donors Trust, the Searle Freedom Trust, the Sarah Scaife Foundation, and The 85 Fund.

Since the 1990s, Blum has been heavily involved in bringing eight cases to the United States Supreme Court. He was a key figure in Bush v. Vera and the Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College lawsuits.

"There were people in my class with lower grades who weren't in all the activities I was in, who were being accepted into UT, and the only other difference between us was the color of our skin," she says. "I was taught from the time I was a little girl that any kind of discrimination was wrong. And for an institution of higher learning to act this way makes no sense to me. What kind of example does it set for others?"

It's a deeply emotional argument delivered by an earnest young woman, one that's been quoted over and over again.

Except there's a problem. The claim that race cost Fisher her spot at the University of Texas isn't really true.

In the hundreds of pages of legal filings, Fisher's lawyers spend almost no time arguing that Fisher would have gotten into the university but for her race.

If you're confused, it is no doubt in part because of how Blum, Fisher and others have shaped the dialogue as the case worked its way to the country's top court.

Journalists and bloggers have written dozens of articles on the case, including profiles of Fisher and Blum. News networks have aired panel after panel about the future of affirmative action. Yet for all the front-page attention, angry debate and exchanges before the justices, some of the more fundamental elements of the case have been little reported.

Race probably had nothing to do with the University of Texas's decision to deny admission to Abigail Fisher.

In 2008, the year Fisher sent in her application, competition to get into the crown jewel of the Texas university system was stiff. Students entering through the university's Top 10 program — a mechanism that granted automatic admission to any teen who graduated in the upper 10 percent of his or her high school class — claimed 92 percent of the in-state spots.

Fisher said in news reports that she hoped for the day universities selected students "solely based on their merit and if they work hard for it." But Fisher failed to graduate in the top 10 percent of her class, meaning she had to compete for the limited number of spaces up for grabs.

She and other applicants who did not make the cut were evaluated based on two scores. One allotted points for grades and test scores. The other, called a personal achievement index, awarded points for two required essays, leadership, activities, service and "special circumstances." Those included socioeconomic status of the student or the student's school, coming from a home with a single parent or one where English wasn't spoken. And race.

Those two scores, combined, determine admission.

Even among those students, Fisher did not particularly stand out. Court records show her grade point average (3.59) and SAT scores (1180 out of 1600) were good but not great for the highly selective flagship university. The school's rejection rate that year for the remaining 841 openings was higher than the turn-down rate for students trying to get into Harvard.

As a result, university officials claim in court filings that even if Fisher received points for her race and every other personal achievement factor, the letter she received in the mail still would have said no.

It's true that the university, for whatever reason, offered provisional admission to some students with lower test scores and grades than Fisher. Five of those students were black or Latino.Forty-two were white.

Neither Fisher nor Blum mentioned those 42 applicants in interviews. Nor did they acknowledge the 168 black and Latino students with grades as good as or better than Fisher's who were also denied entry into the university that year. Also left unsaid is the fact that Fisher turned down a standard UT offer under which she could have gone to the university her sophomore year if she earned a 3.2 GPA at another Texas university school in her freshman year.

In an interview last month, Blum agreed Fisher's credentials and circumstances make it difficult to argue — as he and his supporters have so ardently in public — that but for her race Fisher would have been a Longhorn.

"There are some Anglo students who had lower grades than Abby who were admitted also," Blum told ProPublica. "Litigation like this is not a black and white paradigm."

Blum started his one-man nonprofit, the Project on Fair Representation, in 2005. The organization is funded by deep-pocketed conservatives to, according to its website, influence "jurisprudence, public policy, and public attitudes regarding race and ethnicity" in voting, education, contracting and employment. To do so, Blum — who is not a lawyer — helps arrange pro bono representation to fight race-based policies that were meant to address inequalities.

According to a Reuters profile, Blum has brought at least a dozen lawsuits against such programs and laws — including four that made it to the Supreme Court. He has two on the current docket, Fisher and the Shelby County, Ala., case challenging a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.

In the Fisher case, while the young woman may have lent her name to the lawsuit, the case before the Court has very little to do with her. Her name appears just five times in the thousands of words that make up the body of the complaint. She has already gone on to graduate from Louisiana State University, her second choice, and is working in finance at a firm in Austin.

Asked by a news reporter what harm she had suffered, she cited only her inability to tap into UT's alumni network and possibly missing out on a better first job. If she wins, Fisher seeks only the return of her application fee and housing deposit — a grand total of $100 in damages.

So while the Fisher case has been billed as a referendum on affirmative action, its backers have significantly grander ambitions: They seek to make the case a referendum on the 14th Amendment itself. At issue is whether the Constitution's equal protection clause, drafted by Congress during Reconstruction to ensure the rights of black Americans, also prohibits the use of race to help them overcome the nation's legacy of racism.

The Supreme Court has never ruled that the Constitution bars any and all laws and government programs that consider race. But Blum and his supporters, seeing an opening with the current Court, seek to overturn more than a century of precedent.

The true crux of the suit is not Fisher's failed application, but that government officials violate the constitutional rights of white Americans when they consider race in a way that might help African-Americans and Latinos.

"An argument can be made that it is simply impossible to tease out down to the last student who would have been admitted, and who would have not been admitted, had they been a different skin color," Blum said. "What we know is skin color is weighed and ethnicity is weighed by the University of Texas in their admissions process, and that alone is enough to strike down the plan."

Blum and his supporters say the reasoning is simple. The Constitution is colorblind and the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment prohibits the government from treating people differently because of race.

It's an argument first successfully championed by the NAACP and other civil rights groups, most notably in the landmark Brown v. Board of Education case, in which the Supreme Court declared the notion of "separate but equal" to be a fallacy.

"In its history, colorblindness has this progressive, anti-racist push behind it," said Ian Haney-López, a constitutional scholar at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law.

But following the Brown decision, the very groups that had ardently — and violently — defended laws mandating separation by race used the notion of a colorblind Constitution to challenge court orders to integrate schools.

"They began to say, yes, the Constitution is colorblind, and so the state cannot distinguish between races when it tried to remedy segregation," he said.

...do with race:

Fisher, 23 years old and very white, has been suing the University of Texas since 2008, alleging that the affirmative action process kept her out of UT Austin. The case is bankrolled by the Project on Fair Representation, the brainchild of a 60-year-old former stockbroker named Edward Blum. According to a Reuters profile, Blum sought out Fisher, persuaded her to file suit, found her an attorney, and secured thousands in funding from a few sympathetic conservative donors to make sure the case could be appealed to the highest level. (He's done the same for a dozen or so other suits, including Shelby County vs. Holder, which seeks to strike down a law requiring a few select states — Texas among them — to check with the feds before changing election rules.)

Fisher's case is currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, with a decision expected soon. In the meantime, ProPublica took a stroll through thousands of pages of court documents and education records and found that Fisher's public story — about being a hardworking, high-achieving student who was unfairly shut out of her dream school because of her ethnicity— has a few large holes.

Nikole Hannah-Jones writes that in 2008, the year Fisher applied, 92 percent of freshman spots in the UT system were claimed by in-state high school students who graduated in the top 10 percent of their classes. That didn't include Fisher, who finished high school in Sugar Land with a 3.59 GPA and 1180 on her SATs, according to court docs.

So Fisher and the other remaining applicants were instead evaluated based on two scores: one for her grades and test scores, and the other based on a "personal achievement index," which ProPublica explains awarded points for two required essays, as well "leadership, activities, service and 'special circumstances.' Those included socioeconomic status of the student or the student's school, coming from a home with a single parent or one where English wasn't spoken. And race."

School officials say that this is where Fisher's mediocre grades and test scores really dinged her, Hannah-Jones writes: "[E]ven if Fisher received points for her race and every other personal achievement factor, the letter she received in the mail still would have said no."

And yet: the school did offer "provisional" admission to students with lower test scores and grades than Fisher. Black and brown kids, surely, right?

Wrong. Five of those "provisional" students, according to court docs, were black or Latino. The rest of them —42 in all — were white.

As Hannah-Jones points out, neither Fisher nor her backer Blum saw fit to mention those 42 accepted white kids in interviews:

Nor did they acknowledge the 168 black and Latino students with grades as good as or better than Fisher's who were also denied entry into the university that year. Also left unsaid is the fact that Fisher turned down a standard UT offer under which she could have gone to the university her sophomore year if she earned a 3.2 GPA at another Texas university school in her freshman year.

In an interview last month, Blum agreed Fisher's credentials and circumstances make it difficult to argue — as he and his supporters have so ardently in public — that but for her race Fisher would have been a Longhorn.

"There are some Anglo students who had lower grades than Abby who were admitted also," Blum told ProPublica. "Litigation like this is not a black and white paradigm."

Hannah-Jones also does an excellent job showing how Blum's group has used civil rights-era tactics to advance an agenda that, if successful, would drastically roll back civil rights gains in the U.S. They've chosen the right historical moment to take this case before the Supreme Court, she writes: "[A]s the Supreme Court's make-up has grown more conservative, it has taken up a steady stream of so-called reverse discrimination cases, in which white plaintiffs have argued that race-specific measures born of the civil rights movement discriminate against white Americans and violate the 14th Amendment."

Fisher, meanwhile, graduated from Lousiana State University last year. She recently took a job at an Austin finance firm. Her name appears a grand total of five times in the lengthy complaint with the Supreme Court filed on her behalf.

But as the Supreme Court's make-up has grown more conservative, it has taken up a steady stream of so-called reverse discrimination cases, in which white plaintiffs have argued that race-specific measures born of the civil rights movement discriminate against white Americans and violate the 14th Amendment.

Supreme Court decisions have eroded programs and laws that use race to remedy inequalities, but not eliminated them altogether. And in a 2003 opinion written by centrist Sandra Day O'Connor, the justices narrowly upheld affirmative action in college admissions when it is the only means to ensure diversity.

But the Court's make-up changed in what scholars consider a significant way when Samuel Alito, considered the third most conservative Supreme Court justice since 1937, replaced O'Connor in 2006. Since then, several justices have made their constitutional disdain for race-conscious programs known. In a controversial 2007 decision, Chief Justice John Roberts sent a clear message when he used the equal protection argument at play in Brown v. Board of Education to strike down voluntary desegregation plans in schools.

Evoking a colorblind Constitution, Roberts said, "The way to stop discriminating on the basis of race, is to stop discriminating on the basis of race."

And just last month during oral arguments over the constitutionality of a key aspect of the Voting Rights Act, Justice Antonin Scalia derisively called what's considered the most successful civil rights law in history a "racial entitlement."

Public opinion on race has changed over time as well. In the 1950s, surveys show, most white Americans believed that black Americans faced substantial discrimination but that they themselves experienced little. Today, despite gaping disparities between black and white Americans in income, education, health care, homeownership, employment and college admissions, a majority of white Americans now believe they are just as likely, or more likely, to face discrimination as black Americans.

Blum chose the University of Texas to mount what could be a decisive challenge to affirmative action in college admissions because it already had what was regarded as a "race-neutral" process — the Top 10 program. Since many Texas high schools remain segregated, taking the top 10 percent of students from black and Latino high schools ensured a substantial population of students of color at the UT.

As a consequence, Blum believed he could challenge whether the additional use of race to fill out the entering class passed constitutional muster.

To get standing in court, Blum needed a victim. That's when he started looking for a version of the Brown family, someone who could represent the arguable hurt caused when public officials used race.

This approach, too, mirrors an NAACP tactic from half a century ago. Then, knowing the Supreme Court was unlikely to throw out segregation in one fell swoop, the civil rights group brought a narrower challenge to segregated school facilities first.

One of those cases, ironically, targeted the same university as Blum — the University of Texas at Austin. The university, which had been closed to black students since its founding, denied the law school application of Heman Marion Sweatt because the state constitution required that black and white students attend separate schools.

Because Texas had no black law school, the NAACP sued, arguing that the state violated the constitutional mandate to provide equal facilities for black and white students. The Supreme Court ruled that the hastily put together black law school created to avoid admitting Sweatt could not possibly be equal. It ordered Texas to admit Sweatt as its first black student in 1950.

That suit launched the stone that would shatter separate but equal just four years later when the Court struck down segregation in schools in Brown.

Blum and his supporters hope to use the Fisher case, and the 14th Amendment challenge to the Voting Rights Act that Blum is also behind, in the same way.

According to Blum, the Constitution sees affirmative action policies — in college, in contracting, in employment — and Jim Crow laws as twin evils.

"I don't see the distinction," he said.

But several constitutional scholars interviewed for this piece dispute this notion. Neil Siegel of Duke University called this interpretation of the 14th Amendment "perverse." Georgetown law professor Girardeau A. Spann called it "discriminatory."

While the 14th Amendment doesn't mention race, the drafters went on to pass race-specific legislation aimed at helping former slaves and other black Americans overcome more than a century of racial oppression.

Erwin Chemerinsky, founding dean of the University of California, Irvine School of Law, said that the concept of colorblindness holds great rhetorical appeal but that "there is no basis for concluding that the 14th Amendment equal protection clause requires colorblindness." In drafting the 14th Amendment, he said, Congress recognized "an enormous difference between a white majority disadvantaging minorities and a white majority acting to remedy past discrimination."

Conservatives challenging these types of programs purport to champion the legacy of the civil rights movement, Haney-Lopez said, but the historical roots of their efforts are much more cynical.

"I think that is incredibly important that people realize that today's proponents of colorblindness pretend that they are the heirs to Thurgood Marshall and John Marshall Harlan," he said. "But that is a lie. They are the heirs of Southern resistance to integration. And the colorblindness arguments that they use come directly from the Southern efforts to defeat Brown v. Board of Education."

Ilya Shapiro, a senior constitutional studies fellow at the Cato Institute, which filed an amicus brief supporting Fisher, thinks otherwise.

"I am not going to speak to anyone else's motives. It is unfair to paint people with the Jim Crow brush because they have those kinds of arguments," he said. "I don't like people being judged based on the color of their skin." If a program "treats people different because one has a different skin color, I find that offensive and I think the Constitution does as well."

But when asked why the drafters created programs targeted to black Americans if they did not intend the Constitution to allow the government to use race to help minority groups, Shapiro said, "It was a curious period."

At the same time Congress drafted the equal protection clause, he said, it also "voted for segregated schools in the District of Columbia."

That example is the very same one that segregationists Strom Thurmond and Richard Brevard Russell used when they drafted the 1956 Southern Manifesto urging officials to resist the Supreme Court's use of the equal protection clause to overturn school segregation.

The impact of a ruling that bans all racial considerations by universities, employers and governments "could have devastating impact on the ability to overcome past inequalities," Siegel said.

Few experts think Blum and his supporters are apt to win that big a victory in the Fisher case. And so he will likely be on the hunt again for another case, and another perfect plaintiff.

Now that the last Affirmative Action case has been won by the Jews,
and uppity Black officials like (soon to be former) Congressman Jamaal Bowman
have been defeated, lets take a historical look to see why Jews feel they have the right to
"Block Blacks."

Where did these people who say they are "Ancient"
yet call themselves by a "Modern" name "JEW" are from:

History first records the Hebrews as Bandits emanating from southern Anatolia (now called Turkey), Sumerian and Akkadian inscriptions of the latter part of the 3rd millennium B.C, refer to a people called (MAR.TU-Sumerian) or (Amurru-Akkadian), later called Amorite. In the West in Canaan they took up positions in the hills overlooking the cities from which they attacked and harassed the Canaanites. Eventually they forced the cities in the northern parts of Canaan to form a union of City-States that we call Phoenicia: Their major cities were Tyre, Sidon, Byblos, and Arwad.

Modern Map of Turkey (since 1923) Headquarters of Ottoman Empire before WW-1: Anatolia and Kingdoms before that.
Note the location of Harran, the Home of Abramaic Religious peoples: i.e. Hebrews, Christians, Muslems.

Possible routes to Canaan

A map showing possible routes taken by Abraham from Mesopotamia to Canaan,
and by Moses and the Hebrews in their exodus from Egypt to Canaan.

Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

Real life History is very complicated and involves a lot of research. Therefor we have decided to use this history of the Hebrews from the Bible (Genesis 11: to 12) King James Version; because it is straight-forward and easy to follow. We do not claim that it is accurate history, hell, we don't even know who wrote it, the ONLY Hebrew written religious material that we know of is the "Dead Sea Scrolls" found in 1947. So far - the Central Asian Turk Albinos in Israel and the Central Asian Germanic's in the Vatican haven't yet seen fit to let us see them.

Please remember that the Bible is not a history book, it is a book about the Christian Religion.
Other Religions have their own Bibles, often calling theirs by other names.

And be SURE to understand that it is NOT about the real HEBREW religion;
if it were, then the Albinos in the Vatican and in Israel would
have shared the contents of "The Dead Sea Scrolls" long ago,
because then they would MATCH, which they DON'T.
The evidence indicates that what the Albinos offer
is quite different from the original Hebrew Religion.

Genesis 11: King James Version

11:10 These are the generations of Shem: Shem was an hundred years old, and begat Arphaxad two years after the flood:
11 - And Shem lived after he begat Arphaxad five hundred years, and begat sons and daughters.

Skip 12 - 23 (Note: Terah's Son and the City they call Home are Both called Haran/Harran)

24 - And Nahor lived nine and twenty years, and begat Terah:
25 - And Nahor lived after he begat Terah an hundred and nineteen years, and begat sons and daughters.
26 - And Terah lived seventy years, and begat Abram, Nahor, and Haran.
27 - Now these are the generations of Terah: Terah begat Abram, Nahor, and Haran ; and Haran begat Lot.
28 - And Haran died before his father Terah in the land of his nativity, in Ur of the Chaldees.
29 - And Abram and Nahor took them wives: the name of Abram's wife was Sarai; and the name of Nahor's wife, Milcah, the daughter of Haran, the father of Milcah, and the father of Iscah.
30 - But Sarai was barren; she had no child.
31 - And Terah took Abram his son, and Lot the son of Haran his son's son, and Sarai his daughter in law, his son Abram's wife; and they went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the land of Canaan; and they came unto Haran, and dwelt there.
32 - And the days of Terah were two hundred and five years: and Terah died in Haran.

Genesis 12 - King James Version

12:1 Now the Lord had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee:
2 - And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
3 - And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
4 - So Abram departed, as the Lord had spoken unto him; and Lot went with him: and Abram was seventy and five years old when he departed out of Haran.
5 - And Abram took Sarai his wife, and Lot his brother's son, and all their substance that they had gathered, and the souls that they had gotten in Haran; and they went forth to go into the land of Canaan; and into the land of Canaan they came.
6 - And Abram passed through the land unto the place of Sichem, unto the plain of Moreh. And the Canaanite was then in the land.
7 - And the Lord appeared unto Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land: and there builded he an altar unto the Lord, who appeared unto him.
8 - And he removed from thence unto a mountain on the east of Bethel, and pitched his tent, having Bethel on the west, and Hai on the east: and there he builded an altar unto the Lord, and called upon the name of the Lord.
9 - And Abram journeyed, going on still toward the south.
10 - And there was a famine in the land: and Abram went down into Egypt to sojourn there; for the famine was grievous in the land.
11 - And it came to pass, when he was come near to enter into Egypt, that he said unto Sarai his wife, Behold now, I know that thou art a fair woman to look upon:
12 - Therefore it shall come to pass, when the Egyptians shall see thee, that they shall say, This is his wife: and they will kill me, but they will save thee alive.
13 - Say, I pray thee, thou art my sister: that it may be well with me for thy sake; and my soul shall live because of thee.
14 - And it came to pass, that, when Abram was come into Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair.
15 - The princes also of Pharaoh saw her, and commended her before Pharaoh: and the woman was taken into Pharaoh's house.
16 - And he entreated Abram well for her sake: and he had sheep, and oxen, and he asses, and menservants, and maidservants, and she asses, and camels.
17 - And the Lord plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues because of Sarai Abram's wife.
18 And Pharaoh called Abram and said, What is this that thou hast done unto me? why didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife?
19 - Why saidst thou, She is my sister? so I might have taken her to me to wife: now therefore behold thy wife, take her, and go thy way.
20 - And Pharaoh commanded his men concerning him: and they sent him away, and his wife, and all that he had.

Genesis 17:5

Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee.
Genesis 17:9

And God said unto Abraham, Thou shalt keep my covenant therefore, thou, and thy seed after thee in their generations.
Genesis 17:15

And God said unto Abraham, As for Sarai thy wife, thou shalt not call her name Sarai, but Sarah shall her name be.

This is a plain language version
of Hebrew History with Artifacts,

The Home of the people we now call Hebrews; or at least the family of
Abram/Abraham was Harran a city in southern Anatolia - see map above.

Just to make your head hurt: The main Gods of the Canaanite religion was EL and BAL or Ba'al as in The Great Carthaginian General Hannibal. Worst yet, the name "Israel" means "God Contended" in the Phoenician language.

Israel history: The Phoenician kingdom of Tyre, was made an ally through the marriage of Omri's son Ahab, to the Tyrian princess Jezebel. However, the establishment of a temple to the pagan god Baal (one of the main Canaanite gods), for Jezebels use. And Jezebels attempts to spread the cult of Baal, aroused great opposition on the part of the zealous Yahwists (Yahway - the Hebrew name for God), among the common people. There was also resentment at the despotic manner of Ahabs rule, which was though to have been incited by Jezebel.

She and her cult were challenged by the prophet Elijah - One of Elijah's disciples Elisha, organized the slaughter of Jezebel, Ahab and the whole royal family, as well as all worshippers of Baal. This put a stop to the Baalist threat. "Jehu" Elisha's co-conspirator, and Jehoram's general, who had led this massacre. Became king and established a dynasty that lasted almost a century (842–745 B.C.), the longest in the history of Israel.

Surely we do not need to point out that the figures of Hebrews are figures of Black People.

As is usually the case, migrants from a well-to-do country are generally criminals looking for easy money. These Anatolians split-up when they left their homeland, some went southeast into the land of Sumer and the rest went into the land of Canaan where they took up positions in the hill country from which they could attack and harass the cities of Canaan.

Sumerian and Akkadian inscriptions of the latter part of the 3rd millennium B.C, refer to the Anatolians as a people called (MAR.TU-Sumerian) or (Amurru-Akkadian), later called Amorite.

These seem to have been a nomadic desert people, who moved systematically in from the west. Their homeland was northwest of Sumer in the area stretching from the west bank of the Euphrates River on westward along the northern fringe of the Syrian Desert. The Sumerians called this land "Tidnum". From the early part of the second millennium B.C. onward, these people became more aggressive.

These Amorites were already well known to the Sumerians. They described them as, "people who know not grain and do not live in houses". These Amorite people will come to have a great impact in Mesopotamia, and in Egypt - where they will become known as Habiru or Hebrew!

Sumerian History: After Shulgi died, his son Shu-Sin (2038 B.C.), became king, he also had himself deified. More wars were fought with the Amorites. Shu-Sin lost Assyria and erected a huge wall between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, just north of Babilla, to help keep out the Amorites. The wall was 170 miles long, and breached the banks of both rivers. He also campaigned in the Zagros mountains and defeated a coalition of local tribes there. He had extensive trade relations with the Indus Valley and elsewhere. Later he had to build additional walls around the cities of Ur and Nippur, to protect against the Amorites.

It was later, during the reign of Ibbi-Sin, the fifth ruler of Ur III, that raiders from the Mardu tribe (Amorites), finally broke through the walls. This resulted in widespread panic, and a general breakdown in communications throughout the Empire. Even before that, Ibbi-Sin's situation was insecure and even pathetic at times, throughout much of his reign. With this Amorite attack, the realm began to disintegrate almost immediately. Much of the time Ibbi-Sin was left confined to his capital city of Ur.

The Elamite city of Eshnunna, broke away in 2028 B.C, and the rest of Elam the next year. The Ensi's of most of his cities deserted him, and fended for themselves against the Amorites who were ravaging Sumer. Seeing this, one of Ibbi-Sin's generals, Ishbi-Erra, rebelled and was given rule over the city of Isin in an attempt to placate him.

Hammurabi

As time goes on, ever more wars are fought. Then in the previously unimportant Amorite city of Babilla, (later called Babylon), in the northern part of Sumer, One "Hammurabi" became's king. When Hammurabi succeeded his father, "Sin-muballit" as king of Babylon in 1792 B.C, he was still young. But as was customary in Mesopotamian royal courts of the time, he probably already had been entrusted with some official duties in the administration of the city.

So when he became king, he was ready to hit the ground running. He spent the next 29 years building coalitions and conquering other cities and territories, thereby building Babylon into a powerful state. The next 20 years were a time of relative calm. But the last 14 years of his life were spent in almost constant warfare. It should be understood that Amorite rule in Sumer, was not the result of invasion and conquest alone, but rather, the result of coalition building and conquest, as attested to by this excerpt of a letter found in Mari.

“There is no king who is powerful for himself: with Hammurabi, ‘the man of Babylon,' go 10 or 15 kings, so with Rim-Sin, ‘the man of Larsa'; with Ibalpiel, ‘the man of Eshunna,' go 20 kings.”

Samsuiluna, the son of Hammurabi, took control even before the death of his father, who had a long illness. But an outburst of revolts followed the death of Hammurapi, and this led to the disintegration of the Amorite Empire. Although he fought vigorously, Samsuiluna lost all but Babylonia proper, but Babylon still had some power.

It appears that whatever arrangements and coalitions Hammurabi had made which allowed for Amorite rule, also died with him. For the Sumerians, revolt was in order, not only because of their ancient tradition of independence, but also because of the heavy-handedness of Babylon's policy's and the economic drain on the people.

Soon after, Samsuiluna also had to fight an adventurer who called himself Rim-Sin II of Larsa - for five years. Most of this fighting took place on the Elam/Sumer border, finally Rim-Sin II was captured and executed. The Elamite city of Eshnunna had sided with him, and so it's ruler "Anni" was also captured and strangled in Babylon.

During this war, Samsuiluna had pulled down the walls of Ur, set fire to the temples and partially destroyed the city. He did the same to Uruk. It's assumed that these cities also had sided with Rim-Sin II. Once again Elam, upon seeing weakness, invaded and sacked the two of them, taking away a statue of Inanna from Uruk.

A few years later (1732 B.C.), One Iluma-Ilu - pretending to be a descendent of Damiq-Ilishu, the last King of Isin, took the throne of Isin and declared independence. He ultimately gained the freedom of Sumer south of Nippur, and founded the Dynasty of the “Sealand” (the southern region of Sumer). Also called Chaldea, (see; biblical Ur of the Chaldees). When the Hatti had sacked Babylon, the Amorite dynasty of Hammurabi was at an end.

Sadly, but as one would expect, Hammurabi's code as Translated by L. W. King, and which is the translation universally cited by Whites - Is A Racist Lie. << Click Here for an explanation and the correct translation. >>

The Code of Hammurabi

The Code of Hammurabi is one of the oldest deciphered writings of length in the world (written c. 1754 BCE), and features a code of law from ancient Babylon in Mesopotamia. The Code consisted of 282 laws, with punishments that varied based on social status (slaves, free men, and property owners).

It seems that anything to do with the origins of JEWS is strictly off-limits. Just try to get the "Etymology of Hammurabi" - all of the Google responses are nonsense. Hammu no doubt refers to a God: Rabi/Rabbi in Judaism is a person qualified by academic studies of the Hebrew Bible and the Talmud to act as spiritual leader and religious teacher of a Jewish community or congregation.

Relating back to Hammurabi's code, there can be no doubt that the tradition of a Rabbi being a teacher instead of a Priest is rooted in Hammurabi's example.

Meanwhile back in Egypt;

The Second Intermediate Period

There had been a big building boom in Egypt during the 12th dynasty. Many temples were built and much other construction work was done. This created a need for more workers, and many of the workers that answered the call, were the highly skilled workers of Mesopotamia. Prominent among these, would be the Amorites, (who are now out of work). They are known in Egypt as "Hapiru" (one who sells his services), this word Hapiru will later become "Hebrew". The large-scale immigration of these foreigners into the Nile Valley during the Middle Kingdom, eventually spelled the end of the Middle Kingdom in Egypt.

The Hyksos

Because these foreigners had maintained their identity as "Asiatic's" and had not become Egyptians, they felt empowered to establish their own communities and live by their own laws. Eventually, as their numbers increased, they challenged the power of the Egyptian monarchy itself, and Egypt fell into disarray. We do not known exactly how the "Hyksos" took northern Egypt, but took it they did. The middle and last part of the Second Intermediate Period (15th-17th dynastys) saw northern Egypt ruled by these foreign kings for hundreds of years.

During this time, Egypt was never under the control of a single monarch, but consisted largely of independent states under a variety of kings. The Egyptians called the foreign kings of northern Egypt - Heka-Khaswt - there is argument as to whether this translates to "Shepherd Kings" or "Rulers of the Foreign Lands." The Greeks later perverted this word to Hyksos. It might be of interest to note that in Sumer, the king was known in their hymns and poems as "the good Shepherd".

This second intermediate period, lasted for hundreds of years, until king "Tao" of Thebes took to battle in order to re-unify Egypt. After he fell in battle, his son Kamose carried on. King Kamose's throne name, Wadj-kheper-re means: "Flourishing is the Manifestation of Re". As Kamose picked up the battle-axe from his father, in the war against the Hyksos, he tried to motivate the Egyptian people to break the status quo, but it was a hard task, their fighting spirit wasn't high. The Hyksos had apparently been good neighbors, they had incorporated Egyptian gods into their religious pantheon, and had many commercial agreements with Egyptians in upper Egypt. They were people who had lived in Egypt for hundreds of years, and aside from their desire to build their nation with the Pharaohs land, were in all other ways tolerable.

In order to hold-off the oncoming Egyptian army, the old Hyksos king, "Apepi I" tried to make an alliance with the Nubians (people south of Egypt), and engage King Kamose in a two-front war, but it didn't work out as planned. Instead the Nubians joined forces with Kamose and headed north to expel the Hyksos. However, all Egyptians did not support expulsion of the Hyksos, and these people were treated as traitors.

The Hyksos Expulsion

As the battles raged, the Hyksos were eventually forced to barricade themselves in their city of Avaris. Here they were besieged, but managed to hold out. Kamose, not wishing to maintain a protracted siege, offered a compromise. Whereby if the Hyksos would leave peacefully, they could take all of their possessions and receive safe conduct out of Egypt. This the Hyksos accepted, and they gathered up all of their possessions, (and all of the Egyptians possessions that they could), and left Egypt. They went into Canaan.

Finally the Hyksos were expelled, (they went into Canaan - Biblical Exodus?). Subsequently though, a rebellion by unhappy quarry workers, encouraged the Hyksos to return to Egypt.

Here we are quoting Josephus Flavius from his book, Against Apion, where he is quoting passages concerning the Hyksos from Manetho's Aegyptiaca. Josephus is a Hebrew traitor named Joseph, who upon going over to the Romans, was made a General and given the title Josephus Flavius. He subsequently commanded Roman troops in putting down the Hebrew rebellion. {Not all Hebrews, especially the wealthy, objected to Roman rule}. Josephus's writing is generally considered to be "self-serving", but since he is quoting Manetho, we will use it.

"Those sent to work in the quarries lived miserably for a long while, and the king was asked to set apart the city Avaris, which the Hyksos had left, for their habitation and protection; and he granted them their wish.

But when these men had entered it, and found it suitable for a revolt, they chose a ruler from among the priests of Heliopolis, whose name was Osarsiph (Moses). They swore an oath that they would obey him in all things. The first laws he gave them were that they should not worship the Egyptian gods, nor should they abstain from any of the sacred animals that the Egyptians held in the highest esteem, but could kill them, and that they should not ally themselves to any but those that were of their conspiracy.

After making such laws as these, and others contrary to Egyptian customs, he ordered that the many hands at their service to be employed in building walls around the city and prepare for a war with king Ahmose. He colluded with the other priests, and those that were polluted as well, (apparently many of the quarry workers were Lepers), and sent ambassadors to those Hyksos expelled by Kamose to Jerusalem, informing them of his own affairs, and of the state of those others that had been treated so shamefully, and desired that they would come united to his assistance in this war against Egypt.

He also promised their return to their ancient city and land of Avaris, and plentiful support for their people; that he would protect them and fight for them if need be, and that the land would easily be subdued. The Hyksos were delighted with his message, and assembled two hundred thousand men. Shortly they arrived at Avaris.

This account goes on to tell of the Pharaohs sojourn to Nubia and his return 13 years later.

In any event, by now it was the reign of Kamose's son "Ahmose I", and he offered no compromise. On his stella, Ahmose I proclaims that he chased the Hyksos out of Egypt, and as far east as the Euphrates river.

The Egyptian historian "Manetho" (305–282 B.C.), writes about this expulsion: "And it was also reported that the priest, who ordained their polity and their laws, was by birth of Heliopolis, and his name was Osarsiph from Osyris, who was the god of Heliopolis; but that when he was gone over to these people, his name was changed, and he was called Moses". Kamose's son, "Ahmose I" probably became ruler of Egypt around 1550 B.C. He was about the age of 10 when he came to the throne, and he ruled for a period of about 25 years.

The question is WHEN did the Hyksos and the disparate other Hebrew/Hyksos/Amorite
tribes settle in Canaan and create the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah.

This answer suggests that it took the Hebrews 350 years to finally settle in Canaan.

It is a sad joke to see Turk Albinos and their Mulattoes try to find believable lies to associate themselves with Palestine. Then of course once one group of Albinos or Mulattoes have found such a lie, the entire Albino world will jump-on in support. After all, the turning of Black history into Albino history is everybody's business.

Palestine was a CITY and the home of the Philistines, as sanctioned by Ramesses III who defeated them. It did NOT become a geographical area until 1988.

Note the map, There is no Palestine and the Philistine States occupied the area that is now the Gaza Strip.

^^ RELATED ^^

In c.1,200 B.C. the first Albinos from Central Asia invaded Southern Europe and the Mediterranean Islands.
Over time, the presence of these albinos caused such war and upheaval that many Africans packed-up, boarded
Ships, and returned to Africa. But the lands that they had left, perhaps thousands of years earlier, were now the homes
of other people. So as it turns out, they left Wars in Europe just to fight different Wars in Africa.

Sea people Inscriptions in
The Mortuary Temple of Ramesses III
Commonly called "Medinet Habu Temple"

<< Click here for Ramesses account of his war with the "Sea Peoples" >>

Ramesses III won the War and most of the Sea People were forced into Anatolia and
Mesopotamia, but for reasons unknown the Philistines were allowed to settle in Canaan.

In Europe, the Albinos were eventually "Absorbed" into the Black body Europe.

These Tomb Murals are from c. 600 B.C.

But the Albinos kept coming over the next 2,000 years,
until finally they were able to take Europe from their creators.

Back to the Hebrews:

The Hebrews found no peace in Canaan, over the next 300 years Israel and Judah were attacked by Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, and the Byzantine Empire, until finally..

The Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus (56-118 A.D.) had these thoughts on the origins and customs of the Hebrews as the Romans prepared to destroy Jerusalem.This is in the context of Titus Caesar, who had been selected by his father to complete the subjugation of Judaea.

Tacitus: History Book 5

1. EARLY in this year Titus Caesar, who had been selected by his father to complete the subjugation of Judaea, and who had gained distinction as a soldier while both were still subjects, began to rise in power and reputation, as armies and provinces emulated each other in their attachment to him. The young man himself, anxious to be thought superior to his station, was ever displaying his gracefulness and his energy in war. By his courtesy and affability he called forth a willing obedience, and he often mixed with the common soldiers, while working or marching, without impairing his dignity as general. He found in Judaea three legions, the 5th, the 10th, and the 15th, all old troops of Vespasian's. To these he added the 12th from Syria, and some men belonging to the 18th and 3rd, whom he had withdrawn from Alexandria. This force was accompanied by twenty cohorts of allied troops and eight squadrons of cavalry, by the two kings Agrippa and Sohemus, by the auxiliary forces of king Antiochus, by a strong contingent of Arabs, who hated the Jews with the usual hatred of neighbours, and, lastly, by many persons brought from the capital and from Italy by private hopes of securing the yet unengaged affections of the Prince. With this force Titus entered the enemy's territory, preserving strict order on his march, reconnoitring every spot, and always ready to give battle. At last he encamped near Jerusalem.

2. As I am about to relate the last days of a famous city, it seems appropriate to throw some light on its origin. Some say that the Jews were fugitives from the island of Crete, who settled on the nearest coast of Africa about the time when Saturn was driven from his throne by the power of Jupiter. Evidence of this is sought in the name. There is a famous mountain in Crete called Ida; the neighbouring tribe, the Idaei, came to be called Judaei by a barbarous lengthening of the national name. Others assert that in the reign of Isis the overflowing population of Egypt, led by Hierosolymus and Judas, discharged itself into the neighbouring countries. Many, again, say that they were a race of Ethiopian origin, who in the time of king Cepheus were driven by fear and hatred of their neighbours to seek a new dwelling-place. Others describe them as an Assyrian horde who, not having sufficient territory, took possession of part of Egypt, and founded cities of their own in what is called the Hebrew country, lying on the borders of Syria. Others, again, assign a very distinguished origin to the Jews, alleging that they were the Solymi, a nation celebrated in the poems of Homer, who called the city which they founded Hierosolyma after their own name. (The Solymi were supposedly a tribe from Pisidia, a region of ancient Anatolia/Asia Minor/Byzantium/Eastern Roman Empire/Turkey).

Watch out for Racist Translations!

Here we must pause and caution against using any translation of ancient texts without crosschecking it with others. In this case, the Racist Degenerates at the University of Chicago once again reveal their vile nature by conveniently leaving out Ethiopian as a possible origin of the Hebrews. The reason is quite simple, though the simple-minded might be fooled into believing that Cretans, Egyptians, Assyrians and Solymi were Albinos: Even the dumbest knows that Ethiopians are Black.

Do NOT use this Translation!

http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Tacitus/Histories/5A*.html

_____________________________________________________________________

This translation at Tufts University seems Okay.

http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0080%3Abook%3D5%3Achapter%3D2

Skip 3 & 4.

5. This worship, however introduced, is upheld by its antiquity; all their other customs, which are at once perverse and disgusting, owe their strength to their very badness. The most degraded out of other races, scorning their national beliefs, brought to them their contributions and presents. This augmented the wealth of the Jews, as also did the fact, that among themselves they are inflexibly honest and ever ready to shew compassion, though they regard the rest of mankind with all the hatred of enemies. They sit apart at meals, they sleep apart, and though, as a nation, they are singularly prone to lust, they abstain from intercourse with foreign women; among themselves nothing is unlawful. Circumcision was adopted by them as a mark of difference from other men. Those who come over to their religion adopt the practice, and have this lesson first instilled into them, to despise all gods, to disown their country, and set at nought parents, children, and brethren. Still they provide for the increase of their numbers. It is a crime among them to kill any newly-born infant. They hold that the souls of all who perish in battle or by the hands of the executioner are immortal. Hence a passion for propagating their race and a contempt for death. They are wont to bury rather than to burn their dead, following in this the Egyptian custom; they bestow the same care on the dead, and they hold the same belief about the lower world. Quite different is their faith about things divine. The Egyptians worship many animals and images of monstrous form; the Jews have purely mental conceptions of Deity, as one in essence. They call those profane who make representations of God in human shape out of perishable materials. They believe that Being to be supreme and eternal, neither capable of representation, nor of decay. They therefore do not allow any images to stand in their cities, much less in their temples. This flattery is not paid to their kings, nor this honour to our Emperors. From the fact, however, that their priests used to chant to the music of flutes and cymbals, and to wear garlands of ivy, and that a golden vine was found in the temple, some have thought that they worshipped father Liber, the conqueror of the East, though their institutions do not by any means harmonize with the theory; for Liber established a festive and cheerful worship, while the Jewish (remember this is an Albino translation - no telling what the original word was) religion is tasteless and mean.

With the Hebrews scattered to the Winds, new people enter the void, chief among them were the Black "Real" Arabs. Unfortunately the smallness of the Arab populations required that they use Turk and other Albino "Slave Soldiers" (called Mamluks) to augment their army's. This, together with Mongol aggression, caused Asia to be emptied of all Dravidian (Indian) Albinos by 600 A.D. (White Europeans are Central Asian Albinos by way of India).

The Turks

The Turkic peoples are a collection of diverse ethnic groups of West, Central, East, and North Asia as well as parts of Europe, who speak Turkic languages. According to historians and linguists, the Proto-Turkic language originated in Central-East Asia, potentially in Altai-Sayan region, Mongolia or Tuva. Initially, Proto-Turkic speakers were potentially both hunter-gatherers and farmers; they later became nomadic pastoralists. Early and medieval Turkic groups exhibited a wide range of both East Asian and West-Eurasian physical appearances and genetic origins, in part through long-term contact with neighboring peoples such as Iranic, Mongolic, Tocharian, Uralic and Yeniseian peoples.

Historical Turkic groups

Seljuk
Az
Dingling
Bulgars
Esegel
Barsils
Alat
Basmyl

Onogurs
Saragurs
Sabirs
Shatuo
Ongud
Göktürks
Oghuz Turks

Kanglys
Khazars
Kipchaks
Kurykans
Kumans
Pechenegs
Karluks
Tiele

Tukhsi
Yenisei Kirghiz
Chigils
Toquz Oghuz
Orkhon Uyghurs

Yagma
Nushibi
Duolu
Kutrigurs
Utigurs
Yabaku
Yueban
Bulaqs

Xueyantuo
Torks
Chorni Klobuky
Berendei
Yemeks
Turgesh

One of the important Turkic tribes were the Khazars:

The Khazars

The Khazars were an ancient Turkic people who first appeared in Transcaucasia, in the 2nd century A.D, and subsequently settled in the lower Volga region. They emerged as a force in the 7th century and rose to great power. By the 8th century the Khazar empire extended from the northern shores of the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea to the Urals and as far westward as Kiev (Ukraine). Also in the 8th Century, the Khazars converted to the Hebrew religion and made Judaism the State religion. “Itil” the Khazar capital in the Volga delta, was a great commercial center.

The Khazar Empire fell, when Sviatoslav, duke of Kiev (945–72), son of Igor and of St. Olga, defeated its army in 965 A.D. The Khazars then dispersed all over Europe and the Middle East. Because their religion Judaism, was accepted by both Christians and Muslims, they were able to move about freely throughout the Christian and Muslim worlds. For a long time, their trade was the only trade possible between Europe and the non-Christian world. Thus they were able to set up exclusive trade networks throughout the world - and accumulating great wealth. These are the progenitors of White European Jewry, the entomology of the term Jew or Jewish relates to these people; as Hebrews were not known as Jews.

There are TWO main types of Jews/Khazars: Ashkenazi and Sephardi.

Ashkenazi is Jewish person of central or eastern European descent, traditionally speaking Yiddish. About 80 percent of Jewish people today are Ashkenazim.

Sephardi - In the narrower ethnic definition, a Sephardi Jew is one descended from the Jews who lived in the Iberian Peninsula in the late 15th century, immediately prior to the issuance of the Alhambra Decree of 1492 by order of the Catholic Monarchs in Spain, and the decree of 1496 in Portugal by order of King Manuel I.

Mizrahi (in Hebrew, “Eastern” or “Oriental”) Jews come from Middle Eastern ancestry. Their earliest communities date from Late Antiquity, and the oldest and largest of these communities were in modern Iraq (Babylonia), Iran (Persia), and Yemen. Today, most Mizrahi Jews live either in Israel or the United States.

Crypto-Jews.
Crypto-Judaism is the secret adherence to Judaism while publicly professing to be of another faith; practitioners are referred to as "crypto-Jews" (origin from Greek kryptos – κρυπτός, 'hidden').

The term is especially applied historically to Spanish and Portuguese Jews who outwardly professed Catholicism, also known as Conversos, Marranos, or the Anusim. The phenomenon is especially associated with medieval Spain, following the Massacre of 1391 and the expulsion of the Jews in 1492. After 1492 in Spain and 1497 in Portugal, officially they no longer existed. The Spanish Inquisition and the Portuguese Inquisition were established to monitor converted Jews and their descendants for their continued adherence to Christian faith and practice, with severe penalties for those convicted of secretly continuing to practice Judaism. Information about secretly observant Jews largely survives in Inquisition cases against individuals.

The Scientific Proof.

The Dead Sea Scrolls

The Dead Sea Scrolls, also called the Qumran Caves Scrolls, are a set of ancient Jewish manuscripts from the Second Temple period. They were discovered over a period of 10 years, between 1946 and 1956, at the Qumran Caves near Ein Feshkha in the West Bank, on the northern shore of the Dead Sea. Dating from the 3rd century BCE to the 1st century CE, the Dead Sea Scrolls include the oldest surviving manuscripts of entire books later included in the biblical canons, along with extra-biblical and deuterocanonical manuscripts from late Second Temple Judaism.

At the same time, they cast new light on the emergence of Christianity and of Rabbinic Judaism. Almost all of the 15,000 scrolls and scroll fragments are held in the Shrine of the Book at the Israel Museum, located in the city of Jerusalem. The Israeli government's custody of the Dead Sea Scrolls is disputed by Jordan and the Palestinian Authority on territorial, legal, and humanitarian grounds—they were mostly discovered following the Jordanian annexation of the West Bank and were acquired by Israel after Jordan lost the 1967 Arab–Israeli War—whilst Israel's claims are primarily based on historical and religious grounds, given their significance in Jewish history and in the heritage of Judaism. He, he: just one PROBLEM - These AREN'T HEBREWS - THEY ARE KHAZARS TURKS!

Israel is a Tropical country where the average Summer temp. can hit 90 F and the UV is 11 (the max.) causing a great deal of Skin Cancer. According to data supplied by the ICA, Israel is currently ranked 22nd among the 30 countries with the highest melanoma rates. In the early 1990s, when ICA started ramping up its skin cancer prevention education efforts, Israel placed an alarming third after Australia and New Zealand. Albinos go around the world taking other peoples land and enslaving them or subsistence paying them to work their own lands for the Albinos. Albinos have the Guns - they Don't! But Blacks have something of an equalizer - Mother Nature! Clearly these people with PALE SKIN and FUR HATS above, have no "Natural" connection to Israel, but its quite natural for people of Central Asia.

Central Asia people were quite malleable when it came to religion;
the Khazars above chose the Hebrew Religion.

Meanwhile in Colchis - of Jason and the Argonauts fame - the Blacks are almost all gone and the "Rus" (Russians) and other Slavic people have entered. Many Cossacks of Abkhazia chose to be Orthodox Christians, With significant minorities choosing Islam or the Abkhaz neopaganism.

Herodotus on Colchis:
Book-2

[2.104] There can be no doubt that the Colchians are an Egyptian race. Before I heard any mention of the fact from others, I had remarked it myself. After the thought had struck me, I made inquiries on the subject both in Colchis and in Egypt, and I found that the Colchians had a more distinct recollection of the Egyptians, than the Egyptians had of them. Still the Egyptians said that they believed the Colchians to be descended from the army of Sesostris. My own conjectures were founded, first, on the fact that they are black-skinned and have woolly hair, which certainly amounts to but little, since several other nations are so too; but further and more especially, on the circumstance that the Colchians, the Egyptians, and the Ethiopians (Nubians), are the only nations who have practised circumcision from the earliest times.

THESE ARE THE HEBREWS!

In Ethiopia

The Beta Israel, or Ethiopian Jews, are an African community of the Jewish diaspora. They coalesced in the Kingdom of Aksum and the Ethiopian Empire, which is currently divided between the Amhara Region and Tigray Region in modern-day Ethiopia.

In Israel - These people were not run-off by the European invaders with their guns.

Khazars in Russia

Between 1989 and 2006, about 1.6 million Soviet Jews and their relatives left Russia. About 979,000, or 61%, were received by Israel under the Law of Return, which allows Jews and their non-Jewish spouses to relocate to Israel and acquire Israeli citizenship.

When asked about this loss of trained and educated population, Putin of Russia indicated that the problem was that when Jews asked for something: quote - it must be for "Him and Him Alone" which of course is Antithetical to communism.

Communism: a political theory derived from Karl Marx advocating a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.

Hate to "Down" a fellow Black Man, but this theory never worked, could never work, and will never work. It is Antithetical to "Human Nature".

There is an old quote from Rabbi Hillel that goes, “If I am not for myself, who will be for me? If I am only for myself, what am I?

Sounds altruistic doesn't it? Actually what it means is that One Jew is For Another Jew and so on and on. Rarely will you find a "Goyim" in the chain in any meaningful way. Jews do know how to play "Holier than Thou" while Bullshitting you.

So far, a lot of bullshit but no real answer as to why Jews always want to block Blacks from getting anything that they don't get - even when it is well earned and well deserved. A saying that has become popular with the Jews is "You cannot fix discrimination against one group by discriminating against another group". Typical Jewish double-talk, like we're all stupid.

Affirmative Action was intended to address the "Arrested Development" of Blacks because of Slavery and "Jim Crow" society by taking a small percentage of the Albinos ADVANTAGE gained through VIOLENCE and MISTREATMENT of Blacks by Albinos, and letting OTHERS who were similarly disadvantaged, take benefit from small set-asides. No sooner was the ink dry before the Jews (who were often Slave Traders and Slave owners, their problem being religious discrimination) rushing to get their share. Next came Albino Women, they came to get their share. But when it was time for the "Chief Sufferers" of discrimination to get theirs, the JEWS said NO!

Jim Crow

Jim Crow was the name of the racial caste system which operated primarily, but not exclusively in southern and border states, between 1877 and the mid-1960s. Jim Crow was more than a series of rigid anti-black laws. It was a way of life. Under Jim Crow, African Americans were relegated to the status of second class citizens. Jim Crow represented the legitimization of anti-black racism. Many Christian ministers and theologians taught that white people were the Chosen people, black people were cursed to be servants, and God supported racial segregation. Craniologists, eugenicists, phrenologists, and Social Darwinists, at every educational level, buttressed the belief that black people were innately intellectually and culturally inferior to white people.

For the uninitiated, ALL Humans were originally Black, then we started having Albino Children, and as our Albino Children
started mating with normal Black people they produced often (Yellow-Skinned) MULATTOES - China has about 1.5 Billion of them.
Think Stephen Curry with straight hair.

BACK TO THE KHAZAR TURKS:

Note below: Kublai Khan's wife is an ALBINO, he is a MULATTO, and the two Mongol Chieftains are BLACK. The Chinese are notorious for MIMICKING their rulers (example foot binding - a queen had deformed feet and had to walk tippy-toe, and for centuries foot binding was the fashion so Chinese women could walk tippy-toe too). Similarly mating with Albinos like the Khan did eventually made Mongols the "YELLOW" race - though some Black Mongols still survive.

PROOF OF BLACK MONGOLS.

This is necessary because many of you read Wikipedia and Britannia,
both of which give you Albino swill when it comes to racial questions.

Just to make sure you get the point: here is the scientific proof of Mongol Blackness.

THE CHINESE TAKE MIMICKING THEIR PALE RULERS VERY SERIOUSLY!

Back to the Jews lust for busting the hopes and dreams of Blacks; could it have something to do with being
CHASED out of Asia by Blacks? Or perhaps Blacks tenacity in exposing Jews religious and Racial duplicity?

<< Click here for Realhistoryww.com Homepage >>