This is a specific subject page, dealing exclusively with, or primarily with, the subject in the title. Because of need, there are many such pages at RHWW: usually, but not always, linked to primary pages. For those in a hurry, they enable a quick summary of many important subjects. The menu for these pages is here: Click>>>



House Niggers?

You Bet!








But first some background:

After the second invasion of Black Europe by Central Asian Albinos: in the middle of the first millennium A.D. [See the Wikipedia article titled: "Migration Period" Click here:]. The Albinos finally were able to usurp Black rule and established their own Albino dynasties in Europe. But these people were Illiterate Nomads, thus Albino Europe had produced absolutely no advancement of any kind. As examples: The first steam engine, called the “Aeolipile” was invented by a Black Egyptian “Heron of Alexandria” in 60 A.D, (Egypt was under Greek control at that time). He also invented the first “Wind-wheel” which led to the Windmill. Gunpowder seems to have been co-invented by the Chinese and the Indians – around 800 A.D; with the Indians being the first to use it with projectiles. The first actual “Gun” was likely invented by Black Egyptians, but certainly, first used by Egyptians against the Mongols, at the battle of Ain Jalut in 1260 A.D. (Egypt was then under Turkish control, and Turks at that time were still the Slaves of Black Arabs (Mamlukes): thus likely still illiterates).

But once in control of Europe, the Albinos envisioned themselves: these former Slaves and Doormats of Mongols and Blacks: as rulers of the World. They subsequently began acquiring and accumulating the most advanced weaponry known to man at that time. They took the Egyptian "Gun" and mated it with Chinese and Indian gun power and rocket technology. (Todays Fireworks): And for their "Industrial Revolution" they used the Egyptian invented "Wind Wheel" (Windmill) and "Steam Engine" to power their machines. And with these worlds most advanced weapons, the Human races "LEAST" numerous, and genetically weakest people, managed to conquer the entire world and murder or subjugate its people.

But it was not enough to simply conquer those lands, the Albinos also wanted to "LIVE" in those conquered lands, once they had exterminated enough of its native people that is. But the Albinos soon discovered one little problem: Though these lands had wonderful rich soils, capable of great bounty: they themselves were after all, just Albinos: with a severe allergy to the strong Sunlight of those lands, and therefore they could not work their stolen fields in lands BETWEEN 40 degrees North, and 40 degrees South. In this danger zone above and below the Equator, Sunburn, Sunstroke, and Skin Cancer, awaited.


The fact is that at the bottom of World-Wide White racism, is the White fear (then and Now), that because of their small numbers, and limitations regarding Sun exposure, they cannot compete on equal footing with the rest of the Worlds people. (Whites cannot safely tolerate exposure to the Sun between latitude 40 degrees North: (the Mason-Dixon line in the U.S./ Central Spain and Portugal in Europe). And 40 degrees South: (Just south of Australia and central Chile). It should be noted that because of their love of the Sun, Australians have the highest incidence of “Skin Cancer” in the World.




The Albinos use of Schools and Media to Miseducate us.

As an example of the Albinos duplicitous nature: in current times American Albinos constantly refer to Blacks as "Minorities". This is of course to instill the thought that Albinos are numerous and powerful. They use their monopoly over media to reinforce this by constantly showing images from all parts of the World of only other Albinos and their Mulattoes. Except for Africa, rarely are Blacks shown in international News Stories, or travelogs. But their Make-believe "Black free World" is just like their histories; pure fantasy.

Here is another example of how the Albinos use their power over what we are taught to miseducate us: if you Google "What race has the largest population in the world?" The answer you are given is Quote: "The world's largest ethnic group is Han Chinese". Notice they replaced "Ethnic Group" with "Race". That's like saying that Germans are the largest racial population. Germans are of course NOT a Race! Just like Han Chinese are NOT a Race! Han Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Twainese, Cambodians, Thais, Vietnamese, etc. are of the "MONGOL" Race. All together Mongols account for a little less that Two Billion people.

Do this: Google – “White World Population” Being very care with the syntax, remember you are asking an Albino source for truth. Naturally they will find any number of ways to lie to you if you use the wrong search words.

Answer from Wikipedia section titled “White People”:

850,000,000+ (which is about) 11.5% of the total world population (world population of 7.5 - 7.7 billion).
(This is not counting partial European descent) – Meaning the millions of Black/Albino Mulattoes in Latin America and the Middle-East.
Regions with significant (White) populations | United States = 252,784,000, Russia = 132,516,000
(Of course there is nowhere near 252,784,000 Albinos in the United States, (typical Albino race lie): Russia - is a lie too – but who cares?).

Facts and Figures:

The current population of Japan is 126,766,566 as of 2019, based on Worldometers elaboration of the latest United Nations data.
The current population of the Republic of Korea is 51,236,002 as of 2019,
North Korea population is estimated at 25,666,161 people at mid-year according to UN data.
The current population of China in 2019 is estimated at 1,433,783,686 people at mid-year according to UN data.

For a total East-Asian Mongol population of 1,637,452,415 people: which is about 21% of the Human population.

The current world population is 7.7 billion as of September 2019 according to the most recent United Nations estimates elaborated by Worldometers.

Here is the “Cold Water” of reality Albinos and Mongols: “YOUR” 21% + 11.5% = 32.5% of the Human population.

THE “OTHER” 67.5% or 5.19 BILLION IS BLACK!!! (or Mulatto).

Assuming about 540,000,000 (0.54 billion) Mulattoes world-wide, that means the "Pure-Black" population of the world is about 4.65 Billion.

Therefore YOU Albinos and Mongols are the "Minority": "YOU" are the outliers: "YOU" are the "Others".

Please try to remember


Addendum – the Southeast Asia countries of Cambodia, Burma, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, the Philippines, and Indonesia are a 645 million person part of the World population. These are all formerly Black countries (like Hawaii) which were invaded by Mongols (sometimes by war, sometimes by migration). They are all ruled now by “Light-skinned” Mongols (who are of course Mulattoes themselves). But “Unlike Hawaii”: populations of native Blacks still survive, and then there are the descendants of the “Light-skinned” Mongol invaders, plus the Mulattoes produced by the two. In Vietnam and the Philippine’s, French and Spanish colonizers also added to the gene pool, making it impossible to categorize these countries as Black, Mongol, Albino, or Mulatto.




Why Albinos enslave their creators - Blacks.



Average Summer UV levels for the

15 Slave States of the Confederacy

Arkansas = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at Little Rock is (10)
Missouri = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at Springfield is (10)
Mississippi = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at Jackson is (10)
Louisiana = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at New Orleans is (10)
Alabama = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at Montgomery is (10/11)
Kentucky = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at Lexington is (9)
Tennessee = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at Nashville is (10)
Virginia = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at Richmond is (9)
Maryland = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at Annapolis is (9)
Delaware = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at Dover is (9)
North Carolina = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at Raleigh is (10)
South Carolina = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at Columbia is (10)
Alabama = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at Birmingham is (10)
Florida = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at Orlando is (11)
Texas = In June and July the typical noontime UV level at Houston is (11)




Note from the graphics above that the average White person (Albino) in Texas and Florida would last less than 15 minutes in the fields before Sunburn set in. Also remember that in those days they didn't have Sun screen lotions. It wasn't much better in Maryland; there they would only last about 20 minutes.

Therefore the worlds Whites have had to use mastery of and use of advanced weaponry to keep the worlds nonwhites at bay – while pressing others into Slavery to do the work in the Sun that they cannot do safely for themselves. (Thus the reason why States ABOVE the Mason-Dixon line were free, and those BELOW were Slave States). As a consequence, wholesale killing and Murder of Indigenous peoples has been the Hallmark of White expansion.










New Zealand has naturally high UV levels compared with similar latitudes. For example, our peak UV levels can be 40 percent higher than peak UV levels in similar North American latitudes (McKenzie et al, 2006). There are three main reasons for this (McKenzie et al, 2006). First, Earth's elliptical orbit means it is closest to the sun in the New Zealand summer months of December and January. Second, New Zealand's relatively clean air means UV radiation is less likely to be scattered by airborne-pollution and more UV radiation reaches the ground. Third, our atmospheric ozone layer begins to thin over summer, therefore absorbing less UV radiation. The ozone hole does not have a large effect on our ozone concentrations.

As an example: Wilmington Delaware, at about the same latitude (about 40 degrees North) as the "Mason-Dixon line" the altitude separator between Slave States and Free States: has a much weaker UV rating than Auckland New Zealand, which is at about 40 degrees South.




But it did not take the Albinos long to figure out a solution: Enslave, Indenture, or otherwise Coerce MELANINATED people to work the fields FOR them! In Australia it was called “Blackbirding”.


























The Albino Enslavers


European Albinos who chose to settle in areas of the Earth between 40 degrees North and 40 degrees South; knew fully well that they would NOT be able to do the FARMWORK necessary to support themselves with FOOD in those areas due to the Damaging/Killing strength of the Sun’s UV radiation at those latitudes. So they resolved to use the Slave Labor of pigmented people as a means to supply themselves with enough Food to live in those Latitudes.

At that point they were merely Parasites: - Par·a·site

An organism that lives in or on another organism (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the host's expense. A person who habitually relies on or exploits others and gives nothing in return.

Wikipedia - In evolutionary biology, parasitism is a relationship between species, where one organism, the parasite, lives on or in another organism, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life.












After Slavery was outlawed, they had to PAY pigmented workers to do that same work: so were they still Parasites? Actually yes, because by that time they had used the wealth and position created by slavery to structure societies to where the pigmented workers of Food production were the lowest class and the lowest paid, and thus eternally trapped in the Parasitic relationship. Even the advent of Mechanized agriculture has not done away with the need for Pigmented Workers in those areas, because many Crops cannot be harvested by machines.





It is well understood that the Albinos so low as to use the Slavery of others as a means to support themselves were the most degenerate and Murderous of all Albinos. But seeing the actual manifestation of this degeneracy is still shocking.

The Island of Tasmania sits South-east of Australia just outside of the Albino "Death Zone" for the Suns Ultra Violet Rays. In this place it was "SAFE" for Albinos to "Work Their Own Fields". So having no need to Enslave the Native Black people for their labors, what did they do with them?









As is typical with Albinos as the worlds historians, when the truth hurts Albinos image, they change the story. After many years of accepting William Lanne or Laney, who died in 1869 as the last Tasmanian. The Albinos, having seen the Worlds attitude toward them change, they can no longer revel in their power to kill by whim. So not surprisingly, we now see the Albino boys at Wiki, hard at work producing articles which confuse Tasmanian’s with mainland Australian Aborigines, and then declare that MORE Tasmanians (proportionally) are still alive than Aborigines.


Sick people that they are, their best lie is that they have killed more Blacks on the Mainland (proportionally), than they have in Tasmania. The simple concept that Civilized Humans think it wrong to murder, or to settle lands where you cannot survive naturally, never occurs to them.



For hundreds of years now, beginning just after the usurpation of Black rule in Europe during the 1600s. Albinos have made it their business to scour the world for every last bit of historical artifact and information they can find. They do this not because of a love of history, but rather to “CONTROL HISTORY” so as to shape it’s telling to support their self-serving lies.

As an example of how Albinos “Manage” and “Censor” History to suit their needs: the following was a part of the Wikipedia historical article on the Tasmanians until sometime in 2017, when it was decided by person or persons unknown, that it should be changed – no doubt because it showed Albinos in too “True” a light.

"OLD"-Wiki: Quote: The last of the Tasmanians, William Lanne or Laney, died in 1869. Dr. Lodewyk Crowther removed his head in the name of science at the Colonial Hospital, and made a tobacco pouch out of his scrotum.

Now the only place where that little detail can still be found is in a Wiki article titled “Human Trophy Collecting”. No doubt that will soon be “Sanitized” too.




But after getting others to work their fields and build their countries, Albinos still suffer from Skin Cancer:


Because they won't accept the obvious..

That they ARE Albinos...

and should stay away from BEACHES!











Continuing with "House Nigger"



New York Times

Bill Maher Apologizes for Use of Racial Slur on ‘Real Time’ By DAVE ITZKOFFJUNE 3, 2017

The HBO late-night host Bill Maher apologized on Saturday for using a racial epithet during an interview with Senator Ben Sasse, Republican of Nebraska, on a live broadcast of his show on Friday night. HBO denounced the remark as “completely inexcusable and tasteless,” and said it would be edited out of future airings.


Of course Mr. Maher IS a "House Nigger" - All Albinos are House Niggers, they HAVE to be:

If Albinos could properly work the fields in the Southern United States,

there would never have been a need for "Pigmented" (Black/Mongol) Slavery.

Background: Since they arrived in Europe, the Central Asian Dravidian Albinos were the "Peasantry" of Europe.

So they had plenty of "EXPERIENCE" working the land!





The Class system of European Peasantry

A peasant is a member of a traditional class of farmers, either laborers or owners of small farms, especially in the Middle Ages under feudalism, or more generally, in any pre-industrial society. In Europe, peasants were divided into three classes according to their personal status: slave, serf, and free tenant.

The social class of the peasantry can be differentiated into smaller categories.



Freemen, or free tenants held their land by one of a variety of contracts of feudal land-tenure and were essentially rent-paying tenant farmers who owed little or no service to the lord, and had a good degree of security of tenure and independence. In parts of 11th-century England freemen made up only 10% of the peasant population, and in the rest of Europe their numbers were small.


A villein (or villain) represented the most common type of serf in the Middle Ages. Villeins had more rights and higher status than the lowest serf, but existed under a number of legal restrictions that differentiated them from freemen. Villeins generally rented small homes, with or without land. As part of the contract with the landlord, the lord of the manor, they were expected to spend some of their time working on the lord's fields. The requirement often was not greatly onerous, contrary to popular belief, and was often only seasonal, for example the duty to help at harvest-time. The rest of their time was spent farming their own land for their own profit.

Like other types of serfs, villeins had to provide other services, possibly in addition to paying rent of money or produce. Villeins were somehow retained on their land and by unmentioned manners could not move away without their lord's consent and the acceptance of the lord to whose manor they proposed to migrate to. Villeins were generally able to hold their own property, unlike slaves. Villeinage, as opposed to other forms of serfdom, was most common in Continental European feudalism, where land ownership had developed from roots in Roman law. In many medieval countries, a villein could gain freedom by escaping from a manor to a city or borough and living there for more than a year; but this action involved the loss of land rights and agricultural livelihood, a prohibitive price unless the landlord was especially tyrannical or conditions in the village were unusually difficult.

Bordars and cottagers

Status-wise, the bordar or cottar ranked below a serf in the social hierarchy of a manor, holding a cottage, garden and just enough land to feed a family. In England, at the time of the Domesday Survey, this would have comprised between about 1 and 5 acres (0.4 and 2.0 hectares).[16] Under an Elizabethan statute, the Erection of Cottages Act 1588, the cottage had to be built with at least 4 acres (0.02 km2; 0.01 sq mi) of land. However, the later Enclosures Acts (1604 onwards) removed the cottars' right to any land: "before the Enclosures Act the cottager was a farm laborer with land and after the Enclosures Act the cottager was a farm laborer without land". The bordars and cottars did not own their draught oxen or horses. The Domesday Book showed that England comprised 12% freeholders, 35% serfs or villeins, 30% cotters and bordars, and 9% slaves.


The last type of serf was the slave. Slaves had the fewest rights and benefits from the manor. They owned no tenancy in land, worked for the lord exclusively and survived on donations from the landlord. It was always in the interest of the lord to prove that a servile arrangement existed, as this provided him with greater rights to fees and taxes. The status of a man was a primary issue in determining a person's rights and obligations in many of the manorial court-cases of the period. Also, runaway slaves could be beaten if caught.


The usual serf (not including slaves or cottars) paid his fees and taxes in the form of seasonally appropriate lab our. Usually a portion of the week was devoted to ploughing his lord's fields held in demesne, harvesting crops, digging ditches, repairing fences, and often working in the manor house. The remainder of the serf's time he spent tending his own fields, crops and animals in order to provide for his family. Most manorial work was segregated by gender during the regular times of the year; however, during the harvest, the whole family was expected to work the fields.

A major difficulty of a serf's life was that his work for his lord coincided with, and took precedence over, the work he had to perform on his own lands: when the lord's crops were ready to be harvested, so were his own. On the other hand, the serf of a benign lord could look forward to being well fed during his service; it was a lord without foresight who did not provide a substantial meal for his serfs during the harvest and planting times. In exchange for this work on the lord's demesne, the serfs had certain privileges and rights, including for example the right to gather deadwood – an essential source of fuel – from their lord's forests.

In addition to service, a serf was required to pay certain taxes and fees. Taxes were based on the assessed value of his lands and holdings. Fees were usually paid in the form of agricultural produce rather than cash. The best ration of wheat from the serf's harvest often went to the landlord. Generally hunting and trapping of wild game by the serfs on the lord's property was prohibited. On Easter Sunday the peasant family perhaps might owe an extra dozen eggs, and at Christmas a goose was perhaps required too. When a family member died, extra taxes were paid to the lord as a form of feudal relief to enable the heir to keep the right to till what land he had. Any young woman who wished to marry a serf outside of her manor was forced to pay a fee for the right to leave her lord, and in compensation for her lost lab our.

Serfs served on occasion as soldiers in the event of conflict and could earn freedom or even ennoblement for valor in combat. Serfs could purchase their freedom, be manumitted by generous owners, or flee to towns or to newly settled land where few questions were asked. Laws varied from country to country: in England a serf who made his way to a chartered town (i.e. a borough) and evaded recapture for a year and a day obtained his freedom and became a burgher of the town.


So why didn't European Albinos institute the feudal system

that they were used to in the Americas?

They DID...

It was called Indenture.



An indentured servant or indentured labor is an employee (indenturee) within a system of unfree labor who is bound by a contract (indenture) to work for a particular employer for a fixed period. The employer is often permitted to assign the labor of an indenturee to a third party. Indenturees usually enter into an indenture for a specific payment or other benefit or to meet a legal obligation, such as debt bondage. Upon completion of the contract, indentured servants were granted freedom and occasionally plots of land.


So what was the problem with indenture in the Americas?

NOTHING in the North...

But in the SOUTH...


Digital History ID 449: Quote - Indentured servants agreed to work for a four or five year term of service in return for their transportation to the New World as well as food, clothing, and shelter. In certain respects, the status of white servants differed little from that of slavery. Like slaves, servants could be bought, sold, or leased. They could also be punished by whipping. Unlike slaves, however, servants were allowed to own property, and, if they survived their term of service, received their freedom along with a small sum of money known as "freedom dues."

During the 17th century, indentured servants suffered an appalling death rate. Half of all white servants in the Chesapeake colonies of Virginia and Maryland died within five years of their arrival. Since servants cost half as much as slaves, they were a more economical investment.


So despite their acclamation to pheasant laboring on the land,

there was one thing the European Albino could NOT endure...EVEN IN EUROPE:

The SUN!


The following table demonstrates the problem; as can clearly be seen, during the growing season,

the average uncovered European Albino would last only about 20 minutes in the fields of the Southern United States.





Background: In the beginning, as Humans started to leave Africa, included with the second (OOA) group were the Albinos of Caucasian phenotype Africans (Horn Africans, Dravidians (Indians) who were probably motivated by a quest for relief from the heat and burning Sunshine of southern Africa - and relief from the torment heaped upon them by normal Africans. Even today, superstitious Blacks of southern Africa; maim and mutilate Albinos in the ignorant belief that their body parts process magical properties, which they use in rituals. After they crossed the Arabian Peninsula and entered what is now India, the decided to head north and eventually ended up in Central Asia.

There they found a low sunlight intensity environment to their liking, and there they stayed, and flourished!

Then, at about 1,500 B.C. the Central Asian Albinos decided to start leaving their low sunlight intensity environment, and return to India as invading Aryans. Soon after, they headed WEST toward Europe. It can only be guessed at, but perhaps after Millennia in Central Asia, the Albinos forgot that they were Albinos, and what devastating effect strong Sunlight could have on them.

For after their conquest of Europe in the late medieval "Race Wars": Historically camouflaged as Civil Wars in Britain, and the supposedly Religious "Thirty Years Wars" on the continent. Note there really was a religious component to the "Thirty Years Wars": That being the original Black Europeans (Catholics) verses insurgent original Central Asian Albinos (Germanics & Slav's) under the banner of their newly created "PROTEST" or "Protestant" Religions. i.e. Anglican, Episcopalian, Presbyterian, Methodist, Lutheran, Baptist, Amish, Evangelicalism, Pentecostalism, Quakers, Seventh-Day Adventism, et al. After the conquest, the Catholic Church was also usurped, but the Slav's in the East (like the Rus (Russians), chose not to completely overhaul the Eastern Orthodox branch that they took from the Byzantines. As a result, their Holy icons still have "Dark" Skin. The later arriving Turks took over the Black Arabs newly created religion of Islam. After their conquest of Europe, the Albinos went on to conquer the entire WORLD, and each place they settled brought them the SAME problems: SUNBURN and SKIN CANCER. Because they don't belong in those places, their one and ONLY home is Central Asia!






The Skin Cancer Capitals of the World

Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence and mortality rates of melanoma in the world.



There’s no competition for the country with the highest rate of skin cancer in the world. It’s Australia. One out of two Australians gets skin cancer sometime in their life. Every year, 300,000 Australians have surgery to remove cancerous lesions from their skin. Australia’s problem is simple: It’s located as close to the equator as the Sahara desert, but most of the nation’s 20 million people are descendants of immigrants from the northern, fog-shrouded latitudes of Ireland and Britain.

“This is Mars for most of us, a totally alien environment,” says Robert Burton of the Australian government’s Cancer Strategies Group. In a national campaign, the government now urges people to wear hats, shirts, and suntan lotion whenever they’re outside. On the beaches, children and adults have begun wearing neck-to-knee swimsuits. It may sound extreme, Burton says, but it’s necessary. “You have to wonder how many pale-skinned people you see lying semi-naked in the sun in the middle of the day in the Sahara.


Israel was originally 3rd. highest in the world.

“We were third in the world in the incidents and mortality after Australia and New Zealand and it was, of course, because we have a lot of people who come from Europe with light skin,” Miri Ziv, the Director General of the Israel Cancer Association told The Media Line. “In the last five years, Israel dropped to the 20th country with the highest incidents (of skin cancer) and in terms of mortality, we dropped to number 13 for men and number 20 for women.” According to Ziv, the ICA has worked tirelessly for the past half-decade trying to promote a more sun-smart attitude. “We disseminated our sun-smart stuff in TV programs and in the media. Every summer we launch the early detection project and we encourage people to avoid sun bathing from 10-4.” Ziv cited the achievement that while melanoma is still rising significantly for most of the world, it has stabilized in Israel.


South Africa

In South Africa, among the white population, there is one of the highest incidences of malignant melanoma in the world and concern for skin cancer overall has grown in recent years. The estimated yearly incidence of malignant melanoma is 4.76 per 100,000 persons overall and 19.2 per 100,000 in whites. In 2009, the Western Cape of South Africa’s incidence for whites was unofficially reported as high as 69 per 100,000 population. South Africans are especially susceptible to skin cancer due to their exposure to year-round high ambient solar ultraviolet radiation (UV) and latitude (22–34°S) [3]. In a population of 54 million, the racial mix within South Africa shows a diverse population, consisting of black (80.2 %), white (8.4 %), colored (8.8 %) and Asian/Indian (2.5 %) populations









The aftermath of the Civil War - The Slaves are Freed.



1-After the Civil War, a growing number of white workers, including many children, found employment in tobacco and textile factories. African-Americans were largely excluded from factory employment in the South.





2-The postwar South remained overwhelmingly agricultural. The implements of work were the same as before the war, but relations between planters, laborers, and merchants had changed forever.

3-As under slavery, most rural blacks worked on land owned by whites. But they now exercised control over their personal lives, they could come and go as they pleased, and determined which members of the family worked in the fields. Some Black women found work as domestic servants.




4-In early Reconstruction, many black women, seeking to devote more time to their families, sought to withdraw from field labor, a decision strongly resisted by plantation owners.
Children, whose labor had been dictated by the owner under slavery, now attended school.

5-Some urban growth occurred during Reconstruction, both in cities like Richmond and smaller market centers scattered across the cotton belt. Cities offered more diverse work opportunities for both black and white laborers.

6-Under the sharecropping system, which emerged as the dominant labor system in the rural South, black families rented individual plots of land. The system placed a premium on utilizing the labor of all members of the family.




Despite the changes wrought by emancipation, cotton production in the South remained much the same as before, black laborers working with cotton gins cleaned the harvested cotton, then baled it for shipment to market. During Reconstruction, cotton remained the South's most important crop with the tools and methods of production essentially the same as before the war. Most former slaves now worked as sharecroppers, who kept one-third to one-half of the crop for themselves with the remainder going to the landowner. Although the system afforded workers some degree of autonomy, it kept most in a state of poverty and impeded the South's economic development. Sugar workers continued to labor in closely supervised gangs after the Civil War. The system persisted because each plantation had its own steam-powered sugar mill that required a large crop and labor force to insure economic viability.





In July 1865, slavery ended forever in Alabama when Gov. Lewis E. Parsons issued a proclamation declaring all slaves within the state free. Emancipation was given stronger legal standing in September 1865 when the Constitutional Convention in Montgomery adopted an ordinance abolishing slavery within Alabama. Now free to move about where they wished, many of the newly freed slaves left the plantations and farms and moved to urban centers, crowding into cities such as Huntsville, Selma, Montgomery, and Mobile. Rumors of land and equipment giveaways, popularly known as "40 acres and a mule," were quickly revealed as false. Most freedpeople had to turn to charities and the Bureau of Freedmen, Refugees and Abandoned Lands (generally known as the Freedmen's Bureau) for support, as did many destitute whites. Some people went in search of family members who had been sold during slavery. The black population of some cotton-producing areas, such as the Tennessee Valley, dropped by almost 10 percent, leaving fields uncultivated. As a result, land value depreciated and agricultural income became almost nonexistent. Alabama had been among the top 10 percent of the wealthiest states in the nation in 1860, a position it has never held since.






Landowners quickly realized that a new system of agricultural production had to be found. A variety of methods were suggested, including importing Chinese workers or white laborers from other areas of the nation and employing a wage-labor system (note - Han Chinese are a mulatto people: some are as White as any European, and some are as dark as Africans). Most agriculturalists soon understood, however, that freedpeople were still the best source of labor. They were encouraged to return to the plantations as paid workers by the Freedmen's Bureau, which, under the leadership of Gen. Wager Swayne, worked out contracts between Alabama freedpeople and landowners. The freedpeople were to live in the old slave quarters and work for cash in gangs as they had during slavery. The wage system, however, failed to work. Of the several reasons for the failure, the two most important were that the freedpeople refused to work in gangs or live in former slave quarters, and that landowners simply had no money to pay laborers.





It was obvious that two things had not changed as a result of the Civil War and emancipation. The first was that a majority of the agricultural riches were still in the hands of white landowners. The second was that former slaves would have to make up most of the post-war labor force and that freedpeople had nothing but their ability to work to bring to the contract. Thus a share-based agriculture was the key to restoring Alabama's agricultural system. In this system, the cropper's share of the crop depended on what he brought into the arrangement. If he provided only labor, he received one-third of the crop. If he were lucky enough to have draft animals, equipment, and supplies, he would receive half of the crop.






As early as the 1870s, most planters, newly freed slaves, and poor whites had accepted the sharecrop rental system as the answer to Alabama's farm labor problem. It was a compromise, but it offered poor whites a means of eking out a meager existence; it gave freedpeople the semblance of the independence they craved; and it offered planters the opportunity to return plantations to productivity under some degree of personal supervision. Another element of the tenancy system was that economic domination by white landowners also helped maintain supremacy over blacks and poor whites. Although farm tenancy did not become an official category in the U.S. Census until 1880, several census takers in 1870 recorded tenant farmers.





The post-Civil War tenancy system was designed for freedpeople, but it quickly encompassed a large number of poor whites; eventually white sharecroppers would outnumber blacks. After the Civil War, hill-country whites from north Alabama swarmed into Alabama's Tennessee Valley to become tenant farmers. Between 1860 and 1866, the white population of the Tennessee Valley grew by more than 8 percent, as the black population declined. In the Wiregrass region of southeast Alabama, poor whites also dominated tenancy. Only in the Black Belt did freedpeople dominate tenant farming.







The White Farmer

Many white small farmers turned to cotton production during Reconstruction as a way of obtaining needed cash. As cotton prices declined, many lost their land. By 1880, one third of the white farmers in the cotton states were tenants rather than landowners, and the South as a whole had become even more dependent on cotton than it had been before the war. Before the Civil War, the majority of the South's white population owned no slaves. Few of these farmers grew much cotton; they preferred to concentrate on food crops for their own families, marketing only a small surplus, and making most of the tools, clothing, and other items they needed at home. The widespread destruction of the war plunged many small farmers into debt and poverty, and led many to turn to cotton growing. The increased availability of commercial fertilizer and the spread of railroads into upcountry white areas, hastened the spread of commercial farming.






















The Southern Degenerate


Degenerate (adj.) late 15c., "having lost or suffered impairment to the qualities proper to the race or kind," from Latin degeneratus, past participle of degenerare "to be inferior to one's ancestors, to become unlike one's race or kind, fall from ancestral quality, "used of physical as well as moral qualities, from phrase de genere, from de "off, away from" (see de-) + genus (genitive generis) "birth, descent" (from PIE root *gene- "give birth, beget"). Of things, "unworthy, debased, having fallen in quality or passed to an inferior state," from 1550s. The noun, "one who has degenerated," is from 1550s. Related: Degenerately; degenerateness.




Dahleen Glanton

"Jeff Sessions is a Southern demagogue who used the Justice Department to legalize bigotry," Glanton insisted. In short, he was the successor in the U.S. Senate to the champion Southern bigots, Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms, in pulling every possible string to block equality for African-Americans and pigmented others. Sessions began to make his mark as a white supremacist shortly after Ronald Reagan made him the U.S. attorney for the southern district of Alabama, when one of his first acts was to go after three African-American community organizers for "voter fraud," claiming they had tampered with 14 absentee ballots, an overt act intended to make blacks less likely to vote. The three were acquitted by a jury after just three hours of deliberation.

Shortly after, Reagan nominated Sessions to be a U.S. district judge. At his confirmation hearings by the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, several lawyers told of racist comments made by Sessions. Coretta Scott King, the widow of Martin Luther King Jr., urged that Sessions not be confirmed and he wasn't — only the second nominee to the federal judiciary in 48 years to have his appointment rejected.

Shortly after, the people of Alabama elected Sessions one of their U.S. senators and his record in that office was more of the same, serving some 26 years until he accepted Trump's appointment to be attorney general, one of several dubious appointments made by Trump after his election in 2016. "While Trump was busy distracting us with his name-calling and threats against Sessions, the nation's top law enforcement official was busy working his way through a conservative checklist," Glanton wrote, pointing out his efforts to roll back a number of Obama policies, including jettisoning the requirement that universities use race as a factor to bring more diversity to campuses.

"For nearly two years, Session had free rein to turn American into a nation that shows no mercy. It is now easier for police to put Americans behind bars, whether they belong there or not," she added. "It is easier to lock up immigrants seeking refuge here and is acceptable to fire someone from a job because of sexual orientation." Most Americans would agree with her conclusion that Jeff Sessions did in 21 months what most AGs couldn't do in four years: Turn back the clock. On his last day as attorney general, Jeff Sessions signed an order limiting the use of criminal justice reform tools called consent decrees. Used where the justice department sued racist Police departments and the like.





When you think of yourself as Powerful and Capable, perhaps even Noble among those like you: but people whom you have Power Over, and Control of: make you feel "Weak, Puny, Insufficient, Incapable and Intimated" even if unknowingly and unintentionally. It is only natural that you would use your power over them to hurt and punish them: and sometimes even murder them, for bringing out those disturbing thoughts in you. Because even though they may not know or realize it, you know that your innermost thoughts and fears about yourself are true!




The last Lynching in Jefferson Beauregard Sessions Alabama





By Leada Gore

In 1981, 19-year-old Michael Donald's body was found dangling from a tree in Mobile. The murder, carried out by members of the Ku Klux Klan, is sometimes referred to as the last documented lynching in America. On March 21, 1981, Donald was killed by Henry Hays and James Knowles, young KKK members incensed over the failure of a Mobile jury to convict an African American man charged with the murder of a white policeman.

Hays' father, Bennie Jack Hays, second-highest-ranking official in the United Klans in Alabama at the time, was furious over the failed conviction and told the men "If a black man can get away with killing a white man, we ought to be able to get away with killing a black man." Spurred those words, Hays and Knowles kidnapped Donald, beat him, slit his throat and then hung his body from a tree in a Mobile neighborhood.


But by now Southern Blacks had figured out how to fight back!

Police initially claimed Donald's death was over a drug deal gone bad, despite insistence from his mother, Beulah Mae Donald, that it wasn't true. Civil rights leader Jesse Jackson came to Mobile to lead protests; the FBI took over the investigation.

Knowles later confessed to the murder, pleaded guilty and testified against Hays. Hays was sentenced to death and his 1997 execution in Alabama's electric chair was the first in the state since 1913 for a white-on-black crime.

A third defendant, Benjamin Franklin Cox Jr., of Mobile, was convicted of being an accomplice and sentenced to life in prison. The elder Hays, charged as an accomplice for allegedly ordering the lynching, had his first trial end in a mistrial, and died before a second trial started.

The criminal convictions weren't the end, however. With the help of Morris Dees, co-founder of the Southern Poverty Law Center, Mrs. Donald filed a civil suit against the local KKK and the United Klans of America. An all-white Mobile jury awarded her $7 million, forcing the bankrupted KKK to turn over the deed to its $225,000 national headquarters in Tuscaloosa.
"The verdict marked the end of the United Klans, the same group that had beaten the Freedom Riders in 1961, murdered civil rights worker Viola Liuzzo in 1965, and bombed Birmingham's 16th Street Baptist Church in 1963," the Southern Poverty Law Center said in its description of the historic case. Donald sold the headquarters for a little more than $50,000, allowing her to move from the projects and into her own home before her death a year later.





Trauma and separation: The effect of the zero-tolerance policy:


The family separation and the anguish to which the immigrants detained at the border are subjected to

could cause serious psychological side effects, according to the experts.



By Yamily Habib

As the anti-immigration policies of the Trump administration intensify, the concern of activists and specialists becomes more and more latent, especially when it comes to psychological consequences. The case of thousands of children separated from their parents at the border thanks to the zero-tolerance policy of the Donald Trump government can manifest the symptoms almost immediately. Thomas Plante, professor of psychology at Santa Clara University, explained to ABC7 that "it’s clear child abuse. There is no other way to describe it." Between images of "caged" children and audios exemplifying the desperation and fear felt by minors when separated from their parents, Plante warned that "separation will leave a lasting traumatic impact on these kids’ lives."

For its part, the American Psychological Association (APA) wrote an open letter to the Trump government to "express our deep concern and strong opposition to the Administration’s new policy of separating immigrant parents and children who are detained while crossing the border." In the statement, the organization argues that "based on empirical evidence of the psychological harm that children and parents experience when separated, we implore you to reconsider this policy and commit to a more humane practice of housing families together pending immigration proceedings to protect them from further trauma."

"For children, traumatic events can lead to the development of post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health disorders that can cause long-lasting effects. Furthermore, immigration policies, such as separating families at the border, can also adversely impact those immigrants who are already in the United States. They can suffer from feelings of stigmatization, social exclusion, anger, and hopelessness, as well as fear for the future."



Secretary of the Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen

However, both the Department of Homeland Security and the Trump administration's spokespersons have ensured that the children are in good care. As explained by Secretary of the Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen during a press conference, "it is important to note that these children are very well cared for, don’t believe the press. They are under very good care."



Secretary of the Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen visits Texas border after second child's death.


By The Associated Press - EL PASO, Texas — Dec 28, 2018

Nielsen on Friday visited the Texas border city where an 8-year-old Guatemalan boy was detained with his father before dying in government custody. The trip came four days after the death of 8-year-old Felipe Gomez Alonzo. Felipe was the second Guatemalan child to die in government custody in three weeks. Nielsen has called the death "deeply concerning and heartbreaking" and requested medical help from other government agencies, including the U.S. Coast Guard.

As Nielsen made the trip to Texas, New Mexico's Democratic senators, Tom Udall and Martin Heinrich, sent her a letter Friday seeking answers about the boy's death. "The timeline, action and factors that led to Felipe's death are still developing, but the information that has become public so far is alarming and demands immediate attention and investigation," the letter says.

After an agent noticed Felipe coughing, father and son were taken to an Alamogordo hospital, where Felipe was diagnosed with a common cold and found to have a fever of 103 degrees Fahrenheit (39.4 degrees Celsius), CBP has said. Felipe was held for observation for 90 minutes, according to CBP, before being released with prescriptions for amoxicillin and ibuprofen. But the boy fell sick hours later on Monday and was re-admitted to the hospital. He died just before midnight. New Mexico authorities said late Thursday that an autopsy shows Felipe had the flu, but more tests need to be done before a cause of death can be determined.



It was that lying degenerate twit Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III

who invented that cruel policy: so says General Kelly.





General John Kelly Blames Jeff Sessions For Family Separation Policy: 'He Surprised Us'


By Hayley Mille

Outgoing White House chief of staff John Kelly says former Attorney General Jeff Sessions is to blame for the Trump administration’s controversial “zero-tolerance” immigration policy, which separated children from parents who illegally crossed into the U.S. from Mexico. Kelly spoke out about the policy ― as well as his tumultuous tenure in the White House ― in an interview published in The Los Angeles Times on Sunday. The retired four star Marine general told the Times that the White House had been caught off guard by Sessions’ family separation announcement in April.

Sessions “was the one that instituted the zero-tolerance process on the border that resulted in both people being detained and the family separation,” Kelly said. “He surprised us.” Without singling out anyone, Kelly blasted the administration for failing to anticipate the massive public outcry sparked by the policy. A federal judge in June ordered a halt to most family separations at the border and demanded families affected by the policy be reunified immediately.


In the interest of full disclosure: we must divulge that General Kelly is himself just another

degenerate Albino liar, though in the Sessions case, we believe he is telling the truth.


Washington Post

John Kelly refuses to apologize for false attacks on Florida congresswoman.




By Philip Rucker
October 30, 2017

White House Chief of Staff General John F. Kelly said Monday he would not apologize for the false attacks he leveled against Rep. Frederica S. Wilson (D-Fla.) this month when he sought to defend President Trump for his handling of a condolence call to the widow of a fallen soldier.

On Oct. 19, in a rare appearance at the White House media briefing, Kelly attacked Wilson as an “empty barrel” and accused her of grandstanding at a public event two years ago in Florida by taking credit for securing federal funding for a new building.

Video of the event soon released by the Florida Sun Sentinel showed Wilson did no such thing. Rather, she used her speech to praise the two slain FBI agents in whose memory the building was named. Wilson accused Kelly of “character assassination,” and members of the Congressional Black Caucus demanded that Kelly apologize.






Rolling Stone

General John Kelly Confirms He Was Lying All Along:

The White House "Is" in Chaos!


By Peter Wade - 12/30/2018

It will come as no surprise that the White House is in chaos, but what is shocking is that this fact is being confirmed by President Donald Trump’s outgoing Chief of Staff John Kelly. In an exit interview with the Los Angeles Times, Kelly admits that the White House is not quite the “well-oiled machine” that Trump loves to brag about. Two specific instances he cited as chaotic were the implementation of the travel ban and the “zero-tolerance” family separation policy at the Mexican border.

When the travel ban blocking many people from majority Muslim nations from entering the U.S. was first announced, Kelly told Congress, “The thinking was to get it out quick so that potentially people that might be coming here to harm us would not take advantage of some period of time that they could jump on an airplane and get here.” But now, he told the Times, he was caught off-guard by the announcement. “I had very little opportunity to look at them,” Kelly said. “Obviously, it brought down a greater deal of thunder on the president.”

Kelly also rewrote history regarding the administration’s immigration policies, in particular the decision to separate families. “What happened was Jeff Sessions, he was the one that instituted the zero-tolerance process on the border that resulted in both people being detained and the family separation,” Kelly said to LA Times reporter Molly O’Toole. “He surprised us.”

This revelation is more than a little strange, considering Kelly told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer that the Department of Homeland Security was contemplating separating children from their parents in March 2017, less than two months after Trump was inaugurated. And Sessions announced the beginning of “zero-tolerance” more than a year later, in April 2018. Could it really have been such a surprise? It’s not the first time Kelly has been caught in a lie. When White House staffer Rob Porter was accused of domestic abuse, Kelly defended him and denied knowing about Porter’s wife’s allegations, a fact that has been disputed by FBI Director Christopher Wray.

In the interview, Kelly said he hopes his tenure will be judged not by what Trump did but by what Kelly prevented him from doing — not exactly a ringing endorsement of his former boss. It’s clear that by blaming others for the administration’s blunders, Kelly is trying to protect his legacy and reputation. But after serving and defending Trump, it’s probably too late for that.


We wonder how General Kelly was able to hide such severe character defects during his 46 years in the U.S. Marine Corps.






A reminder: After their conquest of Europe in the late medieval "Race Wars": Historically camouflaged as Civil Wars in Britain, and the supposedly Religious "Thirty Years Wars" on the continent. Note there really was a religious component to the "Thirty Years Wars": That being the original Black Europeans (Catholics) verses insurgent original Central Asian Albinos (Germanics & Slav's) under the banner of their newly created "PROTEST" or "Protestant" Religions. i.e. Anglican, Episcopalian, Presbyterian, Methodist, Lutheran, Baptist, Amish, Evangelicalism, Pentecostalism, Quakers, Seventh-Day Adventism, et al. After the conquest, the Catholic Church was also usurped



The Southern Baptist Convention


The Southern Baptist Convention is a Christian denomination based in the United States. It is the world's largest Baptist denomination and the largest Protestant body in the United States, with over 15 million members as of 2015. Founded: May 1845, in Augusta, GA. The Southern Baptist Convention was formed in the 19th century in defense of slaveholders. the Southern Baptists once prominently taught the “curse of Ham” theory, which the resolution describes as “echoing the belief that God through Noah ordained descendants of Africa to be subservient to Anglos” and “which provided the theological justification for slavery and segregation.





Newsweek Magazine

Christian Leaders Refuse to Renounce White Nationalism at Southern Baptist Convention Meeting. Aidan Quigley, Newsweek.

A resolution condemning white supremacy and the growing white nationalist alt-right movement was initially rejected at the Southern Baptist Convention’s annual meeting this week, raising outrage from black members of the faith. The controversy illustrates the continued clash among evangelicals over President Donald Trump and the more radical, white nationalistic branch of his supporters.




Dwight McKissic, a prominent African-American preacher, drafted the resolution. It called white nationalism a “toxic menace” to the country and called on the church to “reject the retrograde ideologies, xenophobic biases and racial bigotries of the so-called ‘Alt-Right’ that seek to subvert our government, destabilize society, and infect our political system.”

The committee behind new resolutions decided not to move the proposal forward on Tuesday, the first day of the group’s 2017 meeting in Phoenix. Southern Baptist pastors from across the country gather annually to discuss their beliefs and practices. The Committee on Resolutions decided the language was “inappropriate,” committee Chairman Barrett Duke told The Arizona Republic. “The resolution just contained some significantly inflammatory language that we felt was over the bar,” he said.

After the resolutions committee decided not to move the resolution forward, McKissic made a motion to allow additional time for the resolution to be considered. The motion failed, which led to wide-ranging criticism of the organization, especially from black Baptists.

The resolution touched on the church’s racist history, as the Southern Baptists once prominently taught the “curse of Ham” theory, which the resolution describes as “echoing the belief that God through Noah ordained descendants of Africa to be subservient to Anglos” and “which provided the theological justification for slavery and segregation.” “The amount of work left to do in ‘evangelical’ (who knows that means anymore?) Church is staggering,” black pastor Thabiti Anyabwile tweeted. “Any “church” that cannot denounce white supremacy without hesitancy and equivocation is a dead, Jesus denying assembly.”

Garrett Kell, a pastor at Del Ray Baptist Church in Virginia, told the Republic he was concerned about the day’s developments. “I’m disappointed that we as a convention could leave the illusion that we don’t reject the racist ideologies held by many in the alt-right movement,” he said. The controversy comes at a time of a growing divide between evangelicals over politics. White Evangelicals strongly supported Trump, including Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr., who called him the “dream president” for evangelicals, pointing to his Supreme Court nomination and economic and immigration policies. But Trump’s comments about women, including the infamous Access Hollywood tape in which he brags about sexually assaulting women, rankled some anti-Trump evangelicals. While 81 percent of evangelicals are said to have supported Trump, according to exit polls, pre-election polling suggested 62 percent of non-white evangelicals supported his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton. Russell Moore, president of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, is an outspoken opponent of the president. “Most illogical is his support from evangelicals and other social conservatives,” he wrote during the campaign. “To back Mr. Trump, these voters must repudiate everything they believe.”


Associated Press

Southern Baptists reconsider condemning 'alt-right' movement - RACHEL ZOLL AND ANGIE WANG.

PHOENIX (AP) — a national meeting of Southern Baptists will consider condemning the political movement known as the "alt-right" amid an uproar over the denomination's commitment to confronting prejudice. Leaders of the faith group initially refused to take up a proposal that they repudiate the political group that emerged dramatically during the U.S. presidential election, mixing racism, white nationalism and populism. Barrett Duke, a Southern Baptist leader who led a committee that decided which resolutions should be considered for a vote, said the resolution as originally written contained inflammatory and broad language "potentially implicating" conservatives who do not support the "alt-right" movement. But the decision caused a backlash online and at the gathering in Phoenix from Southern Baptists and other Christians, especially African-American evangelicals. The denomination has been striving to overcome its founding in the 19th century in defense of slaveholders. Thabiti Anyabwile, a black Southern Baptist pastor, tweeted that "any 'church' that cannot denounce white supremacy without hesitancy and equivocation is a dead, Jesus denying assembly. No 2 ways about it".

Southern Baptist leaders responded late Tuesday night with a dramatic call for attendees to return to the assembly hall, and then announced they would take up the proposal after all on Wednesday. It was a highly unusual move for the denomination's tightly choreographed conventions, underscoring the sensitivity of the issue and the alarm among leaders that their initial rejection of the proposal would be viewed as an unwillingness to fight racism. In encouraging the meeting to reconsider, Steve Gaines, president of the Southern Baptist Convention, said he wanted to send the message that "we love everybody on this planet." The initial proposed resolution came from a prominent black Southern Baptist pastor, the Rev. Dwight McKissic, who had submitted the suggested statement to Duke's committee before this week's gathering. When the proposal was not presented Tuesday, McKissic made a direct, unsuccessful plea for reconsideration from the floor of the Phoenix meeting. He called the "alt-right" a symptom of "social disease," ''deceptive" and "antithetical to what we believe." His resolution condemned Christians who attempted to use biblical teachings to justify white supremacy.

The new resolution that will be debated Wednesday states racism and white supremacy endure "in various white supremacist movements, sometimes known as 'white nationalism' or 'alt-right.'" Southern Baptists "decry every form of racism, including alt-right white supremacy as antithetical to the Gospel of Jesus Christ" and "denounce and repudiate white supremacy and every form of racial and ethnic hatred as of the devil," the proposed new resolution states. The Southern Baptist Convention, based in Nashville, has 15.2 million members and is the largest Protestant group in the country. Leaders have repeatedly condemned racism in formal resolutions from past meetings and built new relationships with black Baptists.

Billy Levengood, a 32-year-old convention attendee from Oxford, Pennsylvania, said he will vote for the resolution, in part to help the denomination move beyond its origins. "We can't undo the slavery aspect, but we can do all we can to engage every person," Levengood said. "The Gospel is true for all of them." But Daniel Brady, 66, a lifelong Southern Baptist from Flagstaff, said he would examine the language more closely before deciding his vote. He said he would support a less specific condemnation of racism, contending media sometimes categorize people as part of the "alt-right" based solely on whether they backed President Donald Trump. "We're always going to be called racists, as Southern Baptists," he said.
Ed Stetzer, a Southern Baptist speaker and executive director of the Billy Graham Center for Evangelism at Wheaton College in Illinois, said the committee in charge of resolutions should have revised the initial proposal and brought it to a vote."Southern Baptists need to speak to this issue," Stetzer wrote Wednesday in the evangelical magazine Christianity Today. He pointed to the denomination's history in the civil rights movement. "Too many Southern Baptists were on the wrong side of the fire hoses in Birmingham. They need to get on the correct side of the rising tide of racism," Stetzer wrote.


The Latest on the Southern Baptist Convention meeting (all times local):

3:10 p.m. June 14, 2017

The Southern Baptist Convention formally condemned the political movement known as the "alt-right" during a national meeting in Phoenix. The denomination initially refused to take up a resolution repudiating the movement that emerged dramatically during the U.S. presidential election and mixes racism, nationalism and populism. Pressure built on Southern Baptists to make some statement against the movement. They did so Wednesday after emotional appeals from attendees. The resolution decries every form of racism, including what the denomination called "alt-right white supremacy" as antithetical to the Gospel. The Southern Baptist Convention was formed in the 19th century in defense of slaveholders. It has been working to overcome its history.



Members of the National African American Fellowship (NAAF)




A newly appointed advisory council is drafting recommendations to foster vibrant participation within Southern Baptist life among young leaders including pastors, denominational servants and others. The diverse 22-member Young Leaders Advisory Council, appointed by SBC Executive Committee President Frank S. Page, is conducting an online survey of young leaders to help accomplish its goal.







The White mans stated reason for Slavery


Throughout the pages of Realhistoryww we harp on the fact that the only reason for Black Slavery was the White/Albino Mans inability to stay out in the Sun long enough to do normal farming. This meant that without help, White people/Albinos could not feed themselves. Thus without Blacks/pigmented people to do outside work for them, Whites/Albinos would starve or die in the fields.

When we deduced that reality from an analysis of the evidence, we thought that we had achieved a great breakthrough in understanding not just American history, but also World History.

Silly us, once again we had failed to take into account the abject worthlessness of the Negro: as opposed to the Black and even the "Colored" Man. For you see dear reader, unknown to the everyday Black person, and even the average White/Albino person, the Albinos reason for Black Slavery has been known all along. One hundred and sixty years ago, the Southern Albinos themselves, told us in surprising honesty their reasons for enslaving Blacks.

Later Albinos didn't repeat it for obvious reasons, and the Negroes, especially those associated with Negro Institutions (Like Negro Colleges), didn't broadcast it, also for obvious reasons - Albino contributions to their Institutions. The result of this withholding of the "Truth" has been the psychological torturing of Blacks, with many of them wondering why their God had abandoned them, and why they were so lacking as Humans, that they find themselves in such a condition. With many wishing they were White, like what they were taught is "Normal" people.


Yes it was the Albino man, but with the silent collaboration of Negro institutions of higher learning. They knew and did not tell you WHY the Albinos hated you: they knew that it had nothing to do with YOUR failings, but rather with the Albinos failings and potentially deadly WEAKNESS. Like ALL Albinos, strong Sunlight Kills them. Therefore below the 40th parallel they cannot Farm the fields to feed themselves. They must either PAY pigmented people to do the work for them, or ENSLAVE pigmented people to do the work for them. So as Malcolm would have told you, if he knew: Your Skin, Your Hair (straight hair is recessive, just like White Skin), are representative of your PERFECTION, not your defect: that's their issue.


These feelings of despair and worthlessness were encouraged and exasperated by the Albinos recently created religion of "Protestantism" (that is a religion in “Protest” by the Albinos over their treatment by the Black Catholic Church. The first Bible of this Protest religion was the "Tyndale Bible" which was printed in Germany in 1525. Protestantism was itself a derivative of the Black Roman Christianity called Catholicism.

This new Protestant religion and the racial conflicts it represented, is seen as the reason for usurpation by the Germanic and Slavic Albinos of Black Rule in Europe as a result of their victory in the “Thirty Years War” on the continent: and the “English Civil Wars” in Britain. Catholicism was itself a derivative of the Black Hebrew religion of Judaism, which was previously usurped by the Turkic Khazar's. These Albino versions of Black religions: Enslaved Blacks of every kind, from everywhere, were required to accept as their own. (Background: Islam had been usurped by the Turkic Seljuq Chieftain Toghril Beg in 1055 A.D.).

After the Albino defeat of the heavily outnumbered Black forces in Europe, (the Mongols emptied Asia of its Dravidian Albinos - millions upon millions were forced into Europe), the survivors were shipped to the Americas as Slaves or Indentures. For many years English ships ran the route of the Ship Jamaica Galley, which was Rotterdam Germany to pickup Palatines (Blacks), then to Cowes in England to pickup British Blacks, then on to American ports to deliver the Slaves and indentures.

The Protestant Albinos used two particular passages in their newly created Bible to justify their atrocities. Genesis 9, 18–27: (The curse of Ham), and the other favorite came from the Apostle Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians, VI, 5-7: Quote - “Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ; not with eye-service, as men-pleasers; but as the servants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart; with good will doing service, as to the Lord, and not to men: knowing that whatsoever good thing any man doeth, the same shall he receive of the Lord, whether he be bond or free.” (Paul repeated himself, almost word for word, in the third chapter of his Epistle to the Colossians.)

The Albino Catholic Atrocities:
Newsstory, Friday 10 July 2015. On his first papal visit to his native Latin America (the Pope is of course NOT a native American, his family are Italian immigrants to Argentina), Pope Francis issued an historic apology to the native peoples of the Americas for sins committed by the Catholic Church during the conquest of the continents.
In his speech, Francis said that many Latin American Catholic leaders have previously addressed the "grave sins committed against the native peoples of America in the name of God". He also recalled that, during a visit to the Dominican Republic in 1992, Pope John Paul II had apologised for the "pain and suffering" over the hundreds of years since the Church arrived at American shores. But Francis went further: He said: "I humbly ask forgiveness, not only for the offences of the church herself, but also for crimes committed against the native peoples during the so-called conquest of America."


This painting is housed in the Museo Nacional Thyssen-Bornemisza, Madrid Spain


Many paintings like this one, showing the Black Political and Religious Rulers of Europe before the Albino conquest, still exist in some European Museums, and the old Castles of Black nobility. In Britain it is another story entirely, there almost all Black Paintings and other art, or Black depictions, were destroyed by the government of Oliver Cromwell. Oliver Cromwell was an English general and statesman who led England's armies against King Charles I during the English Civil War and ruled the British Isles as Lord Protector from 1653 until his death in 1658: (king Charles was of course Black). Today there is no shortage of paintings and other art in the British Isles: because like everywhere else in the Albino world, these are recent paintings and statues of Albinos, who they pass-off with the names of the usurped Blacks. But descriptions in books of Black Nobility survived: << Click here for examples >>


When the Confederate States seceded from the Union, they all wrote their reasons for secession, this is Mississippi's stated reason.

Mississippi: Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery—the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an “imperious” (meaning power or authority without justification); one arrogant and domineering law of nature, none but the Black Race can bear exposure to the Tropical Sun: (today they claim to be the most pious Americans, “The Good, God Fearing People”. Yet they call the supposed works of God “imperious”??) . These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin. << Click here for other Confederate States manifesto quotes >>

The results of all of these machinations has been the Albinos using their military might to force or coerce subject peoples to adopt their newly created or acquired religions, so that those people may be controlled by simply telling them what God wants them to do. Of course the Black Romans did the same thing to Albinos as they streamed into Europe from their homes in Central Asia. Hebrews however did not seem eager to share their religion. So for these past hundreds of years, Blacks cursed their Blackness, when in truth it was they who were the most "Perfect" Humans, and Whites were simply unfortunate people, with the disease of Albinism. And as such, could not even feed themselves once they traveled below the 40th. degree parallel. If only learned Negroes had told us!



Our Human Genes

Each gene resides at a specific locus (location on a chromosome) in two copies, one copy of the gene inherited from each parent. As a simplistic example: When two Chinese mate, the child will look Chinese because all the genes are healthy and all the genes are the same. But if a Chinese and a White European mate, the children will look like some combination of the two, because the "Appearance" genes are not all the same. Gene copies, however, are not always healthy. When the copies of a gene differ from each other, as through deleterious mutation or failure: Then in this heterozygous condition, we call the two parts “Alleles” and the undamaged or un-mutated allele is dominant, and the organism’s appearance and function is normal. The damaged "other" allele has no noticeable effect on the organism’s appearance, and is called the “Recessive” allele.

When BOTH alleles of a gene become recessive, then the gene cannot complete its assignment. As an example: many Black people have alleles of their “P” gene which are heterozygous and they look normal in every way: (The “P” gene controls the production of Melanin in the skin for protection from the Sun). But if TWO of these people with heterozygous alleles in their “P” gene MATE, then one or more, of their children will be an Albino. If two Albinos mate, there is only damaged or recessive “P” genes to inherit; therefore ALL of their children will be White. The trait for curly hair (which is the normal for humans) follows the same rules, two damaged or recessive allele’s of the "TCHH" gene means straight hair. Same for the genes which control eye color and hair color: (Blonde and Red hair is recessive, as is Blue, Green, and Gray eyes).

Note: The trait for Curly/Kinky hair (which is the "Normal" for humans): is produced by two "Undamaged" TCHH genes. That means that "Curly Hair" is "ANCESTRAL" to Modern Humans. You might keep that in mind the next time you see the White mans depictions of ancient humans shown with "Straight" hair.








Click for Realhistoryww Home Page